The effect of political will, information technology, and the quality of financial reporting information on fraud prevention
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/pmf.14(1).2025.02
-
Article InfoVolume 14 2025, Issue #1, pp. 13-22
- 60 Views
-
26 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to analyze the effect of political will and information technology on fraud prevention either directly or through the quality of financial reporting information. This study uses a survey method that intentionally targets five village officials responsible for village financial administration. The survey was conducted in Pangkep Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Data collection was carried out using a questionnaire with a total research sample of 325 respondents. Data analysis was conducted using partial least squares structural equation modeling with the help of the SmartPls 4.0 application. The results showed that political will had a positive and significant effect on fraud prevention (β = 0.198; t-value = 3.230 > 1.97) but had no effect on the quality of financial reporting information (β = 0.053; t-value = 0.696 < 1.97). Information technology had a significant negative effect on fraud prevention (β = –0.198; t-value = 3.019 > 1.97) and a significant positive effect on the quality of financial reporting information (β = 0.186; t-value = 2. 863 > 1.97). Fraud prevention has a positive and significant effect on the quality of financial reporting information (β = 0.161; t-value = 2.598 > 1.97). Political will has no significant effect on fraud prevention through the quality of financial reporting information (β = 0.009; t-value = 0.628 < 1.97), while information technology has a positive and significant effect on fraud prevention through the quality of financial reporting information (β = 0.029; t-value = 2.093 > 1.97).
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)H72, M41, M48, K42
-
References36
-
Tables3
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Theoretical model
-
- Table 1. Analysis of common method bias
- Table 2. Discriminant validity
- Table 3. Results of hypothesis testing
-
- Ahmed, A. S., Neel, M., & Wang, D. (2013). Does mandatory adoption of IFRS improve accounting quality? Preliminary evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1344-1372.
- Ahmed, M., Mahmood, A. N., & Islam, M. R. (2016). A survey of anomaly detection techniques in financial domain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 55, 278-288.
- Akartuna, E. A., Johnson, S. D., & Thornton, A. (2022). Preventing the money laundering and terrorist financing risks of emerging technologies: An international policy Delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 179, Article 121632.
- Ariyaluran Habeeb, R. A., Nasaruddin, F., Gani, A., Amanullah, M. A., Abaker Targio Hashem, I., Ahmed, E., & Imran, M. (2022). Clustering-based real-time anomaly detection – A breakthrough in big data technologies. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 33(8), Article e3647.
- Ariyanto, D., Dewi, A. A., Hasibuan, H. T., & Paramadani, R. B. (2022). The success of information systems and sustainable information society: Measuring the implementation of a village financial system. Sustainability, 14(7), Article 3851.
- Atiningsih, S. (2020). The implementation of government accounting standards, internal control systems and information technology utilization on the quality of local government financial statements with organizational commitments as moderation variables. Accounting Research Journal of Sutaatmadja, 4(02), 216-229.
- Barrane, F. Z., Ndubisi, N. O., Kamble, S., Karuranga, G. E., & Poulin, D. (2021). Building trust in multi-stakeholder collaborations for new product development in the digital transformation era. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(1), 205-228.
- Chen, Y.-C. (2012). A comparative study of e-government XBRL implementations: The potential of improving information transparency and efficiency. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 553-563.
- Child, J. (1988). Information technology and organization. In K. Urabe, J. Child, T. Kagono, & N. K. Gakkai (Eds.), Innovation and Management–International Comparisons (pp. 255-302). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
- Christensen, H. B., Lee, E., Walker, M., & Zeng, C. (2015). Incentives or standards: What determines accounting quality changes around IFRS adoption? European Accounting Review, 24(1), 31-61.
- Collier, P. M. (2006). Costing police services: The politicization of accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(1), 57-86.
- Corsi, K., Mancini, D., & Piscitelli, G. (2017). The integration of management control systems through digital platforms: A case study. In K. Corsi, N. G. Castellano, R. Lamboglia, & D. Mancini (Eds.), Reshaping Accounting and Management Control Systems (pp. 131-151). Springer International Publishing.
- Ginting, A. H., Widianingsih, I., Mulyawan, R., & Nurasa, H. (2023). Village government’s risk management and village fund administration in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(24), Article 16706.
- Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., & Menictas, C. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling an illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research, 12(1), 115-142.
- Haliah. (2021). A study of performance model development and good governance budgeting. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(3), 301-319.
- Imran, H., Muallimin, & Nirwana. (2014). The role of participations in budget preparation as mediation in relationship between information technology, knowledge of the budget and political processes to quality report. International Journal of Applied Business and Economic Research, 12(3), 885-891.
- Indonesia’s Law. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Tentang Hubungan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat Dan Pemerintahan Daerah [Indonesia’s Law Number 1 Year 2022 on Financial Relations between the Central Government and Regional Governments]. (In Indonesian).
- Kock, F., Berbekova, A., & Assaf, A. G. (2021). Understanding and managing the threat of common method bias: Detection, prevention and control. Tourism Management, 86, Article 104330.
- Liew, A. (2019). Enhancing and enabling management control systems through information technology: The essential roles of internal transparency and global transparency. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 33, 16-31.
- Lokanan, M. E. (2019). A fraud investigation plan for a false accounting and theft case. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(4), 1216-1228.
- Maulidi, A., & Ansell, J. (2021). Tackling practical issues in fraud control: A practice-based study. Journal of Financial Crime, 28(2), 493-512.
- Maulidi, A., & Ansell, J. (2022). Corruption as distinct crime: the need to reconceptualise internal control on controlling bureaucratic occupational fraud. Journal of Financial Crime, 29(2), 680-700.
- Monteiro, A., & Cepêda, C. (2021). Accounting information systems: Scientific production and trends in research. Systems, 9(3), Article 67.
- Okafor, O. N., Adebisi, F. A., Opara, M., & Okafor, C. B. (2020). Deployment of whistleblowing as an accountability mechanism to curb corruption and fraud in a developing democracy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(6), 1335-1366.
- Roszkowska, P. (2021). Fintech in financial reporting and audit for fraud prevention and safeguarding equity investments. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 17(2), 164-196.
- Rustiarini, N. W., Sutrisano, T., Nurkholis, N., & Andayani, W. (2019). Why people commit public procurement fraud? The fraud diamond view. Journal of Public Procurement, 19(4), 345-362.
- Safkaur, O., Tarjo, T., Anggono, A., & Mohd-Sanusi, Z. (2023). The role of unethical behavior in moderating the influence of governance, risk management, and compliance on financial fraud prevention in Indonesian local governments. Management and Accounting Review, 22(3), 297-329.
- Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In C. Homburg, M. Klarmann, & A. Vomberg (Eds.), Handbook of Market Research (pp. 1-40). Springer International Publishing.
- Setiyawati, H., & Doktoralina, C. (2019). The importance of quality accounting information management in regional governments in Indonesia. Management Science Letters, 9(12), 2083-2092.
- Siahaan, M., Suharman, H., Fitrijanti, T., & Umar, H. (2024). When internal organizational factors improve detecting corruption in state-owned companies. Journal of Financial Crime, 31(2), 376-407.
- Siddiquee, N. A. (2010). Combating corruption and managing integrity in Malaysia: A critical overview of recent strategies and initiatives. Public Organization Review, 10(2), 153-171.
- Sofyani, H., Riyadh, H. A., Fahlevi, H., & Ardito, L. (rev. ed.). (2020). Improving service quality, accountability and transparency of local government: The intervening role of information technology governance. Cogent Business & Management, 7(1), Article 1735690.
- Spilnyk, I., Brukhanskyi, R., & Yaroshchuk, O. (2020). Accounting and financial reporting system in the digital economy. 2020 10th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT) (pp. 581-584).
- Taherdoost, H. (2021). A review on risk management in information systems: Risk policy, control and fraud detection. Electronics, 10(24), Article 3065.
- Thoa, D. T. K., & Nhi, V. V. (2022). Improving the quality of the financial accounting information through strengthening of the financial autonomy at public organizations. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies, 29(1), 66-82.
- Trigo, A., Belfo, F., & Estébanez, R. P. (2014). Accounting information systems: The challenge of the real-time reporting. Procedia Technology, 16, 118-127.