The role of consumers’ visual attention stimuli in advertising: traditional and neuromarketing research perspectives
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.21(1).2025.24
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2025, Issue #1, pp. 296-313
- 100 Views
-
21 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This research aims to reveal the role of consumers’ visual attention stimuli in advertising from traditional and neuromarketing research perspectives. This study examines six stimuli of consumers’ visual attention, which are divided into three groups – complexity of advertising, reflection of reality in advertising, and attributes of advertising content. A conceptual model was developed, encompassing the relationships of the identified stimuli with consumers’ visual attention (via gaze fixation duration and frequency) and with consumers’ attitudes toward advertising. The model was empirically tested using survey questionnaires and an eye-tracking system to analyze a specific food advertising case. A survey involving 403 respondents in Lithuania found that a statistically significant relationship exists between all visual attention stimuli and attitudes toward advertising, except for advertising authenticity (p-value>0.05). However, the results of the linear regression confirm only instrumental attributes in advertising content (R2=0.294) and higher design complexity (R2=0.230) positively influence on consumer attitudes toward advertising. In the neuromarketing study with 26 participants, a significant relationship was revealed between both dependent variables (the duration and frequency of participants gaze) and visual attention stimuli in food advertising. ANOVA analysis results show longer gaze fixation duration for simple, clear designs, manipulative advertising, symbolic content attributes; more frequent gaze fixation for advertising reflecting high functional and design complexity, authenticity, and instrumental content attributes. However, no relationship was found between gaze variables and consumer attitudes, except for authentic advertising, where higher greater gaze frequency was linked to a more positive attitude.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M37, M31, M30
-
References61
-
Tables4
-
Figures7
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. Summarized research logic
- Figure 3. Heatmaps in the case of the functional complexity of food advertising
- Figure 4. Heatmaps in the case of the design complexity of food advertising
- Figure 5. Heatmaps in the case of the reflection of reality in food advertising
- Figure 6. Heatmaps in the case of the instrumental content attributes in food advertising
- Figure 7. Heatmaps in the case of the symbolic content attributes in food advertising
-
- Table 1. Demographic characteristics of survey participants
- Table 2. Results of linear regression between consumer visual attention stimuli and consumer attitude towards food advertising
- Table 3. Results of ANOVA analysis in the neuromarketing study
- Table 4. Participants’ attitudes towards authentic and manipulative advertising; the Mann-Whitney U test results of gaze fixation duration and frequency
-
- Al-Dmour, H. H., Al-Zu’bi, M. F., & Fahmawi, A. G. (2013). The Inference of the Characteristics of Pharmaceutical Drug Advertising upon the level of Physicians’ Acceptance of Drugs in Jordan. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(9), 63-87.
- Becker, M., Wiegand, N., & Reinartz, W. J. (2019). Does It Pay to Be Real? Understanding Authenticity in TV Advertising. Journal of Marketing, 83(1), 24-50.
- Behe, B. K., Bae, M., Huddleston, P. T., & Sage, L. (2015). The effect of involvement on visual attention and product choice. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 24, 10-21.
- Bercea, M. D. (2013). Quantitative versus qualitative in neuromarketing research. Munich Personal RePEc Archive.
- Białowąs, S., Reshetkova, A., & Szyszka, A. (2021). Experimental Design. In Experimental design and biometric research (pp. 9-27).
- Boerman, S., Smit, E., & Meurs, L. (2011). Attention Battle: the Abilities of Brand, Visual, and Text Characteristics of the Ad to Draw Attention versus the Diverting Power of the Direct Magazine Context. Advances in Advertising Research, 2, 295-310.
- Boscolo, J. C., Oliveira, J. H. C., Maheshwari, V., & Giraldi, J.d. M. E. (2021). Gender differences: visual attention and attitude toward advertisements. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(2), 300-314.
- Calculator.io. (2024). Sample size calculator. Calculator LLC.
- Cornelis, E., & Peter, P. C. (2017). The real campaign: The role of authenticity in the effectiveness of advertising disclaimers in digitally enhanced images. Journal of Business Research, 77(C), 102-112.
- Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2008). Attitudes and Attitude Change (1st ed.). Psychology Press.
- De Jans, S., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2018). How an advertising disclosure alerts young adolescents to sponsored vlogs: The moderating role of a peer-based advertising literacy intervention through an informational vlog. Journal of Advertising, 47(4), 309-325.
