Trade creation and export diversion: Thailand’s plastic and rubber under the ASEAN-China free trade agreement
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.49
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #1, pp. 619-633
- 391 Views
-
193 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to investigate the impact of the ASEAN-China free trade agreement on plastic and rubber trading, focusing on trade creation and export diversion. The collected data include 11 intra-bloc countries and 23 extra-bloc countries from 1990 to 2021, analyzed using STATA17. The gravity model is applied to the international trade framework. First, the unit root test is used to confirm the stationary nature of the data. Then, the methods are compared, employing fixed effects and a robust Poisson maximum likelihood estimator. The bilateral dummy variables are used to estimate the directional impact of trade agreements on export volume. The result demonstrates that the ASEAN-China free trade agreement establishes trade creation and export diversion. It has had a positive impact on the export value of plastic and rubber in Thailand over the past 30 years, but in terms of trade creation is less than export diversion. This means that exporting plastic and rubber to extra-bloc countries will gain more benefits than trading with member countries under the ASEAN-China free trade agreement. However, trading under the ASEAN-China free trade agreement may continue, but export volumes of plastic and rubber will decline. According to the findings, it can be suggested that Thailand’s government has to have a comparative advantage in product and strong competitiveness. Meanwhile, the ASEAN-China free trade agreement should not only focus on trade tariffs but also improve customs clearance to reduce trade costs.
Acknowledgment
I would also like to extend my thanks to my parents for their support and encouragement throughout my studies.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C19, C39, F15, F19
-
References45
-
Tables6
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Economic indicators and the bilateral dummy variable definition
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. The result of the panel unit root test
- Table 4. The result of a fixed effect and a robust PPML
- Table A1. The ASEAN-China (ACFTA) Free Trade Agreement
- Table B1. Abbreviations
-
- Anderson, J. E. (2003). Gravity with gravitas: A solution to the border puzzle. American Economic Review, 93(1), 170-192.
- Arefin, M. I., & Yamazaki, A (2015). A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA). Journal of Asian Economics, 37, 83-95.
- Baier, S. L. (2007). Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?. Journal of International Economics, 71, 72-95.
- Bas, M., Fernandes, A., & Paunov, C. (2023). How resilient was trade to COVID-19? Economics Letters, 111080.
- Brada, J. C., & Mendez, J. A. (1985). Economic Integration among Developed, Developing and Centrally Planned Economies: A Comparative Analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(4), 547-56.
- Bassem, K., & Samir, M. (2015). Trade creation and diversion effects in the Mediterranean area: Econometric analysis by gravity model. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 24(1), 76-104.
- Carrère, C. (2006). Revisiting the effects of regional trade agreements on trade flows with proper specification of the gravity model. European Economic Review, 50(2), 223-247.
- Carrère, C., Mrázová, M., & Neary, J. P. (2020). Gravity without Apology: The Science of Elasticities, Distance, and Trade. The Economic Journal, 130(628), 880-910.
- Chirathivat, S. (2002). ASEAN–China Free Trade Area: Background, implications, and future development. Journal of Asia Economics, 13(5), 671-686.
- Department of trade and negotiation. (2019). Overview ACFTA.
- Department of trade and negotiation. (2023). Thailand aiming to expand huge China market at Asean FTA meet.
- Djankov, S., & Freund, C. (2002). Trade flows in the former Soviet Union, 1987 to 1996. Journal of Comparative Economics, 30(1), 76-90.
- Dollar, D. (1992). Outward-oriented developing economies really do grow more rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs. Economic Development and Cultural Changes, 40, 523-544.
- Endoh, M. (1999). Trade creation and trade diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA and the CMEA: 1960-1994. Applied Economics, 31(2), 207-216.
- Erlambang, B. D., Rossanto, D. H., & Wisnu, W. (2021). The Impact of ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA) Agreement on Indonesia’s Major Plantation Export Commodities. Business: Theory and Practice, 22(1), 91-97.
- Ferrianta, Y., Hanani, N., Setiawan, B. I., & Muhaimin, W. (2012). Impact of Trade Liberalization Asean-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA) on the Performance of Indonesia Maize Economy. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(7), 6801-6809.
- Freund, L. B. (1998). Further results for a stationary crack. Dynamic fracture mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
- Hair, J. F. (1995). Examing Your Data. Multivariate Data Analysis (3rd ed) (pp. 35-85). New York: Macmillan.
