Evaluating crypto regulation stringency and its impact on digital asset market adoption
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(2).2026.10
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2026, Issue #2, pp. 133-149
- 22 Views
-
3 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The article provides a comprehensive empirical assessment of the legal and operational regimes of digital asset circulation and their real impact on the financial market. To quantitatively measure the degree of state control, a composite Crypto Regulation Stringency Index (CRSI) was applied, constructed based on the OECD-JRC methodology. The index integrates 16 parameters across five fundamental areas (legal status, anti-money laundering, taxation, licensing, and consumer protection) for 61 countries (jurisdictions) as of 2025. The developed tool demonstrated high internal consistency and factor structure reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.955).
To determine the market consequences of legal regulation, the index values were compared with the Chainalysis 2025 Global Crypto Adoption Index. The direct unconditional correlation between the stringency of rules and the scale of digital asset usage proved to be weak. However, a multivariate regression analysis conditional on a set of macroeconomic and institutional covariates (income level, digital infrastructure development, financial freedom, quality of the rule of law, and the specifics of the MiCA regulation) revealed a robust and statistically significant positive relationship. The reversal of the effect is consistent with a Simpson-type compositional effect: within groups of countries with comparable levels of economic development, clear and strict regulatory rules stimulate market activity. The findings extend the literature on comparative financial law and demonstrate that state control does not suppress the crypto-economy but rather serves as its stable institutional foundation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G18, G28, K42, O38
-
References59
-
Tables7
-
Figures4
-
- Figure 1. Heatmap of pairwise Pearson correlations among the five CRSI dimension scores
- Figure 2. Two-dimensional scatter plot of CRSI_EW and Chainalysis 2025 inverse adoption rank (n = 61); the red line represents the linear approximation
- Figure 3. Distribution of CRSI by region (Panel A); CRSI vs. adoption differentiated by MiCA status (Panel B)
- Figure 4. Regression diagnostics: residuals vs. fitted values, normal Q–Q plot, residual distribution, and comparison of the CRSI coefficient across different specifications (95% confidence intervals)
-
- Table 1. Structure of the CRSI index by key dimensions
- Table 2. Descriptive statistics of dimensions and the CRSI 2025 (n = 61)
- Table 3. Top 15 jurisdictions by CRSI 2025*
- Table 4. Pairwise Pearson correlations among the CRSI dimension scores (n = 61)
- Table 5. OLS regressions of the Chainalysis 2025 inverse adoption rank on CRSI and control variables
- Table A1. Complete CRSI 2025 ranking with scores across five dimensions and the original 2025 Chainalysis rank
- Table B1. Sub-indicator system and evaluation criteria of the CRSI index
-
- Adrian, T., & Mancini-Griffoli, T. (2021). The rise of digital money. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 13(1), 57-77.
- Allen, F., Gu, X., & Jagtiani, J. (2022). Fintech, cryptocurrencies, and CBDC: Financial structural transformation in China. Journal of International Money and Finance, 124, 102625.
- Auer, R., & Claessens, S. (2018). Regulating cryptocurrencies: Assessing market reactions. BIS Quarterly Review, 2018, 51-65.
- Auer, R., Cornelli, G., & Frost, J. (2022a). The pandemic, cash, and retail payment behaviour: Insights from the future of payments database (BIS Working Papers No 1055).
- Auer, R., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Monnet, C., Rice, T., & Shin, H. S. (2022b). Central bank digital currencies: Motives, economic implications, and the research frontier. Annual Review of Economics, 14(1), 697-721.
- Bhimani, A., Hausken, K., & Arif, S. (2022). Do national development factors affect cryptocurrency adoption? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 181, 121739.
- Bianchi, D., & Babiak, M. (2022). On the performance of cryptocurrency funds. Journal of Banking & Finance, 138, 106467.
- Bindseil, U., & Senner, R. (2024). Destabilisation of bank deposits across destinations: Assessment and policy implications (ECB Working Paper No. 2887).
- Borri, N., & Shakhnov, K. (2020). Regulation spillovers across cryptocurrency markets. Finance Research Letters, 36, 101333.
- Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1979). A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica, 47(5), 1287-1294.
- Brunnermeier, M. K., James, H., & Landau, J.-P. (2019). The digitalization of money (NBER Working Paper No. 26300).
- Casadio Tarabusi, E., & Guarini, G. (2013). An unbalance adjustment method for development indicators. Social Indicators Research, 112(1), 19-45.
- Chainalysis. (2025). The 2025 Global Adoption Index: India and the United States Lead Cryptocurrency Adoption. Chainalysis Inc.
- Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
- Cumming, D. J., Johan, S., & Pant, A. (2019). Regulation of the crypto-economy: Managing risks, challenges, and regulatory uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 12(3), 126.
- Cumming, D. J., Johan, S., & Reardon, R. (2023). Global fintech trends and their impact on international business: A review. Multinational Business Review, 31(3), 413-436.
