Differences in corporate social responsibility implementation between Slovak and Czech companies
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(1).2024.29
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #1, pp. 353-365
- 321 Views
-
60 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
In recent years, corporate social responsibility has emerged as a pivotal factor for corporations in cultivating a favorable public perception. Despite this, many companies remain uncertain about the integration and rationale behind incorporating it into their core business strategies. This study aims to discern dissimilarities in implementing corporate social responsibility initiatives between Slovak and Czech companies, addressing the triple bottom line framework. This approach is a metric for evaluating a company’s achievement across three dimensions: social, environmental, and economic. The study is predicated on a questionnaire survey conducted among a sample of 180 Slovak and 180 Czech companies operating as subsidiaries of multinational corporations as typical implementers of corporate social responsibility activities in emerging economies. Following the triple bottom line framework, three distinct sets of variables were formulated to account for social, environmental, and economic activities using the Mann-Whitney U Test to ascertain statistically significant disparities between Slovak and Czech companies. The findings indicate that the surveyed companies from monitored countries exhibited no notable distinctions in environmental endeavors. However, discrepancies were discerned in economic activities, specifically relating to post-sales or post-warranty customer services, which was significant with a small effect size (0.19). In social activities, significant differences were observed concerning adherence to the principle of equal opportunities in the workplace. Based on these outcomes, it is recommended that future investigations delve more extensively into the monitored parameters within the Visegrad countries.
Acknowledgment
The paper was prepared within the project “Etika v podnikaní na Slovensku” no. 01/2022/GA FEM SPU supported by Grant Agency – Faculty of Economics and Management – Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra and internal grand of AMBIS college.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, M14, Q56
-
References57
-
Tables2
-
Figures0
-
- Table 1. Statistics of social activities identified by the Mann-Whitney U test
- Table 2. Statistics of economic activities identified by the Mann-Whitney U test
-
- Bohlmann, C., Krumbholz, L., & Zacher, H. (2018). The triple bottom line and organizational attractiveness ratings: The role of pro-environmental attitude. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 912-919.
- Cardoso, R. P., Reis, J. S. M., Sampaio, N. A. S., Barros, J. G. M., Barbosa, L. C. F. M., & Santos, G. (2022). Sustainable quality management: Unfoldings, trends, and perspectives from the triple bottom line. Proceedings on Engineering Sciences, 4(3), 359-370.
- Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497-505.
- Casey, E., Beaini, S., Pabi, S., Zammit, K., & Amarnath, A. (2017). The triple bottom line for efficiency: Integrating systems within water and energy networks. IEEE Power and Energy Magazine, 15(1), 34-42.
- Caughey, D., Berinsky, A. J., Chatfield, S., Hartman, E., Schickler, E., & Sekhon, J. S. (2020). Target estimation and adjustment weighting for survey nonresponse and sampling bias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Erlbaum: Hillsdale.
- Colbert, B. A., & Kurucz, E. C. (2007). Three conceptions of triple bottom line business sustainability and the role for HRM. Human Resource Planning, 30(1), 21-29.
- Depken, D., & Zeman, C. (2018). Small business challenges and the triple bottom line, TBL: Needs assessment in a Midwest State, USA. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 135, 44-50.
- Dubravská, M., Marchevská, M., Vašaničová, P., & Kotulič, R. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental management linkage: An empirical analysis of the Slovak Republic. Sustainability, 12(13), 5431.
- Formánková, S., & Mikusová, J. (2014). Companies’ decision making about CSR. In B. Illés, A. Dunay, & A. Slocinska (Eds.), New trends in management in the 21st century. Czestochowa: Sekcja Wydawnictw Wydzialu Zarzadzania Politechniki Czestochowskiej.
- Frederick, W. C. (1998). Moving to CSR: What to pack for the trip. Business & Society, 37(1), 40-59.
- Galant, A., & Cadez, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance relationship: A review of measurement approaches. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 676-693.
