Optimal deterrence: Exploring business cartels in Indonesia and their impact on the economy
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.40
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #4, pp. 504-516
- Cited by
- 587 Views
-
511 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
A business cartel is a business that is carried out by business actors to obtain market power by regulating the market by fixing prices, for example, by limiting the availability of commodities on the market. This paper examines in detail business cartel practices in Indonesia, explores their impact on the economy, and analyzes KPPU as an unfair business eradication body. In so doing, this paper analyzes eight business cases in Indonesia to describe and evaluate the practices of economic cartels in the industry. Those cases were randomly chosen for different periods and different industrial sectors. Using a qualitative analysis method, it is found that business cartels, unfortunately, are still rather common practice in Indonesia. It is also found that business cartels harm economic development, citizens and customers, since they tend to be monopolistic practices so that the customers will have to pay high prices for limited commodities. In addition, KPPU needs to be reformed, and the amendment of current antitrust law also needs to be executed. Consequently, judges and lawmakers should understand the balance of business interest and public interest at the same time.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)K21, K23
-
References50
-
Tables2
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Business cartel impact
- Table 2. Cartel information in Indonesia
-
- Al Qindy, F. (2018, Agustus). Kajian Hukum Terhadapp Kasus Kartel Minyak Goreng di Indonesia (Studi Putisan KPPU Nomor 24/KPPU-1/2009). Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 1(1).
- Antoni, V. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Atas Perkara Kartel di Luar persekongkolan Tender di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum-Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 31(1), 95-111.
- Barr, C. M. (1998). Bob Hasan, the rise of Apkindo, and the shifting dynamics of control in Indonesia’s timber sector. Indonesia, 65, 1-36.
- Bos, I., & Harrington Jrm J. E. (2015, February). Competition Policy and Cartel Size. International Economic Review, 56(1).
- Business Competition Supervisory Commission’s Regulation Number 1 of 2010 about Procedures for Handling Cases.
- Business Competition Supervisory Commission’s Regulation Number 4 of 2010 about Cartel.
- Business Competition Supervisory Commission’s Verdict Number 08/KPPU-I /2014 in 2015.
- Cerretano, V. (2012). European cartels, European multinationals and economic de-globalisation: Insights from the rayon industry, c. 1900-1939. Business History, 54(4), 594-622.
- Chen, J., & Harrington Jr. J. E. (2007). The impact of the corporate leniency program on cartel formation and the cartel price path. Contributions to Economic Analysis, 282, 59-80.
- Davis, P., & Garces, E. (2010). Quantitative Techniques for Competition and Antitrust Analysis. United Kingdom. Princeton University Press.
- Diantha, P., & Made, I. (2017). Metodolog i Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Cetakan Kedua, Kencana, Jakarta.
- District Court’s Verdict Number 70/PDT.G/KPPU/2015/PN.JKT.PST in 2015.
- Ferres, D., Ormazabal, G., Povel, P., & Sertsios, G. (2020). Capital Structure Under Collusion. Journal of Finance Intermedation.
- Hajar, M. (2017). Model Model Pendekatan dalam Penelitian Hukum & Fiqh. Cetakan Pertama, Kalimedia, Yogyakarta.
- Iman, N. (2014). The dynamics of entrepreneurs in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Business Research, 7(2), 2014, 159-176.
- Katsoulacos, Y. (2015). Penalizing Cartels: The Case of Basing Penaties on Price Overcharge. International Journal of Industrial Organizations, 42.
- KPPU. (2015).
- KPPU. (2016).
- KPPU. (2013).
- Law Number 5 of 1999 about Prohibition of Monopolistic Practicess and Unfair Business Competition.
- Levenstein, M., & Suslow, V. Y. (2006, February). What Determines Cartel Success? Journal of Economic Literature, 44(1).
- Lunde, A.,Sandberg, R., & Soderberg, M. (2019). Calculating the Damage of a Cartel Subject to Transition Periods: The International Uranium Cartel in the 1970s. Energy Economic Elsevier, 84.
- Mariuzzo, F., Ormosi, P. L., & Majied, Z. (2020, March). Fines and Reputational Sanctions: The Case of Cartels. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 69.
- Morgan, J. E. (2009). Controlling Cartels – Implication of the EU Policy Reforms. European Management Journal, 27(1).
