Regional income inequality in Ukraine: The impact of Internet and mobile access on disposable income
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(4).2024.46
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #4, pp. 611-622
- 57 Views
-
29 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The effect of digitalization on inequality continues to spark discussions, with opinions divided on whether it alleviates or exacerbates the issue. This paper explores how digitalization has affected income inequality in Ukraine from 2017 to 2021. A pooled OLS model is used to investigate the relationship between mobile communication access and fixed Internet access and usage and their influence on disposable income levels. The findings reveal that mobile and Internet access significantly impact income distribution, with a notable disparity between high- and low-income regions. Specifically, wealthier regions benefit more from mobile access, while low-income regions lag due to insufficient broadband infrastructure. These results underscore the need for targeted management strategies to reduce regional income inequality via digitalization in Ukraine. The transition from desktop internet to mobile connectivity is clear, as 4G and 4G+ networks have enough speed to substitute fixed Internet and have become the primary means of internet access in Ukraine, reflecting a global trend. This highlights the increasing significance of mobile Internet, especially in lower-income regions, as a practical alternative to fixed broadband. Hence, mobile networks can boost economic participation and reduce regional disposable income inequality. The study suggests that targeted investments in digital infrastructure can significantly contribute to regional economic development.
Acknowledgment
This paper is funded as part of the project “Financial tools for reducing economic inequality in Ukraine” research project (No. 0124U002254), conducted at the State Organization “Institute for Economics and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.”
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I31, G59, H70, O33, O38
-
References43
-
Tables4
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Approach to the measure of the relationship between digital inequality and income distribution
- Figure 2. The dynamics of Internet and mobile access, disposable income indicators with breakdown by income groups countries, 2017–2021
-
- Table 1. Variable characteristics
- Table 2. General model characteristics
- Table 3. OLS results
- Table 4. Comparison between results for low- and high-income regions of Ukraine
-
- Aslan, A., Mold, F., Van Marwijk, H., & Armes, J. (2024). What are the determinants of older people adopting communicative e-health services: A meta-ethnography. BMC Health Services Research, 24(1), Article 60.
- Au, A. (2024). How do different forms of digitalization affect income inequality? Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 30(3), 667-687.
- Bruil, A. (2023). Distributional national accounts for the Netherlands and a comparison with 12 other countries. Review of Income and Wealth, 69(4), 886-906.
- Bulatova, O., Reznikova, N., & Ivashchenko, O. (2023). Tsyfrovyi rozryv chy tsyfrova nerivnist? Novi vymiry hlobalnykh asymetrii sotsialno-ekonomichnoho rozvytku i mizhnarodnoi torhivli v umovakh tekhnohlobalizmu [Digital divide or digital inequality? New dimensions of global asymmetries of socio-economic development and international trade in the conditions of technoglobalism]. Bulletin of Mariupol State University, Series: Economy, 25, 45-57. (In Ukrainian).
- Canh, N. P., Schinckus, C., Thanh, S. D., & Ling, F. C. H. (2020). Effects of the Internet, mobile, and land phones on income inequality and The Kuznets curve: Cross country analysis. Telecommunications Policy, 44(10), Article 102041.
- Castells, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture (3rd vol.). Oxford: Blackwell.
- Choudrie, J., Brinkman, W. P., & Pathania, R. (2006). Diffusion theory and the digital divide in e-services: An empirical investigation of two local areas in the UK. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2006. Göteborg, Sweden.
- DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: Studying Internet use as penetration increases (Working Paper Series No. 15). Princeton University, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies.
- Dovzhuk, І. (2022). Tsyfrova nerivnist v informatsiinomu suspilstvi [Digital inequality in the information society]. Society. Document. Communication, 14, 233-252. (In Ukrainian).
- Eller, R., Alford, P., Kallmünzer, A., & Peters, M. (2020). Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of small and medium-sized enterprise digitalization. Journal of Business Research, 112, 119-127.
- Eurostat. (n.d.). Glossary: Digital divide.
- Feng, S., Chong, Y., Li, G., & Zhang, S. (2022). Digital finance and innovation inequality: Evidence from green technological innovation in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(58), 87884-87900.
- Fräßdorf, A., Schwarze, J., & Grabka, M. M. (2011). The impact of household capital income on income inequality – A factor decomposition analysis for the UK, Germany and the USA. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 35-56.
- Gelles-Watnick, R. (2024, January 31). Americans’ use of mobile technology and home broadband. Pew Research Center.
- Hamelink, G. J. (1979). Informatics: Third World call for new order. Journal of Communication, 29(3), 144-148.
