Price-volume relation behavior around structural breaks in Kuwait Boursa
-
Author(s)Fayez A. AbdulsalamLink to ORCID Index: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3926-4877
,
Amani kh. BouresliLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9247-7989
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.15(2).2019.01
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2019, Issue #2, pp. 1-13
- Cited by
- 1103 Views
-
105 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study attempts to conduct a comprehensive investigation of the price-volume relation using daily stock prices of all publicly traded firms in Kuwait Boursa over the period 2005–2017. The aim is to provide evidence from an emerging market on the information arrival hypothesis, which is explained by the mixture of distribution and the sequential information arrival hypotheses. The investigation covered two main structural events; the 2008 financial crisis and the activation of Kuwait’s New Securities Law in 2010 (CMA). The GARCH-ARCH test revealed a positive contemporaneous relation between trading volume and market return, which implies that previous information shocks affect current returns and imply that Kuwait stock market is weakly efficient. When trading volume is included in the variance equation in the GARCH model, the test revealed that new information arrival is not simultaneously available to all traders and it takes time to observe, providing support to the sequential information arrival hypothesis (SAIH). Finally, there was no change in the price-volume relation around the two events and urgent assessment of the new market reform is recommended.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G10, G12, G14, M38, M39
-
References48
-
Tables7
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Daily market return for the period from January 2005 to the end of 2017
-
- Table 1. Summary statistics of the data
- Table 2. LM test for autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (ARCH) effect
- Table 3. GARCH (1,1) of volume, return, volatility relationship
- Table 4. GARCH (1,1) of volume, return, volatility relationship with volume included in the variance
- Table 5. GARCH (1,1) of volume, return, volatility relationship pre and post CMA law
- Table 6. GARCH (1,1) of volume, return relation in pre-post CMA law, volume included in variance equation
- Table 7. GARCH (1,1) of volume, return and volatility relationship in pre-post financial crisis
-
- Alam, M., Yasmin, Sh., Rahman, M., & Salah Uddin, G. (2011). Effect of Policy Reforms on Market Efficiency: Evidence from Dhaka Stock Exchange. Economics Research International.
- Al-Deehani, T. (2007). Modeling asymmetry in the price-volume relation: Evidence from nine stock markets. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 4(4), 8-15.
- Al-Ajmi, J. (2017). Trading volume and volatility in the Boursa Kuwait. The British Accounting Review, 10, 1-16.
- Al-Saad, Kh., & Moosa, I. (2008). Asymmetry in the price-volume relationship: Evidence based on individual company stock traded in an emerging stock market. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 4(2), 151-155.
- Anderson, T. G. (1996). Return volatility and trading volume: An information flow interpretation of stochastic volatility. Journal of Finance, 51(1), 169-204.
- Belhaj, F., & Abaoub, E. (2015). A generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity examination of relationship between trading volume and conditional volatility in Tunisian Stock Market: Evidence for the Information Flow Paradigm. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 5(2), 354-364.
- Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 31(2), 307-327.
- Brailsford, T. (1996). The Empirical relationship between trading volume, return and volatility. Accounting and Finance, 36(1), 89-111.
- Card, D., & Freeman, R. B. (2004). What Have Two Decades of British Economic Reform Delivered? In D. Card, R. Blundell & R. B. Freeman (Eds.), Seeking a Premier Economy: The Economic Effects of British Economic Reforms, 1980-2000 (pp. 9-62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
- Celik, S. (2013). New evidence on the relation between trading volume and volatility. Business and Economic Research, 3(1), 176-186.
- Chen, S. S. (2012). Revisiting the empirical linkage between stock returns and trading volume. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(6), 1781-1788.
- Christiana, A. M., Setiana, E., & Mamduch, M. (2016). The empirical relationship between stock return and trading volume based on stock market cycles. Indonesian Capital Market Review, 8(1), 46-57.
- Chuang, C., Kuan, C., & Lin, H. (2009). Causality in quantiles and dynamic stock return-volume relations. Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(7), 1351-1360.
- Clark, P. K. (1973). A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices. Econometrica, 41(1), 135-155.
