The determinants of business performance among small and medium enterprise owners: Evidence from Indonesia
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.24(2).2026.18
-
Article InfoVolume 24 2026, Issue #2, pp. 258-270
- 78 Views
-
10 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play a pivotal role in driving economic growth, employment generation, and regional competitiveness in emerging economies such as Indonesia. Yet, they face increasing pressure to enhance innovation and performance amid dynamic market and sustainability demands. This study investigates the impact of supply chain management, corporate social responsibility, and intellectual capital on performance mediated by innovation. Data were collected through an online survey conducted in 2025 involving 453 SME owners across Indonesia and analyzed using a quantitative approach with structural equation modeling (SEM) through Smart PLS 4.0. The results demonstrate that supply chain management (t-statistic = 8.83, p = 0.004), corporate social responsibility (t-statistic = 5.15, p = 0.000), and intellectual capital (t-statistic = 5.64, p = 0.000) exert significant positive effects on innovation. Furthermore, SME performance is strongly influenced by supply chain management (t-statistic = 9.04, p = 0.000), directly affecting innovation. However, corporate social responsibility (t-statistic = 8.83, p = 0.004) and intellectual capital (t-statistic = 1.80, p = 0.070) do not affect innovation. Additionally, innovation partially mediates the relationship between supply chain management (t-statistic = 2.14, p = 0.030), corporate social responsibility (t-statistic = 2.14, p = 0.030), and intellectual capital (t-statistic = 2.36, p = 0.010) to performance. These findings highlight innovation as a critical transformational mechanism that converts strategic and intangible organizational resources into measurable performance gains within the SME context.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L26, O31, M11, M14
-
References74
-
Tables3
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
-
- Table 1. Convergent validity
- Table 2. Model fit
- Table 3. Hypothesis test results
-
- Abasido, A., Olaoye, I., & Salisu, S. (2023). Innovation as a mediator on the relationship between competitor orientation and SME’s performance. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education Technology & Social Strategies, 10(2), 35-49.
- Allameh, S. M. (2018). Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capitals: The role of social capitals, knowledge sharing, and innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capitals, 19(5), 858-874.
- Andreeva, T., Garanina, T., Sáenz, J., Aramburu, N., & Kianto, A. (2021). Does the country’s environment matter in the relationship between intellectual capitals and innovation performance? Journal of Business Research, 136, 263-273.
- Aprilia, N., Subroto, W. T., & Sakti, N. S. (2025). The role of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in supporting the people’s economy in Indonesia. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 11(12), 368-376.
- Arslan, M., Ince, H., & İmamoğlu, S. (2024). Effects of standardized innovation management systems on innovation ambidexterity and innovation performance. Sustainability, 17(1), Article 116.
- Assumpção, J. J., Campos, L. M. S., Plaza-Úbeda, J. A., Sehnem, S., & Vazquez-Brust, D. A. (2022). Green supply chain management and business innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 367.
- Aylak, B. (2022). Impacts of sustainability on supply chain management. European Journal of Science and Technology, 34, 105-109.
- Babajide, A., Osabuohien, E., Tunji-Olayeni, P., Falola, H., Amodu, L., Olokoyo, F., Adegboye, F., & Ehikioya, B. (2021). Financial literacy, financial capabilities, and sustainable business model practice among small business owners in Nigeria. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 13(4), 1670-1692.
- Bai, M., & Astvansh, V. (2024). How and why does a business-to-business firm’s corporate social responsibility disclosure impact its dependence on its major customers and major suppliers? Production and Operations Management, 34(1), 60-78.
- Bartolacci, F., Caputo, A., & Soverchia, M. (2020). Sustainability and financial performance of small and medium-sized enterprises: A bibliometric and systematic literature review. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1297-1309.
- Berndt, A., Gomes, G., & Borini, F. (2023). Exploring the antecedents of frugal innovation and operational performance: The role of organizational learning capability and entrepreneurial orientation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(5), 1704-1722.
- Bocquet, R., Le Bas, C., Mothe, C., & Poussing, N. (2013). Are firms with different CSR profiles equally innovative? Empirical analysis with survey data. European Management Journal, 31(6), 642-654.
- Bourlakis, M., Maglaras, G., & Fotopoulos, C. (2012). Creating a “best value supply chain”? Empirical evidence from the Greek food chain. International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(3), 360-382.
- Burritt, R., & Christ, K. (2023). Modern slavery and the global reporting initiative – A bridge too far? Business Strategy & Development, 6(3), 296-309.
- Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: Internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68-82.
- Cennamo, C., Berrone, P., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R. (2009). Does stakeholder management have a dark side? Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 491-507.
- Chen, J., Wang, X., & Liu, J. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and capacity sharing in a duopoly model. Applied Economics Letters, 28(6), 512-517.
- Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (2025). Pemerintah dorong UMKM naik kelas, tingkatkan kontribusi terhadap ekspor Indonesia [The government encourages MSMEs to move up the ladder to increase their contribution to Indonesia’s exports]. (In Indonesian).
- Córdova-Aguirre, L. J., & Ramón-Jerónimo, J. M. (2024). Designing a sustainability assessment framework for Peruvian manufacturing small and medium enterprises applying the stakeholder theory approach. Sustainability, 16(5), Article 1853.
- Du Plessis, M. (2007). The role of knowledge management in innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(4), 20-29.
- Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing intellectual capitals at Skandia. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 366-373.
- Effendi, M., Suryana, S., Ahman, E., Sobandi, S., & Eka, A. (2024). Intellectual capital and innovation through market orientation in the Indonesian film industry. Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, 8(2), 497-507.
- Elfawal, A., Ragheb, M., & Adel, R. (2021). Supply chain management practices, innovation capabilities and operational performance: an empirical evidence from the FMCG sector. The Business & Management Review, 12(1), 70-81.
- Fatema, F., & Islam, M. (2021). Do innovations improve firm performance in the Indian manufacturing sector? A mediation and synergy effect analysis. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(9), 2620-2642.
- Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Gallego-Álvarez, I., Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and innovation: A capital-based theory. Management Decision, 49(10), 1709-1727.
- Gao, S., Li, W., Meng, J., Shi, J., & Zhu, J. (2023). A study on the impact mechanism of digitalization on corporate green innovation. Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6407.
- Hair Jr, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of multivariate data analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
- Gunawan, R., Siagian, H., Tarigan, Z., & Jie, F. (2024). The role of supplier-buyer relationship in enhancing business performance through supply chain management practice, total quality management implementation and product innovation. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(4), 2463-2478.
- Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.
- Helmi, W., & Widiastuty, E. (2023). Effect of green innovation and green process innovation on firm performance. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Aksioma, 22(1), 55-69.
- Hossain, T., Momin, M., & Dellaportas, S. (2023). Do stakeholders’ interaction and collaboration influence CSR practice within supplier premises in Bangladesh? A managerial perception study. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(8), 1490-1506.
- Hsu, L. C., & Wang, C.-H. (2012). Clarifying the effect of intellectual capitals on performance: The mediating role of dynamic capability. British Journal of Management, 23(2), 179-205.
- Hu, Y., Liu, M., & Li, H. (2024). The catalyst of change in small and micro enterprises: How intellectual capital uses dynamic capabilities to foster innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 25(4), 641-663.
- Ibrahim, M., Ribeiro, M., & Kimbu, A. (2024). Redirecting slack capitals to social and environmental issues: A cross-cultural analysis of tourism firms post-crisis. Journal of Travel Research, 64(7), 1639-1661.
- IESR. (2025). Green SMEs as the backbone of economic transformation.
- Islam, M. (2022). Innovations and service firms’ performance: A firm-level mediating and moderating effects analysis for India. International Journal of Innovation Science, 15(3), 385-405.
- Jamai, K., Steur, H., Abidar, A., & Gellynck, X. (2021). Impact of innovation type on financial and non-financial performance of SMES. A scoping review. Journal of Innovation Management, 9(3), 27-57.
- Karaca, G., & Marşap, A. (2021). Entelektüel sermaye ve yeni̇li̇kçi̇li̇ği̇n i̇şletme performansina etki̇si̇ [The impact of intellectual capital and innovation on business performance]. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi – Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 39, 457-491. (In Turkish).
- Kumera, D., Amentie, C., & Bali, N. (2024). Effect of technological innovation on firm’s performance: Mediating effect of competitive advantage: A study on manufacturing firms operating in Ethiopian industrial parks. Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(3).
- Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in supply chain management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65-83.
- Liao, S.-h., Fei, W. C., & Liu, C. T. (2008). Relationships between knowledge inertia, organizational learning, and organization innovation. Technovation, 28(4), 183-195.
- Linda, M., & Fauzi, A. (2021). Manajemen rantai pasokan dan implementasi sistem enterprise resources planning terhadap kinerja organisasi [Supply chain management and implementation of enterprise capitals planning systems on organizational performance]. Jurnal Kajian Manajemen dan Wirausaha – Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship Studies, 3(1), 18. (In Indonesian).
- Ling, Y. H. (2011). The influence of intellectual capitals on organizational performance – Knowledge management as moderator. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30(3), 937-964.
- Liu, X., Li, S., Wang, X., & Zhang, C. (2024). Leveraging supplier orientation for innovation: Exploring the impact of supply management innovativeness and innovation partnership. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(6), 3690-3704.
- Maaz, M., Ahmad, R., & Abad, A. (2021). Antecedents and consequences of green supply chain management practices: A study of Indian food processing industry. Benchmarking an International Journal, 29(7), 2045-2073.
