Positive contribution of the good corporate governance rating to stability and performance: evidence from Indonesia
-
Received October 19, 2017;Accepted March 19, 2018;Published April 16, 2018
-
Author(s)RR. Iramani , Muazaroh Muazaroh ,Link to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5778-9194
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(2).2018.01
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #2, pp. 1-11
- TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯ
-
Cited by3 articlesJournal title: Financial Markets, Institutions and RisksArticle title: The Impact of Corporate Governance on Banks Profitability in NigeriaDOI: 10.21272/fmir.5(1).18-28.2021Volume: 5 / Issue: 1 / First page: 18 / Year: 2021Contributors: Foluso Ololade OluwoleJournal title: Problems and Perspectives in ManagementArticle title: The impact of good corporate governance and Sharia compliance on the profitability of Indonesia’s Sharia banksDOI: 10.21511/ppm.17(1).2019.06Volume: 17 / Issue: 1 / First page: 56 / Year: 2019Contributors: Nur Fitriana HamsyiJournal title: Stratejik Yönetim Araştırmaları DergisiArticle title: KURUMSAL YÖNETİM DERECELENDİRME PUANININ FİNANSAL PERFORMANS ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE ÖRNEĞİDOI: 10.54993/syad.1242008Volume: 6 / Issue: 1 / First page: 21 / Year: 2023Contributors: Adem Ruhan SÖNMEZ
- 3209 Views
-
314 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This paper aims to examine the impact of Good Corporate Governance (GCG) practice on bank stability and performance. Governance is measured using the GCG rating that covers eleven aspects. The authors apply instrumental regression to link governance to performance and stability. The study covers a sample of 150 banks. The result shows that bank stability can mediate bank governance and bank performance. On the determinant of bank performance, it can be concluded that the GCG rating is positive and directly influences bank performance. Bank stability is also positive for bank performance indicating the indirect contribution of the GCG rating to bank performance. NPL, LDR, CAR and bank’s size (LASSET) are all negative and significant. The aim of this paper is to provide strong empirical evidence on the importance of governance and stability for performance. The limitations of this paper are the size of the sample and that it only covers public banks which are theoretically required to apply better governance in all aspects of their business by the Capital Market Authority.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, D24
-
References35
-
Tables3
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Research framework
-
- Table 1. Variables, definition and sources of data
- Table 2. The data description
- Table 3. The results compared
-
- Aebi, V., Sabato, G., & Schmid, M. (2012). Risk Management, Corporate Governance, and Bank Performance in the Financial Crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(12), 3213-3226.
- BCBS (2015). Basel Committee on Banking Supervision: Corporate governance principles for banks.
- Bank Indonesia (2013). Circular Letter on GCG Implementation.
- Beltratti, A., & Stulz, R. M. (2012). The credit crisis around the globe: Why did some banks perform better? Journal of Financial Economics, 105(1), 1-17.
- Berger, A. N., Clarke, G. R., Cull, R., Klapper, L., & Udell, G. F. (2005). Corporate Governance and Bank Performance: A Joint Analysis of the Static, Selection, and Dynamic Effects of Domestic, Foreign and State Ownership. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(8), 2179-2221.
- Bikker, J. A., & Hu, H. (2012). Cyclical patterns in profits, provisioning and lending of banks and procyclicality of the new Basel capital requirements. PSL Quarterly Review, 55(221).
- Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Čihák, M., & Hesse, H. (2010). Islamic Banks and Financial Stability: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Financial Service Research, 38, 95.
- Daniri, Mas Achmad (2014). Lead by GCG. Gagas Bisnis.
- De Haan, J., & Vlahu, R. (2016). Corporate governance of banks: A survey. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(2), 228-277.
- Dewi, Nurul Hasanah Uswati (2009). The Impact of Corporate Governance Practices on Indonesia Banking Industry (July 1-2, 2009). 17 Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economic, Accounting, and Management (PBFEAM) the 3rd International Conference on Business in Asia.
- Ghalib, S. (2017). Microfinance strategy and its impact on profitability and operating efficiency: evidence from Indonesia. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 14(2), 51-62.
- Gibson, M. S. (2003). Is corporate governance ineffective in emerging markets? Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 38(1), 231-250.
- Goddard, J., Molyneux, P., & Wilson, J. O. S. (2004). Profitability of European Banks: A Cross-Sectional and Dynamic Panel Analysis. E Manchester School, 72(3), 363-381.
- Greene, W. H. (2017). Econometric Analysis (8th ed.). Prentice Hall.
- Halkos, G. E., & Salamouris, D. S. (2004). Efficiency measurement of the Greek commercial banks with the use of financial ratios: A data envelopment analysis approach. Management Accounting Research, 15, 201-224.
- Haryati, S., & Kristijadi, E. (2014). The Effect of GCG Implementation and Risk Profile on Financial Performance at Go-Public National Commercial Banks. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business: JIEB, 29(3), 237.
- IMF (1998). East Asian Crisis: Causes and Cure, Finance and Development.
- Jensen, M. C. (1983). Organization theory and methodology. Accounting Review, 319-339.
- Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S., 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial economics, 11(1-4), 5-50.
- Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259-275.
- La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1-33.
- Love, I. (2011). Corporate governance and performance around the world: What we know and what we don’t. The World Bank Research Observer.
- Lutfi, L., Silvy, M., & Iramani, R. (2014). The role of board of commissioners and transparency in improving bank operational efficiency and profitability. Journal of Economics, Business & Accountancy Ventura, 17(1), 81-90.
- Mongid, A. (2007). The Political Openness of Banking System, Political Governance, Law Enforcement, and Cost of Banking Crisis: Indonesia in the International Perspective. Paper delivered at 32nd Annual Conference of FAEA. Bangkok, and December 7–8.
