Driving sustainability entrepreneurship in Indonesian batik MSMEs: The role of sustainability orientation and government support
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.41
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #1, pp. 544-556
- 71 Views
-
14 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
As a traditional Indonesian craft, batik holds immense cultural significance and economic potential. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a significant decline in the growth of batik micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in Indonesia. This study aims to investigate the role of sustainable orientation and government support in encouraging sustainable entrepreneurship within this sector. The data were obtained using purposive sampling of 32 MSMEs and 89 respondents, including owners, managers, and senior employees. Data analysis was done using the Structural Equation Modeling – Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) method. The results reveal that economic factors have the greatest influence on the development of sustainable entrepreneurial businesses. While social and environmental considerations also play a role, they are secondary to economic issues. In addition, the study reveals that a strong sustainability orientation, characterized by a balanced emphasis on economic, social, and environmental dimensions, as well as supportive government policies, significantly encourages sustainable entrepreneurship. This orientation motivates businesses to adopt long-term perspectives, prioritize sustainable resource use, and consider the social impact of their operations. It also highlights practical strategies for policymakers and entrepreneurs to integrate sustainability into traditional industries. Therefore, this study contributes to the ongoing discourse on sustainable entrepreneurship, which offers insights into harnessing cultural heritage for economic advantage globally post-pandemic.
Acknowledgment
The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support provided by the Directorate of Research, Technology, and Community Service under the auspices of the Directorate General of Higher Education, Research, and Technology, Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of the Republic of Indonesia. This article was funded through the Higher Education Excellence Applied Research Program under contract number 009/SP2H/PT-L/LL7/2023.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L26, Q01, M14
-
References39
-
Tables5
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Construct validity and reliability test results
- Table 2. Construct validity and reliability test results (Re-examination)
- Table 3. Construct validity and reliability test results for second-order constructs
- Table 4. R-squared values for endogenous variables
- Table 5. Path coefficient, t-statistics, and p-values
-
- Adomako, S., Ning, E., & Adu-Ameyaw, E. (2021). Proactive environmental strategy and firm performance at the bottom of the pyramid. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(1), 422-431.
- Ahmad, N. H., Rahman, S. A., Rajendran, N. L. K. A., & Halim, H. A. (2020). Sustainable entrepreneurship practices in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs: The role of individual, organisational and institutional factors. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 16(2), 153-171.
- Alkaraan, F., Elmarzouky, M., Hussainey, K., Venkatesh, V. G., Shi, Y., & Gulko, N. (2024). Reinforcing green business strategies with Industry 4.0 and governance towards sustainability: Natural-resource-based view and dynamic capability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33(4), 3588-3606.
- Alsharif, H. Z. H., Shu, T., Obrenovic, B., Godinic, D., Alhujailli, A., & Abdullaev, A. M. (2021). Impact of entrepreneurial leadership and bricolage on job security and sustainable economic performance: An empirical study of Croatian companies during COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(21), Article 11958.
- Anderson, B. S., Kreiser, P. M., Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Eshima, Y. (2015). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(10), 1579-1596.
- Belz, F. M., & Binder, J. K. (2017). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A convergent process model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(1), 1-17.
- Bonfanti, A., Battisti, E., & Pasqualino, L. (2016). Social entrepreneurship and corporate architecture: Evidence from Italy. Management Decision, 54(2), 390-417.
- Chaudhary, P., Gupta, B., & Singh, A. K. (2022). Implementing attack detection system using filter-based feature selection methods for fog-enabled IoT networks. Telecommunication Systems, 81(1), 23-39.
- Ghozali, I. (2014). Structural equation modeling: Metode alternatif dengan partial least square (PLS) [Structural equation modeling: Alternative methods with partial least square (PLS)] (4th ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. (In Indonesian).
- Gundry, L. K., Kickul, J. R., Griffiths, M. D., & Bacq, S. C. (2011). Creating social change out of nothing: The role of entrepreneurial bricolage in social entrepreneurs’ catalytic innovations. In G.T. Lumpkin & J.A. Katz (Eds.), Social and Sustainable Entrepreneurship (Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth (vol. 13, pp. 1-24). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
- Hanan, A., Shahira, A., & Ali, M. (2021). Drivers of sustainable entrepreneurship among SMEs in Pakistan: Does entrepreneurial knowledge matter? Indonesian Journal of Innovation and Applied Sciences (IJIAS), 1(2), 161-176.
- Hooi, H. C., Ahmad, N. H., Amran, A., & Rahman, S. A. (2016). The functional role of entrepreneurial orientation and entrepreneurial bricolage in ensuring sustainable entrepreneurship. Management Research Review, 39(12), 1616-1638.
- House, R. A., Layton, R., Livingston, J., & Moseley, S. (2014). Engineering ethos in environmental public policy deliberation. 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC) (pp. 1-7). Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
- Imran, A., & Iqbal, J. (2024). The impact of entrepreneurial bricolage on sustainable entrepreneurship: Exploring the role of frugal innovation. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 12(1), 508-516.
- International Labour Organization. (2020). The clock is ticking for survival of Indonesian enterprises, jobs at risk: key findings of the ILO SCORE Indonesia COVID-19 enterprise survey. ILO.