- Davidson, R., & MacKinnon, J. G. (1993). Estimation and inference in econometrics. Oxford University Press.
- Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1-37.
- Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Courts. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 453-517.
- Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman & Hall.
- European Union (EU). (2023). Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA). Official Journal of the European Union, L 150/40, 205.
- Ferreira, A., & Sandner, P. (2021). EU search for regulatory answers to crypto assets and their place in the financial markets’ infrastructure. Computer Law & Security Review, 43, 105632.
- Feyen, E., Kawashima, Y., & Mittal, R. (2022). Crypto-assets activity around the world: Evolution and macro-financial drivers (Policy Research Working Paper No. 9962). World Bank.
- Financial Action Task Force (FATF). (2021). Updated guidance for a risk-based approach to virtual assets and virtual asset service providers. FATF/OECD.
- Frisch, R., & Waugh, F. V. (1933). Partial time regressions as compared with individual trends. Econometrica, 1(4), 387-401.
- Hairudin, A., Sifat, I. M., Mohamad, A., & Yusof, Y. (2022). Cryptocurrencies: A survey on acceptance, governance and market dynamics. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 27(4), 4633-4659.
- Halaburda, H., Haeringer, G., Gans, J., & Gandal, N. (2022). The microeconomics of cryptocurrencies. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(3), 971-1013.
- Hassan, T. A., Hollander, S., van Lent, L., & Tahoun, A. (2019). Firm-level political risk: Measurement and effects. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 134(4), 2135-2202.
- Hoerl, A. E., & Kennard, R. W. (1970). Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics, 12(1), 55-67.
- Houben, R., & Snyers, A. (2018). Cryptocurrencies and blockchain: Legal context and implications for financial crime, money laundering and tax evasion. European Parliament.
- Howell, S. T., Niessner, M., & Yermack, D. (2020). Initial coin offerings: Financing growth with cryptocurrency token sales. Review of Financial Studies, 33(9), 3925-3974.
- International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2024). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2024. ITU Publications.
- Ivasenko, M., Frolov, S., Heyenko, M., Kolodnenko, N., & Datsenko, V. (2025). Operational cost savings: Blockchain-driven back-office automation and syndicated loan growth in U.S. banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(2), 189-205.
- Jarque, C. M., & Bera, A. K. (1980). Efficient tests for normality, homoscedasticity and serial independence of regression residuals. Economics Letters, 6(3), 255-259.
- Kahn, C. M., van Oordt, M. R. C., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Best before? Expiring central bank digital currency and loss recovery. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 58(3), 787-819.
- Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.
- Kraay, A. (2018). Methodology for a World Bank Human Capital Index (Policy Research Working Paper No. 8593). World Bank.
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131-1150.
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113-1155.
- Levine, R. (1999). Law, finance, and economic growth. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 8(1-2), 8-35.
- Liu, Y., & Tsyvinski, A. (2021). Risks and returns of cryptocurrency. Review of Financial Studies, 34(6), 2689-2727.
- Liu, Y., Tsyvinski, A., & Wu, X. (2022). Common risk factors in cryptocurrency. Journal of Finance, 77(2), 1133-1177.
- Long, J. S., & Ervin, L. H. (2000). Using heteroscedasticity-consistent standard errors in the linear regression model. The American Statistician, 54(3), 217-224.
- Lovell, M. C. (1963). Seasonal adjustment of economic time series and multiple regression analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(304), 993-1010.
- Manela, A., & Moreira, A. (2017). News implied volatility and disaster concerns. Journal of Financial Economics, 123(1), 137-162.
- Maume, P. (2023). The Regulation on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCAR): Landmark Codification, or First Step of Many, or Both? European Company and Financial Law Review, 20(2), 243-275.
- Mazziotta, M., & Pareto, A. (2016). On a generalized non-compensatory composite index for measuring socio-economic phenomena. Social Indicators Research, 127(3), 983-1003.
- Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini, E. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing.
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
- O’Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41(5), 673-690.
- Ramsey, J. B. (1969). Tests for specification errors in classical linear least-squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 31(2), 350-371.
- Saiedi, E., Broström, A., & Ruiz, F. (2021). Global drivers of cryptocurrency infrastructure adoption. Small Business Economics, 57, 353-406.
- Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2002). State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. EUR 20408 EN, European Commission–JRC.
- Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, 168(2), 307-323.
- Svirydzenka, K. (2016). Introducing a new broad-based index of financial development (IMF Working Paper No. WP/16/5).
- U.S. Congress. (2024). Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act (H.R. 4763, 118th Congress).
- U.S. Congress. (2025). Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for U.S. Stablecoins Act of 2025 (S. 1582, 119th Congress).
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2025). Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 122 (Release No. SAB 122, 23 January 2025).
- Zetzsche, D. A., Annunziata, F., Arner, D. W., & Buckley, R. P. (2021). The Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation (MiCA) and the EU digital finance strategy. Capital Markets Law Journal, 16(2), 203-225.


