Discovering citizen’s reaction toward e-government adoption: The role of uncertainty avoidance
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.30
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #1, pp. 366-376
- Cited by
- 364 Views
-
110 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
One of the leading indicators of how well an e-government system is being implemented is how much citizen acceptance of e-government has increased. Thus, this study looks at social and psychological traits and uncertainty avoidance as moderating factors to identify the factors influencing Indonesian citizens’ adoption of e-government. SEM-PLS was utilized for data analysis. An online survey with measurement questions tailored to 520 respondents was used to gather data for the proposed model’s quantitative validation. A purposive sampling approach based on self-selection was used in this study. The analysis findings show that citizens’ intents as end users of e-government systems are significantly and positively impacted by the influence of compatibility (β = 0.265; p < 0.05), relative advantage (β = 0.482; p < 0.05), and trust in e-government websites (β = 0.243; p < 0.05). On the other hand, complexity (β= –0.293; p < 0.05) significantly and negatively affects their intention to use the system. Additionally, the connection between relative advantage (β = 0.213; p < 0.05), complexity (β = 0.294; p < 0.05), compatibility (β = 0.275; p < 0.05), and propensity to use e-government was found to be moderated by uncertainty avoidance. Encouraging citizens to use e-government will aid the Indonesian government by increasing individuals’ experience with the system and potentially lowering their perception of its hazards.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H83, M21, O38
-
References64
-
Tables4
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Respondent demographics
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. Convergent validity and reliability test
- Table 4. Bootstrapping testing with PLS path algorithm
-
- Alateyah, S. A., Crowder, R. M., & Wills, G. B. (2013). Factors influencing citizen’s intention to adopt e-government in Saudi Arabia. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 81, 601-606.
- Alomari, M., Woods, P., & Sandhu, K. (2012). Predictors for e-government adoption in Jordan: Deployment of an empirical evaluation based on a citizen-centric approach. Information Technology & People, 25(2), 207-234.
- Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26(1), 164-175.
- Anne Lee, J., Garbarino, E., & Lerman, D. (2007). How cultural differences in uncertainty avoidance affect product perceptions. International Marketing Review, 24(3), 330-349.
- Aswar, K., Julianto, W., Sumardjo, M., Panjaitan, I., & Nasir, A. (2023). An investigation of the factors affecting citizens’ adoption of e-government in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(2), 187-197.
- Baptista, G., & Oliveira, T. (2015). Understanding mobile banking: The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology combined with cultural moderators. Computers in Human Behavior, 50, 418-430.
- Baskerville, R. F. (2003). Hofstede never studied culture. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(1), 1-14.
- Becker, H. S. (1982). Culture: A sociological view. Yale Review.
- Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 165-176.
- Bryman, A. (2008). Of methods and methodology. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 159-168.
- Carter, L., Weerakkody, V., Phillips, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2016). Citizen adoption of e-government services: Exploring citizen perceptions of online services in the United States and United Kingdom. Information Systems Management, 33(2), 124-140.
- Choi, H., Park, M. J., Rho, J. J., & Zo, H. (2016). Rethinking the assessment of e-government implementation in developing countries from the perspective of the design-reality gap: Applications in the Indonesian e-procurement system. Telecommunications Policy, 40(7), 644-660.
- Choudrie, J., Alfalah, A., & Spencer, N. (2017). Older adults adoption, use and diffusion of e-government services in Saudi Arabia, Hail City: A quantitative study. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
- Clift, S. L. (2004). E-government and democracy. Representation and citizen engagement in the information age. UNPAN/DESA for the 2003 World Public Sector.
- Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
- Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences. Beverly Hills: Sage.
- Hofstede, G. (1991). Organizations and cultures: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.
- Hofstede, G. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.
- Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
- Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Psychology Culture, 2(1).
- Holmes, D. (2001). Egov: Ebusiness strategies for government. Nicholas Brealey Publishing.
- Hung, S. Y., Chang, C.-M., & Yu, T. J. (2006). Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system. Government Information Quarterly, 23(1), 97-122.
- Jaeger, P. T. (2003). The endless wire: E-government as global phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly, 20(4), 323-331.
- Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an Internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1-2), 45-71.
- Kim, S., & Lee, Y. (2006). Global online marketplace: A cross-cultural comparison of website quality. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 30(6), 533-543.
- Lee, I., Choi, B., Kim, J., & Hong, S.-J. (2007). Culture-technology fit: Effects of cultural characteristics on the post-adoption beliefs of mobile internet users. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 11(4), 11-51.
- Lee, S., & Koubek, R. J. (2010). The effects of usability and web design attributes on user preference for e-commerce websites. Computers in Industry, 61(4), 329-341.
- Leidner, D. E., & Kayworth, T. (2006). Review: A review of culture in information systems research: Toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly, 30(2), 357-399.
