Does the concept of value for money increase budget performance?
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.14(1).2025.01
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2025, Issue #1, pp. 1-12
- 6 Views
-
2 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
The aim of this study is to assess the factors affecting budget performance through the concept of value for money. This quantitative study uses a rating scale and a survey. The samples included 426 government officials from 43 regional organizations in Makassar City, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. The final sample size was 153 respondents. According to the results, participatory budgeting (β = 0.190; p-value = 0.017 < 0.05), budget goal clarity (β = 0.428; p-value = 0.000 < 0.05), and commitment (β = 0.339; p-value = 0.000 < 0.05) have a direct impact on budget performance. As a moderating variable, organizational culture affected participatory budgeting (β = 0.047; p-value = 0.004 < 0.05), budget goal clarity (β = 0.091; p-value = 0.000 < 0.05), and commitment (β = 0.066; p-value = 0.000 < 0.05). Moreover, motivation, as a moderating variable, affected participatory budgeting (β = 0.041; p-value = 0.019 < 0.05), budget goal clarity (β = 0.078; p-value = 0.000 < 0.05), and commitment (β = 0.070; p-value = 0.000 < 0.05). This study offers significant implications for local government officials in selecting the most effective variables to improve budget performance. For policymakers, the findings suggest supporting skill optimization to carry out government tasks. Finally, it is necessary to reconsider the approach to training the local government staff.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M41, M48, H61
-
References47
-
Tables7
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Theoretical framework
-
- Table 1. Descriptive statistics
- Table 2. Determinant coefficient before interaction
- Table 3. Determinant coefficient after interaction with organizational culture
- Table 4. Determinant coefficient after interaction with motivation
- Table 5. F test results (ANOVA)
- Table 6. Multiple regression results before interacting with moderating variables
- Table 7. Multiple regression results after interacting with the moderating variables (organizational culture and motivation)
-
- Abebe, M. A. (2012). Executive attention patterns, environmental dynamism and corporate turnaround performance. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 33(7), 684-701.
- Aboramadan, M., Albashiti, B., Alharazin, H., & Zaidoune, S. (2020). Organizational culture, innovation and performance: A study from a non-western context. Journal of Management Development, 39(4), 437-451.
- Alhasnawi, M. Y., Mohd Said, R., Alshdaifat, S. M., Elorabi, K. A., Al-Hasnawi, M. H., & Khudhair, A. H. (2024). How does budget participation affect managerial performance in the higher education sector? A mediated-moderated model. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 9(4), 325-339.
- Arifuddin, M., Azis, F., & Kusumawati, A. (2017). Participation and goal clarity budget to performance apparatus with commitment and cultural organization as a moderating variable. World Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 24-37.
- Auzan, M. Z., Setyadi, D., & Irwansyah. (2023). Anteseden value for money pada kinerja keuangan sektor publik di badan pendapatan daerah provinsi Kalimantan Timur [Antecedents of value for money on public sector financial performance at the regional revenue agency of East Kalimantan Province.]. Media Manajemen Jasa, 11(2), 161-188. (In Indonesian).
- Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P, Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024). Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, Article 104177.
- Bastian, I. (2010). Akuntansi sektor publik suatu pengantar [Public sector accounting an introduction]. Erlangga: Jakarta. (In Indonesian).
- Beuren, I. M., de Souza, G. E., & Bernd, D. C. (2021). Effects of budget system use on innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 109-129.
- Brownell, P., & McInnes, M. (1986). Budgetary Participation, Motivation, and Managerial Performance. The Accounting Review, 61(4), 587-600.
- Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and changing organizational culture. John Wiley & Sons.
- Dudija, N., Naibaho, S., & Wibowo, S. B. (2024). Enhancing Performance: The Role of Organizational Culture, Commitment, and Support in Indonesian Paper Industry. Jurnal Psikology, 51(2), 141-152.
- Dunham, R. B., Grube, J. A., & Castañeda, M. B. (1994). Organizational commitment: The utility of an integrative definition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(3), 370-380.
- Frederica, D., & Augustine, Y. (2020). The effect of budget participation, budget planning and clarity of budget goals on performance with environmental uncertainty as moderating variables. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 22(1), 140-148.
- Gkizani, A. M., & Galanakis, M. (2022). Goal setting theory in contemporary businesses: A systematic review. Psychology, 13(3).
- Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Hofstede, G., Neuijen, B., Ohayv, D. D., & Sanders, G. (1990). Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 286-316.
