Identification and stereotypes as determinants of brand extension potential
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.13(1).2017.04
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2017, Issue #1, pp. 33-54
- Cited by
- 983 Views
-
388 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Current research suggests that social identification processes play an important role in markets. In this study, the authors propose that marketing research has neglected one important factor, which influences the success of a brand extension, namely the group processes between social groups and brand communities framing the new product introduction. Based on social identification theory, the authors derive a framework integrating identification and stereotyping processes, simultaneously testing for drivers of brand extension potential, which have been found to be important in past empirical studies. Using a structural equation modeling approach, the authors test for in-group and out-group effects in two hypothetical brand extension scenarios of one snowboard brand (Burton), and a surf brand (Billabong) into the ski market. They find that the social identification processes underlying the new product introduction significantly drive the potential success of the brand extension. By being the first study to explore the role of identification and stereotype effects in brand extension, the authors make an important contribution to research in this area. Moreover, our study provides important implications for brand managers planning to extend their brands into new product categories.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M37
-
References87
-
Tables6
-
Figures3
-
- Fig. 1. Conceptual framework
- Fig. 2. Structural equation models with path coefficients and model fit measures
- Fig. 3. Multiple group analysis
-
- Table 1. Reliability statistics of the individual constructs
- Table 2. T-test for verifying significant differences of the mean values of the structural models
- Table 3. Chi-square difference test for verifying the metric invariance
- Table 4. T-test for verifying significant differences of the path coefficients
- Table 5. T-test for verifying significant differences of the mean values of the multiple group comparison
- Table 6. Local measures of goodness of the individual constructs
-
- Aaker, D. A. (1990). Brand Extensions: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Sloan Management Review, 31(4), 47-56.
- Aaker, D. A., Keller, L. K. (1990). Consumer Evaluation of Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 47-56.
- Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of Brand Personality. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34(August 1997), 347-356.
- Aaker, J. L. (1999). The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-Expression in Persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36(February 1999), 45-57.
- Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A. (1988). Comments on the motivational status of self-esteem in social identity and intergroup discrimination. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18(4), 317-334, August/September 1988.
- Achenreiner, G. B., John, D. R. (2003). The Meaning of Brand Names to Children: A Developmental Investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 205-219.
- Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., Hermann, A. (2005). The Social Influence of Brand Community. Evidence from European Car Clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 19-34.
- Ashfort, B. E., Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39.
- Baron, R. M., Kenny, D. A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychology Research: Conceptual, Strategic and Statistical Consideratioins. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
- Barone, M. J., and Miniard, P. W. (2002). Mood and Brand Extension Judgments:Asymmetric Effects for Desirable Versus Undesirable Brands Mood. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(4), 283-290.
- Barone, M. J. (2005). The Interactive Effects of Mood and Involvementon Brand Extension Evaluations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(3), 263-270.
- Belk, Russell W. (1988). Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(2), 139-168.
- Bergami, M., Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). Self-Categorization, Affective Commitment and Group Self-Esteem as Distinct Aspects of Social Identity in the Organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 555-577.
- Bhattacharya, C. B., Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-Company Identification: A Framework for Understanding Consumer’s Relationships with Companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76-88.
- Boush, D. M., Loken, B. (1991). A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 16-28.
- Broniarczyk, S., Alba, J. W. (1994). The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 214-228.
- Byrne, B. M., Shavelson, R. J., Muthen, B. (1989). Testing for the Equivalence of Factor Covariance and Mean Structure: The Issue of Partial Measurement Invariance. Psychological Bulletin, 105, Jg. (1989) Nr. 3, 465-466.
- Churchill, G. (1979). A Paradigm fo r Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73.
- Crocker, J., Luthanen, R. (1990). Collective Self-Esteem and In-group Bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 60-67.
- Dancin, A. P., Smith, D. C. (1994). The Effects of Brand Portfolio Characteristics on Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(2), 67-88.
- Dawar, N. (1996). Extensions of Broad Brands: The role of retrieval in evaluations of fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(2), 189-207
- Dubé, L., Schmitt, B. H., Bridges, S. (1992). Categorization Research and Brand Extensions. Advances in Consumer Research, 19(1), 255-259.
- Escalas, J. E., Bettman, J. R. (2005). Self-Construal, Reference Groups, and Brand Meaning. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(3).
- Estes, Z., Gibbert, M., Guest, D., Mazursky, D. (2012). A dual-process model of brand extension: Taxonomic feature-based and thematic relation-based similarity independently drive brand extension evaluation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2012), 86-101
- Fornell, C., Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Gürhan-Canli, Z., Maheswaran, D. (1998). The Effects of Extensions on Brand Name Dilution and Enhancement. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), 464-473.
