Methodological landscapes in tourism crisis management: A systematic mapping review of research designs, 2007–2025

  • 10 Views
  • 1 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
This study systematically reviews methodological approaches in tourism crisis management research, examining 374 peer-reviewed articles indexed in Scopus and published between 2007 and 2025. Following PRISMA guidelines, 411 records were identified through a structured Scopus search, and 37 were excluded during screening (15 not substantively addressing crisis management in tourism and 22 falling outside the 2007–2025 window), yielding a final sample of 374 articles. Each article was classified along two dimensions: crisis type (COVID-19/health, war/political/terrorism, natural disaster, financial/economic, or general) and research methodology (paradigm, specific methods, analytical techniques). Classification drew on titles, abstracts, and author keywords rather than full texts; findings should be interpreted accordingly. Because the search string required at least one methodology-related term, the corpus represents the methodology-signaling segment of the literature, and reported shares should be read within that scope. The findings reveal a corpus dominated by qualitative research (56.4% of articles), led by interviews (34.2%) and surveys (21.7%). COVID-19 and health-related crises account for 57.2% of the corpus, confirming a strong post-2020 concentration. Experimental designs appear in 0.8% of articles and longitudinal designs in 2.7%. In comparison, mixed methods research remains at 5.9%, indicating persistent gaps in designs best suited to causal inference and to tracking crises over time. The study contributes a five-category crisis typology, an evidence-based diagnostic of methodological strengths and gaps, and a research agenda for methodological diversification. Practically, stronger and more diverse methodologies improve the evidence base for tourism organizations, destination authorities, and public administrators making decisions under uncertainty.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process
    • Figure 2. Publication trend by year (2007–2025)
    • Figure 3. Crisis type distribution
    • Figure 4. Crisis types over time
    • Figure 5. Research paradigm distribution
    • Figure 6. Evolution of research paradigms over time
    • Figure 7. Research methods by tier: Data collection methods, research designs, and analytical techniques
    • Figure 8. Pre-COVID versus post-COVID comparison of research methods
    • Table 1. Top 15 publication outlets
    • Table 2. Distribution of articles by crisis type (N = 374)
    • Table 3. Research paradigm distribution: Pre-COVID versus post-COVID
    • Table 4. Research designs, data collection methods, and analytical techniques (N = 374)
    • Table 5. Research methods by crisis type (top 10 methods)
    • Conceptualization
      Aisha Akhmetbayeva, Lazat Spankulova
    • Data curation
      Aisha Akhmetbayeva
    • Formal Analysis
      Aisha Akhmetbayeva, Lazat Spankulova
    • Investigation
      Aisha Akhmetbayeva, Lazat Spankulova
    • Methodology
      Aisha Akhmetbayeva
    • Resources
      Aisha Akhmetbayeva, Lazat Spankulova
    • Software
      Aisha Akhmetbayeva
    • Visualization
      Aisha Akhmetbayeva
    • Writing – original draft
      Aisha Akhmetbayeva
    • Writing – review & editing
      Aisha Akhmetbayeva, Lazat Spankulova
    • Project administration
      Lazat Spankulova
    • Validation
      Lazat Spankulova