- Martinez-Conesa, I., Soto-Acosta, P., & Palacios-Manzano, M. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: An empirical research in SMEs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 2374-2383.
- McLaren, E., Salampasis, D., Busulwa, R., Baldegger, R., & Wild, P. (2024). Key stakeholders and their roles in modern slavery monitoring, detection and disclosure: A systematic literature review. Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, 15(6), 1310-1337.
- Miswanto, M., Tarigan, S. T., Wardhani, S., Khuan, H., Rahmadyanti, E., Jumintono, J., Ranatarisza, M. M., & Machmud, M. (2024). Investigating the influence of financial literacy and supply chain management on financial performance and sustainability of SMEs. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 12(1), 407-416.
- Munir, A., & Wang, H. (2021). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in green supply chain management. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Sustainable Management and Innovation.
- Nikookar, E., & Yanadori, Y. (2021). Preparing supply chain for the next disruption beyond COVID-19: Managerial antecedents of supply chain resilience. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(1), 59-90.
- OECD. (2018). SME and entrepreneurship policy in Indonesia 2018. OECD Publishing.
- Purwoko, P., & Fikri, M. (2024). Innovation leadership in supply chain efficiency: The role of process improvement and information technology. Journal Corner of Education Linguistics and Literature, 4(001), 234-246.
- Pusung, C. S., Narsa, N. P. D. R. H., & Wardhaningrum, O. A. (2023). Innovation, competitive strategy and MSME performance: A survey study on culinary SMEs in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Business: Theory and Practice, 24(1), 160-172.
- Reddy, M., & Reddy, P. (2021). Supply chain management and organizational performance: An empirical investigation with special to e-commerce organizations in India. International Journal of Management and Humanities, 5(6), 17-21.
- Rideg, A., Szerb, L., & Róza Varga, A. (2023). The role of intellectual capital on innovation: Evidence from Hungarian SMEs. TEC Empresarial, 17(2), 1-19.
- Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Secundo, G., Ndou, V., Vecchio, P. D., & De Pascale, G. (2020). Sustainable development, intellectual capitals, and technology policies: A structured literature review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, Article 119917.
- Sharma, S., & Vredenburg, H. (1998). Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 19(8), 729-753.
- Thakur, P., Saxena, C., & Arora, R. (2022). Exploring the link between innovativeness and organizational performance. NMIMS Management Review, 30(01), 68-89.
- Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, innovation and firm performance in high- and low-technology regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 687-703.
- Triatmanto, B., Bawono, S., & Wahyuni, N. (2023). The contribution and influence of total external debt, FDI, and HCI on economic growth in Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, and Philippines. Research in Globalization, 7(1).
- Ur Rehman, S., Elrehail, H., Alsaad, A., & Bhatti, A. (2021). Intellectual capitals and innovative performance: A mediation-moderation perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(5), 998-1024.
- Vaccaro, A., Parente, R., & Veloso, F. M. (2010). Knowledge management tools, inter-organizational relationships, innovation and firm performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(7), 1076-1089.
- Waheed, A., & Zhang, Q. (2022). Effect of CSR and ethical practices on sustainable competitive performance: A case of emerging markets from stakeholder theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 175(4), 837-855.
- Wang, Y., & Wang, B. (2024). Can capital dependency and corporate social responsibility drive green innovation performance? Sustainability, 16(11), Article 4848.
- Wang, Z., Cai, S., Liang, H., Wang, N., & Xiang, E. (2021). Intellectual capitals and firm performance: The mediating role of innovation speed and quality. International Journal of Human Capital Management, 32(6), 1222-1250.
- Wang, Z., Wang, N., Cao, J., & Ye, X. (2016). The impact of intellectual capitals – Knowledge management strategy fit on firm performance. Management Decision, 54(8), 1861-1885.
- Wu, W., Shi, J., & Liu, Y. (2024). The impact of corporate social responsibility in technological innovation on sustainable competitive performance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1).
- Xu, J., Yu, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., Cao, Y., & Eachempati, P. (2022). Green supply chain management for operational performance: Anteceding impact of corporate social responsibility and moderating effects of relational capital. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(6), 1613-1638.
- Yadewani, D., Wijaya, R., Mursalini, W., & Almasdi, A. (2023). The effect of skills and experience on the performance of small and medium enterprises with innovation as mediation variable. Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 9(1).
- Zhu, C., Du, J., Shahzad, F., & Wattoo, M. (2022). Environment sustainability is a corporate social responsibility: Measuring the nexus between sustainable supply chain management, big data analytics capabilities, and organizational performance. Sustainability, 14(6), Article 3379.
- Zimon, D., Tyan, J., & Sroufe, R. (2019). Implementing sustainable supply chain management: Reactive, cooperative, and dynamic models. Sustainability, 11(24), Article 7227.


