Role of supply chain management in improving competitive advantage of Indonesian small and medium enterprises
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.54
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #2, pp. 696-707
- Cited by
- 436 Views
-
83 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Global competition has forced companies, including small and medium enterprises (SMEs), to improve their competitive advantage. Supply chain management practices are the ways to improve the competitive advantage, particularly in the global competition context. However, there is still doubt SMEs can compete globally, considering they face limited resources, skilled workforce, and business networks. Therefore, this study aims to examine the influence of supply chain management practices, covering cross-functional integration, partnership, responsiveness, and resilience. Moreover, this study has examined which practices dominate in improving competitive advantage. The quantitative study involved 445 SMEs located in East Java, Indonesia. The respondents are supervisors or higher levels and work in departments related to supply chain management, as they can provide the relevant information and possess complete knowledge of management practices. The data were collected via a questionnaire designed with a five-point Likert scale. The responses were analyzed using SmartPLS software 4.0. The results show that cross-function integration improves supply chain partnership, responsiveness, and resilience (β = 0.705, 0.382, 0.324; t-value = 25.177, 6.697, 5.783). Supply chain partnerships affect supply chain responsiveness, resilience, and competitive advantage (β = 0.327, 0.257, 0.249; t-value = 5.933, 4.536, 5.651). Moreover, supply chain responsiveness improves supply chain resilience and competitive advantage (β = 0.285, 0.106; t-value = 5.690, 2.099). Supply chain resilience improves competitive advantage (β = 0.435 and t-value = 8.987). SMEs can enhance their competitive advantage by integrating their internal cross-functional integration and adopting supply chain partnership, responsiveness, and resilience.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank DIKTI 2023 and Research and Community Outreach Petra Christian University for providing the grant to fund this research.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)O31, L25
-
References53
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research model
-
- Table 1. Respondents’ profile
- Table 2. Goodness of fit
- Table 3. Discriminant validity
- Table 4. Hypotheses testing
-
- Abeysekara, N., Wang, H., & Kuruppuarachchi, D. (2019). Effect of supply-chain resilience on firm performance and competitive advantage: A study of the Sri Lankan apparel industry. Business Process Management Journal, 25(7), 1673-1695.
- Acquah, I. N., Kumi, C. A., Asamoah, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., Agbodza, M., & Agyabeng-Mensah, Y. (2024). Unearthing the relationship between supply chain social capital and firm performance: The role of supply chain responsiveness. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 31(4), 1225-1248.
- Ambekar, S. S., Deshmukh, U., & Hudnurkar, M. (2021). Impact of purchasing practices, supplier relationships and use of information technology on firm performance. International Journal of Innovation Science, 13(1), 118-130.
- Asamoah, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., & Ashun, E. (2020). Social network relationship, supply chain resilience and customer-oriented performance of small and medium enterprises in a developing economy. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(5), 1793-1813.
- Asamoah, D., Nuertey, D., Agyei-Owusu, B., & Akyeh, J. (2021). The effect of supply chain responsiveness on customer development. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(4), 1190-1213.
- Bag, S., Dhamija, P., Luthra, S., & Huisingh, D. (2023). How big data analytics can help SME companies strengthen supply chain resilience in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(4), 1141-1164.
- Birasnav, M., & Bienstock, J. (2019). Supply chain integration, advanced SMEs technology, and strategic leadership: An empirical study. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 130, 142-157.
- Chunsheng, L., Wong, C.W., Yang, C.-C., Shang, K.-C., & Lirn, T.-C. (2020). Value of supply chain resilience: Roles of culture, flexibility, and integration. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 50(1), 80-100.
- Dhaigude, A. S., Kapoor, R., Gupta, N., & Padhi, S. S. (2021). Linking supply chain integration to supply chain orientation and performance – A knowledge integration perspective from Indian SMEs industries. Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(9), 2293-2315.
- Eriksson, P. E. (2015). Partnering in engineering projects: Four dimensions of supply chain integration. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 21(1), 38-50.
