Work engagement and individual performance of teachers: The role of job demands and job resources
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(3).2024.40
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #3, pp. 528-541
- 260 Views
-
47 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This study aims to investigate factors impacting work engagement and individual performance of teachers. The survey-based quantitative approach was used. The sample comprised 455 teachers working in lower and upper secondary education institutions in Lithuania. The findings show that work engagement is a full mediator of the relationship between managerial support (β = 0.319), organizational support (β = 0.432), control (β = 0.374), colleague support (β = 0.456), work pressure (β = –.587), and task performance as the effect of work engagement on task performance is significant (β = 0.229). Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates that remote work moderates the relationships between managerial support (β = 0.560***), organizational support (β = 0.332**), colleague support (β = 0.234*), work pressure (β = 0.456***), control (β = 0.443**), and work engagement. Finally, remote work moderates the relationships between managerial support (β = 0.453***), organizational support (β = 0.332*), colleague support (β = 0.441*), work pressure (β = 0.456***), control (β = 0.444**), and task performance. These insights are valuable to school principals, as they provide a deeper understanding of the factors that determine the task performance of teachers. Remote work requires more job resources to increase engagement and task performance. School principals should focus on increasing engagement through feedback and consultations, psychological safety and development opportunities, and contributing to the individual job performance of teachers. The study supplements the JD-R model with remote work perceived as a contextual factor and thus extends the scientific debate on the application of this model in the teaching occupation.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)J53, J81
-
References47
-
Tables4
-
Figures1
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual framework
-
- Table 1. Discriminant validity
- Table 2. Path analysis
- Table 3. Moderation effects of remote work
- Table A1. Convergent validity
-
- Al Riyami, S., Razzak, M. R., & Al-Busaidi, A. S. (2023). Work from home and workplace ostracism, beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: Moderating effect of perceived organizational support, International Journal of Manpower, 45(3), 466-483.
- Albrecht, S. L., Bakker, A. B., Gruman, J. A., Macey, W. H., & Saks, A.M. (2014). Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage: An integrated approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 7-35.
- Bakker, A. B., & Bal, P.M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(1), 189-206.
- Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285.
- Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Verbeke, W. (2004). Using the job demands-resources model to predict burnout and performance. Human Resources Management, 43(1), 83-104.
- Bakker, A. B., Hakanen, J. J., Demerouti, E., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2007). Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 274-284.
- Biron, M., & Van Veldhoven, M. (2016). When control becomes a liability rather than an asset: Comparing home and office days among part-time teleworkers. Journal of Organizatioal Behavior, 37(8), 1317-1337.
- Bonet, R., & Salvadora, F. (2017). When the boss is away: Manager-worker separation and worker performance in a multisite software maintenance organization. Organization Science, 28(2), 244-261.
- Borst, R. T., Kruyen, P. M., & Lako, C. J. (2019). Exploring the job demands-resources model of work engagement in government: Bringing in a psychological perspective. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(3), 372-397.
- Chan, M., Sharkey, J. D., Lawrie, S. I., Arch, D. A. N., & Nylund-Gibson, K. (2021). Elementary school teacher well-being and supportive measures amid COVID-19: An exploratory study. School Psychology, 36(6), 533-545.
- Cousins, R., Mackay, C. J., Clarke, S. D., Kelly, C., Kelly, P. J., & McCaig, R. H. (2004). ‘Management standards’ and work-related stress in the UK: Practical development. Work & Stress, 18(2), 113-136.
- Cropanzano, R., Anthony, E. L., Daniels, S. R., & Hall, A. V. (2017). Social exchange theory : A critical review with theoretical remedies. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 479-516.
- Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2023). Job demands-resources theory in times of crises : New propositions. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(3), 209-236.
- Denden, M., Tlili, A., Burgos, D., Jemni, M., Huang, R., Essalmi, F., & Chang, T-W. (2021). Framework for teacher support during remote teaching in a crisis: COVID-19, as a case study. In D. Burgos, A. Tlili, & A. Tabacco (Eds.), Radical Solutions for Education in a Crisis Context. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology (pp. 147-161). Singapore: Springer.
- Du, Y., Zhang, L., & Zhang, Z. (2019). Resources matter: Combined influence of job demands and job control on creative process engagement. The Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 153(2), 141-160.
- Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., & Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(3), 500-507.
- Emir, G., Saral, N.Ç., Saçan, B. M., & Özmen, K. S. (2023). The stressors affecting teacher burnout in emergency remote teaching context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 134, Article 104313.
- Fiorilli, C., Schneider, B., Buonomo, I., & Romano, L. (2019). Family and nonfamily support in relation to burnout and work engagement among Italian teachers. Psychology in the Schools, 56(5), 781-791.
- Gemmink, M. M., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., Pauw, I., & van Veen K. (2020). Under pressure? Primary school teachers’ perceptions of their pedagogical practices. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(5), 695-711.