- Deng, W., & Sloutsky, V. M. (2016). Selective attention, diffused attention, and the development of categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 91, 24-62.
- Devkota, N., Bijukshe, A., Pokhrel, L., Paudel, U., & Parajuli, S. (2021). Factors Influencing Attitude toward Online Advertising in Kathmandu Valley. PYC Nepal Journal of Management, 14(1), 17-30.
- Donato, C., & Adıgüzel, F. (2022). Visual complexity of eco-labels and product evaluations in online setting: Is simple always better? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67.
- Eze, U. C., & Lee, C. H. (2012). Consumers’ Attitude towards Advertising. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(13).
- Favier, M., Pantin-Sohier, G., Celhay, F., Rossi, P., & Krey, N. (2017). Is Using Ornaments Still a Crime? Package Design Complexity and Brand Perception with Application to Champagne: Labels. Academy of Marketing Science.
- Florack, A., Egger, M., & Hübner, R. (2020). When products compete for consumers attention: How selective attention affects preferences. Journal of Business Research, 117-127.
- Fransen, M., Verlegh, P., Kirmani, A., & Smit, E. G. (2015). A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 6-16.
- Gençer, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2021). Top-Down Processing. In Vonk, J., & Shackelford, T. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. Springer, Cham.
- Gidlöf, K., Anikin, A., Lingonblad, M., & Wallin, A. (2017). Looking is buying. How visual attention and choice are affected by consumer preferences and properties of the supermarket shelf. Appetite, 116, 29-38.
- Gómez-Carmona, D., Cruces-Montes, S., Marín-Dueñas, P. P., Serrano-Domínguez, C., Paramio, A., & García, A. Z. (2021). Do You See It Clearly? The Effect of Packaging and LabelFormat on Google Ads. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 16, 1648-1666.
- GroupM (2024). This Year Next Year report: 2024 Global Midyear Forecast.
- Gwizdka, J., Zhang, Y., & Dillon, A. (2019). Using the eye-tracking method to study consumer online health information search behaviour. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 71(6), 739-754.
- Herrando, C., & Martín-De Hoyos, M. J. (2022). Influencer endorsement posts and their effects on advertising attitudes and purchase intentions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(6), 2288-2299.
- Higgins, E., Leinenger, M., & Rayner, K. (2014). Eye movements when viewing advertisements. Frontiers in Psychology, 5.
- Huddleston, P., Behe, B. K., Minahan, S., & Fernandez, R. T. (2015). Seeking attention: An eye tracking study of in-store merchandise displays. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 43(6), 561-574.
- Khachatryan, H., Rihn, A., Behe, B., Hall, C., Campbell, B., Dennis, J., & Yue, C. (2018). Visual attention, buying impulsiveness, and consumer behavior. Marketing Letters, 29.
- Kim, C., Jeon, H. G., & Lee, K. C. (2020). Discovering the Role of Emotional and Rational Appeals and Hidden Heterogeneity of Consumers in Advertising Copies for Sustainable Marketing. Sustainability, 12(12), 5189.
- Kim, N., & Lee, H. (2021). Assessing Consumer Attention and Arousal Using Eye-Tracking Technology in Virtual Retail Environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 12.
- Kocaömer, N., Üniversitesi, E., Fakültesi, İ., İlişkiler, H., İzmir, T., & Topsumer, F. (2021). The Effect of Consumer Beliefs and Attitudes towards Social Media and Television Advertising on Purchase Intentions: A Comparative Analysis. Global Media Journal, 11, 1-30.
- Kujur, F., & Singh, S. (2020). Visual Communication and Consumer-Brand Relationship on Social Networking Sites - Uses & Gratifications Theory Perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 15(1).
- Kusumasondjaja, S., & Tjiptono, F. (2019). Endorsement and visual complexity in food advertising on Instagram. Internet Research, 29(4), 659-687.
- Lazard, A., & Mackert, M. (2014). User evaluations of design complexity: The impact of visual perceptions for effective online health communication. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 83.
- Lazard, A., Bock, M., & Mackert, M. (2020). Impact of photo manipulation and visual literacy on consumers’ responses to persuasive communication. Journal of Visual Literacy, 39, 1-21.
- LeBoeuf, R. A., & Simmons, J. P. (2010). Branding alters attitude functions and reduces the advantage of function-matching persuasive appeals. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 348-360.
