Atomization of living space and diffusion of labor activity in the context of coronacrisis: manifestations, consequences and vectors of overcoming
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/slrtp.11(2).2021.02
-
Article InfoVolume 11 2021, Issue #2, pp. 10-25
- Cited by
- 294 Views
-
51 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The symbiosis of new opportunities caused by the breakthrough technologies of the digital age (“big bang-1”) and new challenges and threats caused by sanitary and epidemiological requirements of the coronavirus pandemic (“big bang-2”) leads to a reduction in the living space of an economically active person. The ability to work remotely using information and communication systems (voluntary isolation), on the one hand, and quarantine restrictions (forced isolation), on the other, lead to atomization of a person. At the same time, the time boundaries between work and leisure are being erased, leisure acquires signs of precariousness, a convergence of work and leisure takes place. The relevance of this study is due to the need for a renewed awareness of what kind of format of labor activity will be there in the pandemic and post-pandemic era. Scientific and practical significance of the study is to determine restoration vectors of humancentered, socially acceptable living space of a man of labor, which will help overcome coronacrisis in the social and labor sphere. The main result of the study is the author’s mental model of metamorphoses of labor activity as a component of the new (ab)normality of pandemic and post-pandemic eras. The research subject is the theoretical and applied principles of atomization of the living space of economically active people and the diffusion of labor under the influence of new opportunities and constraints produced by the digital economy and the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. The methodological basis for achieving the set goal is a systematic approach that allows avoiding the fragmentary nature of research, one-sided judgments and conclusions in the study of the interrelated phenomena of living space atomization and labor activity diffusion. The aim of the study is to form scientific ideas about transformations taking place in the field of labor and leisure in the digital age under the influence of coronacrisis. It is proved that the coronacrisis gives rise to a new type of person – an atomized one, which is being increasingly exposed to «negative» individualism influence. The study outlines the contours of the mental model of the organization of work activity in the post-COVID period based on overcoming «negative» individualism, the emergence of a new philosophy of the time, and the formation of an updated concept of leisure culture. Also, the necessity of developing a consolidated multilevel model of social and labor relations in the new socio-economic reality and scientific and applied scenario of its implementation in the system of social and labor development of Ukrainian society is substantiated.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)J20, J29
-
References36
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Пасажирообіг за видами транспорту в Україні, млн пас.–км
- Table 2. Основні показники туристичної діяльності в Україні до пандемії COVID–19 та в період розгортання корона кризи
- Table 3. Соціальні зміни впродовж останніх 12 місяців (%)
-
- Bauman, Z. (2002). Individualizirovannoe obshchestvo [Individualized society]. Moscow: Logos. (In Russian).
- Bevzenko, L. (2020). Instytut okhorony zdorovia: ryzyky dysfunktsiinosti yak tlo zapytu na ahentnu volontersku diiu [Institute of Public Health: Risks of Dysfunction as a Background to the Request for Agent Volunteering]. Ukrainian society: monitoring of social change, 7(21), 373–384. (In Ukrainian).
- Blaug, M. (2004). Metodologiya ekonomicheskoy nauki [Methodology of economic science]. Moscow: Logos. (In Russian).
- Bodriyyar, Zh. (2006). Obshchestvo potrebleniya. Yego mify i struktury [Consumer society. Its myths and structures]. Moscow: Cultural revolution. (In Russian).
- Diligenskiy, G., & Lektorskiy, V. (1990). Problemy tselostnogo mira [Problems of the integral world]. Voprosy filosofii – Questions of Philosophy, 12, 32–43. (In Russian).
- Dyumon, L. (1997). Esse ob individualizme [Essay on individualism]. Dubna: Feniks. (In Russian).
- Fromm, E. (2001). Revolyutsiya nadezhdy [Revolution of Hope]. St. Petersburg: Speech. (In Russian).
- Fromm, E. (2004). Begstvo ot svobody. Chelovek dlya samogo sebya [Begstvo ot svobody. Chelovek dlya sebya]. Minsk: АСТ. (In Russian).
- Gobbs, T. (1965). Leviafan. Izbrannye proizvedeniya [Leviathan. Selected works]. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russian).
- Kastel, R. (2009). Metamorfozy sotsialnogo voprosa. Khronika naemnogo truda [Metamorphoses of the social question. Chronicle of hired labor]. St. Petersburg: Aletheia. (In Russian).
- Keyns, D. (2009). Ekonomicheskie vozmozhnosti dlya nashikh vnukov [Economic opportunities for our grandchildren]. Voprosy filosofii – Questions of Economics, 6, 60–69. (In Russian).
- Khayek, F. (1992). Doroga k rabstvu [Road to slavery]. Moscow: Economics. (In Russian).
