Bridging the gap: How career development learning mediates higher education and employability outcomes in Nepal
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.23(1).2025.48
-
Article InfoVolume 23 2025, Issue #1, pp. 643-655
- 29 Views
-
6 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Higher education institutions are vital for preparing future professionals and integrating education with the job market. Nevertheless, the limited opportunities for career-orientated education in Nepal continue to pose a significant challenge to the employability of youths. This study examines the impact of the higher education institutional environment and career development learnings on the employability of Nepalese youth. It also examines how career development learning influences the connection between the higher education environment and employment preparedness. The study employs a descriptive and causal methodology, using data from a survey of 411 respondents aged 21–35 actively pursuing work and engaging in career-preparatory courses in Nepal. It employed structural equation modeling to analyze the data and assess the proposed hypotheses. The results suggest that the higher education institution environment does not significantly improve employability (β = 0.038, p > 0.05). Career development learning influences this association (β = 0.803, p < 0.05), underscoring its essential function in converting educational experiences into competencies and preparedness for the job market. The paper stresses the importance of self-determination theory, illustrating how autonomy, competence, and interpersonal interactions contribute to personal development and motivation. Despite the specific cultural and economic context, the outcomes highlight the importance of higher education institutions in fostering career-oriented learning opportunities, advancing employability, and promoting broader developmental goals.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)I23, I26, J24
-
References39
-
Tables9
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
- Figure 2. Structural equation model and path analysis
-
- Table 1. Respondent characteristics
- Table 2. Survey instrument items
- Table 3. Standardized regression weight, Cronbach’s alpha, construct reliability, and average variance extracted
- Table 4. Discriminant validity – HTMT criterion
- Table 5. Descriptive statistics
- Table 6. Model fit indices with cut-off values
- Table 7. Hypotheses testing– Direct effects
- Table 8. Hypotheses testing – Direct, indirect, and total effects of the model
- Table 9. Hypotheses summary
-
- Affum-Osei, E., & Chan, D. K. (2023). Job search in a difficult labor market: Linking goal orientation to job search strategies and outcomes with the moderating role of self-control. Current Psychology, 43, 2947-2964.
- Bagozzi, R., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
- Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
- Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
- Biancardi, A., Colasante, A., D’Adamo, I., Daraio, C., Gastaldi, M., & Uricchio, A. F. (2023). Strategies for developing sustainable communities in higher education institutions. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 20596.
- Clarke, M. (2018). Rethinking graduate employability: The role of capital, individual attributes and context. Studies in Higher Education, 43(11), 1923-1937.
- Dahal, R. K. (2018). Students’ perception towards master of business studies (MBS) semester system: A case study of Nepal Commerce Campus. Pravaha – A Journal of Management, 24(1), 181-195.
- Elumalai, K. V., Sankar, J. P., Kalaichelvi, R., John, J. A., Menon, N., Alqahtani, M. S. M., & Abumelha, M. A. (2021). Factors affecting the quality of e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic from the perspective of higher education students. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 731-753.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388.
- Garson, G. D. (2019). Multilevel modeling: Applications in STATA (R), IBM (R), SPSS (R), SAS (R), R, & HLM (TM). Sage Publications Inc.
- Ghimire, B., Dahal, R. K., Joshi, S.P., & Shrestha, I. (2024). Factors affecting virtual work arrangements and organizational performance: Assessed within the context of Nepalese organizations. Intangible Capital, 20(1), 89-102.
- González-Navarro, P., Talavera-Escribano, E., Zurriaga-Lloréns, R., & Llinares-Insa, L. I. (2019). Culture, work, and subjective well-being: The role of LMX and resilience in Spanish and Chinese cultures. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(24), Article 4945.
- Gross, J. J. (1998). The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 271-299.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2018). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). United Kingdom: Cengage Learning.
- Hammond, J., Marshall-Lucette, S., Davies, N., Ross, F., & Harris, R. (2017). Spotlight on equality of employment opportunities: A qualitative study of job-seeking experiences of graduating nurses and physiotherapists from black and minority ethnic backgrounds. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 74, 172-180.
- Healy, M. (2023). Careers and employability learning: Pedagogical principles for higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 48(8), 1303-1314.
- Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135.
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
- Johnson, A., & Wichern, D. W. (2007). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Jones-Burton, A. (2009). Minimizing method bias through programmatic research. MIS Quarterly Management Information Systems, 33(3), 445-471.
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
- Lent, R. W. (2021). Career development and counseling: A social cognitive framework. In S. D. Brown, R. W. Lent, & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work (pp. 129-164). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Li, A., & Toll, M. (2021). Effects of graduating during economic downturns on mental health. Annals of Epidemiology, 55, 41-49.
- Mattila, J., Leinonen, E., Hietaniemi, I., Firouzian, A., & Pulli, P. (2018). Developing a gamified platform to involve unemployed youth in job-seeking activities. In 19th International Conference on Intelligent Games and Simulation, GAME-ON 2018 (pp. 144-150). Eurosis-ETI.
- McCash, P., Hooley, T., & Robertson, P.J. (2021). Introduction: Rethinking career development. In P. J. Robertson, T. Hooley, & P. McCash (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Career Development (pp. 1-20). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Monteiro, S., Almeida, L., Gomes, C., & Sinval, J. (2022). Employability profiles of higher education graduates: A person-oriented approach. Studies in Higher Education 47(3), 499-512.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, C. B., Lee, J. -Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical literature review and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
- Römgens, I., Scoupe, R., & Beausaert, S. (2020). Unraveling the concept of employability, bringing together research on employability in higher education and the workplace. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2588-2603.
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
- Savickas, M. L. (2021). Career construction theory and counseling model. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career Development and Counseling: Putting Theory and Research to Work (pp. 165-200). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2014). Smart technology for self-organizing processes. Smart Learning Environments, 1, Article 1.
- Shiohira, K. (2021). Understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on skills development. Singapore: McGraw Hill.
- Spurk, D. (2021). Vocational behavior research: Past topics and future trends and challenges. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, Article 103559.
- Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s Alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 1273-1296.
- Taylor, M., Marsh, G., Nicol, D., & Broadbent, P. (2017). Good work: The Taylor review of modern working practices. London: Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy.
- Wan, T. T. H. (2002). Evidenced-based health care management: Multivariate modelling approaches. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Wang, F., & Qu, J. G. (2022). A study of the relationship between social support, work values, and job search behavior. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 1021299.
- Watts, A. G. (2006). Career development learning and employability. The Higher Education Academy.
- Žalėnienė, I., & Pereira, P. (2021). Higher education for sustainability: A global perspective. Geography and Sustainability, 2(2), 99-106.