Digital infrastructure and renewable energy transition: Evidence from ASEAN economies
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(4).2026.04
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #4, pp. 55–68
- 4 Views
-
0 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
As economies become increasingly interconnected through digitalization while facing growing sustainability challenges, understanding the drivers of export competitiveness has become an important policy and research concern. This issue is particularly relevant in ASEAN, where digital infrastructure and renewable energy transition have progressed unevenly across member states. Despite growing interest in these transformations, their implications for export performance remain insufficiently understood. This study examines the relationships among digital infrastructure, the renewable energy transition, and export performance across eight ASEAN economies from 2010 to 2021. Using World Bank World Development Indicators data, a balanced panel of 96 country-year observations is analyzed through a fixed-effects model. Internet penetration and renewable energy consumption are specified as the main explanatory variables, while manufacturing value added and foreign direct investment are included as control variables. The results indicate that internet penetration, manufacturing value added, and foreign direct investment are positively and significantly associated with export performance, whereas renewable energy consumption exhibits a significant negative relationship. The estimated model explains approximately 63.5% of the within-country variation in export performance. These findings suggest that digital infrastructure, industrial capability, and foreign investment can strengthen export competitiveness. At the same time, the short-run effects of the renewable energy transition may reflect structural adjustment costs during the transformation process. The study contributes new evidence from ASEAN and highlights the importance of combining digital development with industrial upgrading and supportive policy frameworks to enhance long-term export performance.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and dedicated guidance throughout the review process.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)F14, O33, Q42, C23
-
References31
-
Tables8
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Variable description and measurement
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Correlation matrix of variables
- Table 4. Variance Inflation Factor (VIF)
- Table 5. Fixed effects regression results
- Table 6. Summary of hypothesis testing
- Table 7. Hausman test results
- Table 8. Model diagnostic tests
-
- Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., & Hémous, D. (2012). The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131-166.
- Acemoglu, D., Gallego, F. A., & Robinson, J. A. (2014). Institutions, human capital, and development. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 875-912.
- Aly, F., & Zaki, C. R. (2025). On deep trade agreements, institutions, and global value chains: Evidence from Egypt. Review of World Economics, 161(1), 49-87.
- Ando, M., Hayakawa, K., & Kimura, F. (2024). Supply chain decoupling: Geopolitical debates and economic dynamism in East Asia. Asian Economic Policy Review, 19(1), 62-79.
- ASEAN Secretariat. (2024). ASEAN statistical highlights 2024.
- Baldwin, R. (2016). The great convergence: Information technology and the new globalization. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
- Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407-443.
- Bhuiyan, M. A., Zhang, Q., Khare, V., Mikhaylov, A., Pintér, G., & Huang, X. (2022). Renewable energy consumption and economic growth nexus – A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, Article 878394.
- Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J. W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115-135.
- Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W. W. Norton & Company.
- Chatterjee, N., & Kundu, D. (2021). Role of FDI in developing the base of knowledge – An analysis of the BRICS nations. In R. Bhattacharyya (Ed.), Comparative advantage in the knowledge economy: A national and organizational resource (pp. 113-126). Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Chatterjee, T., & Chatterjee, N. (2026). Digitalisation, skill development and sustainable economic growth: Theories and empirics in the context of BRICS. Quality & Quantity, 60, 11647-11680.
- Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2008). The role of cognitive skills in economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 46(3), 607-668.
- Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251-1271.
- International Energy Agency (IEA). (2023, October 24). World energy outlook 2023.
- Kai, M., Xu, Q., Sibt e Ali, M., Bhat, M. A., Rehman, A., & Janjua, L. R. (2026). Digitalization and institutional quality as drivers of global value chains: Evidence from ASEAN using CS-ARDL analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, Article 119.
- Li, B., Wang, J., Nassani, A. A., Binsaeed, R. H., & Li, Z. (2023). The future of green energy: A panel study on the role of renewable resources in the transition to a green economy. Energy Economics, 127, Article 107026.
- Liu, C., & Marcus, M. (2026). From capital to capability: The roles of governance, finance, and technology in driving sustainable production in developing economies. Sustainable Development, 34(4), 5902-5924.
- Mensah, J. (2019). Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review. Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), Article 1653531.
- Mohanty, S., & Sethi, N. (2019). Outward FDI, human capital and economic growth in BRICS countries: An empirical insight. Transnational Corporations Review, 11(3), 235-249.
- North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
- Qamruzzaman, M., Hoque, M. A., & Khan, M. R. (2026). Bridging inequality: The interplay of renewable energy, digitization, and financial globalization in G7, E7, and N11 economies. Sustainable Futures, 11, Article 101756.
- Rodrik, D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(1), 1-33.
- Saba, C. S., Ngepah, N., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2024). Information and communication technology (ICT), growth and development in developing regions: Evidence from a comparative analysis and a new approach. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(3), 14700-14748.
- Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. World Economic Forum.
- Sharif, F., Majeed, M. T., & Farooq, S. (2026). Digital technologies, trade, renewable energy as sources of green growth: A comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. Green Technologies and Sustainability, 4(3), Article 100385.
- Stern, D. I. (2017). The environmental Kuznets curve after 25 years. Journal of Bioeconomics, 19(1), 7-28.
- United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2023). Trade and development report 2023: Growth, debt and climate: Realigning the global financial architecture. United Nations.
- World Bank. (n.d.). World development indicators [Data set].
- Xiaobin, W., Wu, F., Alharthi, M., Raza, S. M. F., & Albalawi, O. (2024). Natural resources, trade and fintech in the era of digitalization: A study of economies involved in Belt and Road Initiative. Resources Policy, 93, Article 105082.
- Zhang, M., Liu, R., & Sun, H. (2025). Achieving carbon-neutral economies through circular economy, digitalization, and energy transition. Scientific Reports, 15(1), Article 13779.


