What drives economics students to use generative artificial intelligence?
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.08(2).2024.05
-
Article InfoVolume 8 2024, Issue #2, pp. 51-64
- 174 Views
-
42 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The increasing integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into education requires studying the motives for its use among students. This study aims to identify the key motivations for economics students to use AI and compare these motivations by grade level and gender. The study examines satisfaction with the use of AI and analyzes the number of AI tools used.
An anonymous empirical study was conducted among 264 students from the Faculty of Economics at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine. Data analysis included descriptive statistical methods, non-parametric statistical methods, and exploratory factor analysis.
The study found that students’ main motivations for using AI are the automation of routine tasks (34.2%) and the need to save time (21.5%), while 18.7% use AI to compensate for lack of experience. Among Bachelor’s students, motivations such as automating routine tasks and saving time increased from 53% to 58% over the course of their studies, while lack of experience decreased from 22% to 15%. In contrast, Master’s students showed a decrease in routine automation (from 36% to 28%) but an increase in the need to compensate for lack of experience (from 15% to 28%) and to save time (from 18% to 25%). In terms of gender, men are more likely to use AI for learning and personal development, while women are slightly more likely to use AI for work. More than 38% of respondents say they need to use at least 2 AIs to achieve their goals.
Acknowledgment
This publication is based upon work from 24-PKVV-UM-002, ‘Strengthening the Resilience of Universities: Czech-Ukrainian Partnership for Digital Education, Research Cooperation, and Diversity Management,’ supported by the Czech Development Agency and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs under the initiative ‘Capacity Building of Public Universities in Ukraine 2024.’
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I23, O33, J24
-
References37
-
Tables8
-
Figures6
-
- Figure 1. Quantity of AI tools used for different motivations
- Figure 2. Motivation to use AI among Bachelor and Master students
- Figure 3. Boxplot for AI usage by area
- Figure 4. Box-plot of AI usage areas by gender
- Figure 5. Factor loadings: Factor 1 vs Factor 2
- Figure 6. Factor loadings: Factor 1 vs Factor 2 by gender
-
- Table 1. Sociodemographic profile of the sample (n = 264)
- Table 2. Students’ motivation in using AI, %
- Table 3. Students’ average satisfaction with AI usage based on the number of AI tools (Heatmap)
- Table 4. Descriptive statistics for AI usage by area
- Table 5. Mean and median for AI usage by area across gender
- Table 6. Factor analysis results
- Table 7. Factor loadings
- Table 8. Factor loadings by gender
-
- Al-Hafdi, F. S., & AlNajdi, S. M. (2024). The effectiveness of using chatbot-based environment on learning process, students’ performances and perceptions: A mixed exploratory study. Education and Information Technologies.
- An, X., Chai, C. S., Li, Y., Zhou, Y., & Yang, B. (2023). Modeling students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1-22.
- Bravo, F. A., & Cruz-Bohorquez, J. M. (2024). Engineering Education in the Age of AI: Analysis of the Impact of Chatbots on Learning in Engineering. Education Sciences, 14(5), 484.
- ChatGPT. (2024).
- Claude. (2024).
- Copilot. (2024).
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
- Gemini. (2024).
- Grassini, S. (2023). Development and validation of the AI attitude scale (AIAS-4): a brief measure of general attitude toward artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1191628.
- Hmoud, M., Swaity, H., Hamad, N., Karram, O., & Daher, W. (2024). Higher Education Students’ Task Motivation in the Generative Artificial Intelligence Context: The Case of ChatGPT. Information, 15(1), 33.
- Hsia, L.-H., Hwang, G.-J., & Hwang, J.-P. (2023). AI-facilitated reflective practice in physical education: an auto-assessment and feedback approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-20.
- Jančařík, A., Michal, J., & Novotná, J. (2023). Using AI Chatbot for Math Tutoring. Journal of Education Culture and Society, 14(2), 285-296.
- Jin, S.-H., Im, K., Yoo, M., Roll, I., & Seo, K. (2023). Supporting students’ self-regulated learning in online learning using artificial intelligence applications. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 37.
- Jyothy, S. N., Kolil, V. K., Raman, R., & Achuthan, K. (2024). Exploring large language models as an integrated tool for learning, teaching, and research through the Fogg Behavior Model: a comprehensive mixed-methods analysis. Cogent Engineering, 11(1), 2353494.
