Individualism and self-reliance of Generations Y and Z and their impact on working environment: An empirical study across 5 European countries
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.19(1).2021.04
-
Article InfoVolume 19 2021, Issue #1, pp. 39-52
- Cited by
- 1888 Views
-
3472 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In recent years, numerous researches and studies confirm differences between Generations in their values, attitudes, or characteristics. However, the challenge is to get to know the Generation Z, whose individuals are currently entering the labor market for research and practical application. The presented paper aims to expand the knowledge of Generations Y and Z in the field of individualism and self-reliance. This issue is examined concerning independence regarding housing and financial independence to parental help. The aim of the study is an empirical verification of possible similarities and differences between Generations Y and Z. The study is based on an online questionnaire survey. Data were obtained from more than 1,500 respondents of these Generations (born in 1982–2005) in 5 European countries (Czech Republic, Denmark, the Netherlands, Poland, and Slovakia). Data are examined using a two-tailed t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and regression analysis. The overall findings of the study indicate intergenerational differences in the issue of independence, with Generation Z, unlike Millennials, becoming more self-sufficient at a younger age. Research has also found that women leave the parental household earlier than men. The paper presents the possible influence of the outputs on the working environment and work motivation of the Generations Y and Z.
Acknowledgment
The paper was created with the support of the project SGS-2020-015 “Research in selected areas of management and marketing of organisations in the context of demographic and technological changes.”
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M12, M54, R20
-
References60
-
Tables6
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Regression trend of age of leaving parental household in each country (CZE, DAN, NED, POL, and SVK) by the age of birth
- Figure 2. Regression trend of age of leaving parental household in all countries (CZE, DAN, NED, POL, and SVK) by the age of birth
-
- Table 1. Average age (in years) of young people leaving the parental household, 2011–2019
- Table 2. Distribution of respondents by country, generation, and career status
- Table 3. Significance of the impact of providing parental financial support on age
- Table 4. Significance of gender effect on the age of leaving parental household
- Table 5. Significance of generation effect on the age of leaving parental household
- Table 6. Linear regression trend data by states
-
- Agarwal, H., & Vaghela, P. (2018). Work Values of Gen Z: Bridging the Gap to the Next Generation. Paper presented at INC-2018 – National Conference on Innovative Business Management Practices in 21st Century.
- Aminul, I., Cheong, T. W., Yusuf, H., & Desa, H. (2011). A study on Generation at workplace in Penang. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 7(11), 1802-1805.
- Beglova, E. I., Nasyrova, S. I., & Yangirov, A. V. (2017). Factors of Economic Behavior of Population in Regional Labor Market. European Research Studies Journal, XX(Issue 4B), 167-182.
- Bejtkovský, J. (2016). The Employees of Baby Boomers Generation, Generation X, Generation Y and Generation Z in Selected Czech Corporations as Conceivers of Development and Competitiveness in their Corporation. Journal of Competitiveness, 8(4), 105-123.
- Bencsik, A., Juhász, T., & Horváth-Csikós, G. (2016). Y and Z Generations at Workplaces. Journal of Competitiveness, 6(3), 90-106.
- Chillakuri, B., & Mahanandia, R. (2018). Generation Z entering the workforce: The need for sustainable strategies in maximizing their talent. Human Resource Management International Digest, 26(4), 34-38.
- Coe, R. (2012). It’s the Effect Size, Stupid what effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association.
- Corder, G. W., & Foreman, D. I. (2014). Nonparametric statistics: A step-by-step approach. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
- Costanza, D. P., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2015). Generationally based differences in the workplace: Is there a there there? Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 8(3), 308-323.
- Cseh-Papp, I., Varga, E., Szabó, K., Szira, Z., & Hajós, L. (2017). The appearance of a new Generation on the labour market. International Journal of Engineering Tome, 15(1), 123-130.
- Csobanka, Z. E. (2016). The Z Generation. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 6(2), 63-76.
- Desai, S. P., & Lele, V. (2017). Correlating Internet, Social Networks and Workplace – a Case of Generation Z Students. Journal of Commerce and Management Thought, 8(4), 802.
- DeVaney, S. A. (2015). Understanding the Millennial Generation. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 69(6), 11-14.
- Dolot, A. (2018). The characteristic of Generation Z. E-mentor, 2(74), 44-50.
- Dziuban, C., Moskal, P., & Hartman, J. (2005). Higher education, blended learning, and the Generations: Knowledge is power-no more. In J. Bourne and J. C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of quality online education: Engaging communities (pp. 85-100).
- Eurostat. (2013). Household composition, poverty and hardship across Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
- Eurostat. (2020). Household composition statistics.
- Fratričová, J., & Kirchmayer, Z. (2018). What Motivates Generation Z at Work? Insights into Motivation Drivers of Business Students in Slovakia. In Innovation Management and Education Excellence through Vision 2020 (pp. 6019-6030). King of Prussia, USA: IBIMA Publishing LLC.
- Fry, R. (2013). A Rising Share of Young Adults Live in Their Parents’ Home. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
- Fry, R. (2015). More Millennials Living With Family Despite Improved Job Market. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
- Hendl, J. (2015). Přehled statistických metod: Analýza a metaanalýza dat. Praha: Portál.
- Hernandez-De-Menendez, M., Díaz, C. A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Educational experiences with Generation Z. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(3), 847-859.
