Persistence in the cryptocurrency market: does size matter?
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.20(4).2023.12
-
Article InfoVolume 20 2023, Issue #4, pp. 138-146
- Cited by
- 375 Views
-
102 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper investigates the persistence in the cryptocurrency market, focusing on five distinct groups categorized by their market capitalization during the sample period from 2020 to 2023. The study aims to test two hypotheses: (H1) The degree of persistence in the cryptocurrency market is contingent on market capitalization, and (H2) The efficiency of the cryptocurrency market has increased in recent years. The methodology employed for this examination is R/S analysis. The results indicate that the cryptocurrency market maintains its inefficiency, and no significant variations in persistence are discerned among different cryptocurrency groups, leading to the rejection of H1. Outcomes related to H2 present a nuanced scenario. Specifically, Litecoin and Ripple exhibit supportive evidence for the Adaptive Market Hypothesis, suggesting an improvement in the efficiency of the cryptocurrency market in recent years. A noteworthy revelation pertains to the anomaly observed in Bitcoin. Despite being the most capitalized and liquid cryptocurrency, it demonstrates inefficiency akin to levels observed five years ago. The implications of this study contribute to the comprehension of cryptocurrency market efficiency. The findings challenge the assumptions of the Efficient Market Hypothesis, favoring instead the Adaptive Market Hypothesis. For practitioners, the results hold significance, providing evidence of price predictability, particularly in the case of Bitcoin. This suggests that trend trading strategies remain viable for generating abnormal profits in the cryptocurrency market.
Acknowledgments
Alex Plastun gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine (0121U100473).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C22, G12
-
References30
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Results of the dynamic R/S analysis (step = 50, data window = 300)
-
- Table 1. Groups and cryptocurrencies (October 18, 2023)
- Table 2. Results of the R/S analysis for the selected crypto currencies within groups, 2020–2023
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics for the results of the R/S analysis for the selected crypto currencies within groups, 2020–2023
- Table 4. Comparative analysis of the current findings with previous research (Caporale et al., 2018)
-
- Apopo, N., & Phiri, A. (2021). On the (in)efficiency of cryptocurrencies: Have they taken daily or weekly random walks? Heliyon, 7(4).
- Aslam, F., Memon, B.A., Hunjra, A. I., & Bouri, E. (2023). The dynamics of market efficiency of major cryptocurrencies. Global Finance Journal, 58, 100899.
- Bariviera, A. F., Basgall, M. J., Hasperué, W., & Naiouf, Marcelo. (2017). Some stylized facts of the Bitcoin market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 484, 82-90.
- Bariviera, A. F. (2017). The Inefficiency of Bitcoin Revisited: A Dynamic Approach. Economics Letters, 161, 1-4.
- Bartos, J. (2015). Does Bitcoin follow the hypothesis of efficient market? International Journal of Economic Sciences, 4(2), 10-23.
- Bublyk, Y., Borzenko O., & Hlazova, A. (2023). Cryptocurrency energy consumption: Analysis, global trends and interaction. Environmental Economics, 14(2), 49-59.
- Caporale, G. M., Gil-Alana, L., & Plastun, A. (2019). Long memory and data frequency in financial markets. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 89(10), 1763-1779.
- Caporale, G. M., Gil-Alana, L., & Plastun, A. (2018). Persistence in the cryptocurrency market. Research in International Business and Finance, 46, 141-148.
- Fama, E. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Evidence. Journal of Finance, 25, 383-417.
- Greene, M. T., & Fielitz, B. D. (1977). Long-term dependence in common stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 4, 339-349.
- Hu, Y., Valera, H. G. A., & Oxley, L. (2019). Market efficiency of the top market-cap cryptocurrencies: Further evidence from a panel framework. Finance Research Letters, 31(C), 138-145.
- Hurst, H. (1951). Long-term storage of reservoirs. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 116(1), 770-799.
- Karasiński, J. (2023). The Adaptive Market Hypothesis and the Return Predictability in the Cryptocurrency Markets. Economics and Business Review, 9(1), 94-118.
- Keshari Jena, S., Tiwari, A. K., Doğan, B., & Hammoudeh, S. (2022). Are the top six cryptocurrencies efficient? Evidence from time-varying long memory. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27, 3730-3740.
- Khuntia, S., & Pattanayak, J. K. (2018). Adaptive market hypothesis and evolving predictability of Bitcoin. Economics Letters, 167, 26-28.
- Khursheed, A., Naeem, M., Ahmed, S., & Mustafa, F. (2020). Adaptive market hypothesis: An empirical analysis of time-varying market efficiency of cryptocurrencies. Cogent Economics and Finance, 8(1).
- Kristoufek, L. (2018). On Bitcoin markets (in)efficiency and its evolution. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 503, 257-262.
- Łęt, B., Sobański, K., Świder, W., & Włosik, K. (2022). Is the cryptocurrency market efficient? Evidence from an analysis of fundamental factors for Bitcoin and Ethereum. International Journal of Management and Economics, 58(4), 351-370.
- Lo, A.W. (1991). Long-term memory in stock market prices. Econometrica, 59, 1279-1313.
- López-Martín, C., Muela, S. B., & Arguedas, R. (2021). Efficiency in cryptocurrency markets: New evidence. Eurasian Economic Review, 11(3), 403-431.
- Mgadmi, N., Béjaoui, A., & Moussa, W. (2023). Disentangling the Nonlinearity Effect in Cryptocurrency Markets During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Evidence from a Regime-Switching Approach. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 30(3), 457-473.
- Panigrahi Shrikant (2023). Are cryptocurrencies a threat to financial stability and economic growth of India? Evidence from the cointegration approach. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(2), 307-320.
- Sahoo, P. K., & Sethi, D. (2023). Market efficiency of the cryptocurrencies: Some new evidence based on price–volume relationship. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 1-12.
- Souza, O. T., & Carvalho, J. V. F. (2023). Market efficiency assessment for multiple exchanges of cryptocurrencies. Revista de Gestão.
- Urquhart, A. (2016). The Inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economics Letters, 148, 80-82.
- Waspada I., Dwi Fitrizal Salim, & Krisnawati, A. (2023). Horizon of cryptocurrency before vs during COVID-19. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 20(1), 14-25.
- Wei, W. C. (2018). Liquidity and market efficiency in cryptocurrencies. Economics Letters, 168, 21-24.
- Yi, E., Yang, B., Jeong, M., Sohn, S., & Ahn, K. (2023). Market efficiency of cryptocurrency: evidence from the Bitcoin market. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 4789.
- Zargar, F. N., & Kumar, D. (2019). Informational inefficiency of Bitcoin: A study based on high-frequency data. Research in International Business and Finance, 47, 344-353.
- Zhang, W., Wang, P., Li, X., & Shen, D. (2018). The inefficiency of cryptocurrency and its cross-correlation with Dow Jones Industrial Average. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 510, 658-670.