Effects of green intellectual capital, green accounting, and green innovation on firm value: The moderating role of return on assets
-
Received August 14, 2024;Accepted December 27, 2024;Published January 6, 2025
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7949-3019Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8255-0513
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.16(1).2025.01
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2025, Issue #1, pp. 1-12
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
- 48 Views
-
26 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study examines the influence of green intellectual capital, green accounting, and green innovation on firm value and return on assets. Green intellectual capital refers to the knowledge and expertise of environmental sustainability, green accounting involves incorporating environmental costs into financial reporting, and green innovation focuses on developing environmentally friendly technologies and processes. Indicators for evaluating these factors include the Green Intellectual Capital Index, Global Reporting Index disclosures for green accounting, and green process and product innovation dimensions for green innovation. The study employs Warp PLS to analyze data from 88 companies listed on the Sustainable and Responsible Investment (SRI-KEHATI) index on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The findings indicate that green accounting significantly enhances firm value, while green innovation does not show a direct impact. However, all three factors positively influence return on asset (ROA). The moderating role of ROA was found to strengthen the relationship between green intellectual capital and green accounting with firm value, but it did not moderate the effect of green innovation. ROA was used as an indirect financial indicator to formulate the company’s profitability and strategic sustainability planning. These results highlight the importance of embedding sustainability into business strategies to enhance financial and environmental performance.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)L21, M41, Q56
-
References49
-
Tables5
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research model
- Figure 2. Structural model
-
- Table 1. Operationalization of variables
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Model fit and quality indices
- Table 4. Direct effect test
- Table 5. Indirect effect test
-
- Al-Dhaimesh, O. H. (2020). Green accounting practices and economic value added: An applied study on companies listed on the Qatar Stock Exchange. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(6), 164-168.
- Al-Zu’bi, H., & Albloush, A. (2022). The impact of green organizational identity on green innovation at Jordanian food and beverage companies. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(2), 302-310.
- Arfara, C., & Samanta, I. (2023). Exploring the impact of internal marketing practices on the commitment to “green” intellectual capital. Innovative Marketing, 19(2), 198-210.
- Astuti, T., Ambarwati, S., & Wibowo, F. D. (2022a). The influence of green intellectual capital, dividend policy, profitability ratio and activity ratio on company value. Inquisitive International Journal of Economic, 3(1), 55-65.
- Astuti, T., Amyulianthy, R., & Kaniati, R. (2022b). Green accounting, financial performance toward firm value. Asian Journal of Accounting and Finance, 4(1), 1-12.
- Astuti, T., Widyastuti, T., & Ahmar, N. (2022c). Green accounting and green intellectual capital practices: Study of the influence of indirect financial firm on firm value. Asian Journal of Accounting and Finance, 4(3), 101-112.
- Benevene, P., Buonomo, I., Kong, E., Pansini, M., & Farnese, M. L. (2021). Management of green intellectual capital: Evidence-based literature review and future directions. Sustainability, 13(15).
- Bombiak, E. (2021). Assessment of the level of green intellectual capital development – Polish enterprises case study. European Research Studies Journal, XXIV(1), 1139-1156.
- Brooks, C., & Oikonomou, L. (2018). The effects of environmental, social and governance disclosures and performance on firm value: A review of the literature in accounting and finance. The British Accounting Review, 50(1), 1-15.
- Carandang, J., & Ferrer, R. (2020). Effect of environmental accounting on financial performance and firm value of listed mining and oil companies in the Philippines. Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 20(1), 117-134.
- Dinarjito, A., & Ahmar, N. (2023). Is green organizational identity related to sustainability performance? A scooping review. International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science, 4(2), 463-476.
- Dzage, E. J., Hussain, M. R., Dapaah, P. O., & Mustapha, Y. (2024). Corporate social responsibility, sustainable environmental practices and green innovation; Perspectives from the Ghanaian manufacturing industry. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 9, Article 4.
- Egbunike, A., & Okoro, G. (2018). Does green accounting matter to the profitability of firms? A canonical assessment. Ekonomski Horizonti, 20(1), 17-26.
