Methodological framework for integrated business structures branding development in Ukraine
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.15(2).2019.02
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2019, Issue #2, pp. 14-29
- Cited by
- 1012 Views
-
108 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The integrated business structures performance is underpinned by a wide range of external and internal factors that from a business unit perspective may have positive or negative implications for brand building. Moreover, in the context of business integration, the interaction among individual business units is of paramount importance that dramatically affects the performance of the entire business structure. The research objective is to provide a methodological framework for branding development through the calculation of integrated complementary and synergistic effects indicators, based on their compliance with the criteria of congruence and compatibility within architectonic elements of integrated business structures. The methodological toolkit design to estimate the integrated indices for complementary and synergistic effects involves the following stages: building a set of partial indicators for assessing complementary and synergetic effects, developing an algorithm to calculate an integrated index for complementary effect from internal and external brand interactions within integrated business structures (IBS), developing an algorithm to calculate an integrated index for a synergetic effect from brand integration within a business structure, individual business unit brand classification by different complementary and synergistic effects manifestations.
The proposed methodological approach contributes to facilitating brand integration in mergers and acquisitions, as well as enhancing the allocation effectiveness of portfolio roles of integrated business structure brands in product offering in the integration framework.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M31, L22
-
References27
-
Tables10
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Methodological approach to integrated business structure branding development
- Figure 2. Integrated indices for complementary effect
- Figure 3. The results of Fozzy Group hierarchical brand clustering
-
- Table 1. A structure of factors and indicators that have significant influence on complementary effect from internal and external interactions
- Table 2. Complementary effect index values for Fozzy Group business units
- Table 3. The results of integrated indices calculation in the framework of estimate parameters assessment for the components of synergetic effect from brand integration
- Table 4. Integrated indices of complementary and synergistic effects for Fozzy Group business units
- Table 5. Variance analysis results from brand clustering within Fozzy Group business units
- Table 6. Cluster-based brand distribution within Fozzy Group business units
- Table 7. Brand classification matrix for the Fozzy Group business units, subject to the level of complementary and synergistic effects
- Table 8. Portfolio role-based brand classification matrix by manifestations of the complementary and synergistic effects
- Table A1. A set of partial indicators to assess the complementary effect from brand integration in a business structure
- Table B1. A framework for parameters estimation for the components of synergetic effect from brand integration within an integrated business structure
-
- Aaker, D. (1991). Managing brand equity. New York: Free Press.
- Balmer, J. M. T. (1995). Corporate branding and connoisseurship. Journal of General Management, 21, 24-46.
- Becerra, E. P., & Badrinarayanan, V. (2013). The influence of brand trust and brand identification on brand evangelism. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 22(5/6), 371-383.
- Blajut, L. P. (2015). Role of international mergers and acquisitions in corporate integration. SEA – Practical Application of Science, 1(7), 97-102.
- Blunch, N. J. (2011). Introduction to Structural Equation Modelling Using SPSS and AMOS (270 p.). Los Angeles etc.: SAGE Publications.
- Doyle, P. (2000). Value–Based Marketing: Marketing Strategies for Corporate Growth and Shareholder Value (384 p.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
- Feldwick, P. (1996). What is brand equity anyway, and how do you measure it? Jornal of market research society, 38(2), 85-104.
- Garud, R. (2011). Complexity Arrangements for Sustained Innovation: Lessons from 3M Corporation. Organization Studies, 32, 737-767.
- Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Thatam, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5th ed). Prentice-Hall, International, Inc.
- Hereźniak, M., Florek, M., & Augustyn, A. (2018). On Measuring Place Brand Effectiveness – between Theoretical Developments and Empirical Findings. Economics and Sociology, 11(2), 36-51.
- IMAP. (2019). Trends in Global M&A 2018-2019.
- Interbrand (2018). Best Global Brands 2018 Rankings.
- Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand management (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliff. NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Kim, H., Hur, W.-M., & Yeo, J. (2015). Corporate Brand Trust as a Mediator in the Relationship between Consumer Perception of CSR, Corporate Hypocrisy, and Corporate Reputation. Sustainability, 7, 3683-3694.
- Knights D. (2012). Managing masculinity/mismanaging the corporation. Organization, 19, 385-404.
- Marchenko, V. M. (2011). Методичні підходи до оцінювання синергетичного ефекту злиття та поглинання [Metodychni pidkhody do otsiniuvannia synerhetychnoho efektu zlyttia i pohlynannia]. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 4(118), 135-142.
- Marchenko, V. M. (2012). Iнтелектуальний капітал у процесах злиття та поглинання корпорації [Intelektualnyi kapital u protsesakh zlyttia ta pohlynannia korporatsii]. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini, 9(136), 100-105.
- Ponomarenko, V., Kolodiziev, O., & Chmutova, I. (2017). Benchmarking of Bank Performance Using the Life Cycle Concept and the DEA Approach. Banks and Bank Systems, 12(3), 74-86.
- Praude, V., & Shalkovska, E. (2010). Synergistic effect in marketing system. Scientific inquiry, 11(1), 25-34.
- Režňáková, M., & Pěta, J. (2018). The factors driving the synergy value in mergers of mechanical engineering companies in the Czech Republic. Journal of International Studies, 11(3), 239-254.
- Roll, M. (2015). Branding and Mergers & Acquisitions.
- Saaty, T. L. (2008). Relative Measurement and its Generalization in Decision Making: Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors – The Analytic Hierarchy/Network Process. RACSAM (Review of the Royal Spanish Academy of Sciences, Series A, Mathematics), 102(2), 251-318.
- Shindo, S., & Matsubayashi, N. (2014). Horizontally Differentiated Store Brands: Production Outsourcing to National Brand Manufacturers. Journal of Applied Mathematics (14 p.).
- Singh, J. J., Iglesias, O., & Batista-Foguet, J. M. (2012). Does having an ethical brand matter? The influence of consumer perceived ethicality on trust, affect and loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics. 111, 541-549.
- Starov, S. A. (2010). Оценка эффективности брендинга в современной теории маркетинга [Otsenka effektyvnosti brendinga v sovremennoy teorii marketinga]. Brend-menedzhment, 5(54), 270-288.
- Urde, M., Baumgarth, C., & Merrilees, B. (2013). Brand orientation and market orientation – From alternatives to synergy. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 13-20.
- Voss, K. E., & Mohan, M. (2016). Corporate brand effects in brand alliances. Journal of business research, 69(10), 4177-4184.