Robo-advisors and investment decisions: Assessing the impact of the “snakebite” effect and social-emotional well-being & resilience
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.22(1).2025.34
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2025, Issue #1, pp. 453-468
- 64 Views
-
15 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Considering the snakebite effect experience of investors and their decision-making in the era of robo-advisors, this study focuses on examining the mediating role of the snakebite effect between the value of robo-advisors and investment decisions and assessing the moderation of social-emotional well-being and resilience among active investors. The research process began with an exhaustive review of existing literature and the development of a structured questionnaire. A further survey was undertaken by collecting 361 responses from active investors residing in the region of South India using robo-advisors, and finally, the mediation and moderation were analyzed utilizing confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to check the model fit and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to test hypothetical relationships. The results validate the intervening role of the Snakebite Effect in the relationship between the value of Robo-Advisors and investment decision-making. Further, social emotional well-being and resilience of investors significantly lessen the negative impact of the snakebite effect on investment decision-making. The role of social-emotional well-being and resilience is vital as high tendency leads to a low snakebite effect, better effectiveness of robo-advisors, and investment decision-making. This study provides various theoretical, practical, and managerial implications for improved robo-advisory services and increased adoption among diverse investor segments. In particular, the study emphasizes that financial institutions should focus on hybrid advisory models that combine the analytical capabilities of robo-advisors with the empathetic, personal touch of human advisors.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G11, G23, D14
-
References46
-
Tables7
-
Figures5
-
- Figure 1. Proposed conceptual model
- Figure 2. Confirmatory factor analysis
- Figure 3. Mediating role of the snakebite effect in the relationship between the value of robo-advisors and investment decisions
- Figure 4. Moderating effects of social-emotional well-being and resilience
- Figure 5. Moderating role of social emotional well-being and resilience in the relationship between snakebite effect and investment decision
-
- Table 1. Factor loadings, reliability, and convergent validity results
- Table 2. Discriminant validity using the Fornell-Larcker criterion
- Table 3. Disparity between social-emotional well-being and resilience
- Table 4. Direct effect of the value of robo-advisors and snakebite effect
- Table 5. Mediating effect of the snakebite effect (H4)
- Table 6. Moderating effects of social-emotional well-being and resilience
- Table 7. Summary of path estimate
-
- Aw, E. C.-X., Leong, L.-Y., Hew, J.-J., Rana, N. P., Tan, T. M., & Jee, T.-W. (2024). Counteracting dark sides of robo-advisors: justice, privacy and intrusion considerations. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 42(1), 133-151.
- Back, C., Morana, S., & Spann, M. (2021). Do Robo-Advisors Make Us Better Investors? SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Back, C., Morana, S., & Spann, M. (2023). When do robo-advisors make us better investors? The impact of social design elements on investor behavior. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 103, 101984.
- Bai, R. (2023). Impact of financial literacy, mental budgeting and self control on financial wellbeing: Mediating impact of investment decision making. Plos One, 18(11), e0294466.
- Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V, Flavián, C., & Schepers, J. (2014). Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services. Information & Management, 51(6), 627-640.
- Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in FinTech: understanding robo-advisors adoption among customers. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 119(7).
- Bhatia, A., Chandani, A., Divekar, R., Mehta, M., & Vijay, N. (2022). Digital innovation in wealth management landscape: the moderating role of robo advisors in behavioural biases and investment decision-making. International Journal of Innovation Science, 14(3/4), 693-712.
- Bianchi, M., & Briere, M. (2021). Augmenting investment decisions with robo-advice. Université Paris-Dauphine Research Paper, (3751620). SSRN Electronic Journal.
- Bonelli, M. I., & Dongul, E. S. (2023). Robo-Advisors in the Financial Services Industry: Recommendations for Full-Scale Optimization, Digital Twin Integration, and Leveraging Natural Language Processing Trends. 2023 9th International Conference on Virtual Reality, ICVR 2023.
- Brenner, L., & Meyll, T. (2020). Robo-advisors: A substitute for human financial advice? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 25, 100275.
- Cahyono, A. D. (2023). The Psychological, Neuroscience, and Socio-Economic Factors of Mindset Investors in Buying Mutual Fund for Investments Decisions. DiE: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 14(1).
- Cheong, S. F., Keikhosrokiani, P., & Fadilah, S. I. (2023). A Concise Review for Exploring Behaviors to Embrace Investment Robo-advisors. 2023 13th International Conference on Information Technology in Asia (CITA), 100-105.
- Dardana, J. A., & Elgeka, H. W. S. (2023). The Role of Emotional States on Purchase Decision-Making among Novice Stock Investors. Gadjah Mada Journal of Psychology (GamaJoP), 9(2).
- Darskuviene, V., & Lisauskiene, N. (2021). Linking the Robo-advisors Phenomenon and Behavioural Biases in Investment Management: An Interdisciplinary Literature Review and Research Agenda. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 12(2).