- Copeland, T. E. (1976). A model of asset trading under the assumption of sequential information arrival. The Journal of Finance, 31(4), 1149-1168.
- Crouch, R. L. (1970). A nonlinear test of the random-walk hypothesis. American Economic Review, 60(1), 199-202.
- Darrat, A. F., Rahman, S., & Zhong, M. (2003). Intraday trading volume and return volatility of the DJIA stocks: A note. Journal of Banking and Finance, 27(10), 2035-2043.
- Dungey, M. R., Fry, R., Gonzalez-Hermosillo, B., & Martin, V. (2011). Transmission of financial crises and contagion: A latent factor approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Dungey, M. (2009). The tsunami: Measures of contagion in the 2007-2008 credit crunch. CESifo Forum, 9(4), 33-34.
- Epps, T. W., & Epps, M. L. (1976). The stochastic dependence of security price changes and transaction volumes: Implications for the mixture-of-distributions hypothesis. Econometrica, 44(2), 305-321.
- Genlite, M., & Fioravanti, S. F. (2012). The Impact of Market Fragmentation on European Stock Exchange (Working Paper No. 69). CONSOB.
- Foster, D., & Viswanathan, S. (1995). Can speculative trading explain the volume-volatility relation? Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13(4), 379-396.
- Gallo, G., & Pacini, B. (2000). The effects of trading activity on market volatility. The European Journal of Finance, 6(2), 163-175.
- Granger, C. W., & Morgenstern, O. (1963). Spectral analysis of New York Stock Market prices. Kyklos, 16(1), 1-27.
- Habib, N. M. (2011). Trade volume and returns in emerging markets an empirical study: The Egyptian market. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(19), 302-311.
- Harris, L., & Gurel, E. (1986). Cross-security tests of mixture of distribution hypothesis. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 21(1), 39-46.
- Harris, L. (1987). Transaction data tests of the mixture of distributions hypothesis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22(2), 127-141.
- Herbert, J. (1995). Trading volume, maturity and natural gas price volatility. Energy Economics, 17(4), 293-299.
- Huson, J., Hassan, A., & Nasir, A. (2005). The relationship between trading volume, volatility and stock market returns: A test of mixed distribution hypothesis for a pre and post crises on Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 2(3), 146-158.
- Jiranyakul, K. (2016). Dynamic relationship between stock return, trading volume, and volatility in the Stock Exchange of Thailand: does the US subprime crisis matter? (MPRA Paper 73791). Germany: University Library of Munich.
- Karanosos, M., & Kyrtsou, C. (2011). Analyzing the link between stock volatility and volume by a Mackey-Glass GARCH-type Model: The case of Korea. Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis in Social Sciences, 5(1), 49-69.
- Karpoff, J. M. (1986). A Theory of Trading Volume. The Journal of Finance, 41(5), 1069-1087.
- Karpoff, J. M. (1987). The relation between price changes and trading volume: A survey. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 22(1), 109-126.
- Lee, B., & Rui, O. (2002). The dynamic relation between stock returns and trading volume: Domestic and cross-country evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26(1), 51-78.
- Mahajan, S., & Singh, B. (2009). The empirical investigation of relationship between returns, trading volume and volatility dynamics in Indian stock market. Eurasian Journal of Business and Economics, 2(4), 113-137.
- Mahajan, S., & Singh, B. (2008). An empirical analysis of stock price-volume relationship in Indian Stock Market. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 12(3), 1-13.
- Mestel, R., Gurgul, H., & Majdosz, P. (2003). The empirical relationship between stock returns, return volatility and trading volume on the Austrian Stock Market. University of Graz, Institute of Banking and Finance (16 p.).
- Morgan, I. G. (1976). Stock prices and heteroskedasticity. Journal of Business, 49(4), 496-508.
- Morse, D. (1980). Asymmetrical information in securities markets and trading volume. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 15(5), 1129-1148.
- Pathirawasam, C. (2011). The relationship between trading volume and stock returns. Journal of Competitiveness, 2011(3), 41-49.
