Assessment of the moderating effects of Nigerian market environment on the relationship between management success determinants and SMEs’ performance
-
Received April 3, 2020;Accepted November 24, 2020;Published December 18, 2020
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6114-4433Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-4348
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(4).2020.31
-
Article InfoVolume 18 2020, Issue #4, pp. 388-401
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by1 articlesJournal title:Article title:DOI:Volume: / Issue: / First page: / Year:Contributors:
- 932 Views
-
181 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
A reported eighty-five percentage failure rate of SMEs in Nigeria before five years of operation was ascribed to a lack of knowledge of the market environment. Hence, this study investigated the moderating effects of the Nigerian market environment on the relationship between management success determinants and SMEs’ performance to see how the environment has affected SMEs’ performance. The study employed a survey research design, the population of the study comprised chief executive officers (CEOs) of registered SMEs, and a sample size of 1,102 was used. Probability sampling methods of stratified, proportionate, and random sampling were adopted. Responses were collected through a predetermined set of questions and a self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The study found that the Nigerian market environment had moderating effects on the relationship between management success determinants and SMEs’ performance (R = 0.817, R2 adjusted = 0.664, R2 change = 0.041, and Fchange = 19.694 at ρ = 0.000), most of the Nigerian market environment’s components have significant moderating effects on all the management success determinants relationship with SMEs’ performance; management skills (β = 0.220, 0.182; ρ < 0.05), innovation (β = 0.147, 0.135; ρ < 0.05), operating system (β = 0.083, 0.061; ρ < 0.05), organizational structure (β = 0.290, 0.303; ρ < 0.05), business reporting system (β = 0.142, 0.137; ρ < 0.05), system flexibility (β = 0.110, 0.107; ρ < 0.05), environmental scanning (β = 0.091, 0.062; ρ < 0.05). Only decision-making is not statistically significant (β = 0.037, 0.004; ρ > 0.05). These imply that Nigerian SMEs’ decisions under intense environmental turbulence are mostly ineffective, and the effects of management success determinants in facilitating performance were also drastically reduced as well as firms’ system flexibility. The study has a practical value of identifying the effect of the Nigerian market environment on the relationship between management success determinants and SMEs’ performance, thus revealing the gaps in the Nigerian SMEs’ management factors.
Acknowledgment(s)
To Small and Medium Enterprises Development Agency of Nigeria and Small Scale Enterprises Association of Nigeria for their support in ensuring participation of their members.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, D22, L25
-
References65
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Path analysis diagram of the moderating effects of Nigerian market environment on the relationship between the management success factors and SMEs’ performance
-
- Table 1. Regression model summary of moderating effects of selected Nigerian market environment on the relationship between the management success determinants and SMEs’ performance
- Table 2. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) of moderating effects of selected Nigerian market environment on the relationship between the management success factors and SMEs’ performance
- Table 3. Results of moderating effects of selected Nigerian market environment on the relationship between the individual management success factors and SMEs’ performance
- Table 4. Path analysis of the moderating effects of Nigerian market environment on the relationship between the management success factors and SMEs’ performance
-
- Acknowledgment(s) To Small and Medium Enterprises Development Agency of Nigeria and Small Scale Enterprises Association of Nigeria for their support in ensuring participation of their members.
- Adagba, D. T., & Shakpande, C. (2017). Effect of environmental factors on business performance. Nigeria Journal of Management Sciences (NJMS), 6(2), 16-24.
- Adeoye, A. O., & Elegunde, A. F. (2012). Impacts of external business on organisational performance in the food and beverage industry in Nigeria. British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences, 6(2), 194-201.
- Agwu, M. E., & Onwuegbuzie, H. N. (2018). Effects of international marketing environments on entrepreneurship development. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 7(12), 1-14.
- Ahmed, A., Khuwaja, F. M., Brohi, N. A., Othman, I., & Bin, I. (2018). Organizational factors and organizational performance: A resource-based view and social exchange theory viewpoint. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(3), 579-599.
- Al Asheq, A., & Uzzal, H. (2019). SME performance: impact of market, customer and brand orientation. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 23(1), 1-9.
- Almatrooshi, B., Singh, S. K., & Farouk, S. (2016). Determinants of organizational performance: A proposed framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 65(6), 844-859.
- Andrevski, G., & Ferrier, W. J. (2019). Does it pay to compete aggressively? Contingent roles of internal and external resources. Journal of Management, 45(2), 620-644.
- Aremu, Mu. A., Gbadeyan, R. A., & Aremu, Mo. A. (2016). Environmental Factors And Strategic Marketing Planning In Nigerian Insurance Industry. DBA Africa Management Review, 6(1), 17-30.
