Assessment of the population’s quality of life in Kazakhstan during COVID-19: The effectiveness of public policy
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(3).2023.06
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2023, Issue #3, pp. 69-83
- Cited by
- 753 Views
-
197 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to determine the effectiveness of Kazakhstan’s public policy during the pandemic related to healthcare, education, and the financial situation of the population by assessing the population’s quality of life (QoL). The study proceeded from the assumption that the effectiveness of state measures can be assessed through the manifestation of citizens’ reaction to the ongoing public policy, i.e., satisfaction with its results. The source base was the Bureau of National Statistics and the Adilet information and legal base covering 2020–2021. During the pandemic, the population’s satisfaction with their material provision, health, education, and living conditions decreased but not critically. The population’s QoL in Kazakhstan is satisfactory. Satisfaction among rural residents with their life (70.7%) and conditions (63.7%) is higher than among urban residents (56.1% and 49.8%, respectively). One-third of the population reported improved well-being and only 6.5% reported a deterioration. The high number of citizens satisfied with their QoL indicates the effectiveness of Kazakhstani public policy. It is the result not only of the implementation of temporary anti-crisis measures of government through program, organizational, and economic mechanisms during the pandemic but systematic work on modernization of the social, medical, and educational systems from 2019. The practical value of the study is the development of recommendations for the development of public policy in the field of improving QoL and the development of anti-crisis management in Kazakhstan.
Acknowledgments
This study is supported by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (targeted funding program BR10965247 “Study of factors, features and dynamics of demographic processes, migration, urbanization in Kazakhstan, development of digital maps and forecasts”).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)E21, I38, R23
-
References49
-
Tables1
-
Figures8
-
- Figure 1. Kazakhstanis’ satisfaction with their life and its conditions, %, 2020–2021
- Figure 2. Kazakhstanis’ assessment of their level of material support, %, 2020–2021
- Figure 3. Kazakhstanis’ satisfaction with their financial situation and economic situation in the family, %, 2020–2021
- Figure 4. Kazakhstanis’ satisfaction with the situation in their place of residence, %, 2020–2021
- Figure 5. Kazakhstanis’ satisfaction with healthcare services, %, 2020–2021
- Figure 6. Kazakhstanis’ satisfaction with education services, %, 2020–2021
- Figure 7. Kazakhstanis’ satisfaction with the quality of public services, %, 2020–2021
- Figure 8. Confidence of Kazakhstanis in their own safety, %, 2020–2021
-
- Table 1. Parameters used to describe respondents’ opinions about their quality of life
-
- Abisheva, M., & Dulambayeva, R. (2020). Public administration during a pandemic. Nur-Sultan: Astana Civil Service Hub.
- Alfani, F., Dhrif, D., Molini, V., Pavelesku, D., & Ranzani, M. (2021). Living standards of Tunisian households in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic (Policy Research Working Paper 9581). Washington, DC: World Bank.
- Baikova, Y. I., & Vardiashvili, N. N. (2015). To the problem of rise in the standard of living of population. Asian Social Science, 11(6), 45-55.
- Barlybaev, A. A., Ishnazarova, Z. M., & Sitnova, I. A. (2021). Quality of life of the population: The impact of digitalization. E3S Web of Conferences, 295, 01034.
- Blundell, R., Costa Dias, M., Joyce, R., & Xu, X. (2020). COVID-19 and inequalities. Fiscal Studies, 41(2), 291-319.
- CAREC Institute. (2023). COVID-induced inequalities: education, health services, digital access, and female labor force participation: Case studies from Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, and Uzbekistan.
- DiSantostefano, R. L., & Terris-Prestholt, F. (2021). Using societal values to inform public health policy during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of health preference research. The Patient – Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 14, 303-307.
- Evans, D. R. (1994). Enhancing quality of life in the population at large. In D. M. Romney, R. I. Brown, & P. S. Fry (Eds.), Improving the Quality of Life (pp. 47-88). Springer, Dordrecht.
- Fan, Q., Goetz, S. J., & Liang, J. (2016). The interactive effects of human capital and quality of life on economic growth. Applied Economics, 48(53), 5186-5200.