- Hiroyuki, T. (2015). Trade creation and diversion effects of ASEAN-plus-one free trade agreements. Economics Bulletin, 35(3), 1856-1866.
- Hrvoje, J., & Maja, B. (2021). Trade Creation and Trade Diversion Effects from Croatia’s CEFTA and EU membership. Original Scientific Paper, 72(4), 489-521.
- Ismanto, I., & Khrisnamurti, I. (2014). The Political-Economy of ASEAN-China FTA. SECO / WTI Academic Cooperation Project Working Paper Series 2014/05, 1-30.
- Jaime, O. A., & David, R.-B. (2020). A Sensitivity Analysis on the Impact of Regional Trade Agreements in Bilateral Trade Flows. Estudios de Economía, 47(2), 193-219.
- Jason, A. Q. (2015). The Impact of Transportation Costs and Trade Barriers on International Trade Flows. University of Oregon Scholar’s Bank.
- Jongwanich, J. (2023). Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) and Export Structures in Thailand (Discussion Paper No. 75). Thammasat University.
- Khalid, N., & Zamil, A. S. (2005). Prospects for Port in Southeast Asia: Rising to the Challenges of China’s Emergence as an Economic Superpower. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 10, 127-136.
- Laaser, C.-F., & Schrader, K. (2002). European Integration and Changing Trade Patterns: The Case of the Baltic States. Kiel Institute of World Economics.
- Larch, M., Joschka, W., Yoto, V. Y., & Thomas, Z. (2019). Currency Unions and Trade: A PPML Re-assessment with High-dimensional Fixed Effects. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 487-510.
- Lim, B., Hong, K., Yoon, J., Chang, J.-I., & Cheong, I. (2021). Pitfalls of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Energies, 14(21), 7303.
- Martínez-Zarzoso, I., & Felicitas, N.-L. D., & Horsewood, N. (2009). Are regional trading agreements beneficial?: Static and dynamic panel gravity models, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 20(1), 46-65.
- Michael, P. (2018). Gravity Models, PPML Estimation and the Bias of the Robust Standard Errors. Applied Economics Letters, 26(18), 1467-1471.
- Mika, A. (2018). Friends without benefits? New EMU members and the “euro effect”. Journal of International Money and Finance, 83, 75-92.
- Park, Y., & Shin, J (2012). The Impact of ACFTA on Trade Between China and ASEAN: An Empirical Analysis. The World Economy, 35(5), 554-573.
- Rossanto, D. H., Lilik, S., & Miguel, A. E. (2021). Trade Creation And Trade Diversion Effects: The Case Of The Asean Plus Six Free Trade Area. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, Bank Indonesia, 24(1), 93-118.
- Santos Silva, J. M. C., & Silvana, T. (2006). The Log of Gravity. Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 641-658.
- Sawasdee, C. (2018). Assessing Impacts of FTA in Thailand with Special Emphasis on Trade Creation and Trade diversion. Chulalongkorn University.
- Sheng, Y., Tang, H. C., & Xu, X. (2012). The impact of ACFTA on People’s Republic of China ASEAN trade Estimates based on an extended gravity model for component trade. ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, 99.
- Soloaga, I., & Wintersb, A. L. (2001). Regionalism in the nineties: What effect on trade?. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 12(1), 1-29.
- Soulivong, S. (2020). An Analysis of Trade Creation and Trade Diversion Effects of the ASEAN-China Free Trade Agreement: The case after the liberalization of CLMV countries. Seoul National University Library Dissertations.
- Tejvan, P. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of population growth.
- Vivek, A., & Athanasios, V. (2004). How Much Do Trading Partners Matter for Economic Growth. IMF Working Paper, 2004(026), 21.
- Walter, I. (1954). Location Theory and Trade Theory: Short-Run Analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68(2), 305-320.
- Wanasin, S., & Nantarat, T. (2017). Trade Creation and Trade Diversion of ASEAN’s Preferential Trade Agreements. IAFOR Journal of the Social Sciences, 3(1), 5-20.
- Wong, J., & Chan, S. (2003). China-ASENA Free Trade Agreement: Shaping Future. Asian Survey, 43(3), 507-526.
- Yang, S., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2013). A Panel Data Analysis of Trade Creation and Trade Diversion Effects: The case of ASEAN-China Free Trade Area (ACFTA). Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research(IAI).
- Yang, S., & Martínez-Zarzoso, I. (2014). A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN–China Free Trade Area. China Economic Review, 29(C), 138-151.