Technology assessment to transfer them from an engineering university to a business environment
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(4).2019.41
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2019, Issue #4, pp. 504-516
- Cited by
- 1045 Views
-
174 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Technology transfer from universities to the business environment plays a key role in use of the open innovation concept. Meanwhile, in Ukraine which has a sufficiently high level of scientific and technological capacity, universities do not fully respond to market demands and do not receive the proper commercial results. One of the reasons for this is that current methods and models do not allow justifying the level of technology transferability. This article aims to present a methodological approach to assessing the transferability of technologies from universities to the business environment and to develop a method for determining the integral index of technology transferability. Therefore, the study considered and substantiated options for this transfer based on the sale of technology licenses by the universities; creation of spin-off companies by the university; technology transfer as startups; conclusion of a joint activity agreements; scientific and technical cooperation. A market technology launch matrix was developed to select these models. The developed methodological tools can be used to compare investment projects. The results obtained were tested based on technology of personal passive optically stimulated luminescence dosimetry of ionizing radiation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)І23, O32, О33, M21
-
References42
-
Tables3
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Determining the polygon for the level of technology transferability
- Figure 2. Determining the polygon for the technology transferability level of OSL dosimetry IR
- Figure 3. Selection matrix of technology transfer models on the correlation of the technology consumer value and its technological readiness
-
- Table 1. Characteristics of the technology transferability evaluation model
- Table 2. Boundaries for integral indicators of the technology transferability level
- Table 3. Determination of the stage of OSL dosimetry IR technology transferability using the method of geometric construction (polygons)
-
- Andriesson, D. (2005). Implementing the KPMG Value Explorer. Critical success factors for applying IC measurement tools. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 6(4), 474-488.
- Annual Report: The Global R&D Funding Forecast. (2018). R&D Magazine, annual report.
- Audretsch, D., & Caiazza, R. (2016). Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: cross-national analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1247-1259.
- Bahar, M., & Griesbach, R. J. (2017). A New Strategic Approach to Technology Transfer. Innovation Magazine, 14(3).
- Battaglia, D., Landoni, P., & Rizzitelli, F. (2017). Organizational structures for external growth of University Technology.
- Bradley, S., Hayter, C. S., & Link, A. N. (2013). Models and methods of university technology transfer. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 9(6), 571-650.
- Breznitz, S. M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2015). University Technology Transfer: The globalization of academic innovation (1st ed.). Routledge.
- Brooking, A. (1998). Intellectual Capital. International Thomson Business Press.
- Carlson, C. R., & Wilmot, W. W. (2006). Innovation: The Five Disciplines for Creating What Customers Want (1st ed.). Crown Business.
- Castillo, F., Gilless, J. K., Heiman, A., & Zilberman, D. (2018). Time of adoption and intensity of technology transfer: an institutional analysis of offices of technology transfer in the United States. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 120-138.
- Chukhray, N., Lozynskyy, A., & Kachmar-Kos, N. (2012). Komertsializatsiia naukovo-doslidnykh robit universytetu: osnovni problemy ta shliakhy yikh vyrishennia [Commercialization of university research work: the main problems and ways of their solution]. Formuvannia innovatsiinoi kultury v ukrainskykh universytetakh [Formation of innovative culture in Ukrainian universities]. Lviv: Vydavnytstvo Lvivskoi politekhniky (in Ukrainian).
- Chukhray, N., Shakhovska, N., Mrykhina, O., Bublyk, M., & Lisovska, L. (2019). Methodical approach to assessing the readiness level of technologies for the transfer. In: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing IV. Shakhovska N., Medykovskyy, M. (eds.). Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, Switzerland, 971 р.
- European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020 strategy.
- Good, M., Knockaert, M., Soppe, B., & Wright, M. (2018). The technology transfer ecosystem in academia. An organizational design perspective. Technovation.
- Grange, L. L., & Buys, A. J. (2002). A review of technology transfer mechanisms. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 13(1), 81-99.
- Hayter, C. S., & Rooksby, J. H. (2016). A legal perspective on university technology transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 270-289.
- Hicks, B., Larsson, A., Culley, S., & Larsson, T. (2009). A Methodology for Evaluating Technology Readiness During Product Development. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design. Stanford University. USA: CA.
