Macro level analysis of factors contributing to value added: technological changes in European countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.16(4).2018.35
-
Article InfoVolume 16 2018, Issue #4, pp. 417-428
- Cited by
- 886 Views
-
108 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In conditions of globalization and rapidly growing production fragmentation, generation of value added becomes an ultimate goal and a measure of economic performance. The study provides an analysis of factors contributing to value added at macro level in different European countries. The analysis includes a panel framework covering 27 European countries over the period 2006–2015. In order to investigate the differences across regions, three subsamples are considered, namely, developed economies, PIIGS (Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain) and Central-Eastern European Countries (CEEC). Pooled OLS, fixed effects and random effects models are used. The results indicate that increase of value added corresponds to budget discipline, quality of human capital improvement, strong currency and transparent institutions. It could be expected that currency depreciation improves performance of the value added of exported final goods. However, the results show the opposite evidence: currency depreciation causes the value added decrease in all groups. Thus, for transitional countries, it is im¬portant not only to join global production chains, but also to acquire a significant share in generation of value added in these chains based on technological changes.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C13, O11, O32
-
References30
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Theoretical framework of the research: the main predicted relationships
- Figure 2. Value added versus high-tech imports (per capita, thousands USD), 2006–2015
-
- Table 1. Subsamples of European countries used for the estimation
- Table 2. Description of the variables
- Table 3. Descriptive statistics
- Table 4. Correlations for the whole sample of European economies
- Table 5a. Value added determinants: the whole sample and CEE countries
- Table 5b. Value added determinants: developed economies and PIIGS
-
- Ahmed, S., Appendino, M. A., & Ruta, M. (2015). Depreciations without exports? Global value chains and the exchange rate elasticity of exports (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 7390).
- Amador, J., & Cabral, S. (2016). Global value chains: A survey of drivers and measures. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(2), 278-301.
- Arndt, S. W. (2015). Intra-industry Trade and the Open Economy. Evolving Patterns in Global Trade and Finance, 11(3), 179-196.
- Baltagi, B. H. (2008). Econometric analysis of panel data (4th ed.). Chichester, United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons.
- Bems, R., & Johnson, R. C. (2017). Demand for value added and value-added exchange rates. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 9(4), 45-90.
- Brakman, S., & Van Marrewijk, C. (2017). A closer look at revealed comparative advantage: Gross‐versus value‐added trade flows. Papers in Regional Science, 96(1), 61-92.
- Cantore, N., Clara, M., Lavopa, A., & Soare, C. (2017). Manufacturing as an engine of growth: Which is the best fuel? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 42, 56-66.
- Ceglowski, J. (2017). Assessing export competitiveness through the lens of value added. The World Economy, 40(2), 275-296.
- Cherkas, N., & Chekh, M. (2018). Economic effects of production fragmentation and technological transfer: the evidence from CEE countries. In M. Papież & S. Śmiech (Eds.), The 12thProfessor Aleksander Zelias International Conference on Modelling and Forecasting of Socio-Economic Phenomena. Conference Proceedings (pp. 50-59). Cracow: Foundation of the Cracow University of Economics.
- Dafflon, B., & Beer‐Tóth, K. (2009). Managing local public debt in transition countries: An issue of self-control. Financial Accountability & Management, 25(3), 305-333.
- Damijan, J. P., Kostevc, Č., & Rojec, M. (2013). Global Supply Chains at Work in Central and Eastern European Countries: Impact of FDI on export restructuring and productivity growth (LICOS Discussion Paper Series, 332).
- Ebell, M., Pilkington, J., Rowe, J., & Srinivasan, S. (2017). Value Added from Trade for Key Business and Financial Service Industries: Initial Estimates. National Institute Economic Review, 242(1), 14-23.
- Feenstra, R. C., Inklaar, R., & Timmer, M. P. (2015). The next generation of the Penn World Table. The American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150-3182.
- Fontagné, L., & Santoni, G. (2017). Value Added in Motion: Determinants of Value Added Location within the EU (Development Studies Working Papers, 424).
- Gereffi, G., & Fernandez-Stark, K. (2016). Global value chain analysis: a primer. The Duke Center on Globalization. Governance & Competitiveness (Duke CGGC).
- Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Pearson Education India.
- Grubel, H. G., & Lloyd, P. J. (1971). The Empirical Measurement of Intra‐Industry Trade. Economic record, 47(4), 494-517.
- Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 46(6), 1251-1271.
- Hsiao, C. (2007). Panel data analysis – advantages and challenges (WISE Working Paper Series, WP0602).
- Koopman, R., Powers, W., Wang, Z., & Wei, S. J. (2010). Give credit where credit is due: Tracing value added in global production chains (National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, 16426).
- Los, B., Timmer, M., & Vries, G. J. D. (2013). Made in Europe? Trends in International Production Fragmentation (GGDC Working Papers, GD-13). University of Groningen, Groningen Growth and Development Centre.
- Medve-Bálint, G. (2014). The role of the EU in shaping FDI flows to East Central Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 35-51.
- Miroudot, S., & Yamano, N. (2013). Towards the Measurement of Trade in Value-Added Terms: Policy Rationale and Methodological Challenge. In A. Matoo, Z. Wang & Z. We (Eds.), Trade in Value Added: Developing New Measures of Cross-Border Trade (pp. 17-41). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research and the World Bank.
- Riaz, M., Cherkas, N., & Leitão, J. (2018). Corruption and Innovation: Mixed Evidences on bidirectional Causality. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13(2), 56, 378-384.
- Shevchuk, V. (2016). The Real and Nominal Effects of Large Devaluations in Ukraine. Argumenta Oeconomica Cracoviensia, 14, 97-118.
- Stehrer, R., Foster, N., & de Vries, G. (2010). Value added and factors in trade: A comprehensive approach (WIIW Working Papers, 80). Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies.
- Szirmai, A. (2012). Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 406-420.
- Timmer, M. P., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & De Vries, G. J. (2013). Fragmentation, incomes and jobs: an analysis of European competitiveness. Economic policy, 28(76), 613-661.
- Timmer, M. P., Los, B., Stehrer, R., & de Vries, G. J. (2016). An anatomy of the global trade slowdown based on the WIOD 2016 release (GGDC Working Papers, GD-162). University of Groningen.
- World Bank (2017). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC