The role of knowledge assets and corporate social responsibility in creating firm value
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/kpm.07(1).2023.13
-
Article InfoVolume 7 2023, Issue #1, pp. 163-173
- Cited by
- 345 Views
-
66 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of this paper is to investigate how knowledge assets and corporate social responsibility jointly influence the market value of a firm. In the contemporary knowledge-driven economy, where competitive advantage is based on intangible and intellectual capital, this paper emphasizes the strategic significance of knowledge assets, open innovation, and sustainable development practices in creating and maximizing market value. By employing multiple regression analysis on panel data for ten financial years, the study examines the optimal composition of knowledge assets and the impact of CSR initiatives on firm value. Key findings highlight a crucial threshold leading to the peak of market value, approximately when knowledge assets account for about 36% of a firm’s total non-current assets. Further, this study demonstrates that maintaining a balance between internally developed knowledge assets and external acquisitions significantly enhances value, correlating with the cultivation of a capitalization ability. Finally, this paper shows that corporate social responsibility emerges as a substantial driver of generating firm value, suggesting that integrating these practices into corporate strategic decisions not only aligns with ethical goals but also enhances market valuation. The insights from this study offer valuable perspectives for both academic researchers and industry professionals, advocating for a well-balanced approach to corporate asset management and underscoring the strategic importance of incorporating corporate social responsibility.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, L17, L24
-
References37
-
Tables3
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
-
- Table 1. Composition of final sample based on county and economic sector
- Table 2. Means and standard deviations for the continuous variables
- Table 3. Multiple regression model development
-
- Abbasi, S., Aghakhani, H., Azizi, S., Peikanpour, M., & Mehralian, G. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and customer loyalty during the Covid-19 pandemic: evidence from pharmacy practice. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(2), 249-263.
- Abedifar, P., Bouslah, K., Neumann, C., & Tarazi, A. (2023). Resilience of Environmental and Social Stocks under Stress: Lessons from the COVID‐19 Pandemic. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 32(2), 23-50.
- Al-Dhamari, R., Al-Gamrh, B., Farooque, O. A., & Moses, E. (2022) Corporate social responsibility and firm market performance: the role of product market competition and firm life cycle. Asian Review of Accounting, 30(5), 713-745.
- Asiaei, K. Bontis, N., Askari, M. R., Yaghoubi, M., & Barani, O. (2023). Knowledge assets, innovation ambidexterity and firm performance in knowledge-intensive companies. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(8), 2136-2177.
- Berchicci, L. (2013). Towards an open R&D system: Internal R&D investment, external knowledge acquisition and innovative performance. Research Policy, 42(1), 117-127.
- Chen, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Du, J. (2016). The interaction between internal R&D and different types of external knowledge sourcing: an empirical study of Chinese innovative firms: Interaction between internal R&D and different types of external knowledge sourcing. R&D Management, 46(S3), 1006-1023.
- Cheng, C. C. J., & Shiu, E. C. (2020). Leveraging open innovation strategies for fueling eco-innovation performance in dynamic environments. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(7), 1245-1270.
- Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74.
- Cuervo-Cazurra, A., Maloney, M. M., & Manrakhan, S. (2007). Causes of the difficulties in internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 709-725.
- Dancaková, D., Sopko, J., Glova, J., & Andrejovská, A. (2022). The Impact of Intangible Assets on the Market Value of Companies: Cross-Sector Evidence. Mathematics, 10(20), 3819.
- Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., & Tidd, J. (2014a). Creating and capturing value from external knowledge: the moderating role of knowledge intensity: Creating and capturing value from external knowledge. R&D Management, 44(3), 248-264.
- Denicolai, S., Ramirez, M., & Tidd, J. (2016). Overcoming the false dichotomy between internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition: Absorptive capacity dynamics over time. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 57-65.
- Denicolai, S., Ramusino, E. C., & Sotti, F. (2015). The impact of intangibles on firm growth. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(2), 219-236.