- Ethika, Azwari, M., & Muslim, R. Y. (2019). Analysis of the influence of environmental accounting disclosure and environmental performance on company value (Empirical study on LQ-45 Index companies listed on the IDX). Jurnal Kajian Akuntansi dan Auditing, 14(2), 122-133.
- Gonzalez, C. C., & Peña-Vinces, J. (2022). A framework for a green accounting system-exploratory study in a developing country context, Colombia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 25, 9517-9541.
- Guo, J., Fu, Y., & Sun, X. (2023). Green innovation efficiency and multiple paths of urban sustainable development in China: Multi-configuration analysis based on urban innovation ecosystem. Scientific Reports, 13, Article 12975.
- He, Z., Chen, Z., & Feng, X. (2023). How does high-speed railway affect green technology innovation? A perspective of high-quality human capital. Environmental Sciences Europe 35, Article 97.
- Kafeel, K., Zhou, J., Phetkhammai, M., Heyan, L., & Khan, S. (2023). Green innovation and environmental quality in OECD countries: The mediating role of renewable energy and carbon taxes. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 2214-2227.
- Li, C., Wen, M., Jiang, S., & Wang, H. (2024). Assessing the effect of urban digital infrastructure on green innovation: mechanism identification and spatial-temporal characteristics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 320.
- Li, K., Lin, W., Jiang, T., Mao, Y., & Shi, W. (2024). Driving carbon emission reduction in China through green finance and green innovation: An endogenous growth perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 14318-14332.
- Liang, L., Lu, L., & Su, L. (2023). The impact of industrial robot adoption on corporate green innovation in China. Scientific Reports, 13, Article 18695.
- Liu, L. (2023). Green innovation, firm performance, and risk mitigation: Evidence from the USA. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 24009-24030.
- Maama, H., & Appiah, K. O. (2019). Green accounting practices: Lesson from an emerging economy. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 11(4), 456-478.
- Malik, S. Y., Cao, Y., Mughal, Y. H., Kundi, G. M., Mughal, M. H., & Ramayah, T. (2020). Pathways towards sustainability in organizations: Empirical evidence on the role of green human resource management practices and green intellectual capital. Sustainability, 12(8).
- Peng, M. Y.-P., Zhang, L., Lee, M.-H., Hsu, F.-Y., Xu, Y., & He, Y. (2024). The relationship between strategic human resource management, green innovation and environmental performance: A moderated-mediation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 239.
- Ratmono, D., Mail, R., Cahyonowati, N., & Janie, D. N. A. (2024). The role of environmental performance in mediating the relationship between green accounting and corporate social responsibility. Environmental Economics, 15(1), 46-55.
- Rejeki, D., & Ahmar, N. (2022). Literature study review: The importance of implementing integrated reporting (IR). Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi), 6(3), 151-163.
- Revellino, S., & Mouritsen, J. (2023). Intellectual capital, innovation and the bushy form of knowledge capitalisation. Journal of Management and Governance, 28, 957-984.
- Safitri, N., Ahmar, N., Zaky, M., & Rahmani, M. A. (2022). Green intellectual capital and environmental management accounting: A literatur review. Jurnal Proaksi, 9(3), 281-291.
- Sahetapy, K. (2023). Sustainability report and firm value: An evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing, 10(1), 1-8.
- Sarfraz, M., Ozturk, I., Yoo, S., Raza, M. A., & Han, H. (2023). Toward a new understanding of environmental and financial performance through corporate social responsibility, green innovation, and sustainable development. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 297.
- Schäfer, D., Stephan, A., & Fuhrmeister, S. (2023). The impact of public procurement on financial barriers to general and green innovation. Small Business Economics, 62, 939-959.
- Sidik, M. H. J., Yadiati, W., Lee, H., & Khalid, N. (2019). The dynamic association of energy, environmental management accounting and green intellectual capital with corporate environmental performance and competitive. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 9(5), 379-386.