- Grabler, K., Painhaupt, S., Fischer, S. (2004). Zukunftssicherung Wintersport: Ski-fahrer, Aufhörer & Nicht-Skifahrer.
- Grabler, K., Kulnig, A., Dubsky, H. (2010a). Skifahrerpotential in Europa – Gesamtbericht.
- Grabler, K., Kulnig, A., Dubsky, H. (2010b). Skifahrerpotential in Europa: Österreich unter der Lupe.
- Hagtvedt, H., Patrick, V. M. (2008). Art and the brand: The role of visual art in enhancing brand extendibility. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 18(2008), 212-222.
- Hem, L. E., Chernatony, L., Iversen, N. M. (2003). Factors Influencing Successful Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing Management, 19(7), 781-806.
- Herr, P. M., Farquhar, P. H., Fazio, R. H. (1996). Impact of Dominance and Relatedness on Brand Extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 5(2), 135-159.
- Homburg, C., Wieseke, J., Hoyer, W. D. (2009). Social Identity and the Service-Profit Chain. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 38-54.
- John, D. R., Loken, B. Joiner, C. (1998). The Negative Impact of Brand Extensions: Can Flagship Products be diluted? Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 19-32.
- Jonas, K., Stroebe, W., Hewstone, M. (2007). Sozialpsychologie. Heidelberg: Springer.
- Keller, L. K. (1993). Conceptualizing, Measuring and Managing Cusomer-Based Brand Equity. Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 1-22.
- Keller, L. K., Aaker, D. A. (1992). The Effects of Sequential Introduction of Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 35-50.
- Kim, H., John, D. R. (2008). Consumer response to brand extensions: Construal level as a moderator ofthe importance of perceived fit. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 116-126.
- Kleine, S. S., Kleine III, R. E., Allen, C. T. (1995). How is a Possession ‘Me’ or ‘Not Me’? Characterizing Types and Antecedent of Material Possession Attachment. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), 327-343.
- Lam, S. K, Ahearne, M., Hu, Y., Schillewaert, N. (2010). Resistance to Brand Switching When a Radically New Brand is Introduced: A Social Identity Theory Perspective. Journal of Marketing, Forthcoming, 74(6), 128-146.
- Leach, C. W., van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, L. W., Pennekamp. S. F., Doosje, B. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144-165.
- Levy, S. J. (1959). Symbols for Sales. Harvard Business Review, 37(4), 117-124.
- Loken, B., John, D. R. (1993). Diluting Brand Beliefs: Wen do Brand Extensions Have a Negative Impact? Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 71-84.
- Maoz, E., Tybout, A. M. (2002). The Moderating Role of Involvement and Differentiation in the Evaluation of Brand Extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(2), 119-131.
- Mael, F., Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
- McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building Brand Community. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38-54.
- McKinsey & Company. (2010). Planen, Gründen, Wachsen – Mit professionellem Businessplan zum Erfolg, München: Redline Verlag.
- Milberg, S., Park, C. W., McCarthy, M. S. (1997). Managing Negative Feedback Effects Associated with Brand Extensions: The Impact of Alternative Branding Strategies. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6(2), 119-140.
- Muniz Jr., A.M., Hamer, L. O. (2001). Us versus them: Oppositional brand loyalty and the cola wars. Advances in Consumer Research, 28, 355-362. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
- Muniz Jr., A. M., O’Guinn, T. C. (2001). Brand Community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4), 412-432.
- Nakamoto, K., MacInnes, D. J., Jung, H.-S. (1993). Advertising Claims and Evidence as Bases for Brand Equity and Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions. Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising’s Role in Building Strong Brands (pp. 281-297). Eds. Aaker, D. A., Biel, A., Hillsdale, Erlbaum, NJ,.
- Nijssen, E. J., Bucklin, P. L. (1998). The effect of involvement upon brand extension. Working Paper, University of Nijmegen/California.
- Nordlohne, J. (1993). Snowboard contra Ski – Kampf der Brettsysteme.
- O’Sullivan, S., Steven, M. (2003). Economics: Principles in Action. New Jersey: Pearson.
- Park, J.-H., Kim, K.-H., Kim, J. (2002). Acceptance of Brand Extensions: Interactive Influences of Product Category Similarity, Typicality of Claimed Benefits and Brand Relationship Quality. Advances in Consumer Research, 29(1), 190-198.
