The effect of Lithuanian household income on the choice of non-formal education of children through sports and related costs
-
Received January 1, 2020;Accepted January 31, 2020;Published February 3, 2020
-
Author(s)Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4475-3528
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.16(1).2020.02
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2020, Issue #1, pp. 11-18
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by3 articlesJournal title: JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIESArticle title: Country performance in e-sport: Social and economic development determinantsDOI: 10.14254/2071-8330.2022/15-4/14Volume: 15 / Issue: 4 / First page: 226 / Year: 2022Contributors: Mariia Kashcha, Valerii Yatsenko, Tamás GyömöreiJournal title: Economics & SociologyArticle title: The effectiveness of the sports management system in Europe: High achievements, public funding and a healthy lifestyleDOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2022/15-4/13Volume: 15 / Issue: 4 / First page: 264 / Year: 2022Contributors: Vitaliia Koibichuk, Serhii Drozd, Angéla SomogyiJournal title: Problems and Perspectives in ManagementArticle title: Influence of general government expenditure on the development of sports entrepreneurship: The case of some OECD countriesDOI: 10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.33Volume: 21 / Issue: 2 / First page: 336 / Year: 2023Contributors: Vugar Nazarov, Nailya Kalantarly, Jamal Hajiyev, Gulnar Hasanova, Albina Hashimova
-
Funding dataFunder name: Academic Association of Management and AdministrationFunder identifier: 302571456Award numbers: AVADA 2019-1
- 1212 Views
-
99 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Lithuanian government attempts to create equal opportunities for children who are brought up in different economic, social, and cultural conditions. The income of the majority of Lithuanian citizens still falls behind the European average. This study aims to examine the effect of household income on the choice of non-formal education activity of children and the costs of participation in sports. A questionnaire survey was public used on a website. Vilnius households (Ʃ = 136) were those whose 3-7 years old children were enrolled in non-formal sports activities. The survey aimed to find out the effect of household income on the selection of children’s non-formal sports education. Results showed that the importance level of a sports club, the sport, or activity selection criteria are more expressed in families with lower income. Survey revealed the annual (nine months) ten categories of expenses incurred by parents. The average parental costs for children’s sports activities per nine months amount to EUR 550, consisting of the membership fees and other costs. Parents tend to finance children’s non-formal education through sport irrespective of household income, i.e., parental predispositions towards their children’s participation in sports are much stronger compared to incurred expenses on sports activities.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D13, М31,G50, L67
-
References35
-
Tables3
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Average consumption expenditure and its structure in 2012 and 2016
- Table 2. Sports club, the sport, or activity selection criteria importance level by two groups of subjects according to household income per family member
- Table 3. Annual (nine months) parental expenses for children’s sports activities
-
- Adaškevičienė, E., & Strazdienė, N. (2013). Mokinių fizinio aktyvumo didinimo pedagoginės strategijos sveikatos požiūriu. Sportinį darbingumą lemiantys veiksniai. Mokslinių straipsnių rinkinys, 6-15.
- Aidukaite, J. (2009) The Transformation of Welfare Systems in the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. In Cerami & Vanhuysse (Eds.), Post-Communist Welfare Pathways. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Balvočiūtė, R. (2014). Changes in Income Inequality in the EU Countries in 2005−2011. Economics and Business, 25(1), 6-11.
- Barkauskaitė, M. (2004). Moksleivių dorinis ugdymas popamokinėje veikloje. Pedagogika, 72, 21-25.
- Camiré, M., Trudel, P., & Forneris, T. (2014). Examining How Model Youth Sport Coaches Learn to Facilitate Positive Youth Development. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(1), 1-17.
- Candemir, A., & Zalluhoğlu, A. E. (2012). Factors Affecting the Sport Related Consumer Expenditures. Ege Academic Review, 12, 29-39.
- Celik, S., & Ozerkek, Y. (2009). Panel Cointegration Analysis of Consumer Confidence and Personal Consumption in the European Union. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10(2), 161-168.
- Čingienė, V. (2015). Lietuvos gyventojų vartojimo išlaidų sporto sektoriuje analizė. Kaunas: Unikom.
- Davies, L. E. (2002). Consumers’ Expenditure on Sport in the UK: Increased Spending or Underestimation? Managing Leisure, 7(2), 83-102.
- Education and Training 2010 Work Program. European Parliament Resolution of 18 December 2008.
- European Commission (2007). White Paper on Sport Brussels. European Commission.
