R&D deductions in the Czech Republic: Is the amount dependent on the size of a company?
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.07(1).2023.12
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2023, Issue #1, pp. 150-162
- 168 Views
-
55 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research and development (R&D) is considered a critical factor in the long-term performance of companies. Governments are therefore seeking to increase the availability of R&D support for enterprises. This support may include indirect or tax support, often offered as deductions from the tax base or credits on already calculated tax. The paper analyzes the average amount of R&D deductions depending on the size of enterprises in the Czech Republic that use R&D deductions. The research sample includes all companies residing in the Czech Republic that filed tax returns between 2009 and 2021. The methods of descriptive statistics, analysis of variance, and trend analysis were used to test the hypotheses. The results suggest a statistically significant difference (α < 0.01) between the average R&D deduction of companies using the R&D deduction and a company’s size. Furthermore, it was found that the average amount of the R&D deduction has changed and is expected to change as well. This trend in the case of micro companies is negative, and by other groups, it is relatively constant or slightly rising and is also expected to increase. Authorities could use these results to adjust tax laws governing R&D deductions in the Czech Republic.
Acknowledgment
This article was written as one of the outputs of support from the project of Excellent Research called “The impact of tax optimization of intangible assets on corporate finances and national public budgets,” which is being continuously implemented at the Faculty of Economics of the Technical University in Liberec within the years 2021–2022.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O32, O38, H25
-
References48
-
Tables6
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Jarque-Bera test
- Figure 2. The average amount of the deduction for R&D
- Figure 3. Boxplots of average deductions depending on company size
- Figure 4. Actual, fitted and residual lines of the average deduction in each categories
- Figure 5. Prediction of the average deduction based on the calculated models for years 2022–2024
-
- Table 1. The structure of the research sample
- Table 2. Summary statistics describing the average amount of deductions for R&
- Table 3. Results of analysis of variance
- Table 4. Estimation of model parameters and t-statistic values
- Table 5. Interpolation criteria
- Table 6. Chow forecast test
-
- Alam, A., Uddin, M., & Yazdifar, H. (2019). Institutional determinants of R&D investment: Evidence from emerging markets. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 34-44.
- Alvarez, R., & Crespi, G. A. (2015). Heterogeneous effects of financial constraints on innovation: Evidence from Chile. Science and Public Policy, 42(5), 711-724.
- Appelt, S., Bajgar, M., Criscuolo, C., & Galindo-Rueda, F. (2016). R&D Tax Incentives: Evidence on design, incidence and impacts (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers No. 32). OECD Publishing, Paris.
- Barajas, A., Huergo, E., & Moreno, L. (2016). SME Performance and Public Support for International RJVs*. Journal of Small Business Management, 54(4), 1206-1228.
- Bednář, P., & Halásková, M. (2018). Innovation performance and R&D expenditures in Western European regions: Divergence or convergence? Journal of International Studies, 11(1), 210-224.
- Belás, J., Dvorský, J., Kubálek, J., & Smrčka, L. (2018). Important factors of financial risk in the SME segment. Journal of International Studies, 11(1), 80-92.
- Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., & Williams, H., (2019). A Toolkit of Policies to Promote Innovation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(3), 163-184.
- Bösenberg, S., & Egger, P. H. (2017). R&D tax incentives and the emergence and trade of ideas. Economic Policy, 32(89), 39-80.
- Brabec, Z., Cernikova, M., & Hyblerova, S. (2022). Selected Aspects of Indirect R&D Support in the Czech Republic. Journal of International Studies, 15(3), 51-64.
- Caleb, H. T., Yim, C. K. B., Yin, E., Wan, F., & Jiao, H. (2021). R&D activities and innovation performance of MNE subsidiaries: The moderating effects of government support and entry mode. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120603.
- Cernikova, M., & Hyblerova, S. (2021). Tax support evaluation for R&D activities of companies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 27(5), 1057-1071.
- Chatterjee, M., & Bhattacharjee, T. (2021). Ownership concentration, innovation and firm performance: empirical study in Indian technology SME context. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 10(2), 149-170.
- Čučković. N., & Vučković, V. (2018). EU R&D Funding as a Way of Incentivizing Innovation of SMEs: A Review of Impacts. Croatian Economic Survey, 20(2), 97-127.
- Czech Statistical Office. (2022). Ukazatele výzkumu a vývoje – 2021 [Research and development indicators – 2021]. (In Czech).
- Dimos, C., Pugh, G., Hisarciklilar, M., Talam, E., & Jackson, I. (2022). The relative effectiveness of R&D tax credits and R&D subsidies: A comparative meta-regression analysis. Technovation, 115, 102450.
- Donbesuur, F., Ampong, G. O. A., Owusu-Yirenkyi, D., & Chu, I. (2020). Technological innovation, organizational innovation and international performance of SMEs: The moderating role of domestic institutional environment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161, 120252.
- European Union (EU). (2003). Commission Recommendation No. 2003/361/E.C. of May 6 2003 concerning the definition of micro, small and medium-sized enterprises.
- European Commission (EC). (2010). EUROPE 2020. A European strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth.