- Auwal, A. M., Mohamed, Z., Shamsudin, M. N., Sharifuddin, J., & Ali, F. (2020) External pressure influence on entrepreneurship performance of SMEs: a case study of Malaysian herbal industry. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32(2), 149-171.
- Ayegba, O., & Omale, S. A. (2016). A study on factors affecting entrepreneurial development in Nigeria. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(12), 43-51.
- Babalola, Y. A., & Tiamiyu, R. (2013). SWOT analysis of Nigerian business environment. Developing Country Studies, 3(5), 101-104.
- Battisti, M., & Deakins, D. (2017). The relationship between dynamic capabilities, the firm’s resource base and performance in a post-disaster environment. International Small Business Journal, 35(1), 78-98.
- Bengeledijk, S., & Jindra, B. (2018). Product innovation and decision-making autonomy in subsidiaries of multinational companies. Journal of World Business, 53(4), 529-539.
- Bii, J., & Onyango, R. (2018). Moderating effect of dynamic capabilities on the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance of small and medium enterprises. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 1122-1134.
- Boso, N., Adeleye, I., Ibeh, K., & Chizema, A. (2019). The internationalization of African firms: opportunities, challenges and risks. Thunderbird International Business Review, 61(1), 5-12.
- Chong, W. (2012). Critical success factors for small and medium enterprises: Perceptions of entrepreneurs in urban Malaysia. Journal of Business and Policy Research, 7(4), 204-215.
- Dinh, H., Dimitris, M., & Hoa, N. (2010). The binding constraint on firms’ growth in developing countries (Policy Research Working Paper 5485). World Bank, Washington, DC.
- Feng, T., & Wang, D. (2016). The influence of environmental management systems on financial performance: A moderated-mediation analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(2), 265-278.
- Forth, J., & Bryson, A. (2019). Management practices and SMEs performance. Journal of Political Economy, 66(4), 527-559.
- Frank, H., Guttel, W., & Kesler, A. (2017). Environmental dynamism, hostility, and dynamic capabilities in medium-sized enterprises. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 35.
- Frynas, J. G., Mol, M. J., & Mellahi, K. (2018). Management innovation made in China: Haier’s Rendanheyi. California Management Review, 61(1).
- Games, D., & Rendi, R. P. (2019). The effects of knowledge management and risk taking on SME financial performance in creative industries in an emerging market: The Mediating Effect of Innovation Outcomes. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9(44), 1-14.
- George, B., & Desmidt, S. (2018). Strategic-decision quality in public organizations: An information processing perspective. Administration and Society, 50(1), 131-156.
- Grant, R. M. (1996b). Towards a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journals, 17, 109-122.
- Hamann, R., Smith, J., Tashman, P., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Why do SMEs go green? An analysis of wine firms in South Africa. Business & Society, 56(1).
- Jayeola, O., Ihinmoyan, T., & Kazeem, Y. K. (2018). Environmental factors and the performance of micro and small scale enterprises (MSEs) in Nigeria: lessons from some selected MSEs in Ondo State Nigeria. Journal of Economics, Management and Trade, 21(6), 1-14.
- Kang, Y., & He, X. (2018). Institutional forces and environmental management strategy: Moderating effects of environmental orientation and innovation capability. Management and Organisation Review, 14(3), 577-605.
- Kim, E., Beckman, S. L., & Agogino, A. (2018). Design road mapping in an uncertain world; implementing a customer experience-focused strategy. California Management Review, 61(1), 43-70.
- Kiyabo, K., & Isaga, N. (2019). Strategic entrepreneurship, competitive advantage, and SMEs’ performance in the welding industry in Tanzania. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 9, 62.
- Knight, H., Megicks, P., Agarwal, S., & Leender, M. A. A. N. (2019). Firm resources and the development of environmental sustainability among small and medium-sized enterprises: Evidence from the Australian wine industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28.
- Kumar, V. (2018). A theory of customer valuation concepts, metrics, strategy and implementation. Journal of Marketing, 82(1), 1-19.
- Kurniawan, I., Salim, U., Setiawan, M., & Rahayu, M. (2019). The role of business external environment as a moderation of the effect of entrepreneurial orientation on business performance that is mediated in flexibility of strategy. Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 14, 5807-5818.
- Lakshmi, S. (2019). Critical success factors in Indian commercial banks. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 8(6S), 440-442.
- Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J. W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard University.
- Lee, Y. A. (2014). Insight for writing qualitative research paper. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 43(1), 94-97.
- Lo, M. C., Wang, Y. C., Wah, C. R. J., & Ramayah, T. (2016). The critical success factors for organizational performance of SMEs in Malaysia: A partial least squares approach. Review of Business Management, 18(61), 370-392.
