Perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness as drivers of compulsive digital banking behavior: The mediating role of impulsive usage
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/bbs.21(2).2026.15
-
Article InfoVolume 21 2026, Issue #2, pp. 223–233
- 21 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Type of the article: Research Article
Abstract
The rapid expansion of digital banking services has increased concerns regarding excessive and uncontrolled user behavior, particularly impulsive and compulsive usage patterns. This study aims to examine the effect of perceived ease of use (PEU) and perceived usefulness (PU) on compulsive digital banking behavior, with impulsive usage (IU) as a mediating mechanism. A quantitative approach was employed using a survey of 348 active users of digital banking applications, specifically Bank Jago and Allo Bank, selected through purposive sampling based on their experience in digital financial transactions. Data were collected online between April and June 2025 to reflect current digital banking behavior. The results show that PEU (β = 0.511, p < 0.001) and PU (β = 0.523, p < 0.001) significantly influence impulsive usage. Furthermore, PEU (β = 0.187, p < 0.001) and PU (β = 0.511, p < 0.001) have significant direct effects on compulsive usage, while impulsive usage also has a positive but relatively small effect on compulsive usage (β = 0.140, p = 0.021). These findings indicate that perceived usefulness plays a more dominant role in driving compulsive behavior compared to perceived ease of use. The study highlights that while digital banking systems enhance efficiency and user engagement, they may also increase behavioral intensity and potential risks related to excessive usage. Therefore, digital banking providers should integrate system performance with responsible design strategies, such as behavioral control mechanisms, to support sustainable financial behavior.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia and Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for the academic support and facilities provided during the course of this research. We also extend our appreciation to all respondents who participated in the survey and contributed valuable insights. Finally, we acknowledge the constructive feedback from colleagues and reviewers, which greatly helped in improving the quality of this paper.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)G21, M31, O33
-
References43
-
Tables4
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Research paradigm
- Figure 2. Structural model
-
- Table 1. Respondent profile (N = 348)
- Table 2. Validity and reliability of research instruments
- Table 3. Full model analysis
- Table 4. Indirect effects analysis
-
- Addae, J. A., Ahmed, S., Ofori, K. S., Abubakari, A., & Sharma, A. (2025). Understanding users’ continuance adoption of FinTechs through the lens of the behavioural reasoning theory: insights from PLS-SEM and fs-QCA. Behaviour & Information Technology, 45(8), 1696-1726.
- Alalwan, A. A. (2018). Investigating the impact of social media advertising features on customer purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 65-77.
- Balcerowska, J. M., & Brailovskaia, J. (2024). Psychopathological symptoms and social networking sites addiction in Poland and Germany: The role of fear of missing out and preference for online social interaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 156, 108240.
- Budiyanto, A., Lubis, I., Bali Pamungkas, I., & Erlan Maulana, A. (2025). Technology acceptance model, trust, and financial behavior in shaping consumer well-being: Insights from fintech adoption in urban Indonesia. Innovative Marketing, 21(2), 197-210.
- Chaffey, D., & Ellis-Chadwick, F. (2022). Digital Marketing. Pearson.
- Dang, T.-Q., Nguyen, L.-T., & Duc, D. T. V. (2025). Impulsive Buying and Compulsive Buying in Social Commerce: An Integrated Analysis using the Cognitive-Affective-Behavior Model and Theory of Consumption Values with PLS-SEM. Sage Open, 15(2).
- Dash, G., & Paul, J. (2021). CB-SEM vs PLS-SEM methods for research in social sciences and technology forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121092.
- Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 139-340.
- Djamhari, S. I., Mustika, M. D., Sjabadhyni, B., & Ndaru, A. R. P. (2024). Impulsive buying in the digital age: investigating the dynamics of sales promotion, FOMO, and digital payment methods. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1).
- Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., Galanos, V., Ilavarasan, P. V., Janssen, M., Jones, P., Kar, A. K., Kizgin, H., Kronemann, B., Lal, B., Lucini, B., … & Williams, M. D. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
- Förster, K. (2024). Extending the technology acceptance model and empirically testing the conceptualised consumer goods acceptance model. Heliyon, 10(6), e27823.
- Frolov, S., Ivasenko, M., Dykha, M., Shalyhina, I., Hrabar, V., & Fenyves, V. (2024). Interaction between decentralized financial services and the traditional banking system: A comparative analysis. Banks and Bank Systems, 19(2), 53-74.
- Giang, H. T. T., Dung, L. T., Tien, H. T., & Nhu, C. T. B. (2024). Customer empowerment and engagement on sharing platform in the retailing sector: testing the mediating effects of service innovation and platform trust. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 68.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
- Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). Engaged to a Robot? The Role of AI in Service. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 30-41.
