The relationship between social entrepreneurship orientation, business planning, and competitive advantage on cooperative performance: Moderation of the socio-economic context
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.47
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 623-634
- 61 Views
-
5 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study delves into the determinants influencing the efficacy of social enterprises, specifically cooperatives. This study aims to examine the interaction between social entrepreneurial orientation (SEO), strategic planning, and competitive advantage in shaping cooperative performance, accounting for the moderating influence of the socio-economic context. A population of cooperatives in Indargiri Hilir and Bengkalis regencies, Riau Province, Indonesia, served as the study’s focus. A sampling strategy was employed to distribute 500 questionnaires to cooperative managers. Of these, 298 were returned and analyzed using partial least squares (PLS). The findings corroborate a positive association between SEO and financial performance with a p-value of 0.000. Likewise, SEO affects competitive advantage and company planning (p-value 0.000). The exploration indicates no mediating role for business strategy in the relationship between financial performance and SEO, with a p-value of 0.136. However, strategic planning acted as a mediator in the relationship between SEO and social performance (p-value 0.011). Moreover, the findings show that SEO has a favorable influence on social performance through competitive advantage with a p-value of 0.000. Thus, the moderating role of socio-economic context on the relationship between SEO and financial performance can be proven with a p-value of 0.000, as well as on the relationship between business planning and financial performance with a p-value of 0.016. These empirical findings can inform policymakers’ strategic development of inclusive and sustainable policies that foster growth and resilience of cooperatives.
Acknowledgment
Authors are grateful to LPPM Riau University for providing research grants with contract number 993/UN19.5.1.3/AL.04/2024.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M13, M21, M14, O15, O18
-
References38
-
Tables7
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. SEM equation model
-
- Table 1. Characteristics of respondents
- Table 2. Operational definition of research variables
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Cross loading
- Table 5. Discriminant validity testing with Fornel and Larcker criteria
- Table 6. Reliability with Cronbach’s alpha
- Table 7. Hypotheses testing results – Direct and indirect effects
-
- Annarelli, A., Battistella, C., & Nonino, F. (2020). Competitive advantage implication of different product service system business models: Consequences of ‘not-replicable’capabilities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, Article 119121.
- Azeem, M., Ahmed, M., Haider, S., & Sajjad, M. (2021). Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation. Technology in Society, 66, Article 101635.
- Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
- Barney, J. B., Ketchen Jr, D. J., & Wright, M. (2021). Resource-based theory and the value creation framework. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1936-1955.
- Basri, Y. M., Taufik, T., & Yasni, H. (2023). Enhancing social enterprise performance: The role of social entrepreneurship orientation and business planning. Tec Empresarial, 18(2), 568-585.
- Basri, Y. M., Yasni, H., Nurmayanti, P., & Indrawati, N. (2023). Accountability in social enterprises: The role of institutional pressure and social performance. International Journal of Business Excellence, 31(1), 155-175.
- Bentler, P. M., & Chou, S.-P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16(1), 78-117.
- Bhandari, K. R., Ranta, M., & Salo, J. (2022). The resource-based view, stakeholder capitalism, ESG, and sustainable competitive advantage: The firm’s embeddedness into ecology, society, and governance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(4), 1525-1537.
- Boomsma, A. (1985). Nonconvergence, improper solutions, and starting values in LISREL maximum likelihood estimation. Psychometrika, 50, 229-242.
- Cheah, J., Amran, A., & Yahya, S. (2019a). External oriented resources and social enterprises’ performance: The dominant mediating role of formal business planning. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, Article 117693.
- Cheah, J., Amran, A., & Yahya, S. (2019b). Internal oriented resources and social enterprises’ performance: How can social enterprises help themselves before helping others? Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 607-619.
- Chou, S.-F., Horng, J.-S., Liu, C.-H. S., & Lin, J.-Y. (2020). Identifying the critical factors of customer behavior: An integration perspective of marketing strategy and components of attitudes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, Article 102113.
- Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2008). Social enterprise in Europe: Recent trends and developments. Social Enterprise Journal, 4(3), 202-228.
