Environmentally friendly transportation use in Vietnam: Behavioral and policy drivers
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.17(2).2026.06
-
Article InfoVolume 17 2026, Issue #2, pp. 65-80
- 19 Views
-
4 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the behavioral and policy drivers of environmentally friendly transportation use in Vietnam by integrating environmental economics with behavioral theories of pro-environmental action. Primary data were collected through a structured online and in-person survey conducted across Vietnam’s northern, central, and southern regions between March and December 2025. The survey targeted respondents with regular daily travel activities to ensure a relevant transportation experience, and 538 valid responses were retained after data screening for analysis. Data were analyzed using PLS-SEM with SmartPLS software. The results show that behavioral intention is the strongest direct predictor among the examined factors of environmentally friendly transportation use (β = 0.472, p < 0.001), followed by perceived behavioral control (β = 0.283, p < 0.001) and benefits awareness (β = 0.108, p < 0.001). Attitude, subjective norm, and personal norm also exert significant positive effects on behavioral intention. Government policies, environmental awareness, and awareness of consequences positively shape personal norms, with government policies exerting the strongest effect (β = 0.450, p < 0.001). In addition, service availability and willingness to pay enhance perceived behavioral control, while ease of use strengthens benefits awareness. These findings highlight that environmentally friendly transportation adoption in Vietnam depends on the joint effects of behavioral motivation, normative influence, and structural feasibility, suggesting that integrated policy approaches are essential for promoting sustainable mobility in developing economies.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)Q51, Q58, R41
-
References39
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Proposed structural model
- Figure 2. Confirmed research model
-
- Table 1. Characteristics of the survey respondents
- Table 2. Summary of reliability and convergent validity results
- Table 3. Discriminant validity of the measurement model (HTMT)
- Table 4. Summary of direct hypothesis testing results
- Table 5. Summary of indirect hypothesis testing results
- Table 6. Coefficients of determination
-
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
- Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14-25.
- Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 175-187.
- Bamberg, S., Hunecke, M., & Blöbaum, A. (2007). Social context, personal norms and the use of public transportation: Two field studies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 190-203.
- Beirão, G., & Sarsfield Cabral, J. A. (2007). Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14(6), 478-489.
- Bui, V. V., Tran, T. T., Nguyen, H. C., Nguyen, H. H., & Pham, Q. T. (2026). Drivers of consumers’ trust and online purchase decisions: Evidence from Vietnam’s e-commerce market. Innovative Marketing, 22(1), 65-80.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
- De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149(4), 425-449.
- Gardner, B., & Abraham, C. (2008). Psychological correlates of car use: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 11(4), 300-311.
- Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141-157.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publishing.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R. Springer International Publishing.
- Hanemann, W. M. (1991). Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: How much can they differ? The American Economic Review, 81(3), 635-647.
- Heath, Y., & Gifford, R. (2002). Extending the theory of planned behavior: Predicting the use of public transportation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(10), 2154-2189.
- Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J. (2014). Common beliefs and reality about PLS. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182-209.
- International Energy Agency. (2025). Breakthrough agenda report 2025: Accelerating sector transitions through stronger international collaboration.
- Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour – A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(5), 1028-1038.
- Klöckner, C. A., & Blöbaum, A. (2010). A comprehensive action determination model: Toward a broader understanding of ecological behaviour using the example of travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 574-586.
- Lai, W.-T., & Chen, C.-F. (2011). Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers – The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement. Transport Policy, 18(2), 318-325.
- Lanzini, P., & Khan, S. A. (2017). Shedding light on the psychological and behavioral determinants of travel mode choice: A meta-analysis. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 48, 13-27.
- Ng, P. Y., & Phung, P. T. (2021). Public transportation in Hanoi: Applying an integrative model of behavioral intention. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(2), 395-404.
- Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 339-347.
- OECD. (2021). Transport strategies for net-zero systems by design. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Paulssen, M., Temme, D., Vij, A., & Walker, J. L. (2014). Values, attitudes and travel behavior: A hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice. Transportation, 41(4), 873-888.
- Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Hartig, T. (2013). Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport Policy, 25, 119-127.
- Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., & Bodin, J. (2015). Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 34, 122-136.
- Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279.
- Steg, L. (2023). Psychology of climate change. Annual Review of Psychology, 74(1), 391-421.
- Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317.
- Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An integrated framework for encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104-115.
- Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407-424.
- Tietenberg, T., & Lewis, L. (2018). Environmental and natural resource economics. New York: Routledge.
- Turan, B., Hemmelmayr, V., Larsen, A., & Puchinger, J. (2024). Transition towards sustainable mobility: The role of transport optimization. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 32(2), 435-456.
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
- WHO. (2022). Compendium of WHO and other UN guidance on health and environment, 2022 update.
- WHO. (2023). Air pollution in Viet Nam.
- World Bank. (2022). Vietnam country climate and development report. World Bank.
- World Bank. (2024). Viet Nam: Recommendations to the national roadmap and action plan for the electric-mobility transition.
- Zhang, X., Wang, K., Hao, Y., Fan, J.-L., & Wei, Y.-M. (2013). The impact of government policy on preference for NEVs: The evidence from China. Energy Policy, 61, 382-393.