- Park, C. W., Milberg, S., Lawson, R. (1991a). Beurteilung von Markenerweiterungen. Moderne Markenführung, F. R. Esch, ed. Wiesbaden: Gabler, 963-983.
- Rangaswamy, A., Burke, R. R., Oliva, T. A. (1993). Brand Equity and the Extendibility of Brand Names. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(2), 61-75.
- Reddy, S. K., Holak, S. L., Bhat, S. (1994). To Extend or Not to Extend: Success Determinants of Line Extensions. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(31), 243-262.
- Reinstrom, C. (2007). Steuerung des Markenstransfererfolgs. Marken- und Produktmanagement, Esch, F.-R., R. Decker, A. Hermann, H. Sattler, H. Woratscheck, ed. Wiesbaden: Gabler Edition Wissenschaft.
- Sattler, H. (1997a). Monetäre Bewertung von Markenstrategien für neue Produkte, Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.
- Sattler, H. (1998b). Markentransfer bei Dienstleistungen. Markenmanagement für Dienstleistungen, Tomczak, T., M. Schögel, E. Ludwig, ed. St. Gallen: Thexis.
- Sattler, H., Völckner, F. (2003). Erfolgsfaktoren von Markentransfers. Eine Replikation der Studie von Zatloukal (2002). Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 73(10), 1-26.
- Sattler, H., Völckner, F., Zatloukal, G. (2002). Factors Affecting Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions. Working Paper No. 010, September 2002, University of Hamburg.
- Sen, S. (1999). The Effects of Brand Name Suggestiveness and Decision Goal on the Development of Brand Knowledge. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 8(4), 431-455.
- Sheinin, D. A., Schmitt, B. H. (1994). Extending brands with new product concepts: The role of category attribute congruity, brand affect, and brand breadth. Journal of Business Research, 31(1), 1-10.
- Sherif, M. (1966). Psychology of Social Norms. New York: Harper & Row.
- Smith, D. C., Park, C. W. (1992). The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 296-313.
- Steenkamp, J.-B., Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing Measurement Invariance in Cross-National Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, Jg.(1998) Nr. 1, 78-90.
- Sullivan, M. W. (1998). How Brand Names Affect the Demand for Twin Automobiles. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(2), 154-165.
- Tajfel, H. (1959). Quantitative Judgement in Social Perception. British Journal of Psychology, 50(1), 16-29.
- Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between Social Groups. London: Academic Press.
- Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations ( pp. 33-48). Worchel, S., W. G. Austin, ed. Monterey, California: Brooks-Cole.
- Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C. (1986). The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations (pp. 7-24). Worchel, S., W. G. Austin, ed. Chicago: Nelson Hall Publishers.
- Temme, D., Hildebrandt, L. (2009). Gruppenvergleiche bei hypothetischen Konstrukten - Die Prüfung von der Übereinstimmung von Messmodellen mit der Strukturgleichungs-methodik. Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung, 61, Jg. (2009) Nr. 2, 138-185.
- Thomas, A. (1992). Grundriß der Sozialpsychologie, Band 2: Individuum-Gruppe-Gesellschaft. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
- Thompson, S. A., Sinha, R. K. (2008). Brand Communities and New Product Adoption: The Influence and Limits of Oppositional Loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 72(4), 65-80.
- Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a Cognitive Redefinition of the Social Group. Social Identity and Intergroup Relations (pp. 15-40). Tajfel, H., ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J. (1989). Self-Categorization Theory and Social Influence. The Psychology of Group Influence (pp. 233-275). Paulus, P. B., ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Venable, B. T., Rose, G. M., Bush, V. D., Gilbert, F. W. (2005). The Role of Brand Personality in Charitable Giving: An Assessment and Validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(3), 295-312.
- Völckner, F., Sattler, H. (2006). Drivers of Brand Extension Success. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 18-34.
- Wänke, M., Bless, H., Schwarz, N. (1998). Content-Effects in Product-line Extensions: Context is not destiny. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(4), 299-322.
- Wood, S.L., Swait, J. (2002). Psychological Indicators of Innovation Adoption: Cross-Classification Based on Need for Cognition and Need for Change. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(1), 1-13.
- Yorkston, E. A., Nunes, J. C., Matta, S. (2010). The Malleable Brand: The Role of Implicit Theories in Evaluating Brand Extensions. Journal of Marketing, 74(1), 80-93.
- Yeo, J., Park, J. (2006). Effects of Parent-Extension Similarity and SelfRegulatory Focus on Evaluations of Brand Extensions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(3), 272-282.
- Zatloukal, G. (2002). Erfolgsfaktoren des Markentransfers. Wiesbaden: Gabler.