Impact of international trade on regional ecosystem sustainability: Evidence from Ukraine amid war
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.27
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #1, pp. 364-378
- 38 Views
-
7 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The study aims to examine the impact of international trade on the sustainability of regional ecosystems in Ukraine, particularly amid the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war. The paper applies econometric modeling, factor analysis, cluster analysis, and geographic information systems (GIS) for spatial analysis. Sustainability indicators include environmental resilience indicators (carbon emissions, water quality), economic stability metrics (GDP per capita, investment in green technologies), and social sustainability factors (employment rate, access to education and healthcare). Results indicate that a 1% increase in exports enhances sustainability indicators by 0.9%, while a 1% rise in imports or demographic density reduces these indices by 0.94% and 0.75%, respectively. Cluster analysis identifies five groups of regions with varying ecological resilience, revealing critical vulnerabilities in southern and eastern Ukraine where resilience indices are below 0.5. War actions exacerbate these issues, causing infrastructure destruction, soil and water degradation, and pollutant emissions ranging from 152.5 to 16,311.4 thousand tons. Recommendations include scaling up environmental protection investments by 20% (from the current 5,965–165,228 thousand UAH) and integrating sustainability standards into international trade policies to harmonize economic activities with environmental management in crisis and post-war recovery contexts.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F18, Q56, Q51, Q53, R11
-
References56
-
Tables10
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. K-means clustering of regions of Ukraine depending on the level of international trade and environmental sustainability
- Figure 2. Matrix of spatial analysis of the impact of international trade on the ecosystem
-
- Table 1. Calculation methodology and key components
- Table 2. Factor analysis for calculating the sustainable development indicator
- Table 3. Regression analysis of the dependence of ecosystem sustainability on the influence of international trade
- Table 4. Members of cluster 1 and distances from the respective cluster center
- Table 5. Members of cluster 2 and distances from the respective cluster center
- Table 6. Members of cluster 3 and distances from the respective cluster center
- Table 7. Members of cluster 4 and distances from the respective cluster center
- Table 8. Members of cluster 5 and distances from the respective cluster center
- Table 9. Discriminant analysis
- Table A1. Key economic and environmental indicators by region
-
- Adhikary, B. K. (2011). FDI, trade openness, capital formation, and economic growth in Bangladesh: A linkage analysis. International Journal of Business and Management, 6(1), 16-28.
- Apergis, N., Lyroudi, K., & Vamvakidis, A. (2008). The relationship between foreign direct investment and economic growth: Evidence from transition countries. Transition Studies Review, 15(1), 37-51.
- Attaran, A. (2006). Correction: An immeasurable crisis? A criticism of the millennium development goals and why they cannot be measured. PLoS Medicine, 3(5), Article e224.
- Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115-135.
- Brito, L. (2012). Analyzing sustainable development goals. Science, 336(6087).
- Bruckner, M., Giljum, S., Lutz, C., & Wiebe, K. S. (2012). Materials embodied in international trade – Global material extraction and consumption between 1995 and 2005. Global Environmental Change, 22(3), 568-576.
- Brundtland, G. H. (1985). World Commission on environment and development. Environmental Policy and Law, 14(1), 26-30.
- Burford, G., Hoover, E., Velasco, I., Janoušková, S., Jimenez, A., Piggot, G., Podger, D., & Harder, M. (2013). Bringing the “missing pillar” into sustainable development goals: Towards intersubjective values-based indicators. Sustainability, 5(7), 3035-3059.
- Cai, X., Lu, Y., Wu, M., & Yu, L. (2016). Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Journal of Development Economics, 123, 73-85.
- Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jäger, J., & Mitchell, R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8086-8091.
- Chaudhary, A., & Brooks, T. M. (2019). National consumption and global trade impacts on biodiversity. World Development, 121, 178-187.
- Cima, E., & Esty, D. C. (2024). Making international trade work for sustainable development: Toward a new WTO framework for subsidies. Journal of International Economic Law, 27(1), 1-17.
- Dahl, A. L. (2012). Achievements and gaps in indicators for sustainability. Ecological Indicators, 17, 14-19.
