Measuring the antecedents of employees’ intention to use artificial intelligence in the manufacturing sector

  • 53 Views
  • 15 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

This study examines the key factors influencing managerial employees’ intention to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) in the manufacturing sector of Saudi Arabia. The paper assesses the impact of business innovation, entrepreneurial orientation, and technology orientation on AI adoption intention while also exploring the moderating role of leadership in these relationships. The study surveyed 314 managerial employees from 18 manufacturing companies in Saudi Arabia, representing sectors such as industrial equipment, consumer goods, and automotive production. Managerial-level participants were chosen for their direct involvement in AI adoption decisions. A cross-sectional design was used with an online survey, and convenience sampling was applied for its efficiency in gathering relevant insights from key decision-makers. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS version 4.0. The findings indicate that business innovation (β = 0.351, p = 0.001), entrepreneurial orientation (β = 0.264, p = 0.00), and technology orientation (β = 0.435, p = 0.023) significantly enhance the intention to adopt AI. Furthermore, leadership was found to moderate these relationships positively, strengthening the effects of business innovation (β = 0.212, p = 0.00), entrepreneurial orientation (β = 0.371, p = 0.004), and technology orientation (β = 0.251, p = 0.031) on AI adoption. These results underscore the importance of fostering a culture of innovation and entrepreneurship, enhancing technological readiness, and developing effective leadership strategies to promote AI integration in the manufacturing sector.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Research model”
    • Figure 2. Assessment of the structural model
    • Table 1. Demographic profile of participants
    • Table 2. Measurement model
    • Table 3. Discriminant validity (Fornell-Larcker criterion)
    • Table 4. Path coefficients
    • Table A1. Questionnaire
    • Conceptualization
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Data curation
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Formal Analysis
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Funding acquisition
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Investigation
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Methodology
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Project administration
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Resources
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Software
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Validation
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Visualization
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Writing – original draft
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi
    • Writing – review & editing
      Abdulaziz Alhammadi