- Horner, S., Jayawarna, D., Giordano, B., & Jones, O. (2018). Examining the role of strategic choice in the effectiveness of university technology transfer. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1.
- Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Piva, E., & Wright, M. (2016). Are researchers deliberately bypassing the technology transfer office? An analysis of TTO awareness. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 589-607.
- Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard – Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
- Kozyk, V., Mrykhina, O., Novakivskyi, I., & Koleshchuk, O. (2019). Methodological principles of assessing the level of technology readiness for transfer on the basis of the theory of reliability of hierarchically branched systems. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth scientific and practical international conference “International transport infrastructure, industrial centers and corporate logistics” (NTI-UkrSURT 2019), June 6-8, 2019. SHS Web of Conferences. Vol. 67. Ukraine: Kharkiv.
- Kumar, S., Luthra, S. Haleem, A. Mangla, S. K., & Garg, D. (2015). Identification and evaluation of critical factors to technology transfer using AHP approach. International Strategic Management Review, 3, 24-42.
- Litan, R. E., Mitchell, L., & Reedy, E. J. (2008). Commercializing University Innovations: Alternative Approache. NBER Chapters, in Innovation Policy and the Economy, 8, 31-57. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Majidpour, M. (2017). International technology transfer and the dynamics of complementarity: A new approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122, 196-206.
- Miller, K., McAdam, R., & McAdam, M. (2016). A systematic literature review of university technology transfer from a quadruple helix perspective: toward a research agenda. R&D Management, 48(1), 1-162.
- Mosey, S., Guerrero, M., & Greenman, A. (2017). Technology entrepreneurship research opportunities: insights from across Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(1), 1-9.
- Muegge, S. (2012). Business Model Discovery by Technology Entrepreneurs. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(4), 5-16.
- Munari, F., Rasmussen, E., Toschi, L., & Villani, E. (2016). Determinants of the university technology transfer policy-mix: a cross-national analysis of gap-funding instruments. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(6), 1377-1405.
- NASA. (2017). Technology Readiness Level.
- O’Kane, C. (2018). Technology transfer executives’ backwards integration: An examination of interactions between university technology transfer executives and principal investigators. Technovation, 76-77, 64-77.
- OECD. (2015a). Canberra Guide 1995: The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities Manual on the Measurement of human resources devoted to S&T “Canberra Manual”. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD. (2015b). Frascati Manual 2015: Guidelines for Collecting and Reporting Data on Research and Experimental Development. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation [4th ed.]. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. Luxembourg: OECD Publishing, Paris/Eurostat.
- Olsen, J., & Maassen, P. (2007). European Debates on the Knowledge Institution: The Modernization of the University at the European Level. In P. Maassen & J. Olsen (Eds.), University Dynamics and European Integration. Higher Education Dynamics, 19. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Phan, P., & Siegel, D. S. (2006). The effectiveness of university technology transfer: Lessons learned. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 77-144.
- Prokopenko, O., Holmberg, R., & Omelyanenko, V. (2018). Information and communication technologies support for the participation of universities in innovation networks (comparative study). Innovative Marketing, 14(3), 17-29.
- Rayevnyeva, O., Aksonova, I., & Ostapenko, V. (2018). Formation interaction and adaptive use of purposive forms of cooperation of university and enterprise structures. Innovative Marketing, 14(3), 44-56.
- Sauser, B., Verma, D., Ramirez-Marquez, J., & Gove, R. (2006). From TRL to SRL: The concept of systems readiness levels. In Proceedings of the Conference on Systems Engineering Research. Los Angeles, CA: CSER.
- Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academics to practitioners: quantitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1-2), 115-142.
- Tsybuliov, P. (2011). Spin-off kompaniia yak element infrastruktury transferu tekhnolohii naukovymy orhanizatsiiamy Ukrainy [Spin-off company as an element of the technology transfer infrastructure by scientific organizations of Ukraine]. (In Ukrainian).
- Wnuk-Pel, T. (2018). Management accounting practices in support of lean management strategy in service organizations. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, 29(5), 559-570.
- Wulung, R. B. S., Takahashi, K., & Morikawa, K. (2018). A model for selecting appropriate technology for incubator-university collaboration by considering the technology transfer mechanism. International Journal of Production Research, 56, 2309-2321.