Digital tax administration, corporate tax revenue and the informal economy: Panel evidence from 25 transition economies, with a focus on Armenia, Kazakhstan, and Ukraine

  • 3 Views
  • 0 Downloads

Creative Commons License DMCA.com Protection Status
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Type of the article: Research Article

Abstract
Transition economies combine large informal sectors with constrained fiscal capacity, and many have turned to digital tax administration to raise revenue and curb informality. This study assesses digital tax administration as a fiscal-governance innovation in 25 transition economies, asking whether it increases corporate tax revenue and reduces the informal economy, and whether these effects are linked. Using a balanced annual panel for 2008–2022 (375 country-years) and fixed-effects models, it proxies digital administration by the United Nations Online Service Index – a broad measure of digital-government maturity – and tests mediation between revenue and informality. A higher Online Service Index is robustly associated with higher corporate tax revenue (β = 0.89, p < 0.01) – an increase of about 0.89 percentage points of GDP, roughly 41% of the sample mean – that holds across alternative specifications including two-way fixed effects, alternative constructions of the index, and sub-periods. Its association with a smaller informal economy (β = −3.62, p < 0.05) is fragile: it is concentrated in the pandemic years 2020–2021, turns insignificant once they are excluded (β = −1.54, p = 0.12), and does not survive two-way fixed effects or all alternative informality measures. An exploratory decomposition finds no evidence that this association runs through corporate tax revenue: the indirect path is insignificant (about 16% of the total effect), indicating parallel rather than sequential channels. Digitalizing tax administration is associated with a reliable corporate-revenue dividend, whereas the informality association is conditional, pandemic-bound, and does not operate through tax revenue.

Acknowledgment
This article was prepared based on the results of a study funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine entitled “GovTech for Ukraine: A Digital, Secure, Transparent, and Equitable State in Times of War and Post-War Reconstruction” (registration number: 0126U000544).

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Figure 1. Digital-government maturity (OSI) and the informal economy in the focal economies, 2008–2022
    • Figure 2. The Online Service Index and corporate tax revenue: added-variable plot
    • Figure 3. Robustness of the OSI coefficient by period
    • Figure 4. Online Service Index, corporate tax revenue, and the informal economy: parallel channels
    • Table 1. Descriptive statistics
    • Table 2. Fixed-effects estimates under the trend and two-way specifications: the Online Service Index, corporate tax revenue, and the informal economy
    • Table 3. Robustness of the informal-economy estimate
    • Table 4. Mediation decomposition (parallel channels)
    • Table 5. Sensitivity analyses: temporal construction of the OSI, corporate-tax coverage, and small-cluster inference
    • Table A1. Transition economies in the sample (N = 25), 2008–2022
    • Table B1. Pairwise correlations among model variables
    • Table C1. Data coverage by variable (out of 375 country-years)
    • Table C2. Non-missing observations by year (maximum 25 per cell)
    • Table C3. Listwise sample sizes for the primary specifications
    • Conceptualization
      Zhanat Khishauyeva, Madi Takiev, Gaukhar Uvakbayeva, Iryna D’yakonova, Tigran Manukyan, Oleg Filozop, Liudmyla Zakharkina
    • Data curation
      Zhanat Khishauyeva, Gaukhar Uvakbayeva, Iryna D’yakonova, Liudmyla Zakharkina
    • Resources
      Zhanat Khishauyeva, Madi Takiev, Gaukhar Uvakbayeva, Iryna D’yakonova, Tigran Manukyan, Oleg Filozop
    • Software
      Zhanat Khishauyeva, Tigran Manukyan, Oleg Filozop
    • Validation
      Zhanat Khishauyeva, Madi Takiev, Gaukhar Uvakbayeva, Iryna D’yakonova, Tigran Manukyan, Oleg Filozop
    • Visualization
      Zhanat Khishauyeva, Madi Takiev, Gaukhar Uvakbayeva, Iryna D’yakonova, Tigran Manukyan, Oleg Filozop
    • Writing – original draft
      Zhanat Khishauyeva, Madi Takiev, Gaukhar Uvakbayeva, Iryna D’yakonova, Tigran Manukyan, Oleg Filozop, Liudmyla Zakharkina
    • Project administration
      Gaukhar Uvakbayeva
    • Supervision
      Gaukhar Uvakbayeva
    • Formal Analysis
      Liudmyla Zakharkina
    • Investigation
      Liudmyla Zakharkina
    • Methodology
      Liudmyla Zakharkina