- Denicolai, S., Zucchella, A., & Strange, R. (2014b). Knowledge assets and firm international performance. International Business Review, 23(1), 55-62.
- Du, J., Leten, B., & Vanhaverbeke, W. (2014). Managing open innovation projects with science-based and market-based partners. Research Policy, 43(5), 828-840.
- Ebers, M., & Maurer, I. (2014). Connections count: How relational embeddedness and relational empowerment foster absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 43(2), 318-332.
- Edi, E., & Wati, E. (2022). Measuring intangible asset: firm reputation. Business: Theory and Practice, 23(2), 396-407.
- Eisfeldt, A. L., & Papanikolaou, D. (2013). Organization Capital and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns: Organization Capital. The Journal of Finance, 68(4), 1365-1406.
- Freeman, R. E. (2010) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
- Gullifor, D. P., Petrenko, O. V., Chandler, J. A., Quade, M. J., & RoubaY. , (2023). Employee reactions to perceived CSR: The influence of the ethical environment on OCB engagement and individual performance. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113835
- Hendratama, T. D., & Huang, Y.-C. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, firm value and life cycle: evidence from Southeast Asian countries. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 22(4), 577-597.
- Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 235-256.
- Katona, K. (2021). Intangible assets as possible indicators for the growth of the Hungarian firms. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 29(5), 764-775.
- Kuivalainen, O., Sundqvist, S., Puumalainen, K., & Cadogan, J. W. (2009). The Effect of Environmental Turbulence and Leader Characteristics on International Performance: Are Knowledge-Based Firms Different? Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences / Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 21(1), 35-50.
- Lee, S.-H., & Makhija, M. (2009). Flexibility in internationalization: is it valuable during an economic crisis? Strategic Management Journal, 30(5), 537-555.
- Mazur, M., Dang, M., & Vega, M., (2021). COVID-19 and the march 2020 stock market crash. Evidence from S&P1500. Finance Research Letters, 38, 101690.
- Padilla-Lozano, C. P., & Collazzo, P. (2022). Corporate social responsibility, green innovation and competitiveness – causality in manufacturing. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 32(7), 21-39.
- Patel, P. (2012). Indicators of Innovation Performance. In J. Tidd (Ed.), From Knowledge Management to Strategic Competence (pp. 137-159). Imperial College Press.
- Rahman, H. U., Zahid, M., & Al-Faryan, M. A. S. (2023). ESG and firm performance: The rarely explored moderation of sustainability strategy and top management commitment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 404, 136859.
- Roth, F., Sen, A., & Rammer, C. (2023). The role of intangibles in firm-level productivity – evidence from Germany. Industry and Innovation, 30(2), 263-285.
- Santoro, G., Ferraris, A., & Winteler, D. J. (2019). Open innovation practices and related internal dynamics: case studies of Italian ICT SMEs. EuroMed Journal of Business, 14(1), 47-61.
- Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., & Dezi, L. (2018). The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136, 347-354.
- Servaes, M., Nguyen Thi Thu, H., Kluijtmans, T., & Crucke, S. (2023). Don’t talk the talk, but walk the walk: the role of authentic CSR in fostering beneficial employee outcomes. Management Decision, 61(3), 569-588.
- Uddin, M. R., Hasan, M. M., & Abadi, N. (2022). Do intangible assets provide corporate resilience? New evidence from infectious disease pandemics. Economic Modelling, 110, 105806.
- Wang, S., Wareewanich, T., & Chankoson, T. (2023). Factors influencing venture capital performance in emerging technology: The case of China. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 7(1), 18-31.
- Wang, X., Xu, Z., Qin, Y., & Skare, M. (2022). Innovation, the knowledge economy, and green growth: Is knowledge-intensive growth really environmentally friendly? Energy Economics, 115, 106331.
- Zhang, B., Li, Z., Li, X., & Liu, Z. (2021). Speed of internationalization and firm performance: the moderating role of potential slack and knowledge assets. Chinese Management Studies, 15(5), 1120-1142.