- Karsana, Y. W., Anggraini, F. R. R., & Siswanto, F. A. J. (2022). Corporate social responsibility motives in batik enterprises during the COVID-19 pandemic: An exploratory study. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 23(3), 478-501.
- Koutsopoulos, K. C. (2021). Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Towards a new paradigm. European Journal of Business and Management, 13(13), 22-32.
- Laosirihongthong, T., Adebanjo, D., & Choon Tan, K. (2013). Green supply chain management practices and performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 113(8), 1088-1109.
- Mali, M., Latha, K. M., Sidar, S., Rudraboyina, S. K., Jaiswal, N., Akanand, & Chandrakar, G. (2023). Review of conservation agriculture practices for sustainable farming. The Pharma Innovation, 12(10S), 1518-1523.
- Mortimer, A., Ahmed, I., Johnson, T., Tang, L., & Alston, M. (2023). Localizing sustainable development goal 13 on climate action to build local resilience to floods in the Hunter Valley: A literature review. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 5565.
- Mueller, J. T., Taff, B. D., Wimpey, J., & Graefe, A. (2018). Small-scale race events in natural areas: Participants’ attitudes, beliefs, and global perceptions of leave no trace ethics. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 23, 8-15.
- Munawir, H., Kausar, M., Pratiwi, I., & Alghofari, A. K. (2024). Managing and mitigation of risk at batik laweyan during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Technology, 15(3), 561-570.
- Musa, R., Mohamad, M., Omar, N. S. Z., & Cob, C. M. S. (2022). A study of entrepreneurial strategy and nascent venture performance in Malaysia: Emphasizing the entrepreneurial bricolage and entrepreneurial orientation. Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship, 7(23), 84-97.
- Nag, M. B. (2021). Social entrepreneurship in an era of disruption: Converging social change and sustainability through big data analysis in a post-COVID world. In Entrepreneurship and Big Data (pp. 39-54). CRC Press.
- Nave, A., & Franco, M. (2019). University-firm cooperation as a way to promote sustainability practices: A sustainable entrepreneurship perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 230, 1188-1196.
- Nguyen, P. V, Huynh, H. T. N., Lam, L. N. H., Le, T. B., & Nguyen, N. H. X. (2021). The impact of entrepreneurial leadership on SMEs’ performance: The mediating effects of organizational factors. Heliyon, 7(6), Article e07326.
- Nor-Aishah, H., Ahmad, N. H., & Thurasamy, R. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership and sustainable performance of manufacturing SMEs in Malaysia: The contingent role of entrepreneurial bricolage. Sustainability, 12(8), Article 3100.
- Nuseir, M. T., & Aljumah, A. (2022). The impact of entrepreneur orientation on sustainable entrepreneurship among SMEs in the UAE: Mediating effects of the sustainability orientation and bricolage behaviours of entrepreneurs. International Journal of Trade and Global Markets, 16(1-3), 250-264.
- Nwosu, L. I., Enwereji, P. C., & Obokoh, L. (2024). Small, medium, and micro-sized enterprises strategies for dealing with contemporary management issues in post-COVID: A conceptual framework. European Journal of Management Issues, 32(2), 100-114.
- Palacios Temprano, J., Eichholtz, P., Willeboordse, M., & Kok, N. (2020). Indoor environmental quality and learning outcomes: Protocol on large-scale sensor deployment in schools. BMJ Open, 10(3), Article e031233.
- Rao, P., Verma, S., Rao, A. A., & Joshi, R. (2023). A conceptual framework for identifying sustainable business practices of small and medium enterprises. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(6), 1806-1831.
- Rosário, A., Raimundo, R., & Cruz, S. (2022). Sustainable entrepreneurship: A literature review. Sustainability, 14(9), Article 5556.
- Roxas, B., & Coetzer, A. (2012). Institutional environment, managerial attitudes and environmental sustainability orientation of small firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 461-476.
- Sarpong, K. O., & Oppong, M. (2023). Contemporary approach to reverse logistics and environmental sustainability the moderating role of government support. International Journal of Supply Chain and Logistics, 7(2), 56-74.
- Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2016). Business models for sustainability: A co-evolutionary analysis of sustainable entrepreneurship, innovation, and transformation. Organization & Environment, 29(3), 264-289.
- Sekhar, M., Rastogi, M., Rajesh, C. M., Saikanth, D. R. K., Rout, S., Kumar, S., & Patel, A. K. (2024). Exploring traditional agricultural techniques integrated with modern farming for a sustainable future: A review. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 30(3), 185-198.
- Sisaye, S. (2011). The functional-institutional and consequential-conflictual sociological approaches to accounting ethics education. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(3), 263-294.
- Soto-Acosta, P., Cismaru, D.-M., Vătămănescu, E.-M., & Ciochină, R. (2016). Sustainable entrepreneurship in SMEs: A business performance perspective. Sustainability, 8(4), Article 342.
- Yusriadi, Y. (2023). Food security and sustainable development: Overcoming poverty through sustainable agriculture. Journal of Indonesian Scholars for Social Research, 4(1), 12-18.