Income distribution, quality differentiation and product line design
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.13(1).2017.03
-
Article InfoVolume 13 2017, Issue #1, pp. 24-32
- 1222 Views
-
181 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The purpose of this paper is to characterize the relationship between quality differentiation, income distribution and product line design. According to the findings, the author can explain the trend of quality differentiation and the phenomenon of extreme product diversity in different conditions of income distribution. When the middle class of consumers reach a certain critical few number, the quality for them will descend. Only the high-end and low-end quality left for this extreme condition; that is, the product quality spectrum will shrink. The product quality for middle and low class will gradually get worse and worse, even lower than original quality. The product line design will be reconsidered to the opposite extremes.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)D42, L12, L15
-
References14
-
Tables0
-
Figures0
-
- Balakrishnan, P. V., Rakesh, Gupta, and Varghese, S. Jacob. (2004). Development of Hybrid Genetic Algorithms for Product Line Designs. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics, 34(1), 468-483.
- Balakrishnan, P. V., Rakesh, Gupta, and Varghese, S. Jacob. (2006). An Investigation of Mating and Population Maintenance Strategies in Hybrid Genetic Heuristics for Product Line Designs. Computer & Operations Research, 33(3), 639-659.
- Belloni, Alexandre, Freund, Robert, Selove, Matthew, and Simester, Duncan. (2008). Optimizing Product Line Designs: Efficient Methods and Comparisons. Management Science, 54(9), 1544-1552.
- Hauser, John R., Tellis, Gerard J., and Griffin, Abbie. (2006). Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science. Marketing Science, 25(6), 687-717.
- Guo, L., and Zhang, J. (2012). Consumer Deliberation and Product Line Design. Marketing Science, 31, 995-1007.
- Johnson, J. P., and Myatt, D. P. (2003). Multiproduct Quality Competition: Fighting Brands and Product Line Pruning. American Economic Review, 93, 748-774.
- Maskin, E., and Riley, J. (1984). Monopoly with Incomplete Information. Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 171-196.
- Moorthy, K. S. (1984). Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design. Marketing Science, 3, 288-307.
- Mussa, M., and Rosen, S. (1978). Monopoly and Product Quality. Journal of Economic Theory, 18, 301-317.
- Lan, Luo. (2011). Product Line Design for Consumer Durables: An Integrated Marketing and Engineering Approach. Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XLVIII(February 2011), 128-139.
- Liu, Y., and. Cui, T. H. (2010). The Length of Product Line in Distribution Channels. Marketing Science, 29, 474-482.
- Orhun, A. Y. (2009). Optimal Product Line Design When Consumers Exhibit Choice Set-Dependent Preferences. Marketing Science, 28, 868-886.
- Rochet, J. C., and Stole, L. A. (1999). Nonlinear Pricing with Random Participation Constraints, IDEI, Université de Toulouse and GSB, University of Chicago.
- Srinagesh, P., and Bradburd, R. (1989). Quality Distortion by Discriminating Monopolist. American Economic Review, 79, 96-105.