Internal audit under Kazakhstan’s 2019 risk-management and internal control requirements: A continuous-treatment difference-in-differences analysis of commercial banks’ financial stability
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(3).2026.05
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2026, Issue #3, pp. 60–78
- 6 Views
-
1 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
Weak risk governance and legacy non-performing loans have repeatedly destabilized banks in emerging markets, making the payoff from regulatory strengthening of internal control and internal audit a first-order policy question. This study aims to determine whether Kazakhstan’s 2019 risk-management and internal control requirements (National Bank Resolution No. 188), whose core assurance mechanism is a strengthened internal audit function, improved the financial stability of the country’s commercial (second-tier) banks, and to identify the channel of this effect. The analysis applies a continuous-treatment difference-in-differences design to an annual panel of 37 banks over 2015–2025 (287 bank-years), interacting each bank’s pre-intervention (2016–2019) weakness with the post-intervention period and measuring stability by the log Z-score. The results show that the stabilizing effect is concentrated in the asset-quality channel: banks that entered the post-2020 period with a one-standard-deviation greater non-performing-loan weakness recorded a 0.38-0.41 log-point (roughly 40-50%) larger post-intervention increase in the Z-score (p < 0.01), whereas composite pre-intervention weakness yields no robust effect under any weighting scheme. The effect emerges with a multi-year lag, becoming statistically detectable only toward the end of the sample period, and operates through capital rebuilding. Because pre-intervention weakness strongly predicts market exit (Cox hazard ratio ≈ 3.95), the estimates are a lower bound on the intervention’s full association with sector stability. The findings imply that supervisors should target credit-risk governance, loan classification, timely recognition of problem loans, and provisioning, where strengthened internal control and audit yield the largest stability gains.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)C23, G21, G28, G32, M42
-
References46
-
Tables9
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Difference-in-differences coefficients by pre-intervention weakness dimension (dependent variable: log Z-score)
- Figure 2. Event-study estimates of the intervention effect, by pre-intervention weakness measure (base year 2020)
- Figure 3. Stability trajectory of high- versus low-NPL-weakness banks (mean log Z-score by year)
- Figure 4. Pre-intervention weakness (2016–2019) and bank outcome
-
- Table 1. Variable definitions and sources
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics
- Table 3. 2019 requirements and bank stability: continuous-treatment difference-in-differences
- Table A1. Sample of banks and treatment status
- Table B1. Correlation matrix of control variables
- Table C1. Pre-intervention balance by weakness group
- Table D1. Summary of robustness checks
- Table E1. Alternative weighting schemes for the composite pre-intervention weakness index
- Table F1. Event-study coefficients (dependent variable: log Z-score)
-
- Ahmed, M. A. M. (2025). The impact of government expenditure policies on the exchange rate. Public Governance, Regulation and Law, 1(1), 65-74.
- Alabdullah, T. T. Y., Ahmed, E. R., & Salih, W. K. (2025). Business ethics, leadership, and sustainability in light of auditing: The mediating impact of cloud-based managerial accounting practices toward audit quality. Business Ethics and Leadership, 9(4), 106-120.
- Alarcon, L., Franco, J., Garcia, G., & Barlis, B. (2026). Examining the effectiveness and implementation challenges of internal control systems for strategic risk management in private higher education institutions. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 24(1), 292-304.
- Alqaraleh, M. H. (2024). Evaluating the effect of investor culture on internal control reporting and investor perceptions of disclosure credibility. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 21(4), 314-322.
- Alruwaili, W. S., Ahmed, A. D., & Joshi, M. (2023). IFRS innovation, governance practices and firm performance: A new empirical assessment of moderating effects across GCC region. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 18(3), 615-659.
- Amanamah, R. B. (2024). Examining the moderating role of firm characteristics in the corporate governance-financial reporting quality nexus: Evidence from a developing country. Business Ethics and Leadership, 8(1), 28-44.
- Anton, S., & Afloarei Nucu, A. E. (2024). The impact of digital finance and financial inclusion on banking stability: International evidence. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(2), 563-593.
- Asian Development Bank. (2023, October 18). Stabilizing Kazakhstan’s banks: Clear rules and tighter regulations needed. Asian Development Blog.
- AzerNews. (2018, November 21). Asset quality - primary reason for several Kazakh banks’ failures.
- Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS). (2012). The internal audit function in banks. Bank for International Settlements.
- Berger, A. N., & DeYoung, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 21(6), 849-870.
- Boyd, J. H., & Runkle, D. E. (1993). Size and performance of banking firms: Testing the predictions of theory. Journal of Monetary Economics, 31(1), 47-67.
- Gižienė, V., Laskienė, D., Stravinskas, T., Petrikė, I., & Juodžbalytė, I. (2024). The impact of macroeconomic factors on the performance of commercial banks: The case of Lithuania. Engineering Economics, 35(5), 614-629.
- International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2024). Republic of Kazakhstan: Financial system stability assessment (IMF Staff Country Report No. 2024/048).
- Juwita Sari Harahap, A., & Erlina. (2024). Evaluating the impact of risk management and risk-based internal audit on fraud detection in local governments. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(3), 653-664.
- Kaya, H. D. (2025). The global financial crises: Early warnings, consequences, and policy responses. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(3), 21-37.
- Keliuotyte-Staniuleniene, G., Kanapickiene, R., Vasiliauskaite, D., & Spicas, R. (2023). Macroeconomic factors of consumer loan credit risk: The case of Lithuania. Transformations in Business and Economics, 22(3), 156-191.