- Kang, J., Kang, C., Yoon, J., Ji, H., Li, T., Moon, H., Ko, M., & Han, J. (2023). Dancing on the inside: A qualitative study on online dance learning with teacher-AI cooperation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(9), 12111-12141.
- Lawlor, P. & Chang, J. (2024). The rise of generative AI: A timeline of breakthrough innovations. Qualcomm Technologies.
- Lee, K.-A., & Lim, S.-B. (2023). Designing a Leveled Conversational Teachable Agent for English Language Learners. Applied Sciences, 13(11), 6541.
- Li, H., Wang, Y., Luo, S., & Huang, C. (2024). The influence of GenAI on the effectiveness of argumentative writing in higher education: evidence from a quasi-experimental study in China. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 1-26.
- Louise, N. (2024). AI language translator startup DeepL launches traditional Chinese language in Asia push. Tech Startups.
- Maphoto, K. B., Sevnarayan, K., Mohale, N. E., Suliman, Z., Ntsopi, T. J., & Mokoena, D. (2024). Advancing Students’ Academic Excellence in Distance Education: Exploring the Potential of Generative AI Integration to Improve Academic Writing Skills. Open Praxis, 16(2), 142-159.
- McIntire, A., Calvert, I., & Ashcraft, J. (2024). Pressure to Plagiarize and the Choice to Cheat: Toward a Pragmatic Reframing of the Ethics of Academic Integrity. Education Sciences, 14(3), 244.
- Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Schiller, R., Liebenow, L. W., Steinbach, M., Horbach, A., & Fleckenstein, J. (2024). Using LLMs to bring evidence-based feedback into the classroom: AI-generated feedback increases secondary students’ text revision, motivation, and positive emotions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100199.
- Ng, D. T. K., Su, J., & Chu, S. K. W. (2024). Fostering Secondary School Students’ AI Literacy through Making AI-Driven Recycling Bins. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 9715-9746.
- Ni, A., & Cheung, A. (2023). Understanding secondary students’ continuance intention to adopt AI-powered intelligent tutoring system for English learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(3), 3191-3216.
- Niu, W., Zhang, W., Zhang, C., & Chen, X. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence Autonomy in Higher Education: A Uses and Gratification Perspective. Sustainability, 16(3), 1276.
- Opesemowo, O. A. G., & Adekomaya, V. (2024). Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for Advancing Sustainable Development Goals in South Africa’s Higher Education System: A Qualitative Study. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(3), 67-86.
- Qu, K., & Wu, X. (2024). ChatGPT as a CALL tool in language education: A study of hedonic motivation adoption models in English learning environments. Education and Information Technologies.
- Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323-339.
- Rondon, G. (2023). El Rol Docente En El Uso De La Inteligencia Artificial En Ambientes Educativos. Dialógica Revista Multidisciplinaria [The role of teachers in the use of Artificial Intelligence in educational environments]. Dialogica, 20(2), 49-70. (In Spanish).
- Sadegh-Zadeh, S.-A., Movahhedi, T., Hajiyavand, A. M., & Dearn, K. D. (2023). Exploring undergraduates’ perceptions of and engagement in an AI-enhanced online course. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1252543.
- Tiwari, C. K., Bhat, Mohd. A., Khan, S. T., Subramaniam, R., & Khan, M. A. I. (2024). What drives students toward ChatGPT? An investigation of the factors influencing adoption and usage of ChatGPT. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21(3), 333-355.
- Venkatesh, V. (2022). Adoption and use of AI tools: a research agenda grounded in UTAUT. Annals of Operations Research, 308, 641-652.
- Wahba, F., Ajlouni, A. O., & Abumosa, M. A. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT-based learning statistics on undergraduates’ statistical reasoning and attitudes toward statistics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(7), em2468.
- Wu, C.-H., & Fan, W.-S. (2024). Students’ Flow Experience of Using AI-Powered Online English Learning Platforms. HighTech and Innovation Journal, 5(2), 382-399.
- Yao, Y.-C., & Chung, K.-C. (2024). Application of Neural Network and Structural Model in AI Educational Performance Analysis. Sensors and Materials, 36(3), 891-903.
- Yurt, E., & Kasarci, I. (2024). A Questionnaire of Artificial Intelligence Use Motives: A Contribution to Investigating the Connection between AI and Motivation. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(2), 308-325.
- Zou, X., Su, P., Li, L., & Fu, P. (2023). AI-generated content tools and students’ critical thinking: Insights from a Chinese university. IFLA Journal, 50(2).