- Frankowska, M., & Cheba, K. (2022). The relational embeddedness as the differentiator of the cluster supply chain collaboration – A multidimensional comparative analysis. Competitiveness Review, 32(1), 59-84.
- Freije, I., de la Calle, A., & Ugarte, J. V. (2022). Role of supply chain integration in the product innovation capability of serviced SME companies. Technovation, 118, Article 102216.
- Górska-Warsewicz, H. (2024). Relationship between entrepreneurial orientation, innovative co-branding partnership, and business performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 20(2), 139-159.
- Hohenstein, N.-O., Feisel, E., Hartmann, E., & Giunipero, L. (2015). Research on the phenomenon of supply chain resilience: A systematic review and paths for further investigation. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 45(1/2), 90-117.
- Hosseini, S., Morshedlou. N., Ivanov, D., Sarder, M. D., Barker, K., & Al Khaled, A. (2019). Resilient supplier selection and optimal order allocation under disruption risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 124-137.
- Hui, Z., He-Cheng, W., & Min-Fei, Z. (2015). Partnership management, supply chain collaboration, and firm innovation performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Innovation Science, 7(2), 127-138.
- Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Sirmon, D. G. (2003). A model of strategic entrepreneurship: The construct and its dimensions. Journal of Management, 29(6), 963-989.
- Jambulingam, T., & Kathuria, R. (2020). Antecedents to buyer-supplier coordination in the pharmaceutical supply chain. International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing, 14(2), 289-303.
- Khan, I., Khan, I., Khan, I. U., Suleman, S., & Ali, S. (2024). Board diversity on firm performance from resource-based view perspective: New evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73(3), 649-675.
- Khan, Y. K., Kasuma, J., & Ali, A. (2022). The challenges of small and medium businesses in managing human capital towards SMEs performance – A qualitative study. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 15(1), 311-343.
- Kumar, D., & Rahman, Z. (2016). Buyer supplier relationship and supply chain sustainability: An empirical study of the Indian automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 836-848.
- Li, D. Y., & Liu, J. (2014). Dynamic capabilities, environmental dynamism, and competitive advantage: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2793-2799.
- Lii, P., & Kuo, F. (2016). Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 174, 142-155.
- Liu, C.-L., & Lee, M.-Y. (2018). Integration, supply chain resilience, and service performance in third-party logistics providers. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 29(1), 5-21.
- Liu, S., Tan, J., Mao, H., & Gong, Y. (2021). Does national culture matter? Understanding the impact of supply chain integration in multiple countries. Supply Chain Management, 26(5), 610-628.
- Maleki, H., Aghazadeh, H., Mahdiraji, H.A., Vrontis, D., & Mohammadi, E. (2023). Disentangling sustainability and resiliency factors in buyer-supplier relationships: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Business Research, 164, Article 114037.
- Munir, M., Jajja, M. S. S., & Chatha, K. A. (2022). Capabilities for enhancing supply chain resilience and responsiveness in the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring the role of improvisation, anticipation, and data analytics capabilities. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(10), 1576-1604.
- Munir, M., Jajja, M. S. S., Chatha, K. A., & Farooq, S. (2020). Supply chain risk management and operational performance: The enabling role of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, Article 107667.
- Mutlu, F., & Çetinkaya, S. (2020). Supplier – carrier – buyer channels: Contractual pricing for a carrier serving a supplier-buyer partnership. International Journal of Production Economics, 230, Article 107876.
- Nayak, B., Bhattacharyya, S. S., & Krishnamoorthy, B. (2023). Integrating the dialectic perspectives of resource-based view and industrial organization theory for competitive advantage – A review and research agenda. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 38(3), 656-679.
- Nenavani, J., & Jain, R. K. (2022). Examining the impact of strategic supplier partnership, customer relationship, and supply chain responsiveness on operational performance: The moderating effect of demand uncertainty. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(5), 995-1011.
- Orlando, B., Tortora, D., Pezzi, A., & Bitbol-Saba, N. (2022). The disruption of the international supply chain: Firm resilience and knowledge preparedness to tackle the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of International Management, 28(1), Article 100876.
