Influence of the dimensions of CSR activities on consumer purchase intention

  • Received February 28, 2018;
    Accepted April 13, 2018;
    Published April 26, 2018
  • Author(s)
    Vinod Sharma
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    Jeanne Poulose
    ORCID Researcher ID ,
    ResearcherID: E-4300-2018
    Subhasmita Mohanta
    ORCID ,
    ResearcherID: E-4312-2018
    Liza Elizabeth Antony
    ORCID
  • DOI
    http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.14(1).2018.03
  • Article Info
    Volume 14 2018, Issue #1, pp. 23-32
  • TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
  • Cited by
    31 articles
  • 2787 Views
  • 440 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Over the years, the number of organizations investing in CSR activities has increased considerably. This increase is partially attributable to the intention of the organizations to give back to the society to repair and reduce the loss their intentional or unintentional actions might have caused to the environment. The government’s decision to make it mandatory for businesses to invest a small part of their net profit in social welfare activities has also helped nudge the organizations towards CSR activities. However, the question whether this investment influences customers’ intention to purchase the product in any manner remains an unresolved paradox. Limited researches have been conducted in this area to explore and establish the relationship if any between CSR and consumer purchase intention. This research focuses on the five different factors of CSR comprising of loyalty, morality, awareness, behavior and environment, which are identified from the previous literature. With the help of these factors, the authors researched and established the relationship between them and consumer purchase intention. In this descriptive research, the research questionnaire was distributed to 1500 respondents, using convenient sampling method, out of which 319 responses were finally obtained for the analysis purpose. After testing the reliability and validity of the data, the five hypotheses were tested using SEM (Structural Equation Modeling). It was found that all the five hypotheses were supported and thereby acknowledged the significant influence of CSR related activities performed by companies on the consumer purchase intention. The CSR driven morality is emerging to be the most important dimension that appears to influence the consumer purchase intentions. These finding will help decision-makers to formulate their promotion activities in such a manner that it aligns with the value system of the consumers and increase the overall consumer base.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Fig. 1. Conceptual framework of influence of CSR on consumer purchase intention
    • Fig. 2. Confirmatory Factor Analysis model
    • Fig. 3. SEM analysis model
    • Table 1. Literature review summary
    • Table 2. Reliability analysis
    • Table 3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis results
    • Table 4. Index of the fit of the model
    • Table 5. Results of hypotheses test
    • Agarwal, G. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Behavior.
    • Anim, P. A., & Cudjoe, A. G. (February 2015). The Influence Of CSR Awareness On Consumer Purchase Decision Of A Telecommunication Network In Ghana. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 4(2).
    • Balcerowicz, L. (2015). Fryzel. Corporate Social Responsibility: Some Clarifications and Questions.
    • Bueble, E. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility: CSR Communication as an Instrument to Consumer-Relationship Marketing. GRIN Verlag, New York.
    • Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why Would Corporations Behave in Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 194-967.
    • Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer – do ethics matter in purchase behavior?
    • Carroll, V. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons.
    • Carroll, A., & Shabana, K. (2010). The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Review.
    • Chen, Mei-Hua, Tai, Pei-Ni, & Chen, Bryan H. (2016). The Relationship among Corporate Social Responsibility, Consumer-Company Identification, Brand Prestige, and Purchase Intention. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(5).
    • CNN International Edition.
    • Creyer, E. H. (1997). The influence of firm behaviour on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing.
    • Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management.
    • Danko, D. S., Goldberg, J. R., Goldberg, S., & R. A., G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The United States vs. Europe. The Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance.
    • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore its social responsibility? California Management Review.
    • Eshra, N., & Beshir, N. (2017). Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Consumer Buying Behavior in Egypt. World Review of Business Research, 7(1), 32-44.