- Ibadildin, N., Tolesh, F., & Assylkhanova, T. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on students in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Scientific Journal of Astana IT University, 6(1), 38-49.
- Kangalakova, D. M., & Sabden, O. (2017). Methods of assessment of efficiency of small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries: Experience of Kazakhstan. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(7), 47-57.
- Kangalakova, D., Dzhanegizova, А., Satpayeva, Z., Nurgaliyeva, K., & Kireyeva, А. (2023). Distribution of knowledge through online learning and its impact on the intellectual potential of PhD students. Journal of Distribution Science, 21(4), 47-56.
- Kazhyken, M. Z., & Satpayeva, Z. T. (2019). The structure of income and expenditures of the population of Kazakhstan. Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 382(6), 339-345.
- Kravets, O., & Didenko, A. (2021). Modeling the quality of life of the population of Ukraine based on indicators of socio-economic situation. Primedia ELaunch LLC, 92-107. (In Ukrainian).
- Krutikova, V. V., & Khakimov, E. T. (2021). The relationship between psychological well-being and quality of life management and the quality of human capital. The American Journal of Applied Sciences, 3(4), 1-9.
- Kudaibergenova, D. T., & Laruelle, M. (2022). Making sense of the January 2022 protests in Kazakhstan: Failing legitimacy, culture of protests, and elite readjustments. Post-Soviet Affairs, 38(6), 441-459.
- Leow, K. W., & Tan, E. C. (2019). Determinants of poverty: A dynamic panel data analysis with controls for income level and inequality. Malaysian Journal of Economic Studies, 56(2), 227-242.
- Makarova, L., Tkach, E., Kudryavtseva, I., Seliverstova, A., & Vinogradova, N. P. (2021). Life quality and human capital within reproduction system: Regional aspect. SHS Web of Conferences 110, 02005.
- Maltseva, Е. (2021). Kazakhstan’s social policy response to Covid-19: Developmentalism and productive welfare (Report/SFB Globale Entwicklungsdynamiken von Sozialpolitik (SFB 1342)). Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).
- Mardan, M., & Stimmelmayr, M. (2018). Tax competition between developed, emerging and developing countries – Same same but different? (CESifo Working Paper Series 7090). Munich.
- Maunder, L. (2021). Motivating people to stay at home: Using the health belief model to improve the effectiveness of public health messaging during the COVID-19 pandemic. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 11(10), 1957-1962.
- Moyer, J. D., Kabandula, A., Bohl, D. K., Yang, V., McNeil, K., Xiong, Y., Mayaki, I., Bwalya, M., Murumba, G., & Mclean, B. (2021). COVID-19: The future of African development systems (Report). Frederick S. Pardee Center for International Futures, Josef Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver.
- Pedro, E. de M., Leitão, J., & Alves, H. (2021). HEI efficiency and quality of life: Seeding the pro-sustainability efficiency. Sustainability, 13(2), 514.
- Potluri, R. M., Dabyltayeva, N. Y., Medukhanova, L. A., & Kerimbekova, U. A. (2019). Problems and prospects of improving the quality of life in Kazakhstan and world experience. Farabi Journal of Social Sciences, 4(4), 48-53.
- Poudel, K., & Subedi, P. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on socio-economic and mental health aspects in Nepal. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 66(8), 748-755.
- Praskova, Y., Frolova, N., & Shkrabtak, N.V. (2019). Nutrition as an indicator of quality of life of the population in the conditions of trans-border territories (Amur region). Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Development of Cross-Border Regions: Economic, Social and Security Challenges (ICSDCBR 2019).
- Prinja, S., & Pandav, C. S. (2020). Economics of COVID-19: Challenges and the way forward for health policy during and after the pandemic. Indian Journal of Public Health, 64, 231-233.
- Profeta, P. (2020). Gender equality and public policy during COVID-19. Cesifo Economic Studies, 66(4), 365-375.
- Rakhmetova, A., & Budeshov, Ye. (2020). Quality of life as an indicator of public management performance in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Economic Annals-XXI, 184(7-8), 133-153.
- Rosser, R. M. (1993). The history of health related quality of life in 10 1/2 paragraphs. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 86(6), 315-318.