- Martin, S. L., Javalgi, R., & Ciravegna, L. (2020). Marketing capabilities and international new venture performance: The mediation role of marketing communication and the moderation effect of technological turbulence. Journal of Business Research, 107(C), 25-37.
- Mintzberg, H. (1984). Who Should Control the Corporation? California Management Review, 27(1), 90-115.
- Mirani, M., & Shah, S. M. (2012). What does it take to succeed in small business in Pakistan? The lessons for emerging entrepreneurs. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 3(3), 167-169.
- Mohassesi, A. A., & Keshvari, R. S. (2015). Using strategic planning to improve performance management and its impact on organizational success: A study of private sector in Iran. International Journal of Strategic Information Technology and Applications, 6(4), 44-63.
- Muharam, H., Andria, F., & Tosida, E. T. (2020). Effect of process innovation and market innovation on financial performance with moderating role of disruptive technology. Systematic Review Pharmacy, 11(1), 223-232.
- Njanja, W. L., Ogutu, M., & Pellissier, R. (2012). The effects of the external environment on internal management strategies within micro, small and medium enterprises: Kenyan case. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(13), 194-205.
- Obiekwe, O., & Nwaeke, L. I. (2020). Management challenges of Nigerian workplaces: A critical analysis. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 22(1), 56-62.
- Ogundele, O., Akingbade, W., Saka, R., Elegunde, A., & Aliu, A. (2013). Marketing practice of small and medium enterprises (SMEs): Perspective from a developing country. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(3), 243.
- Oketch, J. O., Kilika, J. M., & Kinyua, G. M. (2020). The moderating role of the legal environment on the relationship between TMT characteristics and organizational performance in a regulatory setting in Kenya. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(1), 211-222.
- Omar, T., & Zineb, I. (2019). Firm performance: definition and measurement models. European Scientific Journal, 15(1), 93-106.
- Onditi, E. O., Kibera, N. F., Aranga, M. J., & Iraki, X. N. (2020). The moderating effect of competitive intensity on the relationship between market orientation and performance of private security firms in Kenya. The Strategic Journal of Business & Change Management, 7(1), 47-65.
- Onyenekenwa, C. E. (2010). Survival strategies for entrepreneurs in dwindling Nigerian economy. Asian Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2(2), 52-62.
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD. (2014). Perspectives on global development 2014.
- Pinto, P., Hawaldor, I., Rahman, H. U., & Rajesha, T. M. (2019). An evaluation of financial performance of commercial banks. International Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 15(22), 605-618.
- Planing, P. (2017). On the origin of innovations – the opportunity vacuum as a conceptual model for the explanation of innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(5), 1-18.
- Rodríguez-Aceves, L., Baños-Monroy, V., & Ramírez-Solís, E. (2018) environmental dynamism as a moderator of familiness and performance in Mexican SMEs. Latin American Business Review, 19(3-4), 219-243.
- Schilke, O. (2014). On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: the non-linear moderating effect of environmental dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 179-203.
- Serrasqueiro, Z., Leitão, J., & Smallbone, D. (2018). Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SME) growth and financing sources: Before and after the financial crisis. Journal of Management and Organization, 1-16.
- Shaw, E., Wilson, J., & Pret, T. (2017). The process of embedding a small firm in its industrial context. International Small Business Journal, 35(3), 219-243.
- Sia, C., Teo, H., Tan, B., & Wei, K. (2004). Effects of environmental uncertainty on organisation al intention to adopt distributed work arrangements. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(3), 253-267.
- SMEDAN. (2017). Survey report on MSMEs in Nigeria. Abuja: SMEDAN.
- Su, H., & Moaniba, I. M. (2020). Does geographic distance to partners affect firm R&D spending? The moderating roles of individuals, firms, and countries. Journal of Business Research, 106, 12-23.
- Tajeddini, K., & Mueller, S. (2019). Moderating effect of environmental dynamism on the relationship between a firm’s entrepreneurial orientation and financial performance. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 9, 1-13.
- Teece, D. J. (2011). Dynamic capabilities: A guide for managers. IVEY Business Journal.
- Wang, C., & Rafiq, M. (2014). Ambidextrous organizational culture, contextual ambidexterity and new product innovation. A comparative study of U.K and Chinese high tech firms. British Journal of Management, 25(1), 58-76.
- Wang, H., Gong, Q., & Wang, S. (2017). Information processing structures and decision-making delays in MRP and JIT. International Journal of Production Economics, 188, 41-49.
- Wiengarten, F., Fan, D., Lo, C., & Pagell, M. (2017). The differing impacts of operational and financial slack on occupational safety in varying market conditions. Journal of Operations Management, 52.