- Lin, C-W. J., Murshed, F., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Revisiting Precipitation-Induced Smoking: The Role of Hedonic Versus Utilitarian Advertising Message on Smoking-Related Intervention. Social Marketing Quarterly, 26(3), 204-217.
- Marketing Digi Book (2020). Captivating Visual Content Statistics You Need to Know in 2023.
- Mele, M. L., Federici, S., & Dennis, J. (2014). Believing Is Seeing: Fixation Duration Predicts Implicit Negative Attitudes. PLoS ONE, 9(8).
- Milaković, I. K., & Mihić, M. (2015). Predictors and outcome of attitudes towards advertising: demographics, personal factors and WOM.
- Modig, E., & Rosengren, S. (2014). Can advertising creativity affect product perceptions and retailer evaluations? Journal of Product & Brand Management, 23(6), 452-461.
- Moon, M. A., Khalid, M. J., Awan, H. M., Attiq, S., Rasool, H., & Kiran, M. (2017). Consumer’s perceptions of website’s utilitarian and hedonic attributes and online purchase intentions: A cognitive–affective attitude approach. Spanish Journal of Marketing – ESIC, 21(2), 73-88.
- Moore, T., & Zirnsak, M. (2017). Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 47-72.
- Munusamy, J., Chee, W., See, H., & Marketing, H. (2007). Attitude towards advertising among students at private higher learning institutions in Selangor.
- Murphy, R., & Narkiewicz, V. (2010). Electronic Commerce and the Value Proposition. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, 6(1), 99-105.
- Onișor, L. F., & Ioniță, D. (2021). How advertising avoidance affects visual attention and memory of advertisements. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 22(3), 656-674.
- Peschel, A. O., Orquin, J. L., & Loose, M. S. (2019). Increasing consumers’ attention capture and food choice through bottom-up effects. Appetite, 132, 1-7.
- Peterson, R. A., & Umesh, U. N. (2018). On the significance of statistically insignificant resultsin consumer behavior experiments. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46, 81-91.
- Pieters, R., Wedel, M., & Batra, R. (2010). The Stopping Power of Advertising: Measures and Effects of Visual Complexity. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 48-60.
- Pomering, A., Johnson, L. W., & Noble, G. (2013). Advertising corporate social responsibility: results from an experimental manipulation of key message variables. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18(2), 249-263.
- Pukėnas, K. (2009). Kokybinių duomenų analizė SPSS programa [Qualitative data analysis using SPSS program]. Kaunas: Lietuvos kūno kultūros akademija.
- Raziq, M. M., Ahmed, Q. M., Ahmad, M., Yusaf, S., Sajjad, A., & Waheed, S. (2018). Advertising skepticism, need for cognition and consumers’ attitudes. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 36(6), 678-693.
- Shukla, M., Misra, R., & Singh, D. (2023). Exploring relationship among semiotic product packaging, brand experience dimensions, brand trust and purchase intentions in an Asian emerging market. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 35(2), 249-265.
- Soomro, Y., Kaimkhani, S., & Iqbal, J. (2017). Effect of Visual Merchandising Elements of Retail Store on Consumer Attention. Journal of Business Strategies, 11.
- Suci, A., Maryanti, S., Hardi, H., & Sudiar, N. (2021). Willingness to Pay for Traditional Ready-to-Eat Food Packaging: Examining the Interplay between Shape, Font, and Slogan. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 34(8), 1614-1633.
- Vukmirovic, M. (2015). The effects of food advertising on food-related behaviours and perceptions in adults: A review. Food Research International, 75, 13-19.
- Yagci, M., I., Biswas, A., & Dutta, S. (2009). Effects of comparative advertising format on consumer responses: The moderating effects of brand image and attribute relevance. Journal of Business Research, 62(8), 768-774.
- Yang, C. (2019). Influences of Product Involvement and Symbolic Consumption Cues in Advertisements on Consumer Attitudes. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 11(2).
- Yu, J., Droulers, O., & Lacoste-Badie, S. (2021). Why display motion on packaging? The effect of implied motion on consumer behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 64.
- Zhou, L., & Xue, F. (2021). Show products or show people: an eye-tracking study of visual branding strategy on Instagram. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 729-749.
- Zimmermann, P., Gondan, M., & Fimm, B. (2015). Test of Attentional Performance for Children. Psytest; Herzogenrath, Germany.
- Zuschke, N. (2020). The impact of task complexity and task motivation on in-store marketing effectiveness: An eye tracking analysis. Journal of Business Research, 116, 337-350.