Investigating the role of individualism/collectivism as underlying motives and status consumption as a behavioral outcome of LOHAS: Focusing on the moderating effect of materialism

  • Received June 23, 2023;
    Accepted March 7, 2024;
    Published April 2, 2024
  • Author(s)
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.20(2).2024.02
  • Article Info
    Volume 20 2024, Issue #2, pp. 15-28
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    1 articles
  • 335 Views
  • 79 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

During the recovery from a global pandemic, people around the world remain committed to adopting healthier and more sustainable lifestyles. LOHAS stands for lifestyle of health and sustainability. LOHAS, as a premium lifestyle, is well incorporated into the capitalistic market through exclusive consumption choices. This study uses the means-end-theory of lifestyle to focus on individualism and collectivism as underlying values of LOHAS and status consumption as its behavioral outcome and explores the moderating effect of materialism. To determine the internal motives and behaviors of the targeted population with a LOHAS lifestyle, 204 survey data from general U.S. consumers between the ages of 18 and 65 were collected. The data were analyzed by PLS-3.0. The results indicate the hybrid attribute of the LOHAS lifestyle such that both individualism and collectivism are positively related to LOHAS. This indicates that LOHAS consumers take a holistic approach to their lives by promoting harmony across different life aspects and recognizing an interconnectedness between personal health and well-being and environmental sustainability. LOHAS is positively associated with status consumption, indicating its upscale consumption selections. Finally, materialism positively moderates the relationship between LOHAS and status consumption.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Research model
    • Table 1. Descriptive analysis of participants
    • Table 2. Measurement model assessment
    • Table 3. Assessment of discriminant validity. Heterotrait-monotrait ratio (HTMT)
    • Table 4. Structural model evaluation
    • Table A1. Measures
    • Conceptualization
      Sooyeon Choi
    • Data curation
      Sooyeon Choi
    • Formal Analysis
      Sooyeon Choi
    • Funding acquisition
      Sooyeon Choi
    • Investigation
      Sooyeon Choi
    • Project administration
      Sooyeon Choi, Richard Feinberg
    • Software
      Sooyeon Choi
    • Writing – original draft
      Sooyeon Choi
    • Writing – review & editing
      Sooyeon Choi, Richard Feinberg
    • Resources
      Richard Feinberg
    • Supervision
      Richard Feinberg