Antecedents of corruption in the perspective of local government employees: A fraud hexagon theory approach

  • 10 Views
  • 2 Downloads

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors that influence the occurrence of accounting fraud in local governments using the fraud hexagon theory. This study focused on Enrekang Regency government employees in South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Data were collected by distributing questionnaires to financial managers in 38 offices, agencies, and divisions. Then, using the purposive sampling method, 157 local government employees were selected for the study. Data were analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis via SPSS version 23 software. The results showed that pressure, collusion, opportunity, and rationalization have a significant positive impact on corruption (β = 0.480, p-value 0.000 < 0.05; β = 0.211, p-value 0.001 < 0.05; β = 0.511, p-value 0.000 < 0.05; β = 0.133, p-value 0.020 < 0.05, respectively). Capability has an insignificant impact on corruption (β = 0.021, p-value 0.643 < 0.05), while arrogance has a significant negative impact on corruption (β = –0.229, p-value 0.004 < 0.05). The study offers implications for academics as the findings can be used as an additional reference for research in the field of fraud hexagon and corruption. The research results can contribute to theory development, particularly those related to fraud theory, as well as add empirical evidence in accounting research studies, particularly in terms of factors that influence corruption.

view full abstract hide full abstract
    • Table 1. Descriptive statistical analysis
    • Table 2. Reliability testing results
    • Table 3. Classical assumption testing results
    • Table 4. Hypothesis testing results (t-test)
    • Conceptualization
      Aini Indrijawati, Yulia Fitri, Nurdiana Ningsih
    • Data curation
      Aini Indrijawati, Yulia Fitri
    • Investigation
      Aini Indrijawati, Yulia Fitri, Nurdiana Ningsih
    • Methodology
      Aini Indrijawati, Yulia Fitri, Nurdiana Ningsih
    • Project administration
      Aini Indrijawati
    • Supervision
      Aini Indrijawati, Yulia Fitri
    • Validation
      Aini Indrijawati, Yulia Fitri, Nurdiana Ningsih
    • Writing – original draft
      Aini Indrijawati, Yulia Fitri, Nurdiana Ningsih
    • Writing – review & editing
      Aini Indrijawati, Yulia Fitri, Nurdiana Ningsih
    • Formal Analysis
      Nurdiana Ningsih
    • Software
      Nurdiana Ningsih