- Darvidou, K. (2024). Omnichannel marketing in the digital age: Creating consistent, personalized and connected customer experiences. Technium Business and Management, 10, 34-54.
- Dittrich, M., & Bringezu, S. (2010). The physical dimension of international trade: Part 1: Direct global flows between 1962 and 2005. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1838-1847.
- Evans, A., & Steven, D. (2012). Sustainable development goals – A useful outcome from Rio + 20. New York: New York University, Centre on International Cooperation.
- Feeny, S., Iamsiraroj, S., & McGillivray, M. (2014). Growth and foreign direct investment in the Pacific Island countries. Economic Modelling, 37, 332-339.
- Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441-473.
- Freckleton, M., Wright, A., & Craigwell, R. (2012). Economic growth, foreign direct investment and corruption in developed and developing countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 39(6), 639-652.
- Frolov, S., Savytska, O., & Ostapenko, L. (2016). Impact of social and economic development of the region on the international trade by the example of Ukraine. Public and Municipal Finance, 5(3), 7-15.
- Gann, G. D., McDonald, T., Walder, B., Aronson, J., Nelson, C. R., Jonson, J., Hallett, J. G., Eisenberg, C., Guariguata, M. R., Liu, J., Hua, F., Echeverría, C., Gonzales, E., Shaw, N., Decleer, K., & Dixon, K. W. (2019). International principles and standards for the practice of ecological restoration. Second edition. Restoration Ecology, 27(S1), S1-S46.
- Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy – A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768.
- Glaser, G. (2012). Base sustainable development goals on science. Nature, 491(7422), Article 35.
- Griggs, D., Stafford-Smith, M., Gaffney, O., Rockström, J., Öhman, M. C., Shyamsundar, P., Steffen, W., Glaser, G., Kanie, N., & Noble, I. (2013). Sustainable development goals for people and planet. Nature, 495(7441), 305-307.
- Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2015). Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565-573.
- Hak, T., Kovanda, J., & Weinzettel, J. (2012). A method to assess the relevance of sustainability indicators: Application to the indicator set of the Czech Republic’s Sustainable Development Strategy. Ecological Indicators, 17, 46-57.
- Hak, T., Moldan, B., & Dahl, A. (2007). Sustainability indicators: A scientific assessment. SCOPE 67. Island Press.
- Hickel, J., Dorninger, C., Wieland, H., & Suwandi, I. (2022). Imperialist appropriation in the world economy: Drain from the global South through unequal exchange, 1990–2015. Global Environmental Change, 73, Article 102467.
- Hoover, N., & Wible, N. (2020). Ricardian inference: Charles S. Peirce, economics, and scientific method. Transactions of the Charles S Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 56(4), 521-557.
- Huan, Y., Yu, Y., Liang, T., & Burgman, M. (2021). A method for assessing the impacts of an international agreement on regional progress towards sustainable development goals. The Science of the Total Environment, 785, Article 147336.
- Hudea, O. S., & Stancu, S. (2012). Foreign direct investments, technology transfer and economic growth. A panel approach. Romanian Journal of Economic Forecasting, 2, 85-102.
- Kastner, T., Schaffartzik, A., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K., Haberl, H., & Krausmann, F. (2014). Cropland area embodied in international trade: Contradictory results from different approaches. Ecological Economics, 104, 140-144.
- Klapper, J., & Schröter, M. (2021). Interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services through global trade in wild species. Ecosystem Services, 50, Article 101316.
- Kottaridi, C., & Filippaios, F. (2015). The FDI and trade relationship revisited under structural change: Evidence from a sector-based analysis in Central and Eastern European countries. East-West Journal of Economics and Business, 18(2), 1-40.
- Lempert, R. J., Groves, D. G., Popper, S. W., & Bankes, S. C. (2006). A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Management Science, 52(4), 514-528.
- Malik, A., Lenzen, M., Li, M., Mora, C., Carter, S., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., & Gómez-Paredes, J. (2024). Polarizing and equalizing trends in international trade and sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 7(10), 1359-1370.