- Mongid, A., & Muazaroh, M. (2017). On the nexus between risk taking and profitability: Evidences from Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Society, 18(2), 271-284.
- Mongid, A., & Tahir, I. M. (2011). Impact of corruption on banking profitability in ASEAN countries: An empirical analysis. Banks and Bank Systems, 6(1), 41-48.
- Murharsito, Fauziah, F. E., Kristijadi, E., & Iramani, R. (2017). Provincial corruption and local development bank performance. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 9(1), 66-73.
- Nur’ainy, Remmy, Bagus Nurcahyo, Sri Kurniasih A., & Sugiharti (2013). Implementation of Good Corporate Governance and Its Impact on Corporate Performance: The Mediation Role of Firm Size (Empirical Study from Indonesia). Global Business and Management Research: An International Journal, 5(2 & 3).
- Okike, E., & Turton, A. (2009). Corporate Governance Reform within the UK Banking Industry and its Effect on Firm Performance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 7(1-4), 456-470.
- Sastrosuwito, S., & Suzuki, Y. (2012). The determinants of post-crisis Indonesian banking system profitability. Economics and Finance Review, 1(11), 48- 57.
- Subanidja, S., Rajasa, A., Suharto, E., & Atmanto, J. D. (2016). The determinants of firm value: The role of earnings management and good corporate governance. Corporate Ownership & Control, 13(4-4), 609-615.
- Suhartono, S. (2017). Productive efficiency of banks in ASEAN countries. Banks and Bank Systems, 12(2), 91- 99.
- Stata, Stata Manual Book.
- Williams, B. (2014). Bank risk and national governance in Asia. Journal of Banking & Finance, 49, 10-26.
-
Perceived health risk, online retail ethics, and consumer behavior within online shopping during the COVID-19 pandemic
Yuniarti Fihartini , Arief Helmi , Meydia Hassan , Yevis Marty Oesman doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.17(3).2021.02Innovative Marketing Volume 17, 2021 Issue #3 pp. 17-29 Views: 4519 Downloads: 1730 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe risk of virus contracting during the COVID-19 pandemic has changed consumer preference for online shopping to meet their daily needs than shopping in brick-and-mortar stores. Online shopping presents a different environment, atmosphere, and experience. The possibility of ethical violations is higher during online than face-to-face transactions. Therefore, this study was conducted to investigate the influence of perceived health risk and customer perception of online retail ethics on consumer online shopping behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic, involving seven variables, namely perceived health risk, security, privacy, non-deception, reliability fulfillment, service recovery, and online shopping behavior. The data were collected through an online survey by employing the purposive sampling technique to a consumer who has shopped online during the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia. 315 valid responses were obtained and analyzed through quantitative method using SEM-Amos. The results showed that perceived health risk and four variables of online retail ethics including security, privacy, reliability fulfillment, and service recovery affected online shopping behavior. Meanwhile, non-deception was found to have an insignificant effect. The coefficient value proved perceived health risk to be more dominant in influencing online shopping behavior than the variables of online retail ethics. Thus, consumers pay more concern for their health during online shopping. However, positive consumer perceptions of the behavior of online retail websites in providing services also can encourage consumers to shop online during this pandemic.
-
Human resource management in promoting innovation and organizational performance
I Gede Riana , Gede Suparna , I Gusti Made Suwandana , Sebastian Kot , Ismi Rajiani doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.10Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #1 pp. 107-118 Views: 3558 Downloads: 851 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯHuman resource management (HRM) is one of the elements enabling an organization to remain competitive in turbulence conditions. The effective practice of HRM makes competent and innovative employees contributing to the achievement of organizational objectives. This study aims to analyze HRM practices in creating innovation and organizational performance. The questionnaire was used to measure the respondents’ perceptions of variables used by a Likert scale. A survey of 126 manager samples and middle managers at export-oriented short and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Bali, Indonesia, was conducted to test the model. The analysis has shown that the proposed model was proven to be compliant with the research hypotheses. HRM significantly affects organizational performance and innovation, and it was found out that innovation can improve organizational performance. However, in the process of simultaneous testing, it was found out that innovation cannot improve organizational performance. The lack of attention to investments in human resources became one of the barriers to SMEs in creating innovation.
-
The influence of corporate governance on the intellectual capital disclosure: a study on Indonesian private banks
Joy Elly Tulung , Ivonne Stanley Saerang , Stevanus Pandia doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.13(4).2018.06Banks and Bank Systems Volume 13, 2018 Issue #4 pp. 61-72 Views: 2718 Downloads: 405 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe release of bank’s intellectual capital is one of the important elements of bank’s annual reports. Although it is not presented adequately in the annual reports, voluntary disclosure of bank’s intellectual capital relatively represents the response to the needs of greater information for the users. This research aims to see the influence of corporate governance on the intellectual capital disclosure based on a case study on private banks in Indonesia. The variables to be examined in the research include the Composition of Independent Commissioners as well as The Competence of Audit Committee and Risk Oversight Committee. The samples were taken using purposive sampling, considering particular criteria. As many as 62 banks are selected to be taken as research samples. The data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis method. The result of a partial test shows that the Composition of Independent Commissioners has a positive and significant influence on the intellectual capital disclosure; the Competence of Audit Committee has a positive and significant influence on the intellectual capital disclosure; and the Competence of Risk Oversight committee does not influence the intellectual capital disclosure. Meanwhile, the result of a simultaneous test shows that the Composition of Independent Commissioners, the Competence of Audit Committee, and the Competence of Risk Oversight Committee significantly influence the intellectual capital disclosure.