Adoption of Mobile Banking and Perceived Risk in GCC
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(1).2018.07
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2018, Issue #1, pp. 72-79
- Cited by
- 2461 Views
-
571 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The study deals with the adoption of mobile banking services by respondents in UAE and the perception of risk factors by them. A model was developed on the Customer Adoption Process of mobile banking. The model is validated based on the data collected using the questionnaire from a sample of 90 respondents in UAE. Factor analysis is used to evaluate and analyze the responses. Belief in technology and the value it creates are the major driving force for respondents to adopt mobile banking. Respondents perceive that mobile banking helps in proper financial planning due to continuous monitoring the transactions and time saving. Lack of privacy in the mobile banking transactions and not all banks offering mobile banking services in UAE are the major challenges perceived by the respondents for non-adoption of mobile banking. Respondents identify time risk, financial risk and performance risk as the most predominant risk factors compared to other risks in the adoption process.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, L96
-
References32
-
Tables13
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model on mobile banking adoption
-
- Table 1. Factor analysis on services respondents predominantly use in mobile banking
- Table 2. Factor analysis on perceived ease of use by respondents
- Table 3. Factor analysis on perceived usefulness
- Table 4. Factor analysis on perceived benefit
- Table 5. Factor analysis on the social risk of the respondents using mobile banking
- Table 6. Factor analysis on the financial risk of the respondents using mobile banking
- Table 7. Factor analysis on the privacy risk of the respondents using mobile banking
- Table 8. Factor analysis on the time risk of the respondents using mobile banking
- Table 9. Factor analysis on the security risk of the respondents using mobile banking
- Table 10. Factor analysis on the performance risk of the respondents using mobile banking
- Table 11. Attitude of respondents towards mobile banking usage
- Table 12. Possible reasons for respondents to adopt mobile banking
- Table 13. Possible reasons for respondents as to non-adoption of mobile banking
-
- Aboelmaged, G., & Gebba, T. R. (2013). Mobile Banking Adoption: An Examination of Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. International Journal of Business Research and Development, 2(1), 35-50.
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Ali, Y. (2001). Does the internet compete with or complement bricks and mortar bank branches? International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 29(6), 272-281.
- Anckar, B., & D’Incau, D. (2002). Value Creation in Mobile Commerce: Findings from a Consumer Survey. Journal of Information Technology and Application, 4, 43-64.
- Bandyopadhyay, G. (2010). Banking the Unbanked: Going mobile in Africa. Bangalore: Infosys Technologies Ltd.
- Bunduch, R. (2005). Business Relationships in Internet Based Electronic Markets: The role of goodwill, trust and transaction cost. Information Systems Journal, 15, 321-341.
- Carlsson, C., Waide, P., & Bouwman, H. (2006). Adoption of 3G+ services in Finland. International Journal Mobile Communications, 4(4), 369-385.
- Coleman, R. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
- Coviello, N., Milley, R., & Marcolin, B. (2001). Understanding IT-enabled interactivity in Contemporary Marketing. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 18-33.
- Daud, N. M., Kassim, N. E. M., Said, W. S. R. W. M., & Noor, M. M. M. (2011). Determining critical success factors of mobile banking adoption in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(9), 252-265.
- Davis, F. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 37(8), 982-1002.
- Delvin, J. (1995). Technology and innovation in retail banking distribution. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 13, 19-25.
- Fernandes, C., & Awamleh, R. (2005). Internet banking: An Empirical Investigation into the extent of adoption of banks and Determinants of customer satisfaction in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 10(1), 1-12.
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
- Herzberg, A. (2003). Payments and Banking with Mobile Personal Devices. Communications of ACM, 46(5), 111-127.
- Hosseini, M. H., Fatemifar, A., & Rahimzadeh, M. (2015). Effective factors of the adoption of mobile banking services by customers. Kuwait Chapter of Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 4(6), 1-13.
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer Trust in an Internet Store. Information Technology & Management, 1, 45-71.
- Kleijnen, M., Wetzels, M., & Ruyter, K. (2004). Consumer Acceptance of wireless finance. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8, 205-217.
- Lee, M., Mc. Goldrick, P. J., Keeling, K. A., & Dorherty, J. (2003). Using ZMET to explore barriers to the adoption of 3G Mobile Banking Services. International Journal of Retail Distribution Management, 31, 340-348.
- Lee, M., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for Consumer Internet Shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6, 75-91.
- Lee, Y., & Benbast, I. (2003). Interface Design for Mobile Commerce. Communications of the ACM, 46, 49-52.
- Liao, Z., & Cheung, M. (2002). Internet-based e-banking and consumer attitudes: an empirical study. Information & Management, 39(4), 282-295.
- Mallat, N., Rossi, M., & Tuunainen, V. K. (2004). Mobile banking services. Communications of the ACM, 47, 42-46.
- Mavri, M., & Ioannou (2006). Consumers’ perspectives on online banking services. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30, 552-560.
- Munusamy, J., Annamalah, S., & Chelliah, S. (2012). A Study of Users and Non-Users of Internet Banking in Malaysia. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(4), 452-458.
- Pallant, J. R., & Tennant, A. (2007). An Introduction to the Ranch Measurement Model: An example using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46, 1-8.
- Ramayah, T., Jantan, M., Noor, M. N. M., & Ling, K. P. (2003). Receptiveness internet banking by Malaysian consumers. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 8(2), 1-29.
- Suoranta, M., & Mattila, M. (2004). Mobile Banking and Consumer Behavior: new insights into the diffusion pattern. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8, 354-366.
- Wang, Y. S., Lin, H. H., & Luarn, P. (2006). Predicting consumer intention to use mobile service. Information Systems Journal, 16, 157-179.
- Wiedmann, K. P., Buxel, H., & Walsh, G. (2002). Customer profiling in e-commerce: Methodological aspects and challenges. Journal of Database Marketing, 9(2), 170-184.
- Yang, A. S (2009). Exploring adoption Difficulties in Mobile Banking Services. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 136-149.
- Yousafzai, S., Pallister, J., & Foxall, G. (2009). Multidimensional role of trust in internet banking adoption. Service Industry Journal, 29(5), 591-605.