- Guglielmi, D., Bruni, I., Simbula, S., Fraccaroli, F., & Depolo M. (2016). What drives teacher engagement: A study of different age cohorts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31(3), 323-340.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis (Pearson New International ed.). Harlow, Essex: Edinburgh Gate.
- Halinski, M., & Harrison, J. A. (2020). The job resources-engagement relationship: The role of location. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 33(6-7), 681-695.
- Herman, K. C., Reinke, W. M., & Eddy, C. L. (2020). Advances in understanding and intervening in teacher stress and coping: The Coping-Competence-Context Theory. Journal of School Psychology, 78, 69-74.
- Hetland, J., Bakker, A. B., Espevik, R., & Olsen, O. K. (2022). Daily work pressure and task performance: The moderating role of recovery and sleep. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
- Hill, J., & Reimer, T. (2023). Technology as a tool to address educational inequities: Practices implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic that have been sustained. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 10879-10898.
- Huang, X., Wang, C., Lam, S. M., & Xu, P. (2022). Teachers’ job crafting: The complicated relationship with teacher self-efficacy and teacher engagement. Professional Development in Education.
- Jin, M. H., & McDonald, B. (2017). Understanding employee engagement in the public sector: The role of immediate supervisor, perceived organizational support, and learning opportunities. The American Review of Public Administration, 47(8), 881-897.
- Johari, J., Yean Tan, F., & Tjik Zulkarnain, Z.I. (2018). Autonomy, workload, work-life balance and job performance among teachers, International Journal of Educational Management, 32(1), 107-120.
- Ju, C., Lan, J., Li, Y., Feng, W., & You, X. (2015). The mediating role of workplace social support on the relationship between trait emotional intelligence and teacher burnout. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51, 58-67.
- Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., De Vet, H.C.W., & Van Der Beek, A. J. (2014). Construct validity of the individual work performance questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 56(3), 331-337.
- Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M., & Bunner, J. (2017). The bright and dark sides of job autonomy. In C. Korunk & B. Kubicek (Eds.), Job demands in a changing world of work (pp. 45-63). Cham: Springer.
- Ma, L., Zheng, Y., & Wei, Y. (2023). The double-edged sword effect of telecommuting on employees’ work engagement: Evidence from China during COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 14.
- Maan, A. T., Abid, G., Butt, T. H., Ashfaq, F., & Ahmed, S. (2020). Perceived organizational support and job satisfaction: A moderated mediation model of proactive personality and psychological empowerment. Future Business Journal, 6(1), Article 21.
- Mazzetti, G., Robledo, E., Vignoli, M., Topa, G., Guglielmi, D., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023). Work engagement: A meta-analysis using the job demands-resources model. Psychological Reports, 126(3), 1069-1107.
- Mérida-López, S., Sánchez-Gómez, M., & Extremera, N. (2020). Leaving the teaching profession: Examining the role of social support, engagement and emotional intelligence in teachers’ intentions to quit. Psychosocial Intervention, 29(3), 141-151.
- OECD. (2016). Reviews of school resources: Lithuania 2016. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Official Statistics Portal. (2021). Education, Culture and Sports in Lithuania (edition 2021): General education.
- Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
- Prem, R., Paškvan, M., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2018). Exploring the ambivalence of time pressure in daily working life. International Journal of Stress Management, 25(1), 35-43.
- Robinson, L. E., Valido, A., Drescher, A., Woolweaver, A. B., Espelage, D. L., LoMurray, S., Long, A. C. J., Wright, A. A., & Dailey, M. M. (2023). Teachers, stress, and the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative analysis. School Mental Health, 15(1), 78-89.
- Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Utrecht work engagement scale. Preliminary Manual Version 1.1. Occupational Health Psychology Unit Utrecht University.
- Šimunović, M., Balaž, B., Parmač Kovačić, M., & Burić, I. (2023). Understanding factors related to teacher job performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of emotional well-being. Teachers and Teaching.
- Šimunović, M., Balaž, B., Parmač Kovačić, M., & Burić, I. (2023). Understanding factors related to teacher job performance during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of emotional well-being. Teachers and Teaching.
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2018). Job demands and job resources as predictors of teacher motivation and well-being. Social Psychology of Education, 21(5), 1251-1275.
- Sokal, L., Trudel, L. E., & Babb, J. (2020). Canadian teachers’ attitudes toward change, efficacy, and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1, Article 100016.
- Stang-Rabrig, J., Brüggemann, T., Lorenz, R., & McElvany, N. (2022). Teachers’ occupational well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of resources and demands. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, Article 103803.
- Zhang, H., Zhao, Y., Zou, P., Liu,Y., & Gan, L. (2021). Engagement among physicians fighting COVID-19: The mediating role of autonomy. Occupational Medicine, 7(1), 9-11.