- Richardson, G., Sefcik, S., & Thompson, R. (1987). A test of dividend irrelevance using volume reaction to a change in dividend policy. Journal of Financial Economics, 17(2), 313-333.
- Saatcioglu, K., & Starks, L. (1998). The stock price-volume relationship in emerging stock markets: The case of Latin America. International Journal of Forecasting, 14(2), 215-225.
- Statman, M., Thorley, S., & Vorkink, K. (2006). Investor overconfidence and trading volume. Review of Financial Studies, 19(4), 1531-1565.
- Smirlock, M., & Starks, L. (1985). A further examination of stock price changes and transaction volume. The Journal of Financial Research, 8(3), 217-226.
- Tauchen, G. E., & Pitts, M. (1983). The price variability-volume relationship on speculative markets. Econometrica, 51(2), 485-505.
- Westerfield, J. (1977). An examination of foreign exchange risk under fixed and floating rate regimes. Journal of International Economics, 7(2), 181-200.
- Woertz, E. (2008). Impact of the US Financial Crisis on GCC Countries (19 p.). Gulf Research Center GRC, Knowledge for all.
- Ying, C. C. (1966). Stock market prices and volume of sales. Econometrica, 34(3), 676-685.
-
The impact of foreign ownership on corporate governance: evidence from an emerging market
Rawan Shubita , Moade Fawzi Shubita
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(2).2019.09
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 16, 2019 Issue #2 pp. 101-115 Views: 2019 Downloads: 300 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThis research explores the influence of foreign ownership on non-financial public shareholding firms in the Amman Stock Exchange (ASE). The study involved an investigation into the connection between non-Jordanian ownership and the company growth opportunity, stock liquidity, leverage, dividend policy and business output. The results highlight that foreign ownership can provide improved corporate governance practices by playing a decisive role in increasing the growth opportunity and enhancing the firms’ market valuation, as measured by Tobin’s Q. Moreover, the findings indicate that companies with foreign board membership have better operating performance and higher firm value. The rewards were reaped by foreign investors based on their superior monitoring ability, which affects the decisions made and actions taken by management.
-
Fund performance-flow relationship and the role of institutional reform
Jinyu Feng ,
Wenzhao Wang
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(1).2018.26
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 15, 2018 Issue #1 pp. 311-327 Views: 1939 Downloads: 223 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯExtant literature shows the positive impact of institutional development on investor rationality and market efficiency. The authors extend this evidence by investigating the performance-flow relationship in the Chinese mutual fund market before and after the enforcement of the revised Law of the People’s Republic of China on Securities Investment Fund. Empirical evidence reveals that Chinese investors irrationally chase past star performers before institutional reform, but gradually become rational and less obsessed with star-chasing behaviors after reform. Moving one percentile upward in the relative performance among the star funds is associated with money inflows by 0.532% after reform, much lower than 1.433% before reform. The findings confirm the positive influence of institutional development on investor rationality and market efficiency. The successful experience can be borrowed by other emerging markets with less developed institutions.
-
New market reforms and stock exchange liquidity: the case of Kuwait
Amani kh. Bouresli ,
Fayez A. Abdulsalam
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/imfi.16(1).2019.04
Investment Management and Financial Innovations Volume 16, 2019 Issue #1 pp. 46-64 Views: 1841 Downloads: 185 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯIn developing markets, new regulations are imposed to protect investors, to assure fairness and to enhance trust through controlling all types of market abuse. In addition, these regulations are imposed to enhance the overall market performance and efficiency. Market liquidity is one of the main pillars used to measure market overall performance. In this paper, the authors attempt to analyze market liquidity before and after the passage of the Capital Market Authority Law of 2010 (CMA), aimed at enhancing investors’ confidence and reinforcing better disclosure quality and accountability for Kuwait public companies. By introducing six liquidity measures that captures market depth, turnover, and volatility, the authors documented highly significant deterioration in all the measures following the CMA Law with more profound effect on smaller firms. The researchers concluded that overstated regulations in developing markets, in spite of its goal of improving market overall performance, structure, enhancing investors’ protection, and market integrity, can have an adverse effect on market efficiency.