- Eurostat Statistics Explained (2016). Minimum Wage Statistics.
- Gratton, Ch., & Taylor, P. (1988). Economics of Leisure Services Management. Harlow: Longman Group ltd.
- Kokolakakis, Th., Lera-López, F., & Castellanos, P. (2014). Regional differences in sports participation: the case of Local Authorities in England. International Journal of Sport Finance, 9(2), 149-171.
- Kvieskienė, G., & Petronienė, O. (2007). Neformaliojo vaikų švietimo sąnaudos ir prieinamumas. Socialinis ugdymas, 3(14), 60-78.
- Lamb, L., Asturias, L., Roberts, L. P. K., & Ve Brodie, D. A. (1992). Sports Participation – How Much Does It Cost? Leisure Studies, 11(1), 19-29.
- Lenartowicz, M. (2013). Family Leisure Consumption and Youth Sport Socialization in Post-communist Poland: A Perspective Based on Bourdieu’s Class Theory. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 51(2), 219-237.
- Lera-López, F., & Rapún-Gárate, M. (2007). The Demand for Sport: Sport Consumption and Participation Models. Journal of Sport Management, 21(1), 103-122.
- Lisauskaitė, V. (2010). Lietuvos gyventojų pajamų ir vartojimo diferenciacija. Verslas: teorija ir praktika, 11(3), 266-278.
- Lydeka, Z., & Žaliauskas, Ž. D. (2013). Veiksnių, turinčių įtakos Lietuvos valstybės išlaidoms ir jų struktūroms tyrimas. Taikomoji ekonomika: sisteminiai tyrimai, 7(1), 13-29.
- Moldovan, O., & Bocoş-Binţinţan, V. (2015). The Necessity of Considering the Concept of non-formal education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, 337-343.
- Morkūnienė, A. (2012). Neformaliojo vaikų švietimo kaitos nuostatos. Vilnius: Ugdymo plėtotės centras.
- National Education Strategy 2013–2022. Valstybinė švietimo 2013–2022 metų strategija, 2013.
- Preuss, H., & Alfs, C. (2013). Wirtschaftliche Bedeutung des Sportkonsums in Deutschland. Sportwissenschaft, 43(4), 239-252.
- Preuss, H., Alfs, C., & Ahlert, G. (2012). Economic Dimensions of Sport Consumption in Germany. Executive Summary.
- Putys, T. (2015, gruodžio 2 d.). Neformaliojo vaikų švietimo lėšų skyrimo ir panaudojimo tvarkos aprašo įgyvendinimo savivaldybėse apžvalga. Pranešimas konferencijoje, Švietimo ir mokslo ministerija, Vilnius.
- Ruškus, J., Žvirdauskas, D., & Stanišauskienė, V. (2009). Neformalusis švietimas Lietuvoje. Faktai, interesai, vertinimai. Vilnius: Švietimo aprūpinimo centras.
- Skirmantienė, J. (2013). Neformaliojo ugdymo reikšmė pozityviajai socializacijai. Socialinė teorija, empirija, politika ir praktika, 7, 118-116.
- Statistikos departamentas. (2016). Namų ūkiai ir šeimos, jų sudėtis ir dydis.
- Summers, J., Johnson, M. M., & Ve Kanoyangwa, R. (2007). Teenage Motivations for Sport Related Consumption in Australia. In P. G. Pitts (Eds.), Sport Marketing in the New Millennium, U.S, Fitness Information Technology Inc.
- Taks, M., Renson, R., & Ve Vanreusel, B. (1999). Consumer Expenses in sport: a marketing tool for sports and sports facility providers? European Journal for Sport Management, 6(1), 4-18.
- The Ministry of Economy of the Republic of Lithuania (n.d.). Lithuania: National Reform Programme, 2011.
- Vaikų ir Jaunimo Socializacijos Programa. Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės 2010 m. spalio 11 d. įsakymas, Nr. V-1715.
- Wicker, P., Breuer, C., & Pawlowski, T. (2010). Are Sports Club Members Big Spenders?: Findings from Sport Specific Analyses in Germany. Sport Management Review, 13(3), 214-224.
- Žygaitienė, B., & Sinkevičienė, J. (2015). Neformalusis technologinis vaikų ugdymas Vilniaus mieste. Pedagogika, 3, 60-72.