- Trevlopoulos, N. S., Tsalis, T. A., Evangelinos, K. I., Tsagarakis, K. P., Vatalis, K. I., & Nikolaou, I. E. (2021). The influence of environmental regulations on business innovation, intellectual capital, environmental and economic performance. Environment Systems and Decisions, 41, 163-178.
- Wang, D., & Dou, W. (2023). Investigation on how carbon markets and digital transformation affect green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 22775-22800.
- Widiyaningsih, V. A., & Jati, A. K. N. (2024). Implementation of green accounting, intellectual capital and environmental performance on company value mediated by financial performance. Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 17(1), 129-151.
- Wu, Q., Wang, S., Zhou, A., Xia, B., Abruquah, L. A., & Chen, Z. (2023). Effects of digital transformation and environmental resource integration capability on medical equipment suppliers’ green innovation performance. Scientific Reports, 13, Article 17559.
- Xia, Y., Luo, L., Ji, K., Huang, C., Wan, F., & Wang, Z. (2024). The impact of green finance and local regulations on industrial green innovation efficiency in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 1980-1994.
- Xiao, H., Mamun, A. A., Masukujjaman, M., & Yang, Q. (2023). Modelling the significance of strategic orientation on green innovation: Mediation of green dynamic capabilities. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, Article 777.
- Xie, X., Huo, J., & Zou, H. (2019). Green process innovation, green product innovation, and corporate financial performance: A content analysis method. Journal of Business Research, 101, 697-706.
- Xu, Q., Lu, Y., Lin, H., & Li, B. (2021). Does corporate environmental responsibility (CER) affect corporate financial performance? Evidence from the global public construction firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 315, Article 128131.
- Yin, S., & Zhao, Y. (2024). Digital green value co-creation behavior, digital green network embedding and digital green innovation performance: Moderating effects of digital green network fragmentation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, Article 228.
- Yu, H., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Z., Shang, W.-L., Han, C., & Zhao, Y. (2022). The impact of carbon emission trading policy on firms’ green innovation in China. Financial Innovation, 8, Article 55.
- Yusliza, M., Yong, J. Y., Tanveer, M. I., Ramayah, T., Juhari, N. F., & Muhammad, Z. (2020). A structural model of the impact of green intellectual capital on sustainable performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 249, Article 119334.
- Yuvianita, M., Ahmar, N., & Mandagie, Y. (2022). The effect of corporate social responsibility and profitability disclosure on company value (Empirical study on state-owned enterprises listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the period 2017–2020). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Pancasila, 2(2), 138-150.
- Zhang, H., Zhang, D., Qian, W., & Xu, S. (2023). The ambient air quality standards, green innovation, and urban air quality: evidence from China. Scientific Reports, 13, Article 19684.
- Zhang, Q., & Ma, Y. (2021). The impact of environmental management on firm economic performance: The moderating effect of green innovation and the moderating effect of environmental leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, Article 126057.
- Zhang, X.-B. (2023). A dynamic game of strategic carbon taxation and energy pricing with green technology innovation. Dynamic Games and Applications, 14, 1027-1055.
- Zhong, X., Duan, Z., Liu, C., & Chen, W. (2024). Research on the coupling mechanism and influencing factors of digital economy and green technology innovation in Chinese urban agglomerations. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 5150.