- King’s College London (2020). Life under lockdown: coronavirus in the UK.
- Kolot, А., & Herasymenko, О. (2021). Pratsia XXI: filosofiia zmin, vyklyky, vektory rozvytku [Work XXI: philosophy of change, challenges, vectors of development] (488 p.). Kyiv: KNEU. (In Ukrainian).
- Kolot, А. (2011). Dialektyka ekonomichnoho i sotsialnoho rozvytku yak predmet naukovykh doslidzhen [The dialectics of economic and social development as a subject of scientific research]. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi – Ukraine: aspects of work, 5, 3–8. (In Ukrainian).
- Kolot, А. (2014). Global transformations of individualized society: consequences and lessons. International economic policy, 1(20), 5–22.
- Kolot, А. (2014). Indyvidualizatsiia osobystosti ta formuvannia indyvidualizovanoho suspilstva yak fenomen suchasnosti: naslidky ta uroky [Individualization of personality and formation of individualized society as modern phenomena: consequences and lessons]. Ukraina: aspekty pratsi – Ukraine: aspects of work, 2, 3–10. (In Ukrainian).
- Kolot, А., & Kravchuk, O. (2014). Global transformations of an individualized society: expanded opportunities and new challenges. Economic Theory, 4, 17–35. (In Ukrainian).
- Kornish, E. (2000). Kiberbudushcheye. Vperedi XXI vek: perspektivy, prognozy, futurologi [Cyberfuture. Ahead of the 21st century: prospects, forecasts, futurologists]. Moscow: Academia. (In Russian).
- Korsani, A. (2015). Transformatsiya truda i ego temporalnostey. Khronologicheskaya dezorientatsiya i kolonizatsiya nerabochego vremeni [Transformation of labor and its temporalities. Chronological disorientation and colonization of non–working time]. Logos, 105, 51–71. (In Russian).
- Lukyanenko, D., Poruchnik, A., & Kolesov, V. (Ed.) (2013). Globalnoye ekonomicheskoye razvitiye: planirovaniye, sovokupnos, regulirovaniye [Global Economic Development: Trends, Asymmetries, Regulation] (740 p.). Kyiv: KNEU. (In Russian).
- Masi, D. (2002). Ozio Creativo. Roma: BUR Biblioteca Univerzale Rizzoli.
- Moskovichi, S. (1998). Vek tolp. Istoricheskiy traktat po psikhologii mass [Age of crowds. Historical treatise on the psychology of the masses]. Moscov: Center for Psychology and Psychotherapy. (In Russian).
- Naysbitt, Dzh. (2000). Megatrendy na perspektivu do 2000 goda. Vperedi KHKHН vek: perspektivy, prognozy, futurologi [Megatrends for the prospect until the year 2000. Ahead of the XXI century: prospects, forecasts, futurologists]. Moscow: Academia. (In Russian).
- Palasios–Uerta, I. (2017). In 100 Years: Leading Economists Predict the Future. Moscow: Gaidar Institute. (In Russian).
- Pocheptsov, G. (2020). Koronavirus. Kak menyayetsya nashe soznaniye i budushcheye [Coronavirus: how our consciousness and future are changing] (256 p.). Kharkiv: Folio. (In Russian).
- Schwab, K. (2017). Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya [The fourth industrial revolution]. Moscow: Publishing house “E”. (In Russian).
- Skokova, L. (2020). Systemic risks in an unstable society: social and cultural–informational dimensions. Visnyk of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 7(21), 400–406. (In Ukrainian).
- State Statistics Service of Ukraine (n.d.). Official website.
- Toffler, E. (1999). Tretya volna [Third wave]. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).
- Toffler, E. (2003). Shok budushchego [Shock of the future]. Moscow: AST. (In Russian).
- Tulenkov, M. (2019). Atomizatsiia sotsialna [Social atomization]. Velyka ukrainska entsyklopediia – Great Ukrainian encyclopedia. (In Ukrainian).
- Turen, A. (2004). Sotsiologiya bez obshchestva [Sociology without society]. Sociological studies, 7, 6–11. (In Russian).
- Virno, P. (2013) Grammatika mnozhestva. K analizu form sovremennoy zhizni [Grammar of the set. To the analysis of the forms of modern life]. Moscow: AD Marginem Press. (In Russian).
- Vorona, V., & Shuljgha, M. (2019). Ukrainske suspilstvo: monitorynh sotsialnykh zmin (Vypusk 7 (21)) [Ukrainian society: monitoring of social change (Issue 7 (21)] (547 p.). Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
- Zakariia, F. (2021). 10 urokiv dlia svitu pislia pandemii [10 lessons for the world after the pandemic] (264 p.). Kyiv: Nash format. (In Ukrainian).