    • Fallah Tafti, S. F. (2012). Assessment the corporate social responsibility according to Islamic values (Case Study: Sarmayeh Bank). 8th International Strategic Management Conference, Iran.
    • General circular 01/2016, 05/19/2915-CSR.
    • Guisheng Jin, D. C. (2014). The Role of Moral Identity in Consumers’ Purchase. International Conference on Global Economy, Commerce and Service Science (GECSS 2014).
    • Gupta, M. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Global Apparel Industry: An Exploration of Indian Manufacturers’ Perceptions.
    • Hazel H. Huang, V.-W. M.-E. (2012). Are Consumer and Brand Personalities the Same? Are Consumer and Brand Personalities the Same? 29(5).
    • Ho, Han Chiang, Awan, Mahmood A.; Khan, Habib Ullah (2016). Luxury Brands and Corporate Social Responsibility: A Perspective on Consumers’ Preferences. Journal of International Management Studies, 16(1), 77-81.
    • Jeremy, & Moon (2004). Government as a Driver of Corporate Social Responsibility (Research Paper Series No. 20-2004).
    • Kang, J. H., Kozar, J. M. (2016). Purchase Intention of Socially Responsible Apparel Goods: Investigating Consumers Cross-Culturally. In M. Groza, C. Ragland (Eds.), Marketing Challenges in a Turbulent Business Environment. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham.
    • Karl Aquino, A. R. (2002). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. The self-importance moral identity, 83(6), 1423-1440.
    • Katzel, T. A. (2011). The 2008 Financial Crisis and Its Aftermath: Addressing the Next Debt Challenge. (Occasional Paper 82).
    • Księżak, P. (2016). The Benefits from CSR for a Company and Society. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership Contemporary Challenges in Corporate Social Responsibility, 3(4).
    • Lina, L., & Berg, H. (2012). The Effect of Perceived CSR on Customer Loyalty. An empirical study into consumer behaviour on the Swedish chocolate market.
    • Mazurkiewicz, P. (2004). Corporate environmental responsibility: Is a common CSR framework possible? Washington, DC: World Bank.
    • Mohr, L., Webb, D., & Harris, K. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45-67.
    • Mulaessa, N., & Wang, H. (2016). The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Consumers Purchase Intention in China: Mediating Role of Consumer Support for Responsible Business. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 9(1).
    • Mullerat, R. (2010). International Corporate Social Responsibility: The Role of Corporations in the Economic Order of the 21st Century, Kluwer Law International (pp 278-294). Netherlands.
    • Mullerat, R. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility: A European Perspective. The Jean Monnet/Robert Schuman Paper Series, 13(6).
    • Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence Consumer Loyalty? Journal of Marketing.
    • Paswan, A. (2009). Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equations Modeling. An Introduction, Department of Marketing and Logistics, COB, University of North Texas, USA.
    • Perry, P., & Towers, N. (2013). Conceptual Framework Development for CSR Implementation in Fashion Supply Chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management.
    • Qasim, S., Siam, Mohammad R. A., Sallaeh, Salniza Bt Md. (2017). The Impact of CSR on Consumers Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Corporate Reputation and Moderating Peers Pressure. International Journal of Supply Chain Management IJSCM, 6(3).
    • Roitto, A. (2013, April). Oulun Yliopisto. Factors Affecting Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Ratings.
    • Schwartz, M., & Carroll, A. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Three-Domain Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 503-530.
    • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research.
    • Sharma, V., Sonwalkar, J., & Kapse, M. (2013). Consumer Purchase Behaviour for Green Products. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration, I(4), 50-65.
    • Su, Y. K., & Chang, B. (2015). Consumer purchase intentions to corporate social responsibility. Managing Intellectual Capital and Innovation for Sustainable and Inclusive Society. Does doing good’ always lead to ‘doing better.
    • Vahdati, H., Mousavi, N., & Tajik, Z. (2015). The Study of Consumer Perception on Corporate Social Responsibility Towards Consumers Attitude and Purchase Behavior. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 5, 831-845.
    • Veersalu, L. (2011). The importance of corporate social responsibility in Estonia consumerʼs purchasing decisions. Bachelorʼs Thesis of Tallin Universityʼs Baltic Film and Media School, Estonia.
    • Yam, S. (2013). The practice of corporate social responsibility by Malaysian developers. Property Management.
    • Zairi, M., & John, P. (2002). The impact of social responsibility on business performance. Managerial Auditing Journal.
Related Articles