- Kamau, J. K., Rotich, G., & Anyango, W. (2017). Effect of budgeting process on budget performance of state corporations in Kenya: A case of Kenyatta national hospital. International Academic Journal of Human Resource and Business Administration, 2(3), 255-281.
- Kenis, I. (1979). Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance. The Accounting Review, 54(4), 707-721.
- Khoo, S. V., Rahman, N. H. A., & Kamil, N. L. M. (2024). An evaluation of the influence of budgeting process on budget performance in Malaysia. Public Administration and Policy: An Asia-Pacific Journal, 27(1), 31-44.
- Kim, J. (2023). Public management strategies for improving satisfaction with pandemic-induced telework among public employees. International Journal of Manpower, 44(3), 558-575.
- Kirkpatick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership: do traits matter? Academy of Management Perspectives, 5(2), 48-60.
- Li, W., Nan X., & Mo, Z. (2010). Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance. International Conference on Management and Service Science (pp. 1-5). Wuhan, China.
- Lin, Y.-H., Han, W., Kim, C. J., Jiang, L., & Xia, N. (2023). Effect of commitment on the link between organizational culture and international project performance: A comparison between China and Korea. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(9), 4518-4539.
- Liu, J., & Wang, H. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty and the cost of capital. International Review of Financial Analysis, 81.
- Locke, E. A. (1968). Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 3(2), 157-189.
- Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2020). Building a theory by induction: The example of goal setting theory. Organizational Psychology Review, 10(3-4), 223-239.
- Lu, C.-T. (2011). Relationships among budgeting control system, budgetary perceptions, and performance: A study of public hospitals. African Journal of Business Management, 5(15), 6261-6270.
- Luthans, F. (2005). Perilaku organisasi [Organizational behavior] (10th ed.). PT Andi. (In Indonesian).
- Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior. Journal of Management, 33(3), 321-349.
- Lyons, P., & Bandura, R. P. (2023). Coaching to build commitment for generating performance improvement. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 15(1), 120-134.
- Melo, A. I., & Mota, L. F. (2020). Public sector reform and the state of performance management in Portugal: is there a gap between performance measurement and its use? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6/7), 613-627.
- Meyer, J. P., Paunonen, S. V, Gellatly, I. R., Goffin, R. D., & Jackson, D. N. (1989). Organizational commitment and job performance: It’s the nature of the commitment that counts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1), 152-156.
- Milani, K. W. (1975). The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: A field study. The Accounting Review, 50(2), 274-284.
- Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. Academic Press.
- Nazir, O., & Islam, J. U. (2017). Enhancing organizational commitment and employee performance through employee engagement: An empirical check. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 6(1), 98-114.
- Nouri, H., & Parker, R. J. (1998). The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23(5-6), 467-483.
- Park, J., Han, S. J., Kim, J., & Kim, W. (2022). Structural relationships among transformational leadership, affective organizational commitment, and job performance: The mediating role of employee engagement. European Journal of Training and Development, 46(9), 920-936.
- Park, S., & Choi, S. (2020). Performance feedback, goal clarity, and public employees’ performance in public organizations. Sustainability, 12(7), Article 3011.
- Randall, D. M. (1990). The consequences of organizational commitment: Methodological investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(5), 361-378.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
- Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2021). Self-efficacy and human motivation. Advances in Motivation Science. Advances in Motivation Science, 8, 153-179.
- Su, S., & Baird, K. (2023). The impact of the emphasis on budgets and budget difficulty on budget value and job stress: The mediating role of organisational fairness. In C. Akroyd (Ed.), Advances in Management Accounting (Advances in Management Accounting (vol. 34, pp. 145-175). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited.
- Van der Hoek, M., Groeneveld, S., & Kuipers, B. (2018). Goal setting in teams: Goal clarity and team performance in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 38(4), 472-493.
- Wang, R. (2022). Organizational commitment in the nonprofit sector and the underlying impact of stakeholders and organizational support. Voluntas, 33, 538-549.
- Weiner, B. (2020). Theories of motivation: From mechanism to cognition. Routledge.
- Whittingtong, J. L., Meskelis, S., Asare, E., & Belodona, S. (2017). Employee engagement: An evidence-based approach. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Willoughby, K. G., & Melkers, J. E. (2001). Budgeter’s views of state performance based budgeting systems. Public Administrations Review, 61(1), 54-64.