Does standardization have an impact on innovation activity in different countries?
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.39
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #4, pp. 486-503
- Cited by
- 1047 Views
-
403 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Nowadays, innovation and standardization are very important issues. The aim of this paper was to review the relationship between the components of the Summary Innovation Index (SII) according to the European Innovation Scoreboard and the features that determine the innovation level in 35 countries (taking into account the number of the following certificates: ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO 27001, ISO 50001, ISO 22000, ISO 13485) in 2017. The innovation ranking was created for these countries, considering the fact of certification for compliance with the ISO requirements. In this paper, an attempt was made to determine whether countries with very low innovation activity (performance) are at the same time characterized by a very low level of saturation with globally recognized ISO certificates, which confirm the implementation, functioning and improvement of selected types of management systems. The conclusions from the study are as follows: 1) standardization can be seen as an innovation tool; 2) as the number of ISO 9001 certificates increases, the number of ISO 14001 certificates (per the population of 100,000 people) also increases; 3) as the number of ISO 13485 certificates increases, the value of the SII also becomes higher. The features are modelled at 70%; 4) the weakest relationship can be observed between the SII and the ISO 9001 certification; 5) Switzerland obtained the highest mean value set for the innovation index proposed in the study, suggesting that the country can be considered the innovation leader of 2017 from among the countries investigated. The last (35th) place in the ranking was occupied by Ukraine.
Acknowledgement(s)
The authors are thankful to The Ministry of Science and Higher Education in Poland for financial support to carry out this research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L15, O31, Q56
-
References72
-
Tables4
-
Figures7
-
- Figure 1. Scatter plot between ISO 13485 and SII
- Figure 2. Bagplot between ISO 13485 and SII
- Figure 3. Scatter plot between SII and Research Systems
- Figure 4. Bag plot between SII and Research Systems
- Figure 5. Countries grouping results
- Figure 6. Mean values of the SII in the created clusters
- Figure 7. Relationship between the ranking of countries and the SII
-
- Table 1. The basic descriptive statistics of components adopted for the study – 2017
- Table 2. Correlation between different types of ISO indicators and SII
- Table 3. Correlation between the SII and innovation dimensions
- Table 4. Ranking of the innovation activity of countries in 2017, created on the basis of features adopted for the study (the SII is not taken into account)
-
- Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: a review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21-47.
- Akimova, L., Akimov, O., Maksymenko, T., Hbur, Z., & Orlova, V. (2020) Adaptive management of entrepreneurship model as a component of enterprise resource planning. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 26(3), 1-8.
- Baregheh, A., Rowley J., & Sambrook S. (2009). Towards a Multidisciplinary Definition of Innovation. Management Decision, 47(8), 1323-1339.
- Bessant, J., Lamming, R., Noke, H., & Phillips, W. (2005). Managing innovation beyond the steady state. Technovation, 25(12), 1366-76.
- Bilan Y., Mishchuk, H., Roshchyk, I., & Kmecova I. (2020). Analysis of Intellectual Potential and its Impact on the Social and Economic Development of European Countries. Journal of Competitiveness, 1, 22-38.
- Blind, K. (2009). Standardization: a catalyst for innovation. Inaugural Address Series Research in Management, Erasmus Research Institute of Management – ERIM, Rotterdam School of Management (RSM), Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, Haveka.
- Blind, K. (2013). The Impact of Standardization and Standards on Innovation (Nesta Working Paper No. 13/15, Manchester Institute of Innovation Research, 3-28).
- Blind, K., Bekkers, R., Dietrich, Y., Iversen, E., Köhler, F., Müller, B., Pohlmann, T., Smeets, S., & Verweijen, J. (2011). Study on the Interplay between Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPPRs). European Commission: Luxembourg 2011.
- Blind, K., & Jungmittag, A., (2008). The impact of patents and standards on macroeconomic growth: a panel approach covering four countries and 12 sectors. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 29(1), 51-60.
- Blind, K., & Mangelsdorf, A. (2016). Motives to standardize: Empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation, 48-49, 13-24.
- Blind, K., Pohlisch, J., & Zi, A. (2018). Publishing, patenting, and standardization: Motives and barriers of scientists. Research Policy, 47(7), 1185-1197.
- Blind, K., Pohlisch, J., & Rainville, A. (2020). Innovation and standardization as drivers of companies’ success in public procurement: an empirical analysis. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45, 664-693.
- Bochm, G., & Frederick, L. J. (2010). Strategic innovation management in global industry networks. Asian Journal of Business Management, 2(4), 110-120.
- Braja, M., & Gemzik-Salwach, A. (2019). Competitiveness of high-tech sectors in the European Union: A comparative study. Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 213-227.
- Brem, A., Nylund, A. P., & Schuster, G. (2016). Innovation and de facto standardization: The influence of dominant design on innovative performance, radical innovation, and process innovation. Technovation, 50-51, 79-88.
- Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2011). The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World EconomyPrinceton University Press, Princeton.