- Maheswaran, D., & Shavitt, S. (2000). Issues and new directions in global consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(2), 59-66.
- Mahmood, M., Weerakkody, V., & Chen, W. (2020). The role of information and communications technology in the transformation of government and citizen trust. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(4), 708-728.
- Menpan. (2020). Hasil Survei PBB, e-Government Indonesia Naik Peringkat [UN Survey Results, Indonesian e-Government Rises in Ranking]. (In Indonesian).
- Moital, M., Vaughan, R., & Edwards, J. (2009). Using involvement for segmenting the adoption of e-commerce in travel. The Service Industries Journal, 29(5), 723-739.
- Ojha, A., Sahu, G. P., & Gupta, M. P. (2009). Antecedents of paperless income tax filing by young professionals in India: An exploratory study. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 3(1), 65-90.
- Omari, A. (2013). Technology adoption in the Arabian Gulf countries: The case of e-government. International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 3, 1-8.
- Ozkan, S., & Kanat, I. E. (2011). e-Government adoption model based on theory of planned behavior: Empirical validation. Government Information Quarterly, 28(4), 503-513.
- Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Citizen’s adoption of an e-government system: Validating extended social cognitive theory (SCT). Government Information Quarterly, 32(2), 172-181.
- Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-undang Republik Indonesia. Nomor 25 tahun 2009. Tentang pelayanan public [Laws of the republic Indonesia. Number 25 of 2009. Concerning public services]. (In Indonesia).
- Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
- Rotter, J. (1967). A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality, 35(4), 651-665.
- Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 31(suppl_1), S63-S71.
- Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2011). E-government adoption model (GAM): Differing service maturity levels. Government Information Quarterly, 28(1), 17-35.
- Shin, D.-H. (2010). MVNO services: Policy implications for promoting MVNO diffusion. Telecommunication Policy, 34(10), 616-632.
- Srivastava, S. C., & Teo, T. S. (2009). Citizen trust development for e-government adoption and usage: Insights from young adults in Singapore. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 31.
- Steenkamp, J. B. E., Ter Hofstede, F., & Wedel, M. (1999). A cross-national investigation into the individual and national cultural antecedents of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 55-69.
- Sun, Y., & Jeyaraj, A. (2013). Information technology adoption and continuance: A longitudinal study of individuals behavioral intentions. Information & Management, 50(7), 457-465.
- Susanto, T. D., & Aljoza, M. (2015). Individual acceptance of e-government services in a developing country: Dimensions of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use and the importance of trust and social influence. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 622-629.
- Tam, C., & Oliveira, T. (2019). Does culture influence m-banking use and individual performance? Information & Management, 56(3), 356-363.
- Tan, C. W., Pan, S. L., & Lim, E. T. (2007). Managing stakeholder interests in e-government implementation: Lessons learned from a Singapore e-government project. Journal of Global Information Management (JGIM), 13, 61-84.
- Teo, T. S., Srivastava, S. C., & Jiang, L. (2008). Trust and electronic government success: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 25(3), 99-132.
- Twizeyimana, J. D., Larsson, H., & Grönlund, Å. (2018). E-government in Rwanda: Implementation, challenges and reflections. Electronic Journal of E-government, 16(1), 19-31.
- United Nations. (2020). United Nations e-Government survey 2020. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
- Vassilakis, C., Lepouras, G., Fraser, J., Haston, S., & Georgiadis, P. (2005). Barriers to electronic service development. E-service Journal, 4(1), 41-63.
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
- Wang, T., & Lu, Y. (2010). Determinants of trust in e-government. 2010 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering. IEEE.
- Warkentin, M., Gefen, D., Pavlou, P. A., & Rose, G. M. (2002). Encouraging citizen adoption of e-government by building trust. Electronic Markets, 12(3), 157-162.
- Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. Research monograph No. 6. National Institute for Science Education, Madison, WI.; Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC.
- Weerakkody, V., El-Haddadeh, R., Al-Sobhi, F., Shareef, M. A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Examining the influence of intermediaries in facilitating e-government adoption: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 716-725.
- Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42(5), 719-729.
- Yeniyurt, S., & Townsend, J. D. (2003). Does culture explain acceptance of new products in a country? An empirical investigation. International Marketing Review, 20(4), 377-396.
- Yoo, B., Donthu, N., & Lenartowicz, T. (2011). Measuring Hofstede’s five dimensions of cultural values at the individual level: Development and validation of CVSCALE. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 23(3-4), 193-210.
- Zhao, F. (2011). Impact of national culture on e-government development: A global study. Internet Research, 21(3), 362-380.
- Zhao, F. (2013). An empirical study of cultural dimensions and e-government development: Implications of the findings and strategies. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(3), 294-306.