- Hao, Y., & Zhang, B. (2024). The impact of digital financial usage on resident’s income inequality in China: An empirical analysis based on CHFS data. Journal of Asian Economics, 91, Article 101706.
- Heeks, R. (2022). Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: Conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the global South. Information Technology for Development, 28(4), 688-704.
- Houngbonon, G. V., & Liang, J. (2017). Broadband Internet and income inequality (Paper hal–01653815).
- Hu, S., Chen, M., Liu, X., & Wang, H. (2024). Winner–takes–all or inclusive growth? The impact of digitalization on inter-firm wage inequality: Evidence from China. Applied Economics.
- Imran, A. (2023). Why addressing digital inequality should be a priority. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 89(3), Article e12255.
- Keshav, S. (2005). Why cell phones will dominate the future Internet. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, 35(2), 83-86.
- Kouladoum, J. C. (2023). Digital infrastructural development and inclusive growth in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 25(2), 403-427.
- Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine. (2024, November 1). Uriad ukhvalyv postanovu dlia zapusku pilotnoho proiektu 5G: Ukraina pochynaie testuvaty novi standarty zviazku [The government has approved a resolution to launch a pilot project for 5G: Ukraine begins testing new communication standards]. (In Ukrainian).
- Myskevych, Т. (2019). Tsyfrova nerivnist u suchasnomu suspilstvi: ukrainskyi vymir svitovykh tendentsii [Dіgital inequality in modern society: Ukrainian dimension of global trends]. Ukrainian Journal on Library and Information Science, (3), 87-107.
- Ragnedda, M., & Ruiu, M. L. (2017). Social capital and the three levels of digital divide. In M. Ragnedda & G. Muschert (Eds.), Theorizing Digital Divides (pp. 21-34). Routledge.
- Rainie, L. (2010, January 5). Internet, broadband, and cell phone statistics. Pew Research Center.
- Rajabiun, R., & Middleton, C. A. (2013). Multilevel governance and broadband infrastructure development: Evidence from Canada. Telecommunications Policy, 37(9), 702-714.
- Reisdorf, B. C., Fernandez, L., Hampton, K. N., Shin, I., & Dutton, W. H. (2022). Mobile phones will not eliminate digital and social divides: How variation in Internet activities mediates the relationship between type of Internet access and local social capital in Detroit. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2), 288-308.
- Ren, W., Zhu, X., & Liang, Z. (2024). How does Internet access quality affect learning outcomes?: A multiple mediation analysis among international students in China. Journal of International Students, 14(1), 449-468.
- Riggins, F. J., & Dewan, S. (2005). The digital divide: Current and future research directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(12), 298-337.
- Shapoval, Yu., Kerimov, P., Shpanel-Yukhta, O., Korablin, S., Bublyk, Ye., & Brus, S. (2022). Financial depth-economic growth nexus in Ukraine. Kharkiv: РС Тесhnology Сеntеr.
- Traber, M. (Ed.). (1986). The myth of the information revolution: Social and ethical implications of communication technology. London: Sage.
- Vassilakopoulou, P., & Hustad, E. (2023). Bridging digital divides: A literature review and research agenda for information systems research. Information Systems Frontiers, 25(3), 955-969.
- Wang, F., & Shen, S. (2024). Does the digital economy development improve or exacerbate income inequality? International evidence. Managerial and Decision Economics, 45(6), 4012-4038.
- Word Bank. (n.d.a). GNI, Atlas method (current US$).
- Word Bank. (n.d.b). Mobile cellular subscriptions (per 100 people).
- Word Bank. (n.d.c). Fixed broadband subscriptions (per 100 people).
- World Summits on the Information Society (WSIS). (2003a). Declaration of Principles. WSIS–03/GENEVA/DOC/4–E.
- World Summits on the Information Society (WSIS). (2003b). Geneva Plan of Action. WSIS–03/GENEVA/DOC/0005.
- World Summits on the Information Society (WSIS). (2005a). Tunis Agenda for the Information Society. WSIS–05/TUNIS/DOC/6.
- World Summits on the Information Society (WSIS). (2005b). Tunis Commitment. WSIS–05/TUNIS/DOC/7.
- Yin, Z. H., & Choi, C. H. (2023). Does digitalization contribute to lesser income inequality? Evidence from G20 countries. Information Technology for Development, 29(1), 61-82.
- Zhu, W. (2023). Digital financial inclusion and the share of labor income: Firm-level evidence. Finance Research Letters, 56, Article 104160.