- Ensz, J., E. M. , R. H. , S. M. , B. S. , & M. C. (2024). Resilience – The ability to bounce back! Frontiers for Young Minds.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson Education. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
- Himanshu, Ritika, Mushir, N., & Suryavanshi, R. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 on portfolio allocation decisions of individual investors. Journal of Public Affairs, 21(4), e2649.
- Hodge, F. D., Mendoza, K. I., & Sinha, R. K. (2021). The effect of humanizing robo-advisors on investor judgments. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(1), 770-792.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
- Husnah, H., Nurdin, D., & Kasim, M. Y. (2023). Informativeness of environmental, social and governance (ESG) data on investment decisions: The mediating role purpose of investment. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 7(4).
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the fundamentals of financial decision making: Part I (pp. 99-127). World Scientific.
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (2018). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Experiments in Environmental Economics (Vol. 1).
- Kuo, M.-H., Huang, P.-K., & Jane, W.-J. (2013). The impact of the financial tsunami on stock investment behavior: the case of individual investors in Taiwan. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 10(1 cont.), 207-217.
- Liu, C. W., Yang, M., & Wen, M. H. (2023). Judge me on my losers: Do robo-advisors outperform human investors during the COVID-19 financial market crash? Production and Operations Management, 32(10).
- Park, S. R., & Oh, K.-S. (2022). Integration of ESG Information Into Individual Investors’ Corporate Investment Decisions: Utilizing the UTAUT Framework. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
- Pimentel, A. P., Schneider, D., Oliveira, L., de Souza, J., Correia, I. A., & Motta, C. (2019). Exploring Social Validation on A Collaborative Curation Platform. 2019 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), 140-145.
- Qureshi, S. A. (2012). Measuring validity of the determinants of investment decision making. International Journal. Department of Business Administration. Allama Iqbal Open University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
- Rachman, K. M., & Sukmadilaga, C. (2022). Influence of robo advisory in investment decision: A case study in Indonesian mutual fund market. Journal of Digital Innovation Studies, 1(1).
- Roongruangsee, R., & Patterson, P. (2023). Engaging Robo-advisors in Financial Advisory Services: The Role of Psychological Comfort and Client Psychological Characteristics. Australasian Marketing Journal, 14413582231195990.
- Salinas, G. A. M. (2024). Assessment of the efficiency of investment robo-advisory. Vilniaus Universitetas.
- Saltalı, N. D., Erbay, F., Işık, E., & İmir, H. M. (2018). Turkish validation of social emotional well-being and resilience scale (PERIK): Preschool children social-emotional well-being. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(5), 525-533.
- Segars, A. H., & Grover, V. (1998). Strategic information systems planning success: An investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 22(2).
- Shahzad, M. A., Jianguo, D., Jan, N., & Rasool, Y. (2024). Perceived Behavioral Factors and Individual Investor Stock Market Investment Decision: Multigroup Analysis and Major Stock Markets Perspectives. SAGE Open, 14(2).
- Shrestha, N. (2021). Factor Analysis as a Tool for Survey Analysis. American Journal of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, 9(1).
- Siloam, Y. C., & Gunawan, L. (2023). The Influence of Emotional Intelligence Towards Investing Decision. Jurnal Entrepreneur Dan Entrepreneurship, 12(1).
- Singh, S., Kang, J. H., & Ramani, R. S. (2023). Authentic passion matters: the role of emotional labor between presenters’ passion and investment decision. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 29(9-10).
- Soubhari, T. (2023). Financial risk tolerance and investment decisions of retail equity investors in Kerala. Department of Commerce and Management Studies, University of Calicut.
- Strauss, M. E., & Smith, G. T. (2009). Construct validity: Advances in theory and methodology. In Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (Vol. 5).
- Su, J., & Sun, Y. (2023). An Improved TOPSIS Model Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory: Application to ESG Performance Evaluation of State-Owned Mining Enterprises. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(13).
- Tan, G. K. S. (2020). Robo-advisors and the financialization of lay investors. Geoforum, 117, 46-60.
- Waweru, N. M., Munyoki, E., & Uliana, E. (2008). The effects of behavioural factors in investment decision-making: a survey of institutional investors operating at the Nairobi Stock Exchange. International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, 1(1), 24-41.
- Xia, H., Zhang, Q., Zhang, J. Z., & Zheng, L. J. (2023). Exploring investors’ willingness to use robo-advisors: mediating role of emotional response. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(11), 2857-2881.
- Yen Xuan, P. N. (2022). Impact Of Emotions on Investment Decisions of Individual Investors in Vietnam Stock Market. Ra Journal of Applied Research, 08(10).
- Yi, T. Z., Rom, N. A. M., Hassan, N. Md., Samsurijan, M. S., & Ebekozien, A. (2023). The Adoption of Robo-Advisory among Millennials in the 21st Century: Trust, Usability and Knowledge Perception. Sustainability, 15(7), 6016.
- Zhou, M., Hu, Y., & Wang, D. (2023). Trust or Distrust: The Effect of Facial Emotion and Trustworthy Behavior on Trust Decision-Making. Psychologica Belgica, 63(1).