- Sansyzbayeva, Kh., Ashirbekova, L., Pisula, T., & Musulmankulova, A. (2022). Impact of the pandemic on the socio-economic development of Кazakhstan. Economics: The Strategy and Practice, 17(3), 6-21.
- Seubert, C., Hopfgartner, L., & Glaser, J. (2021). Living wages, decent work, and need satisfaction: An integrated perspective. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 30(6), 808-823.
- Shih, Y. C. (2021). Effectiveness of a lockdown policy during a global pandemic. Current Chinese Science, 1(4), 406-428.
- Sukhwal, P. C., & Kankanhalli, A. (2022). Determining containment policy impacts on public sentiment during the pandemic using social media data. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(19), e2117292119.
- Taspenova, G., Malgaraeva, Zh., & Kudaibergenov, N. (2019). Analysis of quality of life of the population of Kazakhstan. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Series of Social and Human Sciences, 324(2), 252-258.
- Tereshchenko, E., & Zhelnina, Z. Y. (2019). The influence of the cultural industry market on the quality of life of the population of the Arctic regions. Proceedings of the International Scientific-Practical Conference “Business Cooperation as a Resource of Sustainable Economic Development and Investment Attraction” (ISPCBC 2019).
- The WHOQOL Group. (1995). The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science & Medicine, 41(10), 1403-1409.
- Thives, L. P., Ghisi, E., & Thives Júnior, J. J. (2022). Regional inequalities in electricity access versus quality of life in Brazil. Ambiente Construído, 22(3), 47-65.
- Torres, E., & Domínguez-Menchero, J. S. (2006). The impact of second homes on local taxes. Fiscal Studies, 27(2), 231-250.
- Torres-Toukoumidis, Á., González-Moreno, S. E., Pesántez-Avilés, F., Cárdenas-Tapia, J., & Valles-Baca, H. G. (2021). Educational public policy during the pandemic: Comparative study of Mexico and Ecuador. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 29, 88.
- Tulegenova, A. M., Dauletova, G., Nakipov, Z., Sarsenbayeva, G., Dossybayeva, G., Sadibekova, Z., Raissova, K., & Turgambayeva, A. (2022). Assessment of the quality of life and living conditions of the rural population of the Kazakhstan during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences, 10(E), 498-505.
- Tvaronavičienė, M., Mazur, N., Mishchuk, H., & Bilan, Y. (2022). Quality of life of the youth: Assessment methodology development and empirical study in human capital management. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 1088-1105.
- Vinnikov, D., Raushanova, A., Romanova, Zh., & Tulekov, Zh. (2021). Health-related quality of life in a general population sample in Kazakhstan and its sociodemographic and occupational determinants. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 19, 199.
- Vu, V. T. (2021). Public trust in government and compliance with policy during COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Public Organization Review, 21, 779-796.
- Yagudin, R., Fakhrutdinova, E., Kolesnikova, J., & Pshenichnyi, S. (2014). Ecology as factor of quality of life of the population. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 1587-1593.
- Yang, J., Du, J., Yang, H., Cheng, C., & Chen, T. (2023). Quality of life assessment and its spatial correlation in impoverished districts and counties: A case study of Guizhou Province. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1153953.
- Zhan, Z., Su, Z., & Chang, H. (2022). Education and quality of life: Does the internet matter in China? Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 860297.
- Zhanabekova, A., Darzhanova, A., Tleulesova, A., Slamgazhy, A., Toleu, A., Kislova, A., Urpekova, A., Klimchenko, A., Zhusipbek, G., Urazova, D., Alpysbaeva, D., Dzhuzbaeva, D., Abildenova, D., Serdaly, D., Kapkyzy, E., Daminov, I., Zholshaeva, M., Bocharova, M., Ergebekov, M., … Ozer, J. (2021). Kazahstan i COVID-19: media, kultura, politika [Kazakhstan and COVID-19: media, culture, politics]. Almaty: DELUXE Printery Publishing House. (In Russian).
- Zhang, K. (2023). Study on the path of sustainable financial development in resource-based regions. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 8(2), 28-31.