Do voluntary environmental practices improve firm productivity? Evidence from Moroccan firms
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.17(2).2026.05
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2026, Issue #2, pp. 52-64
- 26 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The environmental and economic benefits of voluntary firm-level practices are often assumed but rarely tested, particularly with respect to firm-level heterogeneity in developing economies. This study aims to estimate the effect of two voluntary environmental practices (energy management and CO2 emissions monitoring) on firm productivity in Morocco, and to test whether these effects vary across the productivity distribution. Using firm-level microdata from the 2023 World Bank Enterprise Survey on 598 Moroccan manufacturing and service firms, conditional quantile regressions and quantile treatment effects with propensity score matching are employed to address heterogeneity and potential endogeneity. The results show that energy management practices increase productivity by 33% and CO2 monitoring by 57% on average. However, these average effects mask substantial heterogeneity. At the 10th percentile, energy management yields a 9.6% gain while CO2 monitoring has no significant effect. At the 50th percentile, energy management yields a 46.4% increase, while CO₂ monitoring yields a 61.2% increase. At the 90th percentile, energy management yields 28.4% and CO2 monitoring 61.7%. Quantile treatment effects confirm this heterogeneity but reveal that energy management benefits mid-to-upper performers (30th–70th percentiles), whereas CO2 monitoring benefits primarily low-performing firms (10th–20th percentiles). These findings indicate that the impact of voluntary environmental practices is context- and firm-specific. Policy implications suggest that differentiated support strategies are required to enhance both environmental and economic performance in developing economies.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Mohammed V University of Rabat, the Faculty of Law, Economics and Social Sciences – Agdal (FSJES-Agdal) and the Laboratory of Applied Economics for their institutional support.
This work was supported by the Centre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique (CNRST).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q52, D24, L25, C21
-
References64
-
Tables2
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Effect of CO2 monitoring on the distribution of firm production
- Figure 2. Effect of energy management on the distribution of firm production
- Figure 3. Effect of CO2 monitoring on the distribution of firm production (QTE)
- Figure 4. Effect of energy management on the distribution of firm production (QTE)
-
- Table 1. Effects of environmental measures on production (linear regression)
- Table 2. Effects of environmental measures (energy and CO2) on production quantiles
-
- Aghion, P., Dechezleprêtre, A., Hemous, D., Martin, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2016). Carbon taxes, path dependency, and directed technical change: Evidence from the auto industry. Journal of Political Economy, 124(1), 1-51.
- Albrizio, S., Kozluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2014). Empirical evidence on the effects of environmental policy stringency on productivity growth (OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1179). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Albrizio, S., Kozluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2017). Environmental policies and productivity growth: Evidence across industries and firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 81, 209-226.
- Alpay, E., Kerkvliet, J., & Buccola, S. (2002). Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84(4), 887-901.
- Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., & Lanoie, P. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 7(1).
- Arimura, T. H., Darnall, N., & Katayama, H. (2011). Is ISO 14001 a gateway to more advanced voluntary action? The case of green supply chain management. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(2), 170-182.
- Bambe, B. W. W., Combes, J. L., Kouassi, B. V., & Schwartz, S. (2026). Environmental policy stringency and firm efficiency in developing countries. Small Business Economics, 66(3), 1163-1182.
- Barani, O., Ahmed, A. D., Joshi, M., & Asiaei, K. (2025). How environmental management accounting drives performance: A meta-analysis considering national EMA maturity. Journal of Accounting Literature, 47(5), 416-443.
- Barbera, A. J., & McConnell, V. D. (1986). Effects of pollution control on industry productivity: A factor demand approach. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(2), 161-172.
- Barbera, A. J., & McConnell, V. D. (1990). The impact of environmental regulations on industry productivity: Direct and indirect effects. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 18(1), 50-65.
- Benbba, R., Barhdadi, M., Ficarella, A., Manente, G., Romano, M. P., El Hachemi, N., Barhdadi, A., Al-Salaymeh, A., & Outzourhit, A. (2024). Solar energy resource and power generation in Morocco: current situation, potential, and future perspective. Resources, 13(10), Article 140.
- Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. (2002). Process management and technological innovation: A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), 676-707.
- Berman, E., & Bui, L. T. (2001). Environmental regulation and productivity: Evidence from oil refineries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(3), 498-510.
- Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1-25.
- Blackman, A., Lahiri, B., Pizer, W., Planter, M. R., & Piña, C. M. (2010). Voluntary environmental regulation in developing countries: Mexico’s Clean Industry Program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 60(3), 182-192.
- Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), 1351-1408.
- Boyd, G. A., & McClelland, J. D. (1999). The impact of environmental constraints on productivity improvement in integrated paper plants. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38(2), 121-142.
- Bu, M., Qiao, Z., & Liu, B. (2020). Voluntary environmental regulation and firm innovation in China. Economic Modelling, 89, 10-18.
- Burritt, R. L., Hahn, T., & Schaltegger, S. (2002). Towards a comprehensive framework for environmental management accounting – Links between business actors and environmental management accounting tools. Australian Accounting Review, 12(27), 39-50.
- Christmann, P. (2000). Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 663-680.
- Cohen, M. A., & Tubb, A. (2018). The impact of environmental regulation on firm and country competitiveness: A meta-analysis of the Porter hypothesis. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 5(2), 371-399.
- Darnall, N., Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1072-1094.
- Dechezleprêtre, A., & Kruse, T. (2018). A review of the empirical literature combining economic and environmental performance data at the micro-level (OECD Economic Department Working Papers No. 1514). Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Dechezleprêtre, A., & Sato, M. (2017). The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 11(2), 183-206.
- Dechezleprêtre, A., Kozluk, T., Kruse, T., Nachtigall, D., & De Serres, A. (2019). Do environmental and economic performance go together? A review of micro-level empirical evidence from the past decade or so. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 13(1), 1-118.
- Dechezleprêtre, A., Nachtigall, D., & Venmans, F. (2023). The joint impact of the European Union emissions trading system on carbon emissions and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 118, Article 102758.
- Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151-161.
- Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2008). Organizational responses to environmental demands: Opening the black box. Strategic Management Journal, 29(10), 1027-1055.
- El Baz, J., & Laguir, I. (2017). Third-party logistics providers (TPLs) and environmental sustainability practices in developing countries: The case of Morocco. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(10), 1451-1474.
- El Hafdaoui, H., Khallaayoun, A., & Al-Majeed, S. (2025). Renewable energies in Morocco: A comprehensive review and analysis of current status, policy framework, and prospective potential. Energy Conversion and Management: X, 26, Article 100967.
- Firpo, S. (2007). Efficient semiparametric estimation of quantile treatment effects. Econometrica, 75(1), 259-276.
- Gerged, A. M., Zahoor, N., & Cowton, C. J. (2024). Understanding the relationship between environmental management accounting and firm performance: The role of environmental innovation and stakeholder integration – Evidence from a developing country. Management Accounting Research, 62, Article 100865.
- Gollop, F. M., & Roberts, M. J. (1983). Environmental regulations and productivity growth: The case of fossil-fueled electric power generation. Journal of Political Economy, 91(4), 654-674.
- Gray, W. B. (1987). The cost of regulation: OSHA, EPA and the productivity slowdown. The American Economic Review, 77(5), 998-1006.
- Gray, W. B., & Shadbegian, R. J. (2003). Plant vintage, technology, and environmental regulation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 46(3), 384-402.
- Greenstone, M., List, J. A., & Syverson, C. (2012). The effects of environmental regulation on the competitiveness of US manufacturing (Working Paper No. 18392). National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Hancevic, P. I. (2016). Environmental regulation and productivity: The case of electricity generation under the CAAA-1990. Energy Economics, 60, 131-143.
- Huang, C. J., & Liu, J. T. (1994). Estimation of a non-neutral stochastic frontier production function. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 5(2), 171-180.
- Jaffe, A. B., & Palmer, K. (1997). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79(4), 610-619.