- Margulis, S. (2003). Causes of deforestation of the Brazilian Amazon. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- McAusland, C., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade and the environment: Theory and evidence. Canadian Public Policy, 30(4), 456-458.
- Melnyk, L., Kubatko, O., & Pysarenko, S. (2014). The impact of foreign direct investment on economic growth: Case of post communism transition economies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 12(1), 17-24.
- Mudgal, S., Tan, A., Lockwood, S., Eisenmenger, N., Fischer-Kowalski, M., Giljum, S., & Brucker, M. (2012). Assessment of resource efficiency indicators and targets (Final Report). European Commission.
- Nath, H. K. (2009). Trade, foreign direct investment, and growth: Evidence from transition economies. Comparative Economic Studies, 51(1), 20-50.
- O’Riordan, T. (2000). Sustainability indicators: Measuring the immeasurable: Simon Bell and Stephen Morse; Earthscan Publications, London, 1998, 175pp, paperpack, ISBN 1 85389 498, £14.95. Journal of Rural Studies, 16(3), 395.
- Omelchenko, O., Dorokhov, A., Kolodiziev, O., & Dorokhova, L. (2018). Fuzzy modeling of creditworthiness assessments of bank’s potential borrowers in Ukraine. Economic Studies (Ikonomicheski Izsledvania), 27(4), 100-125.
- Pokharel, B., & Baral, J. (2009). From green to REDD, from aid to trade: Translating the forest carbon concept into practice. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 8(1), 37-40.
- Pyšek, P., & Richardson, D. M. (2010). Invasive species, environmental change and management, and health. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 25-55.
- Rees, W. E. (2013). Ecological footprint, concept of. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (2nd ed., pp. 701-713). Academic Press.
- Shcherbak, V., Danko, Y., Tereshchenko, S., Nifatova, O., Dehtiar, N., Stepanova, O., & Yatsenko, V. (2024). Circular economy and inclusion as effective tools to prevent ecological threats in rural areas during military operations. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 10(3), 969-986.
- Shcherbak, V., Ganushchak-Yefimenko, L., Nifatova, O., Fastovets, N., Plysenko, G., Lutay, L., Tkachuk, V., & Ptashchenko, O. (2020). Use of key indicators to monitor sustainable development of rural areas. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management, 6(2), 175-190.
- Siskos, E., Darvidou, K., & Ostapenko, V. (2023). Analytical support for identification trends and problems in the development of interaction between stakeholders of education, science and business. Economics of Development, 22(4), 8-22.
- Sutherland, W. J., Aveling, R., Brooks, T. M., Clout, M., Dicks, L. V., Fellman, L., Fleishman, E., Gibbons, D. W., Keim, B., Lickorish, F., Monk, K. A., Mortimer, D., Peck, L. S., Pretty, J., Rockström, J., Rodríguez, J. P., Smith, R. K., Spalding, M. D., Tonneijck, F. H., & Watkinson, A. R. (2013). A horizon scan of global conservation issues for 2014. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(1), 15-22.
- Telles, K. (2024). Pursuing a grand theory: Douglass C. North and the early making of a new institutional social science (1950–1981). EconomiA, 25(1), 109-156.
- Telnova, H., Kolodiziev, O., Petchenko, M., Yakushev, O., Shulga, N., & Kochetkov, V. (2023). Foreign trade policy and its impact on economic growth. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, 4(51), 345-357.
- Tsitouras, A., Koulakiotis, A., Makris, G., & Papapanagos, H. (2017). International trade and foreign direct investment as growth stimulators in transition economies: Does the impact of institutional factors matter? Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(4), 148-170.
- Vačkářová, D., Medková, H., Krpec, P., & Weinzettel, J. (2023). Ecosystem services footprint of international trade: Economic value of ecosystem services lost due to crop production. Ecosystem Services, 64, Article 101560.
- Wang, S., Wang, H., & Sun, Q. (2020). The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental pollution in China: Corruption matters. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), Article 6477.
- World Trade Organization (WTO). (2022). World Trade Report 2022: Climate Change and International Trade.