- Gill, D. L., Dickinson, S. J., & Scharl, A. (2008). Communicating sustainability: A web content analysis of North American, Asian, and European firms. Journal of Communication Management, 12(3), 243-262.
- Hąbek, P. (2017). CSR reporting practices in Visegrad Group countries and the quality of disclosure. Sustainability, 9(12), 2322.
- Hetze, K., & Winistörfer, H. (2016). CSR communication on corporate websites compared across continents. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(4), 501-528.
- Hoffman, A. J., & Bazerman, M. H. (2007). Changing practice on sustainability: Understanding and overcoming the organizational and psychological barriers to action. In Organizations and the Sustainability Mosaic. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Ivanová, E., & Masárová, J. (2018). Performance evaluation of the Visegrad Group countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 270-289.
- Ivanova, O. E., Sikyr, M., & Abrashkin, M. S. (2019). Cost management of industrial production based on the system of production rules. Espacios, 40(30).
- Jamali, D. (2006). Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 809-821.
- Javed, M., Ali, H. Y., Asrar-ul-Haq, M., Ali, M., & Kirmani, S. A. A. (2020). Responsible leadership and triple-bottom-line performance – Do corporate reputation and innovation mediate this relationship? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 41(4), 501-517.
- Jayanti, R. K. (2018). Sustainability based corporate identity: A study of corporate websites. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 22(3), 1-16.
- Jurská-Tešovičová, Z., & Krchová, H. (2022). Implementation of corporate social responsibility environmental actions in comparison of small, medium, and large enterprises in the Slovak Republic. Sustainability, 14(9), 5712.
- Kim, J., & Shin, W. (2014). How to do random allocation (randomization). Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 6(1), 103-109.
- Kovács, Z., Csachová, S., Ferenc, M., Hruška, V., & Konopski, M. (2015). Development policies on rural peripheral areas in Visegrad countries: A comparative policy analysis. Studia Obszarów Wiejskich, 39, 77-102.
- Kozakova, J. (2021). Social responsibility in the business of multinational companies in Slovakia. Nitra: Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra.
- Księża, K. P., & Fischbach, B. (2018). Triple bottom line: The pillars of CSR. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 4(3), 95-110.
- Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253-261.
- Leontitsis, A., & Pagge, J. (2007). A simulation approach on Cronbach’s alpha statistical significance. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 73(5), 336-340.
- Lock, I., & Araujo, T. (2020). Visualizing the triple bottom line: A large-scale automated visual content analysis of European corporations’ website and social media images. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(6), 2631-2641.
- Low, M. P. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and the evolution of internal corporate social responsibility in 21st century. Asian Journal of Social Sciences and Management Studies, 3(1), 56-74.
- Masud, M. A. K., Rashid, M. H. U., Khan, T., Bae, S. M., & Kim, J. D. (2019). Organizational strategy and corporate social responsibility: The mediating effect of triple bottom line. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(22), 4559.
- McKnight, P. E., & Najab, J. (2010). Mann-Whitney u test. In The Corsini Encyclopedia of Psychology.
- McWilliams, A., Parhankangas, A., Coupet, J., Welch, E., & Barnum, D. T. (2016). Strategic decision making for the triple bottom line. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(3), 193-204.
- Moehl, S., & Friedman, B. A. (2022). Consumer perceived authenticity of organizational corporate social responsibility (CSR) statements: A test of attribution theory. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(4), 875-893.
- Nadanyiova, M., Majerova, J., & Gajanova, L. (2021). The usage of the CSR concept and its communication in Slovak companies in the process of globalization. SHS Web of Conferences, 91, 01024.
- Nguyen, H. P. D., & Rajnai, Z. (2022). Trustworthy cybersecurity cooperation of Visegrád countries. Scientia et Securitas, 2(4), 428-432.
- Obeidat, D., Altheeb, S., & Masa’deh, R. E. (2018). The impact of internal corporate social responsibility on job satisfaction in Jordanian pharmaceutical companies. Modern Applied Science, 12(11).
