Evaluation of innovative technology market potential on the basis of technology audit
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.15(2).2019.03
-
Article InfoVolume 15 2019, Issue #2, pp. 30-41
- Cited by
- 1179 Views
-
216 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Enterprise innovation activity supposes coordinated technical and business processes of decision-making and its performance required for successful transformation of new product or service from concept to market. The purpose of this study is to develop valuation methods of innovative technology market potential and prospects of their introduction into the production enterprise activity.
In order to achieve this goal, we used brand new evaluation tool, this is technology audit conception, application of which increased significantly the accuracy and reliability of technology market potential evaluation. Clarification of terminological essence of technological audit allowed the authors to discover the content of technology audit components required for the market research and thereupon to develop evaluation mechanism for innovative technology market potential using technology audit. This mechanism is built on structure evaluation table of technology market potential level detection as an object of commercialization. To ensure the efficiency of practical effect of the mechanism proposed, the authors systematized and completed methods of functional analysis and scanning of market environment for the purpose of qualitative comprehensive evaluation and innovative technology market potential forecasting.
Introduction of the proposed evaluation method for technology market potential will result in the improvement of efficiency of enterprise innovation activity due to more rational distribution of available resources and immediate financing of developments with greater market potential.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)М31, О32, О33
-
References32
-
Tables1
-
Figures3
-
- Figure 1. Practical realization mechanism of innovative technology market potential
- Figure 2. Triad of courses of technology audit at industrial enterprise
- Figure 3. Structural logical (conceptual) scheme of technology audit of innovative technology
-
- Table 1. Evaluation table of innovative technology market potential as an object of commercialization on the basis of technology analysis
-
- Abdel-Razek, R., & Alsanad, D. (2014). Auditing and Comparing Innovation Management in Organizations. Global Journal of Business Research, the Institute of Business and Finance Research, 8, 49-56.
- Astebro, T. (2004). Key success factors for technological entrepreneurs R&D projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(3), 314-321.
- Auerswald, P., & Branscomb, L. (2003). Valleys of death and Darwinian seas: financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3), 227-239.
- Bart de Vries (2011). Assessment of market potential for innovations with new technology in an existing market (61 p.). University of Twente.
- Beers, C., & Zand, F. (2014). R&D cooperation, partner diversity, and innovation performance: an empirical analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 292-312.
- Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
- Cooper, R. G., & Edgett, S. J. (2008). Maximizing productivity in product innovation. Research-Technology Management, 51(2), 47-58.
- Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1997). Winning businesses in product development: The critical success factors. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(2), 52-66.
- De Prato, G., Nepelski, D., & Piroli, G. (2015). Innovation Radar: Identifying innovations and innovators with high potential in ICT FP7. CIP & H2020 Projects (Joint Research Centre, science for policy report-EUR 27314 EN).
- Evanschitzky, H., Eisend, M., Calantone, R. J., & Jiang, Y. (2012). Success factors of product innovation: An updated meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(S1), 21-37.
- Huang, X., Soutar, G. M., & Brown, A. (2004). Measuring new product success: an empirical investigation of Australian SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(2), 117-123.
- Kelessidis, V. (2000). Technology audit Report produced for the EC funded project INNOREGIO – Benchmarking, Thessaloniki Technology Park.
- Kobielieva, T. A., Pererva, P. G., Kosenko, A. P., Tkachev, M. M., & Tkacheva, N. P. (2017). Financial and technological leverage in the system of economic evaluation of innovative technologies. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2(23), 405-413.
- Kocziszky, G., Pererva, P. G., Szakaly, D., & Veres Somosi, M. (2012). Technology transfer (668 p.). Kharkiv-Miskolc: NTU “KhPI”.
- Kosenko, A. V., Pererva, P. G., Tkachev, M. M., & Kobieliev, V. M. (2018). Innovative compliance of technology to combat corruption. In Innovative management: theoretical, methodical, and applied grounds (pp. 285-295). Prague: Prague Institute for Qualification Enhancement.
- Kvashnin, A. (2006). Как провести экспертизу коммерциализации технологий [Kak provesti ekspertizu kommertsializatsii tekhnologiy]. Ser. “Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo dlya tsentrov kommertsializatsii tekhnologiy”: metodicheskie materialy (64 p.).
- Levie, J. (2012). ACE research vignette 017: The new venture mortality myth.
- Lyashenko, V. I., Pіdoricheva, I. Y., & Petrova, I. P. (2017). “Інноваційний ліфт” як інструмент стимулювання нових видів діяльності в малому бізнесі Донбасу [“Innovatsiinyi lift” yak instrument stymuliuvannia novykh vydiv diialnosti v malomu biznesi Donbasu]. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Donbasu, 3(49), 11-24.
- Maslak, O. I., Kosenko, A. P., Kotsiski, D., & Sakay, D. (2008). Экономическая оценка инновационного потенциала [Ekonomicheskaya otsenka innovatsionnogo potentsiala] (170 p.). Natsyonalnyi tekhnycheskyi universytet “KHPY”.
- Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: A new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23(2), 140-156.
- Mcclure, D. (2011). The 7-Step Technology Audit. Accounting & Audit.
- Nagy, S., Pererva, P., & Maslak, M. (2018). Organization of Marketing activities on the Intrapreneurship. MIND JOURNAL, 5, 10.
- Nepelski, D., & Piroli, G. (2018). Organizational diversity and innovation potential of EU-funded research projects. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3), 615-639.
- Nepelski, D., Van Roy, V., & Pesole, A. J. (2019). The organisational and geographic diversity and innovation potential of EUfunded research networks. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(2), 359-380.
- O’Donnell, J. (2019, February). Innovations in Audit Technology: A Model of Continuous Audit Adoption. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 21(1), 11-20.
- Pererva, P. G., Kobielieva, T. A., Tkachev, M. M., & Tkacheva, N. (2017). Determination of marketing characteristics of market capacity for electrical automation. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 79-86.
- Pererva, P., Hutsan, O., Kobieliev, V., Kosenko, A., Kosenko, A., & Kuchynskyi, V. (2018). Evaluating elasticity of costs for employee motivation at the industrial enterprises. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 16(1), 124-132.
- Pilnov, G., Tarasova, O., & Yanovskiy, A. (2006). Как проводить технологический аудит [Kak provodit tekhnologicheskiy audit]. Seriya metodicheskikh materialov “Prakticheskiye rukovodstva dlya tsentrov kommertsializatsii tekhnologiy”. Proyekt EuropeAid “Nauka i kommertsializatsiya tekhnologiy” (96 p.).
- Poberezhna, N. M., & Pererva, P. G. (2012). Визначення ефективності використання виробничого потенціалу машинобудівного підприємства [Vyznachennia efektyvnosti vykoristannia vyrobnychoho potentsialu mashynobudivnoho pidpryiemstva]. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii, 2, 191-198.
- Tkachenko, E. A., Rogova, E. M., & Osipenko, A. S. (2018). Commercialization of Technologies, Productivity and Problems of Technological Audit in the Russian Economy. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 12(2), 248-253.
- Tkachev, M. M., Pererva, P. G., Kosenko, A. P., Kobielieva, T. A., & Tkacheva, N. P. (2017). Modeling the marketing characteristics of market capacity for electrical automation. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 67-74.
- Trinci, M. (2018). Technology and audit – a powerful future. KPMG Australia.