- Gali, N., Niemand, T., Shaw, E., Hughes, M., Kraus, S., & Brem, A. (2020). Social entrepreneurship orientation and company success: The mediating role of social performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160.
- Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), Article 100027.
- Hertel, C., Bacq, S., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2020). Social performance and social impact in the context of social enterprises – A holistic perspective. In A. Vaccaro & T. Ramus (Eds.), Social Innovation and Social Enterprises: Toward a Holistic Perspective. Berlin: Springer.
- Islam, T., Islam, R., Pitafi, A. H., Xiaobei, L., Rehmani, M., Irfan, M., & Mubarak, M. S. (2021). The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25, 123-135.
- Lückenbach, F., Schmidt, H. J., & Henseler, J. (2023). Building brand meaning in social entrepreneurship organizations: The social impact brand model. Journal of Brand Management, 30(3), 207-226.
- Manjon, M.-J., Merino, A., & Cairns, I. (2022). Business as not usual: A systematic literature review of social entrepreneurship, social innovation, and energy poverty to accelerate the just energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 90, Article 102624.
- Mansoori, Y., & Lackeus, M. (2020). Comparing effectuation to discovery-driven planning, prescriptive entrepreneurship, business planning, lean startup, and design thinking. Small Business Economics, 54, 791-818.
- Marion, T. J., & Fixson, S. K. (2021). The transformation of the innovation process: How digital tools are changing work, collaboration, and organizations in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(1), 192-215.
- Mohammad, W. M. W., & Wasiuzzaman, S. (2021). Environmental, Social and governance (ESG) disclosure, competitive advantage and performance of firms in Malaysia. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 2, Article 100015.
- Nunnally, J. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd vol.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Ouechtati, I. (2020). The contribution of financial inclusion in reducing poverty and income inequality in developing countries. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 10(9), 1051-1061.
- Ozdemir, S., & Gupta, S. (2021). Inter-organizational collaborations for social innovation and social value creation: Towards the development of new research agenda and theoretical perspectives. Industrial Marketing Management, 97, 134-144.
- Pinheiro, P. P., Daniel, A., & Moreira, A. (2021). Social enterprise performance: the role of market and social entrepreneurship orientations. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 32, 45-60.
- Power, M., Doherty, B., Pybus, K. J., & Pickett, K. E. (2023). How COVID-19 has exposed inequalities in the UK food system: The case of UK food and poverty. Emerald Open Research, 1(10).
- Satar, M. S., & Natasha, S. (2019). Individual social entrepreneurship orientation: Towards development of a measurement scale. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 49-72.
- Sholihin, M., & Ratmono, D. (2021). Analisis SEM-PLS dengan WarpPLS 7.0 untuk hubungan nonlinier dalam penelitian social dan bisnis [SEM-PLS analysis with WarpPLS 7.0 for nonlinear relationships in social and business research]. Jakarta: Andi Offset. (In Indonesian).
- Siregar, A. P. (2020). Cooperative performance in Indonesia. Vigor: Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Agricultural Sciences, 5(1), 31-38.
- Situma, C. M. K. (2021). Entrepreneurial orientation on performance of agricultural cooperatives in Uasin Gishu County, Kenya (Doctoral Thesis). Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology.
- Sofyani, H. (2023). Determining the number of samples in quantitative accounting and business research. Reviu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 7(2), 311-319.
- Sulphey, M. M., & Salim, A. (2020). Development of a tool to measure social entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(2), 231-253.
- Tanaka, M., Bloom, N., David, J. M., & Koga, M. (2020). Firm performance and macro forecast accuracy. Journal of Monetary Economics, 114, 26-41.
- Tykkyläinen, S., & Ritala, P. (2021). Business model innovation in social enterprises: An activity system perspective. Journal of Business Research, 125, 684-697.
- Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21-35.
- Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
- Zafar, Z., Wenyuan, L., Bait Ali Sulaiman, M. A., Siddiqui, K. A., & Qalati, S. A. (2022). Social entrepreneurship orientation and enterprise fortune: An intermediary role of social performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 6711.