- Hurriyati, R., Dagustani, D., Surachim, A., Sulastri, S., & Lisnawati, L. (2023). Triple-Layered Business Model Canvas Environment Based in the Fashion Industry. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, 4(4), 411-423.
- Kelly, A. E., & Palaniappan, S. (2023). Using a technology acceptance model to determine factors influencing continued usage of mobile money service transactions in Ghana. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 34.
- Khaddam, A., & Alhanatleh, H. (2024). Role of artificial intelligence and BIG DATA capabilities on fintech services: Value co-creation theory. Innovative Marketing, 20(4), 219-233.
- Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing Effect in Consumer Choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 259-266.
- Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., & Chernev, A. (2021). Marketing Management, Global Edition. Pearson Deutschland.
- Kumar, V., Rajan, B., Gupta, S., & Pozza, I. D. (2019). Customer engagement in service. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(1), 138-160.
- Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2011). Online Social Networking and Addiction – A Review of the Psychological Literature. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(9), 3528-3552.
- Lee, Y. Y., Gan, C. L., & Liew, T. W. (2022). The Impacts of Mobile Wallet App Characteristics on Online Impulse Buying: A Moderated Mediation Model. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, 1-15.
- Lee, Y. Y., Gan, C. L., & Liew, T. W. (2023). Do E-wallets trigger impulse purchases? An analysis of Malaysian Gen-Y and Gen-Z consumers. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 11(2), 244-261.
- Li, M., & Deng, R. (2026). Consumer impulse buying behavior in the evolving marketplace: An integrated quantitative and qualitative approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 89, 104586.
- Lisnawati, L., Hurriyati, R., Disman, D., Gaffar, V., & Firdaus, E. (2023). Omnichannel quality: the new imperative of purchase intention among fashion retail market. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research (JEECAR), 10(6), 829-839.
- Ly, B., & Ly, R. (2022). Internet banking adoption under Technology Acceptance Model – Evidence from Cambodian users. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7, 100224.
- Ma, Q., Tan, Y., He, Y., Cheng, L., & Wang, M. (2024). Why does mobile payment promote purchases? Revisiting the pain of paying, and understanding the implicit pleasure via selective attention. PsyCh Journal, 13(5), 760-779.
- Mamun, M. A. Al, Tanchangya, T., Rahman, M. A., Hasan, Md. M., Islam, N., & Yeamin, B. (2025). Measuring the influence of FinTech innovation towards consumers’ attitude: Moderating role of perceived usefulness. Sustainable Futures, 10, 100885.
- Mason, M. C., Zamparo, G., Marini, A., & Ameen, N. (2022). Glued to your phone? Generation Z’s smartphone addiction and online compulsive buying. Computers in Human Behavior, 136, 107404.
- Matar, A., & Aloqaily, A. N. (2025). The mediating influence of perceived usefulness on consumer behaviour towards driving e-wallet adoption in Jordan. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(4), 100651.
- Ong, C. S., & Lin, M. Y. C. (2016). Is being satisfied enough? Well-being and IT post-adoption behavior: An empirical study of Facebook. Information Development, 32(4), 1042-1054.
- Pikkarainen, T., Pikkarainen, K., Karjaluoto, H., & Pahnila, S. (2004). Consumer acceptance of online banking: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Internet Research, 14(3), 224-235.
- Schiffman, L. G., & Wisenblit, J. (2019). Consumer Behavior. Pearson.
- Thakur, R., & Srivastava, M. (2014). Adoption readiness, personal innovativeness, perceived risk and usage intention across customer groups for mobile payment services in India. Internet Research, 24(3), 369-392.
- Underdown, K., & Tamara, D. (2025). Digital wallets: a study on the influence of consumer perceptions and attitudes on impulsive consumer behaviour. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 7.
- Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178.
- Waleed Rababa, B., Ali, A., & Montaser Mohammad, A. (2025). Understanding mobile banking adoption via the technology acceptance model: evidence from Jordan. Banks and Bank Systems, 20(1), 23-37.
- Windasari, N. A., Kusumawati, N., Larasati, N., & Amelia, R. P. (2022). Digital-only banking experience: Insights from gen Y and gen Z. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100170.
- Wirtz, J., & Lovelock, C. (2021). Services Marketing. World Scientific (US).
- Yuan, Y.-P., Tan, G. W.-H., & Ooi, K.-B. (2025). What shapes mobile fintech consumers’ post-adoption experience? A multi-analytical PLS-ANN-fsQCA perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 217, 124162.
- Zhao, H., & Khaliq, N. (2024). In quest of perceived risk determinants affecting intention to use fintech: Moderating effects of situational factors. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 207, 123599.