- Hole, D., Zhang, L., & Schwartz J. (2010). Talking About Whose Generation? Why Western Generational models can’t account for a global workforce. Deloitte Review, 6, 83-97.
- Johnson, D. (2011). Households Doubling Up.
- Kaifi, B. A., Nafei, W. A., Khanfar, N. M., & Kaifi, M. M. (2012). A Multi-Generational Workforce: Managing and Understanding Millennials. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(24), 88-93.
- Kutlák, J. (2019). Generations Y and Z in the Workplace: Perception of Teamwork. ACC Journal, 25(2), 65-77.
- Lancaster, L. C., & Stillman, D. (2010). The M-factor: How the millennial Generation is rocking the workplace. New York, USA: HarperBusiness.
- Liffreing, I. (2018). Forget millennials, Gen Alpha is here (mostly).
- Lub, X. D., Bal, P. M., Blomme, R. J., & Schalk, R. (2016). One job, one deal…or not: do Generations respond differently to psychological contract fulfillment? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(6), 653-680.
- Lyons, S., & Kuron, L. (2013). Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), 139-157.
- Maloni, M., Hiatt, M. S., & Campbell, S. (2019). Understanding the work values of Gen Z business students. The International Journal of Management Education, 17(3), 1-13.
- Manning, W. D., Brown, S. L., & Payne, K. K. (2014). Two Decades of Stability and Change in Age at First Union Formation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(2), 247-260.
- McCrindle, M., Wolfinger, E., & Salt, B. (2014). The ABC of XYZ: Understanding the global Generations. Sydney: UNSW Press.
- McNulty, E. (2006). Can You Manage Different Generations.
- Miller, J. (2018). 10 Things You Need to Know About Generation Z. HR Magazine, 51-56.
- Murray, M. (2011). Mind the gap: Technology, millennial leadership and the cross-Generational workforce. Australian Library Journal, 60(1), 54-65.
- Nagy, Á., & Kölcsey, A. (2017). Generation Alpha: Marketing or Science. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 7(1), 107-115.
- Novotný, P., Bosničová, N., Břenková, J., Fukan, J., Lazarová, B., Navrátilová, D., & Rabušicová, M. (2014). Age management: Jak rozumět stárnutí a jak na něj reagovat: Možnosti uplatnění age managementu v České republice: Průvodce pro jednotlivce, organizace a společnost. Plzeň: Asociace institucí vzdělávání dospělých ČR.
- Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of Effect Size for Comparative Studies: Applications, Interpretations, and Limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(3), 241-286.
- Ozkan, M., & Solmaz, B. (2015). Mobile Addiction of Generation Z and its Effects on their Social Lifes. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 92-98.
- Pandit, V. (2015). We are Generation Z: How identity, attitudes, and perspectives are shaping our future. Dallas, TX: Brown Books Publishing Group.
- Perry, E. L., & Finkelstein, L. M. (1999). Toward a broader view of age discrimination in employment-related decisions: a joint consideration of organizational factors and cognitive processes. Human Resource Management Review, 9, 21-49.
- Perry, E. L., Kulik, C. T., & Zhou, J. (1999). A closer look at the effects of subordinate-supervisor age differences. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(3), 341-357.
- Prawitasari, G. (2018). The Influence of Generations on Career Choice (Social Cognitive Career Theory Perspective). Konselor, 7(1).
- Puiu, S. (2017). Generation Z – an educational and managerial perspective. Young Economists Journal / Revista Tinerilor Economisti, 14(29), 61-72.
- Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017a). Generation Z leads: A guide for developing the leadership capacity of Generation Z students. North Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
- Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2017b). Generation Z: Educating and Engaging the Next Generation of Students. About Campus, 22(3), 21-26.
- Shagvaliyeva, S., & Yazdanifard, R. (2014). Impact of Flexible Working Hours on Work-Life Balance. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 04(01), 20-23.
- Sharma, L. (2012). Generation Y at workplace. Human Resource Management, 5, 74-78.
- Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., & Goldberg, C. B. (2003). Work attitudes and decisions as a function of manager age and employee age. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 529-537.
- Schroth, H. (2019). Are You Ready for Gen Z in the Workplace? California Management Review, 61(3), 1-14.
- Schwertman, N. C., & Silva, R. D. (2007). Identifying outliers with sequential fences. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 51(8), 3800-3810.
- Singh, A. (2014). Challenges and Issues of Generation Z. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 16(7), 59-63.
- Statistics Kingdom. (2017). Statistics calculators.
- Stewart, J. S., Oliver, E. G., Cravens, K. S., & Oishi, S. (2017). Managing millennials: Embracing Generational differences. Business Horizons, 60(1), 45-54.
- Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (2000). Millennials Rising: The Next Generations. New York: Vintage Books.
- Svoboda, M., Gangur, M., & Mičudová, K. (2019). Statistické zpracování dat. Plzeň: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni.
- Swanzen, R. (2018). Facing The Generation Chasm: The Parenting And Teaching Of Generations Y And Z. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 9(2), 125.
- Tang, F. (2019). A critical review of research on the work-related attitudes of Generation Z in China. Social Psychology and Society, 10(2), 19-28.
- Yadav, G. P., & Rai, J. (2017). The Generation Z and their Social Media Usage: A Review and a Research Outline. Global Journal of Enterprise Information System, 9(2), 110.