Unfolding the determinants of university students’ intentions toward digital social entrepreneurship
-
Author(s)Md. Mobarak KarimLink to ORCID Index: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-8716
,
Khadiza Rahman TanchiLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2669-6611
,
Farhana NoorLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7389-0503
,
Shahana KabirLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6684-7585
,
Sabrina AkhterLink to ORCID Index: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5042-8641
-
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.22(2).2024.08
-
Article InfoVolume 22 2024, Issue #2, pp. 93-102
- 315 Views
-
67 Downloads
This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Digital social entrepreneurship is increasingly receiving recognition in emerging economies to maximize societal benefit. The objective of this study is to examine the factors determining students’ intentions toward digital social entrepreneurial ventures. The targeted population was students of various programs, namely business, humanities, science, tourism, and pharmacy, of private and public universities in Bangladesh. This study is quantitative and exploratory in nature, whereas online self-administered questionnaires were prepared to collect data from 433 students in Bangladesh between January and June 2023. The model was tested and the hypotheses were confirmed at the 5% significance level using SPSS v26.0; a Cronbach’s alpha (α) value of 0.70 or higher was considered adequate for measuring reliability. The results show that students’ innovativeness, social pro-activeness, and risk-taking motive positively affect their intention toward digital social entrepreneurial intention. These results may aid in developing successful plans and regulations to support the expansion of digital social entrepreneurial intention in Bangladesh by the government, non-governmental organizations, the neighborhood, civil society, and researchers.
- Keywords
-
JEL Classification (Paper profile tab)M10, M13
-
References34
-
Tables4
-
Figures2
-
- Figure 1. Conceptual model
- Figure 2. Regression results
-
- Table 1. Reliability and validity analysis
- Table 2. Demographic information
- Table 3. Regression coefficients
- Table A1. Questionnaire variables
-
- Abbasianchavari, A., & Moritz, A. (2021). The impact of role models on entrepreneurial intentions and behavior: A review of the literature. Management Review Quarterly, 71, 1-40.
- Al-Mamary, Y. H. S., & Alraja, M. M. (2022). Understanding entrepreneurship intention and behavior in the light of TPB model from the digital entrepreneurship perspective. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2), Article 100106.
- Asheq, A. A., Tanchi, K. R., Kamrujjaman, M., & Karim, M. M. (2021). The impact of e-marketing orientation, technological orientation, and learning capacity on online SME performance. Innovative Marketing, 17(3), 168-179.
- Astrini, N. J., Rakhmawati, T., Sumaedi, S., Bakti, I. G. M. Y., Yarmen, M., & Damayanti, S. (2020). Innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking: Corporate entrepreneurship of Indonesian SMEs. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 722(1), Article 012037.
- Bali Swain, R., & Yang-Wallentin, F. (2020). Achieving sustainable development goals: Predicaments and strategies. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 27(2), 96-106.
- Barba-Sánchez, V., & Atienza-Sahuquillo, C. (2018). Entrepreneurial intention among engineering students: The role of entrepreneurship education. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 24(1), 53-61.
- Chipeta, E. M., & Surujlal, J. (2017). Influence of attitude, risk taking propensity and proactive personality on social entrepreneurship intentions. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 15(2), 27-36.
- Chipeta, E. M., Venter, R., & Kruse, P. (2022). Measuring the role of reductive bias in social enterprise formation: Development and validation of a social entrepreneurial intention bias scale. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 13(2), 164-182.
- De Pillis, E., & Reardon, K. K. (2007). The influence of personality traits and persuasive messages on entrepreneurial intention: A cross-cultural comparison. Career Development International, 12(4), 382-396.
- Durbin, J., & Watson, G. S. (1950). Testing for serial correlation in least squares regression: I. Biometrika, 37(3/4), 409-428.
- Farrukh, M., Lee, J. W. C., Sajid, M., & Waheed, A. (2019). Entrepreneurial intentions: The role of individualism and collectivism in perspective of theory of planned behavior. Education + Training, 61(7/8), 984-1000.
- Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modelling technique. Journal of Quantitative Methods, 3(1), 76-83.
- Kumar, S., Paray, Z. A., & Dwivedi, A. K. (2021). Student’s entrepreneurial orientation and intentions: A study across gender, academic background, and regions. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 11(1), 78-91.
- Lai, F. Y., Lin, C. C., Lu, S. C., & Chen, H. L. (2021). The role of team–member exchange in proactive personality and employees’ proactive behaviors: The moderating effect of transformational leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 28(4), 429-443.
- Law, K. M., & Breznik, K. (2017). Impacts of innovativeness and attitude on entrepreneurial intention: Among engineering and non-engineering students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27, 683-700.
- Luc, P. T. (2020). The influence of personality traits on social entrepreneurial intention among owners of civil society organizations in Vietnam. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 40(3), 291-308.
- Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429-451.
- Lumpkin, G. T., Moss, T. W., Gras, D. M., Kato, S., & Amezcua, A. S. (2013). Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: How are they different, if at all? Small Business Economics, 40, 761-783.
- Mueller, S. (2011). Increasing entrepreneurial intention: Effective entrepreneurship course characteristics. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 13(1), 55-74.
- Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2021). On the costs of digital entrepreneurship: Role conflict, stress, and venture performance in digital platform-based ecosystems. Journal of Business Research, 125, 520-532.
- Rahaman, M. A., Ali, M. J., Mamoon, Z. R., & Al Asheq, A. (2020). Understanding the entrepreneurial intention in the light of contextual factors: Gender analysis. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 639-647.
- Rahaman, M. A., Luna, K. F., Mite, S., Islam, M., & Wafik, H. (2021). The effect of entrepreneurial orientation, market orientation and gender on business performance: An empirical study of SMEs in Bangladesh. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(6), 741-746.
- Rambe, P., & Ndofirepi, T. M. (2021). Explaining social entrepreneurial intentions among college students in Zimbabwe. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 12(2), 175-196.
- Satar, M. S., & Natasha, S. (2019). Individual social entrepreneurship orientation: Towards development of a measurement scale. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 49-72.
- Sharahiley, S. M. (2020). Examining entrepreneurial intention of the Saudi Arabia’s University students: Analyzing alternative integrated research model of TPB and EEM. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 21, 67-84.
- Sulphey, M. M., & Salim, A. (2021). Development of a tool to measure social entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(2), 231-253.
- Swain, R. B. (2018). A critical analysis of the sustainable development goals. In W. L. Filho (Ed.), Handbook of sustainability science and research (pp. 341-355). Springer.
- Tu, B., Bhowmik, R., Hasan, M. K., Asheq, A. A., Rahaman, M. A., & Chen, X. (2021). Graduate students’ behavioral intention towards social entrepreneurship: Role of social vision, innovativeness, social proactiveness, and risk taking. Sustainability, 13(11), Article 6386.
- Urban, B., & Kujinga, L. (2017). The institutional environment and social entrepreneurship intentions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(4), 638-655.
- Wathanakom, N., Khlaisang, J., & Songkram, N. (2020). The study of the causal relationship between innovativeness and entrepreneurial intention among undergraduate students. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9, 1-13.
- Weerakoon, C., McMurray, A. J., Rametse, N. M., & Arenius, P. M. (2020). Social capital and innovativeness of social enterprises: Opportunity-motivation-ability and knowledge creation as mediators. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 18(20), 147-161.
- Younis, H., Katsioloudes, M., & Al Bakri, A. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship intentions of Qatar university student’s motivational factors identification: Digital entrepreneurship intentions. International Journal of E-Entrepreneurship and Innovation (IJEEI), 10(1), 56-74.
- Yuan, D., Rahman, M. K., Issa Gazi, M. A., Rahaman, M. A., Hossain, M. M., & Akter, S. (2021). Analyzing of user attitudes toward intention to use social media for learning. Sage Open, 11(4).
- Zhang, P., & Cain, K. W. (2017). Reassessing the link between risk aversion and entrepreneurial intention: The mediating role of the determinants of planned behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(5), 793-811.
-
Human resource management in promoting innovation and organizational performance
I Gede Riana ,
Gede Suparna ,
I Gusti Made Suwandana ,
Sebastian Kot ,
Ismi Rajiani
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/ppm.18(1).2020.10
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 18, 2020 Issue #1 pp. 107-118 Views: 3495 Downloads: 825 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯHuman resource management (HRM) is one of the elements enabling an organization to remain competitive in turbulence conditions. The effective practice of HRM makes competent and innovative employees contributing to the achievement of organizational objectives. This study aims to analyze HRM practices in creating innovation and organizational performance. The questionnaire was used to measure the respondents’ perceptions of variables used by a Likert scale. A survey of 126 manager samples and middle managers at export-oriented short and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Bali, Indonesia, was conducted to test the model. The analysis has shown that the proposed model was proven to be compliant with the research hypotheses. HRM significantly affects organizational performance and innovation, and it was found out that innovation can improve organizational performance. However, in the process of simultaneous testing, it was found out that innovation cannot improve organizational performance. The lack of attention to investments in human resources became one of the barriers to SMEs in creating innovation.
-
Entrepreneurial orientation and its impact on firm growth amongst SMEs in South Africa
Problems and Perspectives in Management Volume 15, 2017 Issue #3 pp. 166-178 Views: 1703 Downloads: 574 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯEntrepreneurial orientation (EO) has been widely touted as a fundamental ingredient for enhancing firm growth. Consequently, this aimed at examining the impact of EO and its dimensional variables (innovativeness, risk-taking, and proactiveness) on SME growth (employment, sales, and asset growth). Using information from 285 SMEs, the results obtained indicated that while EO had a significant positive association with SME growth (employment and sales growth), most SMEs show a moderate level of EO. Also, following the EO dimensions, the findings established the emergence of proactive innovation (a combination of proactiveness and innovativeness) which showed a significant positive association on sales growth. Risk-taking was the only factor that showed a significant influence on employment and asset growth. This study also showed that controlling for the effect of firm age on growth significantly reduced the error of predicting sales growth by 2.3%. This study culminates with recommendations on enhancing EO amongst SMEs in South Africa.
-
Examining university students’ behaviors towards online shopping: An empirical investigation in an emerging market
Ahmed Al Asheq ,
Khadiza Rahman Tanchi ,
Sabrina Akhter ,
Md. Kamruzzaman ,
K. M. Anwarul Islam
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21511/im.18(1).2022.08
Innovative Marketing Volume 18, 2022 Issue #1 pp. 94-103 Views: 1374 Downloads: 2232 TO CITE АНОТАЦІЯThe paper strives to investigate the influential factors that might significantly affect consumers’ intention to shop from online websites. On this premise, this paper aims to examine the impact of perceived trust (PT), convenience (CONV), perceived website quality (PWQ), and subjective norm (SN) on individuals’ intention towards online shopping (ITOS). The paper proposed a study framework based on previous relevant literature. The study has drawn samples from private university students of Bangladesh. A quantitative research approach was adopted, followed by a survey method. Only undergraduate and postgraduate students of two Bangladeshi universities were considered as respondents as it is believed that they were the primary online shoppers in Bangladesh perspective. The sample size in this paper is 339, which was deemed adequate to run regression analysis. SPSS software has been utilized to conduct correlation and regression analysis. The convenience sampling method was applied in the study as the population is not known. This paper applied a 95% confidence interval to accept the hypotheses. Correlation results confirm that all independent variables correlated with ITOS. The findings of the paper report that PT, CONV, PWQ, and SN have a significant impact on students’ intention towards online shopping (ITOS). Henceforth, the online business managers can utilize the findings of this paper to understand the young consumer behaviors and develop a solid and effective online marketing plan for sustainable business performance.
