Gaukhar Uvakbayeva

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Money laundering threatens global financial integrity, while digital governance is increasingly seen as a tool to enhance transparency and regulatory capacity. This study operationalized digital governance through the United Nations E-Government Development Index, which captures the scope and quality of online public services, telecommunications infrastructure, and human capital. The paper aims to examine whether improvements in e-government development are associated with measurable reductions in systemic money-laundering vulnerabilities at the country level. The study uses an unbalanced panel of 171 countries for 2012–2024 (982 observations). Fixed- and random-effects models with Box–Cox transformations were estimated, with the Hausman test guiding model selection and cluster-robust and Driscoll–Kraay standard errors ensuring reliable inference. The results demonstrate a statistically significant and economically meaningful inverse relationship between e-government development and money-laundering risk, measured by the Basel AML Index. In the preferred fixed-effects specification, the coefficient on the transformed EGDI is –1.56 (p < 0.001), indicating that within-country improvements in digital governance capacity are associated with substantial reductions in AML vulnerability over time. This effect remains robust across alternative error structures, with 95% confidence intervals of [–1.96, –1.17] under cluster-robust estimation and [–1.75, –1.38] under Driscoll–Kraay correction. The inclusion of country-specific fixed effects reveals considerable structural heterogeneity in baseline AML risk (approximately 1.15–3.90), while time effects display limited variation over the sample period (approximately 2.11–2.19), confirming that the risk-reducing role of digital governance is not driven by specific countries or particular years.

Acknowledgment
This article was prepared based on the results of a study funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, “GovTech for Ukraine: A Digital, Secure, Transparent, and Equitable State in Times of War and Post-War Reconstruction” (registration number: 0126U000544).

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Weak risk governance and legacy non-performing loans have repeatedly destabilized banks in emerging markets, making the payoff from regulatory strengthening of internal control and internal audit a first-order policy question. This study aims to determine whether Kazakhstan’s 2019 risk-management and internal control requirements (National Bank Resolution No. 188), whose core assurance mechanism is a strengthened internal audit function, improved the financial stability of the country’s commercial (second-tier) banks, and to identify the channel of this effect. The analysis applies a continuous-treatment difference-in-differences design to an annual panel of 37 banks over 2015–2025 (287 bank-years), interacting each bank’s pre-intervention (2016–2019) weakness with the post-intervention period and measuring stability by the log Z-score. The results show that the stabilizing effect is concentrated in the asset-quality channel: banks that entered the post-2020 period with a one-standard-deviation greater non-performing-loan weakness recorded a 0.38-0.41 log-point (roughly 40-50%) larger post-intervention increase in the Z-score (p < 0.01), whereas composite pre-intervention weakness yields no robust effect under any weighting scheme. The effect emerges with a multi-year lag, becoming statistically detectable only toward the end of the sample period, and operates through capital rebuilding. Because pre-intervention weakness strongly predicts market exit (Cox hazard ratio ≈ 3.95), the estimates are a lower bound on the intervention’s full association with sector stability. The findings imply that supervisors should target credit-risk governance, loan classification, timely recognition of problem loans, and provisioning, where strengthened internal control and audit yield the largest stability gains.