- Choi, D. G., Lee, H., & Sung, T. (2011). Research profiling for ’standardization and innovation’. Scientometrics, 88(1), 259-287.
- Chudy-Laskowska, K., (2019). Diversification of the innovation level in enterprises in Poland. In A. Nalepka & A. Ujwary-Gil (Eds.), Business and Non-profit Organizations Facing Increased Competition and Growing Customers’ Demands. Warsaw: Institute of Economics of the Polish Academy of Sciences; NowyTarg: Foundation for the Dissemination of Knowledge and Science “Cognitione”; Nowy Sącz: WyższaSzkołaBiznesu – National Louis University (monografia pokonferencyjna 18th International Conference (Economy, Management – Finance): New Challenges in Economic Policy, Business and Management, Warsaw, Poland 17-18 June 2019.
- Cornell University, INSEAD, and WIPO (2018). The Global Innovation Index 2018: Energizing the World with Innovation. Ithaca, Fontainebleau, and Geneva.
- David, P. A., & Rothwell, G. S. (1996). Standardization, diversity and learning: Strategies for the coevolution of technology and industrial capacity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 14(2), 181-201.
- De Vries, H. J. (1997). Standardization – What’s in a name? Terminolog, 4(1), 55-83.
- Edler, J. (2016). The impact of policy measures to stimulate private demand for innovation. In J. Edler, P. Cunningham, A. Gök, & P. Shapira (Eds.), Handbook of innovation policy impact (pp. 318-354). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Egyedi, T. M., & Widlak, A. (2019). Institutional economics of standards, regulation and innovation effects. In Kai Jakobs and Pierguiseppe Morone (Eds.). EURAS proceedings 2019: Standards for a bio-based economy (pp. 143-162). 13-15 June 2018, LUISS Guido Carli University, Rome, Italy.
- Europe Innova. (2008). Standards in European Public Procurement leading to Innovation (STEPPIN). Directorate General Enterprise and Industry. Brussels: European Commission.
- European Commission. (2010). Communication from the Commission, ’EUROPE 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth’, COM(2010) 2020 Final, 3 March 2010.
- Fixson, S. K., & Park, J. (2008). The power of integrality: Linkages between product architecture, innovation, and industry structure. Research Policy, 37(8), 1296-1316.
- Funk, J. L., & Luo, J. (2015). Open standards, vertical disintegration and entrepreneurial opportunities: How vertically-specialized firms entered the U.S. semiconductor industry. Technovation, 45-46, 52-62.
- Fura, B., & Wang, Q. (2017). The level of socioeconomic development of EU countries and the state of ISO 14001 certification. Quality & Quantity, 51(1), 103-119.
- Geodecki, T. (2008). Pomiar innowacyjności gospodarki przy użyciu pośrednich i bezpośrednich wskaźników innowacji. Zarządzanie Publiczne, 3(5), 27-48.
- Goluchowicz, K., & Blind, K. (2011). Identification of future fields of standardization: An explorative application of the Delphi methodology. Technological Forecasting &Social Change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1526-1541.
- Guler, I., Guillén, M. F., Muir, J., & Macpherson, J. M. (2002). Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(2), 207-232.
- Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2013). Environmental Management System according to ISO 14001 as a source of eco-innovations in enterprises – a case of Podkarpackie Voivodeship. World Academy of Science Engineering and Technology, 75, 650-655.
- Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2016). Pułapki decyzyjne a system zarządzania środowiskowego, [w:] Rachunkowość na rzecz zrównoważonego rozwoju, Dziawgo D. (red.), Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, nr 436, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, Wrocław, 133-142. (In Polish).
- Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2014). Integration of management systems in the context of strategic thinking in enterprises implementing organizational eco-innovations. The International Conference Hradec Economic Days 2014, Economic Development and Management of Regions, Hradec Králové, Peer – Reviewed Conference Proceedings Part IV (pp. 177-184). Edited by Pavel Jedlička. University of Hradec Kralove, Faculty of Informatics and Management.
- Hollanders, H., & Es-Sadki, N. (2018). For European Commission, European Innovation Scoreboard 2018 Methodology Report. 15 June. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.
- International Organization for Standardization – ISO 50001:2018. (2018). Energy Management Systems – Requirements with guidance for use, Geneva, Switzerland: ISO/IEC.
- International Organization for Standardization official website. (2020).
- International Organization for Standardization, ISO Survey 2018. (2019).
- ISO 13485:2016 Medical Devices – A Practical Guide. International Organization for Standardization.
- ISO 13485:2016. Medical devices – Quality management systems – Requirements for regulatory purposes.
- ISO 9001:2015. Quality Management Systems – Requirements. International Organization for Standardization.
- ISO/ IEC 27001 Information Security Management, PN-ISO/IEC 27001 (PN-EN ISO/IEC 27001 – System zarządzania bezpieczeństwem informacji).
- Karničar Šenk, M., & Roblek, M. (2019). The impact of the standardization of the NPD process on its efficiency. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(1), 149-167.