- González Cabral, A., Appelt S., & Hanappi, T. (2021). Corporate effective tax rates for R&D: The case of expenditure-based R&D tax incentives (OECD Taxation Working Papers No. 54). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Gorodnichenko, Y., & Schnitzer, M. (2013). Financial constraints and innovation: Why poor countries don’t catch up. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(5), 1115-1152.
- Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2022). Government R&D support and firms’ access to external financing: funding effects, certification effects, or both? Technovation, 115, 102469.
- Gyamfi, S., Anderson, H., & Stejskal, J. (2019). Public Sector Financial Support for SME Innovativeness: Case Study of Selected CEE countries. In Proceeding of the 23rd International Conference on Current Trends in Public Sector Research (pp. 84-91). Brno: Masaryk University.
- Hand, C., & Judge, G. (2012). Searching for the picture: forecasting U.K. cinema admissions using Google Trends data. Applied Economics Letters, 19(11), 1051-1055.
- Hong, C., & Lee, J. D. (2016). Macroeconomic effects of R&D tax credits on small and medium enterprises. Economic Systems Research, 28(4), 467-481.
- Hwang, W. S., Hong, C., Oh, I., & Yeo, Y. (2022). Assessing the economy-wide impacts of public R&D support options based on a computable general equilibrium model: focusing on types of fiscal incentives and beneficiaries. Applied Economics, 54(40), 4664-4680.
- Klímová, V. (2018). How do regions use indirect R&D support for their innovation activities? Scientific papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration. 42/2018.
- Kobayashi, Y. (2014). Effect of R&D tax credits for SMEs in Japan: a microeconometric analysis focused on liquidity constraints. Small Business Economics, 42, 311-327.
- Květoň, V., & Horák, P. (2018). The effect of public R&D subsidies on firms’ competitiveness: Regional and sectoral specifics in emerging innovation systems. Applied Geography, 94, 119-129.
- Lai, Y. L., Lin, F. J., & Lin, Y. H. (2015). Factors affecting firm’s R&D investment decisions. Journal of Business Research, 68(4), 840-844.
- Legislation of Czech Republic. (1991). Act No. 563/1991 Coll., on Accounting. Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic.
- Legislation of Czech Republic. (1992). Act No. 586/1992 Coll., on Income Taxes. (In Czech).
- Li, J., Lee, R. P., & Wan, J. (2020). Indirect effects of direct subsidies: an examination of signaling effects. Industry and Innovation, 27(9), 1040-1061.
- Malá, I., Sládek, V., & Bílková, D. (2021). Power comparisons of normality tests based on l-moments and classical tests. Mathematics and Statistics, 9(6), 994-1003.
- Moon, B. (2022). Unleash liquidity constraints or competitiveness potential: The impact of R&D grant on external financing on innovation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(3), 100195.
- OECD. (2021). OECD R&D Tax Incentives Database. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Pfeiffer, O., & Spengel, C. (2017). Tax incentives for research and development and their use in tax planning (Discussion Paper No. 17-046). ZEW – Centre for European Economic Research.
- Pisár, P., Ďurčeková, I., & Stachová, M. (2020). The Contribution of Innovation Actors into Business R&D Funding – Does the Substitution Effect of Public Support Work in the E.U.? E&M Economics and Management, 23(1), 121-134.
- Pöschel, C. (2020). Incentive Effects of R&D Tax Incentives: A Meta-Analysis Focusing on R&D Tax Policy Designs (Discussion Paper No. 243). Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre (arqus), Berlin.
- Radas, S., Anit, ID., Tafro, A., & Wagner, V. (2015). The effects of public support schemes on small and medium enterprises. Technovation, 38, 15-30.
- Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Zhang, M. (2020). The cost of weak institutions for innovation in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119937.
- Sasidharan, S., Lukose, P. J., & Komera, S. (2015). Financing constraints and investments in R&D: Evidence from Indian manufacturing firms. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 55, 28-39.
- Seo, J. H., & Cho, D. (2020). Analysis of the Effect of R&D Planning Support for SMEs Using Latent Growth Modeling. Sustainability, 12(3), 1018.
- Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR). (2023). The SBIR and STTR Programs.
- Sterlacchini, A., & Venturini, F. (2019). R&D tax incentives in E.U. countries: does the impact vary with firm size? Small Business Economics, 53(3), 687-708.
- 4Szczygielski, K., Grabowski, W., Pamukcu, M. T., & Tandogan, V. S. (2017). Does government support for private innovation matter? Firm-level evidence from two catching-up countries. Research Policy, 46(1), 219-237.
- Thompson, M. J., & Woerter, M. (2020). Competition and invention quality: Evidence from Swiss firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 156, 120023.
- Vicenová, M. (2016). Metodika pro daňové odpočty na výzkum a vývoj [Methodology for research and development tax deductions]. (IN Czech). Prague: Technology Agency of the Czech Republic.
- Xu, E. M., & Xiao, J. Q. (2014). The Effects of Government Subsidy on Entrepreneurial Firm’s R&D Expenditure: A Resource Dependence and Institutional Perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Strategic Management (2013 ICSM) (pp. 3-9). Chengdu: Sichuan University.