- Panahifar, F., Byrne, P. J., Salam, M. A., & Heavey, C. (2018). Supply chain collaboration and firm’s performance: The critical role of information sharing and trust. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 31(3), 358-379.
- Pu, X., Cai, Z., Chong, A. Y. L., & Paulraj, A. (2023). Dependence structure, relational mechanisms, and performance: Teasing out the differences between upstream and downstream supply chain partners. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(7), 1009-1039.
- Rajaguru, R., Matanda, M. J., & Zhang, W. (2022). Supply chain finance enhances supply-oriented and demand-oriented performance capabilities, moderating the role of perceived partner opportunism. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 37(11), 2396-2413.
- Rezaei, J., Ortt, R., & Trott, P. (2018). Supply chain drivers, partnerships and performance of high-tech SMEs: An empirical study using SEM. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 67(4), 629-653.
- Shan, H., Bai, D., Li, Y., Shi, J., & Yang, S. (2023). Supply chain partnership and innovation performance of SME firms: Mediating effect of knowledge sharing and the moderating effect of knowledge distance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(4), Article 100431.
- Shiau, W.-L., Sarstedt, M., & Hair, J. F. (2019). Internet research using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Internet Research, 29(3), 398-406.
- Siagian, H., Tarigan, Z. J. H., & Jie, F. (2021). Supply chain integration enables resilience, flexibility, and innovation to improve business performance in the COVID-19 Era. Sustainability, 13, Article 4669.
- Siagian, H., Ubud, S., Basana, S. R., & Tarigan, Z. J. H. (2022). The effect of amended order on firm resilience through supply chain coordination. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3), 1009-1022.
- Srivastava, P., Iyer, K. N. S., & Rawwas, M. Y. A. (2017). Performance impact of supply chain partnership strategy-environment co-alignment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 37(7), 927-949.
- Sujatha, R., & Maheswari, B. (2023). Green supply chain management practices as a determinant of organizational competitiveness: An empirical study among hotels in India. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 16(1), 193-218.
- Tan, H.-C., Soh, K. L., Wong, W. P., & Tseng, M.-L. (2022). Enhancing supply chain resilience by counteracting the Achilles heel of information sharing. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(3), 817-846.
- Tarigan, Z. J. H., & Siagian, H. (2021). The effects of strategic planning, purchasing strategy, and strategic partnership on operational performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 363-372.
- Tarigan, Z. J. H., Siagian, H., & Jie, F. (2021). Impact of internal integration, supply chain partnership, supply chain agility, and supply chain resilience on sustainable advantage. Sustainability, 13(10), Article 5460.
- The Indonesian Chamber of Commerce and Industry. (2024). UMKM Indonesia. (In Indonesian).
- Tsanos, C. S., & Zografos, K. G. (2016). The effects of behavioral supply chain relationship antecedents on integration and performance. Supply Chain Management, 21(6), 678-693.
- Tseng, P. H., & Liao, C. H. (2015). Supply chain integration, information technology, market orientation, and firm performance in container shipping firms. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(1), 82-106.
- Vafaei-Zadeh, A., Ramayah, T., Hanifah, H., Kurnia, S., & Mahmud, I. (2020). Supply chain information integration and its impact on the operational performance of SME firms in Malaysia. Information & Management, 57(8), Article 103386.
- Wernerfelt, B. (2020). A possible micro-foundation for the RBV and its implications. Strategic Management Review, 1(1), 145-158.
- Xie, Y., Zhao, Y. Q., Chen, Y. H., & Allen, C. (2022). Green construction supply chain management: Integrating governmental intervention and public-private partnerships through ecological modernization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 331, Article 129986.
- Youn, S., Yang, M. G., Hong, P., & Park, K. (2013). Strategic supply chain partnership, environmental supply chain management practices, and performance outcomes: An empirical study of Korean firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 56, 121-130.
- Yu, W., Chavez, R., Jacobs, M., Wong, C. Y., & Yuan, C. (2019). Environmental scanning, supply chain integration, responsiveness, and operational performance: An integrative organizational information processing theory framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39(5), 787-814.