- Zehir, C., & Balak, D. (2018). Market dynamism and firm performance relation: The mediating effects of positive environment conditions and firm innovativeness. Emerging Markets Journal, 8(1), 45-41.
-
-
Conceptualization
Olalekan Asikhia
-
Data curation
Olalekan Asikhia
-
Formal Analysis
Olalekan Asikhia
-
Investigation
Olalekan Asikhia
-
Methodology
Olalekan Asikhia
-
Project administration
Olalekan Asikhia, Vannie Naidoo
-
Writing – original draft
Olalekan Asikhia
-
Supervision
Vannie Naidoo
-
Validation
Vannie Naidoo
-
Visualization
Vannie Naidoo
-
Writing – review & editing
Vannie Naidoo
-
Conceptualization
-
Non-financial factors affecting the operational performance of hospitality companies: Evidence from Vietnam
Trung Kien Phan , Thi Hong Thuy Nguyen , Thu Ha Dang , Van Thuan Tran , Kim Ngoc Le doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(4).2021.05Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021 Issue #4 pp. 48-62 Views: 9178 Downloads: 1421 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯNon-financial factors including quality of services, the flexibility of a company, utilization of resources, and market orientation are regarded as significant determinants that enhance the profitability-based performance of a service company or a hotel. The study investigated the interaction between these factors and hotel operating performance measured by the hospitality performance and results indicators. Data on 346 executives of Vietnam’s hospitality companies were collected. A structural equation modeling (SEM) method was utilized to examine the positive-direct and moderating effects of non-financial factors on hotel performance in terms of occupancy rate (OCR), average daily rate (ADR), and the revenue per available room (RevPAR). The findings showed that service quality ( = 0.118, p < 0.05), flexibility ( = 0.173, p < 0.05) and resource utilization (= 0.172, p < 0.05) positively affected the performance of Vietnam’s hospitality companies. Meanwhile, innovation showed no direct influence (p = 0.068) but an indirect impact on the performance through service quality ( = 0.311, p < 0.05). Market orientation did not impact the performance (p = 0.076) but it positively affected both innovation ( = 0.322, p < 0.05) and service quality ( = 0.146, p < 0.05). The study contributed to a theoretical enhancement of the current level of knowledge on the factors that affect the performance and developed a reliable scale for measuring the performance of hotels in Vietnam.
-
Exploring fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) small, medium and micro enterprises manufacturers’ need for innovation to achieve growth
Lawrence Mpele Lekhanya , Nze Grace Olajumoke , Dorasamy Nirmala doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.08(2).2017.01Environmental Economics Volume 8, 2017 Issue #2 pp. 8-16 Views: 5575 Downloads: 1172 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the problems of the sustainable development, to explore the level of innovation in the fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) manufacturing SMMEs sectors, which most affects on the state of the environment, to identify the causes of low innovation in the industry and to examine these factors influence on the effectiveness of SMMEs manufacturers innovation strategies, as well as to invent a new innovation strategic approach to overcome innovation problems in the economic growth of fast moving consumer goods SMMEs manufacturers. The study is aimed to determine the level of innovation and factors contributing to low innovation in fast moving consumer goods (FMCG) SMMEs manufacturers, which hinder their economic performance. Mixed approach of quantitative and qualitative questionnaire is used for primary data collection. Sample consists of 120 SMMEs. Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) (23.0) was employed for data analysis. The study results are presented with figures and diagrams. This study will be a useful tool for general public and relevant stakeholders in this sector.
-
Holacracy and Obliquity: contingency management approaches in organizing companies
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 16, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 330-335 Views: 3617 Downloads: 1156 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe paper aims to examine the development of modern innovative management methods and practices such as Holacracy, Obliquity, Adhocracy and Sociocracy, which are novelty in the Management science and practice. The study illustrates contingency approaches in designing, managing and developing agile companies from wide varieties of industries. The paper sheds light on contemporary methods in organizing, planning and setting goals of companies in a post-knowledge era. It is like an operating system for business that requires the installation of different applications as applications for hiring employees, for setting salaries, for planning or logistics. In the paper, literature review on management innovations is conducted and subsequently statistical operationalization through STATA software has been employed to examine how particular organizations design and set up their organizational structures such as lean, agile or scrum. Paper results show that smaller companies are more agile and they tend to acquire Holacratic Management models thanks to the fact that self-managing teams exist internally and their organizational structures are flatter and more adaptive in comparison to the multinational corporations. Consequently, the paper concludes with suggestions on innovative management implementations for future development of companies and emphasizes the need for further research on what is the impact of Holacracy and Obliquity on shaping the organizational culture of companies.