-
-
Conceptualization
Tri Astuti
-
Data curation
Tri Astuti, Nurmala Ahmar
-
Formal Analysis
Tri Astuti, Nurmala Ahmar
-
Funding acquisition
Tri Astuti, Nurmala Ahmar
-
Investigation
Tri Astuti, Nurmala Ahmar
-
Methodology
Tri Astuti, Nurmala Ahmar
-
Project administration
Tri Astuti
-
Software
Tri Astuti
-
Supervision
Tri Astuti
-
Validation
Tri Astuti, Nurmala Ahmar
-
Writing – original draft
Tri Astuti
-
Resources
Nurmala Ahmar
-
Visualization
Nurmala Ahmar
-
Writing – review & editing
Nurmala Ahmar
-
Conceptualization
-
Environmental Performance Index: relation between social and economic welfare of the countries
Tetyana Pimonenko , Oleksii Lyulyov , Olena Chygryn , Maksim Palienko doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ee.09(3).2018.01Environmental Economics Volume 9, 2018 Issue #3 pp. 1-11 Views: 3614 Downloads: 553 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe paper deals with the analysis of methodology of Environmental Performance Index. The authors analyzed and systematized the main existing integrated indices, which were used for evaluation of environmental, social and economic situation in the countries. The authors allocated the environmental performance index as a basis for analyzing the environmental policy of the country. In this direction, the authors analysed the main features, structure and indicators of environmental performance index. The authors allocated the world-leader countries with huge level of CO2 emissions. According to the results, the authors aproved that these countries should improve their environmental policy. Accordingly, they occupied less position in environmental performance index. For the purpose to analyze the relation between ecological, social and economic welfare, the authors analyzed score of sustainable development goal index, social progress index and gross domestic product per capita. The comparison analysis of findings showed that countries with good position on environmental performance index have the strong position on sustainable development goal index and social progress index. The authors suggested that Ukraine should orient to the EU countries with purpose to improve the environmental policy.
-
Financial sustainability management of the insurance company: case of Ukraine
Ruslana Pikus , Nataliia Prykaziuk , Mariia Balytska doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(4).2018.18Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 219-228 Views: 3596 Downloads: 306 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn the current conditions of the Ukrainian economy, which is characterized by crisis phenomena and frequent changes in legislation, the insurance organizations are facing a number of difficulties in maintaining their financial sustainability. Moreover, these processes take place under the increased requirements for solvency of insurers. However, a significant part of domestic insurance companies is financially unstable, which is conditioned not only by the lack of funds, but also by the low level of management. This situation hinders the further development of the insurance market in Ukraine and has a negative impact on all areas of the domestic financial system and prevents it from successful integration into the European financial field. In order to address this problem, it is necessary to distinguish the key groups of risks that affect the financial sustainability of insurance organizations, among which there are the following: insurance, strategic, market risk, risk of inefficient capital structure, risk of limiting the insurance company’s liquidity, tax risk, investment risk, operational risk, the risk of ineffective organizational structure of the enterprise, and information risk. It should be noted that under conditions of changing environment, the impact of these risks only increases, and therefore the task of minimizing the impact of these risks on the activities of insurance companies is highly important. Accordingly, the authors of the article proposed a four-stage strategy to manage the financial sustainability of the insurance company, the purpose of which is to identify the risks of limiting the insurer’s financial sustainability, their qualitative and quantitative assessment, as well as the development and implementation of appropriate measures to minimize and eliminate unacceptable consequences.
-
The risk management practices in the manufacturing SMEs in Cape Town
Clinton Mbuyiselo Sifumba , Kevin Boitshoko Mothibi , Anthony Ezeonwuka , Siphesande Qeke , Mamorena Lucia Matsoso doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(2-2).2017.08Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #2 (cont. 2) pp. 386-403 Views: 3442 Downloads: 548 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯRisk management is one of the prominent issues which are pivotal to the success of a business and may adversely affect profitability if not properly practised. Therefore, the main objective of this paper was to determine risk management practices in manufacturing SMEs in Cape Town. The research conducted was quantitative in nature and constituted the collection of data from 74 SME leaders, all of whom had to adhere to a list of strict delineation criteria. All data collected were thoroughly analyzed through means of descriptive statistics. From the findings made, it is clear that SMEs in the manufacturing sector do in fact understand risk management initiatives applicable to ‘manage’ their respective businesses towards sustainability, but not to a large extent. It was found that respondents are unaware of the elements which make risk management effective, which ultimately aids to the development of problems for SMEs. All employees, managers and owners must coordinate their efforts together to identify and manage organizational risks within their ambit to obtain total risk coverage, as well as provide assurance that these risks are effectively managed from a coordinated approach. Further studies may be carried out to identify measures that can be taken to improve the effectiveness of risk management practices in SMEs.