- Kim, D., Kumar, V., & Kumar, U. (2012). Relationship between quality management practices and innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 30(4), 295-315.
- Kondo, Y. (2000). Innovation versus standardization. The TQM Magazine, 12(1), 6-10.
- Lewandowska, A., & Stopa, M. (2020). The impact of innovative professional qualifications on the sense of employment security: Evidence from Poland. Economics and Sociology, 13(3), 72-83.
- Lim, S., & Prakash, A. (2014). Voluntary Regulations and Innovation: The Case of ISO 14001. Public Administration Review, 74(2), 233-244.
- Lorenz, O., Lange, M., Rahmann, T., Blind, K., Weber, M., & Krohn, W. (2009). “Einkäufer Staat” als Innovationstreiber. Entwicklungspotenziale und Hand – lungs notwendigkeiten für eine innovativere Beschaffung im öffentlichen Auftragswesen Deutschlands, Berlin: Wegweiser, TU Berlin und Orrick.
- Maier, D., Vadastreanu, A. M., Keppler, T., Eidenmulleret, T., & Maier, A. (2015). Innovation as a part of an existing integrated management system. 4th World Conference on Business, Economics and Management, WCBEM. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 1060-1067.
- Manders, B. (2014). Implementation and Impact of ISO 9001 (Thesis to obtain the degree of Doctor from the Erasmus University Rotterdam by command of the rector magnificus Prof. dr. H.A.P. Pols and in accordance with the decision of the Doctorate Board). ERIM PhD Series in Research in Management.
- Manders, B., de Vries, H. J., & Blind, K. (2016). ISO 9001 and product innovation: A literature review and research framework. Technovation, 48-49, 41-55.
- Meissner, D., & Kotsemir, M. (2016). Conceptualizing the innovation process towards the ’active innovation paradigm’ – trends and outlook. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5, 14.
- Narayanan, V. K., & Chen T. (2012). Research on technology standards: Accomplishment and challenges. Research Policy, 41(8), 1375-1406.
- Naveh, E. (2018). Standardization and Innovation: a Multipriority Approach. In M. Zelm, F-W. Jaekel, Doumeingts, M. Wollschlaeger (Eds), Enterprise Interoperability: Smart Services and Business Impact of Enterprise Interoperability. ISTE Ltd and John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Great Britain and the United States.
- Okrah, J., & Hajduk-Stelmachowicz, M. (2020). Political stability and innovation in Africa. Journal of International Studies, 13(1), 234-246.
- Pacana, A. (2018). Zarządzanie środowiskowe zgodne z ISO 14001:2005. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Rzeszowskiej, Rzeszów 2018.
- Pesämaa, O. (2017). Personnel- and action control in gazelle companies in Sweden. Journal of Management Control, 28, 107-132.
- Porter, M. (1993). The competitive advantage of nations.
- Scapolo, F., Churchill, P., Viaud, V., Antal, M., Córdova, H., & De Smedt, P. (2015). JRC foresight study How will standards facilitate new production systems in the context of EU innovation and competitiveness in 2025? Final Report, European Commission DG Joint Research Centre, European Union, Belgium.
- Swann, G. M. P. (2010). The Economics of Standardization: An Update. Innovative Economics Limited: Manchester.
- Swann, G. M. P. (2000). The Economics of Standardization. Final Report for Standards and Technical Regulations Directorate Department of Trade and Industry. Manchester Business School: Manchester.
- Swann, G. M. P., & Lambert, R. (2010). Why do Standards Enable and Constrain Innovation? 15th EURAS Annual Standardization Conference “Service Standardization”. University of Lausanne, Switzerland, July 1.
- Tamura, S. (2013). Generic definition of standardization and the correlation between innovation and standardization in corporate intellectual property activities. Science and Public Policy, 40(2), 143-156.
- Tassey, G. (2000). Standardization on Technology-Based Markets. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 587-602.
- Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10(1), 1-20.
- Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28-45.
- Van de Ven, A. (1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590-607.
- Viardot, E., Hashem, M. S., & Chen, J. (2016). Managing innovation with standardization: An introduction to recent trends and new challenges. Technovation, 48-49, 1-3.
- Vit, M., Wadim, S., Anatoly, S., & Bilan Y. (2015). Determinants of Innovations and Competitiveness in The European Union. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 224-232.
- Wang, Z., Min, Z., Hongyi, S., & Guilong, Z. (2016). Effects of standardization and innovation on mass customization: An empirical investigation. Technovation, 48-49, 79-86.
- Wright, C., Sturdy, A., & Wylie, N. (2012). Management innovation through standardization: Consultants as standardizers of organizational practice. Research Policy, 41(3), 652-662.
- Zarzycka, E., Dobroszek, J., Lepistö, L., & Moilanen, S. (2019). Coexistence of innovation and standardization: evidence from the lean environment of business process outsourcing. Journal of Management Control, 30, 251-286.