-
-
Conceptualization
Vilma Čingienė
-
Data curation
Vilma Čingienė
-
Formal Analysis
Vilma Čingienė
-
Investigation
Vilma Čingienė
-
Methodology
Vilma Čingienė
-
Project administration
Vilma Čingienė
-
Supervision
Vilma Čingienė
-
Validation
Vilma Čingienė
-
Visualization
Vilma Čingienė
-
Writing – original draft
Vilma Čingienė
-
Writing – review & editing
Vilma Čingienė
-
Conceptualization
-
“Say hello to Halo”: the halo effect in sports
Innovative Marketing Volume 15, 2019 Issue #3 pp. 116-129 Views: 2750 Downloads: 654 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn daily life, people tend to use mental shortcuts to simplify and speed up their decision-making processes. A halo effect exists if the impression created by a dominant attribute influences how other attributes of an object or subject are judged. It involves a cognitive bias that leads to distorted assessments. However, the halo effect has barely been researched in a sports-related context, although it can substantially contribute to understanding how sport fans think and behave. The objective of this paper is to answer the question that is of interest for both theory and practice of sports marketing: Is there a halo effect in sports? Does the sporting success or failure of a professional soccer team radiate or even outshine other sports-related and non-sports aspects and influence or distort how the club is perceived by its fans? Fans of six soccer clubs selected from the first German soccer league Bundesliga were interviewed. This paper presents the results of an empirical study based on a data set consisting of a total of 4,180 cases. The results of the analyses substantiate the distortion of the fans’ perception with regard to a very diverse range of aspects that is triggered by the sporting success or failure of their favorite club.
-
Affordable housing for internally displaced persons: The priorities for investment and development in Ukraine
Lyudmyla Alekseyenko , Oksana Tulai , Yuriy Petrushenko , Andriy Kuznietsov , Julia Derkash doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.18(1).2021.09Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 18, 2021 Issue #1 pp. 101-113 Views: 1013 Downloads: 441 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe institution of home ownership provides for the functioning of affordable housing for low-income people and new groups in need of social protection, including the reintegration of migrants to new places of residence.
The aim of the study is to substantiate the priorities of investments into affordable housing for internally displaced persons promoting their adaptation and social reintegration in the context of administrative-territorial decentralization.
The study is based on use of empirical, economic and statistical methods, which in the process of correlation, regression and canonical analysis showed that many indicators that characterize the housing market are closely correlated with the scale and development level of administrative units in Ukraine. To characterize the state and investment attractiveness of the residential real estate market, a set of indicators was used in the modeling: population, the number of employed, household income, regional domestic product, volume of commissioned housing, construction investments, regional human development index, total housing stock, housing prices in the regions of Ukraine and Kyiv. The most significant parameter that affects the volume of housing construction is the amount of investments into per capita housing construction.
The article also discusses the housing market situation, which differs in regions or some cities due to the significant differentiation of their development, which affects the ability to obtain affordable housing. The implementation of regional development programs should determine investment priorities of social protection, particularly the possibility of buy-out schemes through the mechanism of leasing of social housing by internally displaced persons.Acknowledgment
This research was funded by a grant from the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine “Reforming the lifelong learning system in Ukraine for the prevention of the labor emigration: a coopetition model of institutional partnership” (No. 0120U102001). -
Influence of general government expenditure on the development of sports entrepreneurship: The case of some OECD countries
Vugar Nazarov , Nailya Kalantarly , Jamal Hajiyev , Gulnar Hasanova , Albina Hashimova doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.21(2).2023.33Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 21, 2023 Issue #2 pp. 336-346 Views: 678 Downloads: 208 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe low level of the nation’s health and physical activity highlights the need to find additional mechanisms for the development of the sports sphere, one of which is to increase its financing. This paper aims to investigate how an increase in general government expenditure on recreation and sports affects sports entrepreneurship (turnover or gross premium written in the sports industry; value added at factor cost of sports enterprises; sports industry market size) and the share of the population involved in sports (as an indicator characterizing the development of sports). The study used the panel unit root test and fixed and random effects models. Modeling proved that the increase in general government expenditure on recreation and sports by 1% largely determines the increase in value added at factor cost of sports enterprises (by 5.48%). A significantly less effect is for turnover or gross premium written in the sports industry (by 0.85%), and the smallest is for the sports industry market size (by 0.4%). A 1% increase in general government expenditure on recreation and sport has the greatest impact in the Czech Republic (by 2.37%) and Slovakia (by 2.44%) and the least – in Australia (by 0.4%). The share of the population involved in sports is almost independent of general government expenditure on recreation and sports in all 10 OECD countries.