- Johnstone, N., Managi, S., Rodríguez, M. C., Haščič, I., Fujii, H., & Souchier, M. (2017). Environmental policy design, innovation and efficiency gains in electricity generation. Energy Economics, 63, 106-115.
- Khan, M., Rana, A. T., & Ghardallou, W. (2022). Economic instability and pollution emissions in developing countries: A panel data investigation. Energy & Environment, 33(7), 1465-1484.
- Koenker, R., & Bassett, Jr. G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33-50.
- Kozluk, T., & Zipperer, V. (2015). Environmental policies and productivity growth: A critical review of empirical findings (Economics Department Working Papers No. 1096). OECD.
- Lanoie, P., Laurent-Lucchetti, J., Johnstone, N., & Ambec, S. (2011). Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the Porter hypothesis. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(3), 803-842.
- Lanoie, P., Patry, M., & Lajeunesse, R. (2008). Environmental regulation and productivity: Testing the porter hypothesis. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 30(2), 121-128.
- Lawton, J., McKay, T. J., & Tantoh, H. B. (2025). The emerging green economy: Exploring the influence of ISO 14001 on South African manufacturing sector. Development Southern Africa, 42(3), 363-382.
- Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and the environment: A theoretical perspective. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2(2).
- Mansouri, R., & Tounsi, S. (2026a). Market-based environmental regulation and competitiveness: A comparative analysis of developed and developing economies. PSL Quarterly Review, 79(316), 51-69.
- Mansouri, R., & Tounsi, S. (2026b). Voluntary environmental regulation, innovation and access to finance in Moroccan firms: Revisiting Porter’s Hypothesis. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 16(1), 45-50.
- Michailidis, M., Zafeiriou, E., Kantartzis, A., Galatsidas, S., & Arabatzis, G. (2025). Governance, energy policy, and sustainable development: Renewable energy infrastructure transition in developing MENA countries. Energies, 18(11), Article 2759.
- Porter, M. (1991). American’s green strategy. Scientific America, 168(4).
- Porter, M. E., & Van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118.
- Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288-300.
- Song, D., Shin, J. H., & Sam, A. G. (2026). Corporate environmentalism and economic performance: Examining the effects of ISO 14001 certification on technical efficiency. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 69(2), 404-424.
- Wang, C., Wu, J., & Zhang, B. (2018). Environmental regulation, emissions and productivity: Evidence from Chinese COD-emitting manufacturers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92, 54-73.
- Wang, W., Zhang, Q., & Hao, J. (2025). How does green factory certification affect corporate sustainability performance: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 17(1), Article 61.
- Wang, Y., & Shen, N. (2016). Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: The case of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 62, 758-766.
- World Bank. (n.d.). World Bank Enterprise Surveys.
- Wu, R. (2023). Environmental management, environmental innovation, and productivity growth: A global firm-level investigation. Environment and Development Economics, 28(5), 449-468.
- Xepapadeas, A., & de Zeeuw, A. (1999). Environmental policy and competitiveness: The Porter Hypothesis and the composition of capital. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(2), 165-182.
- Yang, C. H., Tseng, Y. H., & Chen, C. P. (2012). Environmental regulations, induced R&D, and productivity: Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing industries. Resource and Energy Economics, 34(4), 514-532.
- Yang, M., Yuan, Y., Yang, F., & Patino-Echeverri, D. (2021). Effects of environmental regulation on firm entry and exit and China’s industrial productivity: A new perspective on the Porter Hypothesis. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 23(4), 915-944.
- Zhang, W., Zhu, B., Li, Y., & Yan, D. (2024). Revisiting the Porter Hypothesis: A multi-country meta-analysis of the relationship between environmental regulation and green innovation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), Article 232.
- Zubeltzu-Jaka, E., Erauskin-Tolosa, A., & Barinaga-Rementeria, I. (2024). Throwing light on the relationship between voluntary environmental certification and corporates’ financial performance: A meta-analysis-based study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 28, 6389-6412.