- Ostapenko, G., Šikýř, M., & Montenero, V. (2022). Attitudes and perceptions of employees and employers toward remote working. Proceedings of the IDIMT 2022 – Digitalization of Society, Business and Management in a Pandemic: 30th Interdisciplinary Information Management Talks. Linz: Trauner Verlag.
- Pan, X., Sinha, P., & Chen, X. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and eco-innovation: The triple bottom line perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 214-228.
- Pasko, O., Zhang, L., Martey, E.M., Kuts, T., & Joshua, L.B. (2024). Does managerial ability matter in corporate sustainability-related dynamics? An empirical investigation. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(1), 128-146.
- Peng, W., Xin, B., & Kwon, Y. (2019). Optimal strategies of product price, quality, and corporate environmental responsibility. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(23), 4704.
- Phillips, R., Troup, L., Fannon, D., & Eckelman, M. J. (2020). Triple bottom line sustainability assessment of window-to-wall ratio in US office buildings. Building and Environment, 182, 107057.
- Przytuła, S., Formánková, S., Ubrežiová, I., & Dunay, A. (2019). Corporate social responsibility in Visegrad countries (Poland, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary) overall landscape. In A. Długopolska-Mikonowicz, S. Przytuła, & C. Stehr (Eds.), Corporate Social Responsibility in Poland. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham.
- Schönborn, G., Berlin, C., Pinzone, M., Hanisch, C., Georgoulias, K., & Lanz, M. (2019). Why social sustainability counts: The impact of corporate social sustainability culture on financial success. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 17, 1-10.
- Shapiro, S. S., & Wilk, M. B. (1972). An analysis of variance test for the exponential distribution (complete samples). Technometrics, 14(2), 355-370.
- Shen, J., & Zhang, H. (2019). Socially responsible human resource management and employee support for external CSR: Roles of organizational CSR climate and perceived CSR directed toward employees. Journal of Business Ethics, 156, 875-888.
- Shim, J. M., Lee, W. S., Moon, J., & Song, M. (2021). Coffee shop corporate social responsibility (CSR) and reuse intention using triple bottom line theory. British Food Journal, 123(12), 4421-4435.
- Singh, K., & Misra, M. (2021). Linking corporate social responsibility (CSR) and organizational performance: The moderating effect of corporate reputation. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 27(1), 100139.
- Skácelík, P. (2010). Social responsibility of organizations. Prague: Grada Publishing.
- Svensson, G., Ferro, C., Høgevold, N., Padin, C., Varela, J. C. S., & Sarstedt, M. (2018). Framing the triple bottom line approach: Direct and mediation effects between economic, social and environmental elements. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 972-991.
- Tate, W. L., & Bals, L. (2018). Achieving shared triple bottom line (TBL) value creation: Toward a social resource-based view (SRBV) of the firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 152, 803-826.
- Thao, L. H. N., Anh, D. N. P., Cuong, V. H., Ngoc, N. T. K., & Cuong, V. V. (2023). The effect of corporate social responsibility on firm performance: Evidence from Vietnam. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 21(3), 528-542.
- Ubrežiová, I., Stankovič, L., Mihalčová, B., & Ubrežiová, A. (2013). Perception of corporate social responsibility in companies of Eastern Slovakia region in 2009 and 2010. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 61(7), 2903-2910.
- Villarino, J., & Font, X. (2015). Sustainability marketing myopia: The lack of persuasiveness in sustainability communication. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 21(4), 326-335.
- Watson, G. S., & Durbin, J. (1951). Exact tests of serial correlation using noncircular statistics. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22(3), 446-451.
- Westerman, J. W., Rao, M. B., Vanka, S., & Gupta, M. (2020). Sustainable human resource management and the triple bottom line: Multi-stakeholder strategies, concepts, and engagement. Human Resource Management Review, 30(3), 100742.
- Willard, A. K., & Cingl, L. (2017). Testing theories of secularization and religious belief in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Evolution and Human Behavior, 38(5), 604-615.