- Nazir, M. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian, Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2009.
- Nurfaik, M. (2019). Kartel Skutik di Balik Lemahnya Sanksi Administratif dalam Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechtsvinding. Juli 2019.
- Nurhayati, I. (2011). Kajian Hukum Persaingan Usaha: Kartel Antara Teori dan Praktik. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis, 2(30). Desember 2019.
- Ohanga, M. (2010). Cartel Criminalisation, Ministry of Economic Development, Discussion Document for Regulatory Impact Assessment. Ministry of Economic Development: New Zealand.
- Osborne, D. K. (1976). Cartel problems. The American Economic Review, 66(5), 835-844.
- Pratama. R. A. (2018). Pengaturan Monopoli Kartel oleh Pelaku Usaha dalam Persaingan Usaha Garam: Suatu Kajian Putusan KPPU No 10/KPPU-1/2005. Jurnal IUS Constituendum, 3(2).
- Pressey, A. D. (2016). Dark Network Tension and Illicit Forbearance: Exploring Paradox and Instability in Illegal Cartels. Journal of Industrial Marketing Management, 55, 35-49.
- Pujiyono, S. D. A., & Manthovani, R. (2019). The Future of Leniency Program as an Efforts to Reveal Cartel Practices in Indonesia. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14(20).
- Qaqaya, H., & Lipimule, G. (2008). The Effect of anti competetive business practices on developing countries and their development prospect. UN. New York and Geneva.
- Setyanegara, E. (2013). Kebebasan Hakim Memutus Perkara Dalam Konteks Pancasila (Ditinjau Dari Keadilan “Substantif”). Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Tahun, 44(4).
- Silalahi, U., & Edgina, I. C. (2017). Pembuktian Perkara Kartel di Indonesia dengan Menggunakan Bukti Tidak Langsung (Indirect Evidence). Jurnal Yudisial, 10(3).
- Simbolon, A. (2012). Kedudukan Hukum Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Melaksanakan Wewenang Penagakan Hukum Persaingan Usaha. Jurnal Mimbar Hukum, 23(3).
- Slater, D. (2004). Indonesia’s accountability trap: Party cartels and presidential power after democratic transition. Indonesia, 78, 61-92.
- Suhara, J. J. (2009). Redefinisi Azas dan Tujuan Undang-Undang No 5 Tahun 1999 sebagai Dasar Hukum dan Kebijakan Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha, 1(2).
- Sukmana, O. (2016). Konsep dan Desain Negara Kesejahteraan (Welfare State). Jurnal Sospol, 2(1), Juli-Desember 2016.
- Supreme Court’s Regulation Number 3 of 2005 about Procedures for Submitting Objection Laws against KPPU Verdicts.
- Supreme Court’s Verdict Number 167/PK/PDT.SUS-KPPU/2017 in 2018. Supreme Court’s Verdict Number 221/K/PDT.SUS-KPPU/2016 in 2016.
- Symeonidis, G. (2000). Price competition and market structure: the impact of cartel policy on concentration in the UK. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(1), 1-26.
- Tadajewski, M. (2010, February). Reading ’The Marketing Revolution’ Through the Prism of the FBI. Journal of Marketing Management, 26(1), 90-107.
- Tampubolon, T., Lele, G., Kumorotomo, W., & Suripto. (2019). Cartel and Political Corruption: Insight from Beef Imports Collusion in Indonesia. Conference: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Indonesian Association for Public Administration (IAPA 2019).
- Toha, K. (2019). Urgensi Amandemen UU tentang Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia: Problem dan Tantangan. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 49(1). 73-90.
- Usman, R. (2004). Hukum persaingan Usaha di Indonesia, Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2004.
- Usman, R. (2013). Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.
- Weruin, Urbanus Ura (2017). Logika, Penalaran, dan Argumentasi Hukum. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(2).
- Wibowo, K. (2020). Tantangan Pembuktian Ekonomi dalam Kasus Kartel.
- Wicaksana, Y. P. (2018). Implementasi Asas Ius Curia Novit Dalam Penafsiran Hukum Putusan Hakim Tentang Keabsahan Penetapan Tersangka. Jurnal Lex Renaisance, 1(3), 86-108.