  • Effect of work motivation and job satisfaction on employee performance: Mediating role of employee engagement

    Setyo RiyantoORCID , Endri EndriORCID Researcher ID, Novita Herlisha doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(3).2021.14
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 19, 2021         Issue #3         pp. 162-174 Views: 9892 Downloads: 7852 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Technological developments are things that must be followed by companies to achieve a competitive advantage to improve performance. To achieve and improve performance, companies need active employee engagement by encouraging motivation and fulfilling their job satisfaction. This study aims to analyze the effect of motivation and job satisfaction on performance with employee engagement as a mediating variable. The research sample is Information Technology (IT) companies located in the cities of Jakarta and Bandung, Indonesia. Research respondents are system developers who handle system development activities for a project or part of an ongoing project. By using the convenience sampling technique 103 responses were obtained from IT developers. The research model analysis method uses Partial Least Square (PLS) with SMART PLS Ver 3.0 software. Empirical findings prove that motivation has a positive effect on the performance of IT employees, while job satisfaction is independent. Employee engagement does not directly affect employee performance, but the effect of mediation through motivation and job satisfaction can have a significant effect on employee performance. The research findings have managerial implications, in increasing high employee involvement, motivation needs to be encouraged to be more active and innovative, and facilitate the achievement of the desired results.

    Acknowledgment
    This study was made possible because of the full support of the Region III Education Service Institute (LL-DIKTI III), the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia, and the Research Center at Mercu Buana University, Jakarta.

  • Environmental Performance Index: relation between social and economic welfare of the countries

    Tetyana PimonenkoORCID Researcher ID, Oleksii LyulyovORCID Researcher ID, Olena ChygrynORCID Researcher ID, Maksim Palienko doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.09(3).2018.01
    Environmental Economics Volume 9, 2018         Issue #3         pp. 1-11 Views: 3585 Downloads: 549 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    The paper deals with the analysis of methodology of Environmental Performance Index. The authors analyzed and systematized the main existing integrated indices, which were used for evaluation of environmental, social and economic situation in the countries. The authors allocated the environmental performance index as a basis for analyzing the environmental policy of the country. In this direction, the authors analysed the main features, structure and indicators of environmental performance index. The authors allocated the world-leader countries with huge level of CO2 emissions. According to the results, the authors aproved that these countries should improve their environmental policy. Accordingly, they occupied less position in environmental performance index. For the purpose to analyze the relation between ecological, social and economic welfare, the authors analyzed score of sustainable development goal index, social progress index and gross domestic product per capita. The comparison analysis of findings showed that countries with good position on environmental performance index have the strong position on sustainable development goal index and social progress index. The authors suggested that Ukraine should orient to the EU countries with purpose to improve the environmental policy.

  • Fuzzy reporting as a way for a company to greenwash: perspectives from the Colombian reality

    Orlando E. Contreras-PachecoORCID , Cyrlene Claasen doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(si).2017.06
    Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017         Issue #2 (cont. 3)         pp. 525-535 Views: 3251 Downloads: 729 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ

    Drawing on the legitimacy theory framework, this study introduces an alternative means to spot “fuzzy reporting” signals as a way to detect greenwashing at the firm level. Its approach is based on the way the sustainability reporting process can mislead stakeholders after critical incidents take place. In order to do so, a single environmental incident, which took place in Colombia, is analyzed in light of what happened before, during and afterwards, with special emphasis on the corporate disclosure process performed by the company involved. Results obtained give support to the assumption that fuzzy reporting can be objectively detected not only through the analysis of annual sustainability reports, but also by tracking other forms of corporate messages when a specific concern is carefully followed. This study’s contribution is two-fold. First, it builds on the theoretical notions of greenwashing and fuzzy reporting by illustrating a practical and objective way to identify some deceiving corporate practices. Second, it empirically evaluates this approach in a sensitive context in order to obtain better illustration and prepare the groundwork for further studies.

Download Preview
Close
Innovative Marketing
Innovative Marketing