- Klein, N. (2013). Non-performing loans in CESEE: Determinants and impact on macroeconomic performance (IMF Working Paper No. 13/72). International Monetary Fund.
- Klochan, I., & Filipov, D. (2023). Design of assessment and forecasting of a country’s financial security in change management conditions. Smart Economy, Entrepreneurship and Security, 1(1), 31-42.
- Kuzior, A., Vasylieva, T., Smutka, L., & Hadj Ammar, O. (2025). Toward tailored AML/CFT strategies: Clustering countries by FATF compliance and effectiveness. Journal of International Studies, 18(2), 229-254.
- Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation and risk taking. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259-275.
- Letkovsky, S., Jencova, S., Vasanicova, P., Gavura, S., & Bacik, R. (2023). Predicting bankruptcy using artificial intelligence: The case of the engineering industry. Economics & Sociology, 16(4), 178-190.
- Lyeonov, S., Hrytsenko, L., Trojanek, R., & Popp, J. (2025). Who benefits from AI in money laundering in Europe: The organised criminals or the AML services? Human Technology, 21(1), 222-245.
- Lyeonov, S., Yarovenko, H., Reshetniak, Y., & Bilan, Y. (2025). The triple threat: Understanding the effects of cyber threats, corruption, and money laundering on the business environment. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 20(3), 1087-1129.
- Mehrotra, R., & Chadha, S. (2025). Macroeconomic resilience to socioeconomic challenges and corporate stability in the automotive industry: Impact on dividend policy. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(2), 180-189.
- Mursalov, M., Niemi, O., Kolomiiets, S., & Trofimenko, D. (2025). Determinants of financial stability in banks: The impact of key regulatory financial indicators. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 9(2), 123-134.
- National Bank of Kazakhstan. (2019). Resolution of the Board of the National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 188 of November 12, 2019, on approval of the rules for forming a risk management and internal control system for second-tier banks and branches of non-resident banks of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
- National Bank of Kazakhstan. (n.d.). Banking sector reporting [Data set].
- Nguyen, P. D. (2024). Determinants of bank profitability in Vietnam: A focus on financial and COVID-19 crises. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 25(4), 709-730.
- Noor, A. S., Alam, S., Nohong, M., & Sobarsyah, M. (2024). Investigating the impact of corporate governance and investment decisions on financial performance and firm value in insurance and banking sectors. Insurance Markets and Companies, 15(2), 122-132.
- Nsekela, A. M., Sibindi, A. B., & Makoni, P. L. (2026). Corporate governance and financial performance in banks: The moderating role of information leakage. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 9(4), 51-68.
- Nurgaliyeva, A., Saparova, G., Zhadigerova, O., Satenov, B., Nurmagambetova, A., & Bekturova, A. (2025). Internal financial control and internal financial audit: Tools for eliminating financial misconduct. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 21(4), 229-251.
- Prokopenko, O., Koldovskiy, A., Khalilova, M., Orazbayeva, A., & Machado, J. (2024). Development of blockchain technology in financial accounting. Computation, 12(12), Article 250.
- Rakhimzhanova, K., Zhorabayeva, Z. K., Ichshanova, R., Kodasheva, G. S., & Mikhailova, G. V. (2025). Improving the mechanism for managing problematic loans from second-tier banks. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 21(1), 233-244.
- S&P Global Ratings. (2019, October 11). Kazakh banks might need additional provisioning following the asset quality review.
- Sitnicka, S., Xinyang, L., Serhiienko, R., & Babaiev, D. (2025). Determinants affecting bank profitability: A broad and comparative analysis across regions and income groups. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 9(3), 120-158.
- Soussou, K., & Hbaieb, E. (2026). Ethical leadership and financial resilience: The impact of ESG performance on corporate financial distress. Business Ethics and Leadership, 10(1), 90-104.
- Szüle, B. (2023). Traditional commercial banking and systemic risk: Evidence from Hungary. Journal of International Studies, 16(4), 65-76.
- Tutar, H., Kavas, Y. B., Medetoğlu, B., & Koltai, J. (2025). Analysis of financial performance of deposit banks in Turkey using multi-criteria decision-making methods. Journal of International Studies, 18(1), 196-215.
- U.S. Department of State. (2020). 2020 investment climate statements: Kazakhstan.
- Waliszewski, K., Cichowicz, E., Gębski, Ł., Kliber, F., Kubiczek, J., Niedziółka, P., Solarz, M., & Warchlewska, A. (2024). Digital loans and buy now pay later from LendTech versus bank loans in the era of ‘black swans’: Complementarity in the area of consumer financing. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(1), 241-278.
- Wheelock, D. C., & Wilson, P. W. (2000). Why do banks disappear? The determinants of U.S. bank failures and acquisitions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(1), 127-138.
- World Bank. (2024). Bank nonperforming loans to total gross loans (%): Kazakhstan [Data set]. World Development Indicators.
- Yefimenko, A., Boronos, V., Serpeninova, Y., & Koldovskyi, A. (2025). Innovative and technological determinants of corruption reduction: How do knowledge and technology contribute to public integrity and transparency? Knowledge Economy and Lifelong Learning, 1(1), 21-34.
- Yildirim, Y. (2025). Measuring systemic stress in emerging markets: Socioeconomic challenges for financial and real sectors. SocioEconomic Challenges, 9(4), 129-149.
- Zurika Lubis, H., Sari, M., Auliya Ramadhany, A., Chyntia Ovami, D., & Rahmayati Brutu, I. (2024). Effect of internal audit, internal control, and audit quality on fraud prevention: Evidence from the public sector in Indonesia. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 22(2), 40-50.


